Year 2017, Volume 27 , Issue 2, Pages 100 - 106 2017-06-14

EVALUATION OF EFFECT OF IMPRESSION TECHNIQUES TO SATISFACTION OF EDENTULOUS PATIENTS TREATED WITH IMPLANT-RETAINED OVERDENTURES: A PILOT STUDY

Emre TOKAR [1] , Serdar POLAT [2] , Bülent ULUDAĞ [3]


ABSTRACT

Aim: The implant-retained mandibular overdentures are standard care of the edentulous patients. Function, phonetics and satisfaction of the patient are decisive to acquire prospering treatment results. Passive fit between the implants and the denture framework is important for restoration of the implants. Accurate impression is primary factor to obtain fitted denture. Several impression techniques (single stage, double, and functional impression techniques) described making impression of the implant-retained overdentures. The aim of this study was to evaluate influence of two different implant-retained overdenture impression techniques to quality of life of the patients. 

Materials and Method: Six women edentulous patients participated in this study. 2 implant-retained overdentures were fabricated using two different impression techniques per patient. The first overdentures were produced using the single stage close tray impression technique. After 6 months, the functional impression technique was used to fabricate the second overdentures. 13 questions were asked to the patients about both of their dentures in the first follow up visits those two days after the delivery of their overdentures. The Mann-Whitney U statistical analysis was performed on the acquired data.

Results: The patients satisfied with the performance of both of the overdentures. Half of the participants complained soreness of the gums under the overdenture that was fabricated using the close tray impression technique. Other questionnaire items were shown no statistically significant differences.

Conclusion: The single stage close tray, and the functional impression techniques are used confidently to fabricate the implant-retained mandibular overdentures. The functional impression technique decreased chair time of the post-insertion maintenance.

Keywords: Overdenture, Precision attachment, Dental implant, Fabrication technique, Impression

İMPLANT DESTEKLİ OVERDENTURELARLA TEDAVİ EDİLEN TAM DİŞSİZ HASTALARDA ÖLÇÜ TEKNİĞİNİN MEMNUNİYETE ETKİSİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: BİR PİLOT ÇALIŞMA

ÖZ

Amaç: İmplant destekli overdenture uygulamaları tam dişsiz hastalar için standart tedavi yöntemlerindendir. Fonksiyon, fonasyon ve hasta memnuniyeti başarılı tedavi sonuçları elde etmek için belirleyicidir. İmplant restorasyonlarında, implant ve protez altyapısı arasındaki pasif uyum önem arzetmektedir. Tam uyumlu protezler için ölçünün doğruluğu birincil faktördür. İmplant destekli overdenturelarda ölçünün alınması için birkaç ölçü tekniği (tek aşama, çift aşama ve fonksiyonel ölçü teknikleri) tanımlanmıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, iki farklı implant destekli overdenture ölçü tekniğinin hastaların yaşam kalitesine olan etkisinin değerlendirilmesidir.  

Materyal ve Metot: Çalışmamıza altı kadın dişsiz hasta katılmıştır. Her hasta için iki farklı ölçü tekniği kullanılarak iki tane implant destekli overdenture protez yapılmıştır. Birinci overdenturelar, tek aşama kapalı kaşık ölçü tekniği kullanılarak hazırlanmıştır. Altı ay sonra fonksiyonel ölçü tekniği kullanılarak ikinci overdenture protezler yapılmıştır. Protezlerin tesliminden sonraki ilk kontolde hastalara protezleri ile ilgili 13 soruluk anket yöneltilmiştir. Elde edilen veriler Mann-Whitney U istatistiksel analizi uygulanarak değerlendirilmiştir.       

Bulgular: Hastalar hazırlanan iki protezin de performan- sından memnun kalmışlardır. Katılımcıların yarısı kapalı kaşık tekniği ile yapılan overdenture protezin altındaki yu- muşak dokudaki yaralardan yakınmışlardır. Anketteki di- ğer sorular istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark göstermemiştir. 

Sonuç: Tek aşama kapalı kaşık ölçü tekniği ile fonksiyo- nel ölçü tekniği implant destekli overdentureları hazırla- mak için güvenle kulanılabilirler. Fonksiyonel ölçü tekniği protez tesliminden sonra harcanan hasta başı zamanını azaltmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Overdenture, Hassas tutucu, Dental implant, Yapım tekniği, Ölçü

Overdenture, Precision attachment, Dental implant, Fabrication technique
  • . Mack F, Schwahn C, Feine JS, Mundt T, Bernhardt O, John U et al. The impact of tooth loss on general health related to quality of life among elderly Pomeranians: results from the study of health in Pomerania (SHIP-O). Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:414-9.
  • 2. Mericske-Stern RD, Taylor TD, Belser U. Management of the edentulous patient. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:108-25.
  • 3. Thomason JM, Kelly SA, Bendkowski A, Ellis JS. Two implant retained overdentures--a review of the literature supporting the McGill and York consensus statements. J Dent 2012;40:22-34.
  • 4. Sivaramakrishnan G, Sridharan K. Comparison of implant supported mandibular overdentures and conventional dentures on quality of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Aust Dent J 2016;61:482-8.
  • 5. Naert I, Quirynen M, Theuniers G, van Steenberghe D. Prosthetic aspects of osseointegrated fixtures supporting overdentures. A 4-year report. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:671-80.
  • 6. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S et al. The McGill Consensus Statement on Overdentures. Montreal, Quebec, Canada. May 24-25, 2002. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:413-4.
  • 7. Thomason JM, Feine J, Exley C, Moynihan P, Muller F, Naert I et al. Mandibular two implant-supported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients--the York Consensus Statement. Br Dent J 2009;207:185-6.
  • 8. Pesqueira A, Goiato M, Gennari-Filho H, Monteiro D, Dos Santos D, Haddad M et al. The use of stress analysis methods to evaluate the biomechanics of oral rehabilitation with implants. J Oral Implantol 2014;40:217-28.
  • 9. Heckmann SM, Winter W, Meyer M, Weber HP, Wichmann MG. Overdenture attachment selection and the loading of implant and denture-bearing area. Part 1: In vivo verification of stereolithographic model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:617-23.
  • 10. Porter JA, Jr., Petropoulos VC, Brunski JB. Comparison of load distribution for implant overdenture attachments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:651-62.
  • 11. Heckmann SM, Winter W, Meyer M, Weber HP, Wichmann MG. Overdenture attachment selection and the loading of implant and denture-bearing area. Part 2: A methodical study using five types of attachment. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:640-7.
  • 12. Alsabeeha NH, Payne AG, Swain MV. Attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures: a review of in vitro investigations on retention and wear features. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22:429-40.
  • 13. Celik G, Uludag B. Effect of the Number of Supporting Implants on Mandibular Photoelastic Models with Different Implant-Retained Overdenture Designs. J Prosthodont 2014;23:374-80.
  • 14. Tokar E, Uludag B. Load Transfer Characteristics of Various Designs of Three-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015;30:1061-7.
  • 15. Ichikawa T, Horiuchi M, Wigianto R, Matsumoto N. In vitro study of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: the influence of stud attachments on load transfer to the implant and soft tissue. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:394-9.
  • 16. Wee AG, Aquilino SA, Schneider RL. Strategies to achieve fit in implant prosthodontics: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:167-78.
  • 17. Lee YJ, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Kim SK. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:823-30.
  • 18. Burawi G, Houston F, Byrne D, Claffey N. A comparison of the dimensional accuracy of the splinted and unsplinted impression techniques for the Bone-Lock implant system. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:68-75.
  • 19. Humphries RM, Yaman P, Bloem TJ. The accuracy of implant master casts constructed from transfer impressions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:331-6.
  • 20. Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a five-implant mandibular model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:448-55.
  • 21. Herbst D, Nel JC, Driessen CH, Becker PJ. Evaluation of impression accuracy for osseointegrated implant supported superstructures. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:555-61.
  • 22. Gregory-Head B, LaBarre E. Two-step pick-up impression procedure for implant-retained overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:615-6.
  • 23. De La Cruz JE, Funkenbusch PD, Ercoli C, Moss ME, Graser GN, Tallents RH. Verification jig for implant-supported prostheses: A comparison of standard impressions with verification jigs made of different materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:329-36.
  • 24. Ganddini MR, Schejtman N, Ercoli C, Graser GN. Prosthodontic application for implant carriers. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:399-402.
  • 25. Chee W, Jivraj S. Impression techniques for implant dentistry. Br Dent J 2006;201:429-32.
  • 26. Jannesar S, Siadat H, Alikhasi M. A dual impression technique for implant overdentures. J Prosthodont 2007;16:327-9.
  • 27. Uludag B, Celik G. An alternative impression technique for implant-retained overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:377-8.
  • 28. Uludag B, Ozturk O, Celik G. Alternate functional impression technique for implant-retained overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:242-3.
  • 29. Uludag B, Sahin V. A functional impression technique for an implant-supported overdenture: a clinical report. J Oral Implantol 2006;32:41-3.
  • 30. Uludag B, Celik G, Sahin V, Ozturk O. Fabrication of implant-assisted restorations utilizing functional impression techniques: case reports. J Oral Implantol 2007;33:297-304.
  • 31. Uludag B. An alternate pressure-free functional impression technique for implant-retained overdentures. J Oral Implantol 2010;36:205-7.
  • 32. White KC, Ramus DL. Two-stage impression technique for overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:452-7.
  • 33. Hobkirk JA, Abdel-Latif HH, Howlett J, Welfare R, Moles DR. Prosthetic treatment time and satisfaction of edentulous patients treated with conventional or implant-supported complete mandibular dentures: a case-control study (part 1). Int J Prosthodont 2008;21:489-95.
  • 34. Korkmaz C, Atay A. Evaluation of two different attachment system used for maxillary overdenture: two case reports. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2014; 9:33-7.
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Author: Emre TOKAR

Author: Serdar POLAT

Author: Bülent ULUDAĞ

Dates

Publication Date : June 14, 2017

Bibtex @research article { ataunidfd321458, journal = {Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi}, issn = {1300-9044}, eissn = {2667-5161}, address = {}, publisher = {Ataturk University}, year = {2017}, pages = {100 - 106}, doi = {10.17567/ataunidfd.321458}, title = {EVALUATION OF EFFECT OF IMPRESSION TECHNIQUES TO SATISFACTION OF EDENTULOUS PATIENTS TREATED WITH IMPLANT-RETAINED OVERDENTURES: A PILOT STUDY}, key = {cite}, author = {TOKAR, Emre and POLAT, Serdar and ULUDAĞ, Bülent} }
APA TOKAR, E , POLAT, S , ULUDAĞ, B . (2017). EVALUATION OF EFFECT OF IMPRESSION TECHNIQUES TO SATISFACTION OF EDENTULOUS PATIENTS TREATED WITH IMPLANT-RETAINED OVERDENTURES: A PILOT STUDY. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi , 27 (2) , 100-106 . DOI: 10.17567/ataunidfd.321458
MLA TOKAR, E , POLAT, S , ULUDAĞ, B . "EVALUATION OF EFFECT OF IMPRESSION TECHNIQUES TO SATISFACTION OF EDENTULOUS PATIENTS TREATED WITH IMPLANT-RETAINED OVERDENTURES: A PILOT STUDY". Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 27 (2017 ): 100-106 <https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ataunidfd/article/321458>
Chicago TOKAR, E , POLAT, S , ULUDAĞ, B . "EVALUATION OF EFFECT OF IMPRESSION TECHNIQUES TO SATISFACTION OF EDENTULOUS PATIENTS TREATED WITH IMPLANT-RETAINED OVERDENTURES: A PILOT STUDY". Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 27 (2017 ): 100-106
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - EVALUATION OF EFFECT OF IMPRESSION TECHNIQUES TO SATISFACTION OF EDENTULOUS PATIENTS TREATED WITH IMPLANT-RETAINED OVERDENTURES: A PILOT STUDY AU - Emre TOKAR , Serdar POLAT , Bülent ULUDAĞ Y1 - 2017 PY - 2017 N1 - doi: 10.17567/ataunidfd.321458 DO - 10.17567/ataunidfd.321458 T2 - Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 100 EP - 106 VL - 27 IS - 2 SN - 1300-9044-2667-5161 M3 - doi: 10.17567/ataunidfd.321458 UR - https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.321458 Y2 - 2016 ER -
EndNote %0 Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi EVALUATION OF EFFECT OF IMPRESSION TECHNIQUES TO SATISFACTION OF EDENTULOUS PATIENTS TREATED WITH IMPLANT-RETAINED OVERDENTURES: A PILOT STUDY %A Emre TOKAR , Serdar POLAT , Bülent ULUDAĞ %T EVALUATION OF EFFECT OF IMPRESSION TECHNIQUES TO SATISFACTION OF EDENTULOUS PATIENTS TREATED WITH IMPLANT-RETAINED OVERDENTURES: A PILOT STUDY %D 2017 %J Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi %P 1300-9044-2667-5161 %V 27 %N 2 %R doi: 10.17567/ataunidfd.321458 %U 10.17567/ataunidfd.321458
ISNAD TOKAR, Emre , POLAT, Serdar , ULUDAĞ, Bülent . "EVALUATION OF EFFECT OF IMPRESSION TECHNIQUES TO SATISFACTION OF EDENTULOUS PATIENTS TREATED WITH IMPLANT-RETAINED OVERDENTURES: A PILOT STUDY". Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 27 / 2 (June 2017): 100-106 . https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.321458
AMA TOKAR E , POLAT S , ULUDAĞ B . EVALUATION OF EFFECT OF IMPRESSION TECHNIQUES TO SATISFACTION OF EDENTULOUS PATIENTS TREATED WITH IMPLANT-RETAINED OVERDENTURES: A PILOT STUDY. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2017; 27(2): 100-106.
Vancouver TOKAR E , POLAT S , ULUDAĞ B . EVALUATION OF EFFECT OF IMPRESSION TECHNIQUES TO SATISFACTION OF EDENTULOUS PATIENTS TREATED WITH IMPLANT-RETAINED OVERDENTURES: A PILOT STUDY. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2017; 27(2): 106-100.


İMPLANT DESTEKLİ OVERDENTURE PROTEZLERDE KULLANILAN HASSAS TUTUCULAR
Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi
Mustafa SOLMAZGÜL
https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.649191