ENDODONTİK TEDAVİLİ DİŞLERİN RESTORASYONUNDA POST MATERYALLERİ

Abstract

Endodontik postlar restoratif sistemin bir parçası olduğundan, restorasyonun başarısı veya başarısızlığı postların bilinmesiyle yakın ilişkidedir. Endodontik postlar geçmişten günümüze farklı materyallerden ve farklı şekillerde üretilmiştir. Bu değişken post sistemlerinin birbirlerine göre avantaj ve dezavantajları bulunmaktadır. Bu makale endodontik tedavisi yapılmış bir dişe uygulanacak olan restoratif başarının güvenliği için endodontik post sistemleriyle ilgili bilgi sunmaktadır.

Keywords

• Endodontik postlar

POST MATERIALS IN RESTORATION OF ENDODONTICALLY TREATED TEETH

Abstract

Knowledge of posts is associated with the success or failures of the restoration because of endodontic posts are part of the restorative system. Endodontic posts are manufactured in different ways and different materials from past to present. These variable post systems have advantages and disadvantages to each other. This article provides information about endodontic post systems for safety of restoration of endodontically treated teeth

Keywords

• Endodontic posts

References

1. Christensen GJ. Posts and cores: state of the art. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:96-7.
2. Ingle JE, Bakland LK. Endodontics. 4th ed. Lea&Febiger, Philadelphia, 1994.
3. Rivera EM, Yamauchi M. Site comparisons of dentine collagen cross-links from extracted human teeth. Arch Oral Biol 1993;38:541-6.
4. Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod 1989;15:512-6.
5. Robbins JW. Guidelines for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth. JAmDentAssoc 1990;120:558-62.
6. Goodacre CJ, Spolnik KJ. The prosthodontic management of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. Part I. Success and failure data, treatment concepts. J Prosthodont 1994;3:243-50.
7. Alaçam T, Nalbant L, Alaçam A. ileri Restorasyon Teknikleri. 1. Baskı, Polat Basımevi, Ankara, 1998.
8. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 2nd ed., The C.V. Mosby Co., St. Louis 1995.

9. Robbins JW. Restoration of the endodontically treated tooth. Dent Clin North Am 2002;46:367-84.
10. Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod 2004;30:289-301.
11. Uzun G, Keyf F. Geleneksel Post-Core Sistemlerine Bir Alternatif: Polietilen Fiber Post. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2007;31:43-8.
12. Newman MP, Yaman P, Dennison J, Rafter M, Billy E. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:360-7.
13. Akkayan B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:431-7.
14. Cormier CJ, Burns DR, Moon P. In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic, and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration. J Prosthodont 2001;10:26- 36.
15. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 2000;13(Spec No):15B-18B.
16. Bateman G, Ricketts DN, Saunders WP. Fibre- based post systems: a review. Br Dent J 2003;195:43-8
17. Eskitascioglu G, Belli S, Kalkan M. Evaluation of two post core systems using two different methods (fracture strength test and a finite elemental stress analysis). J Endod 2002;28:629-33.
18. Galhano GA, Valandro LF, de Melo RM, Scotti R, Bottino MA. Evaluation of the flexural strength of carbon fiber-, quartz fiber-, and glass fiber-based posts. J Endod 2005;31:209-11.
19. Felton DA, Webb EL, Kanoy BE, Dugoni J. Threaded endodontic dowels: effect of post design on incidence of root fracture. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:179-87.
20. Lambjerg-Hansen H, Asmussen E. Mechanical properties of endodontic posts. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:882-7.
21. Stankiewicz NR, Wilson PR. The ferrule effect: a literature review. Int Endod J 2002;35(7):575-581.
22. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:529-36.
23. Zhi-Yue L, Yu-Xing Z. Effects of post-core design and ferrule on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors.Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:368-73.
24. Fernandes AS, Shetty S, Coutinho I. Factors determining post selection: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:556-62.
25. Soares CJ, Mitsui FH, Neto FH, Marchi GM, Martins LR. Radiodensity evaluation of seven root post systems. Am J Dent 2005;18:57-60.
26. American Dental Association Professional Product Review. Endodontic Posts: Tips for Securing Restorative Success. 2006;1:2 (http://www.ada. org/sections/scienceAnd Research/pdfs/ 0604_ tips_ endoposts.pdf).
27. Finger WJ, Ahlstrand WM, Fritz UB. Radiopacity of fiber-reinforced resin posts. Am J Dent 2002; 15:81-4.
28. Abbott PV. Incidence of root fractures and methods used for post removal. Int Endod J 2002;35:63-7.
29. Altshul JH, Marshall G, Morgan LA, Baumgartner JC. Comparison of dentinal crack incidence and of post removal time resulting from post removal by ultrasonic or mechanical force. J Endod 1997; 23:683-6.
30. de Rijk WG. Removal of fiber posts from endodontically treated teeth. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 19B-21B.
31. Freedman GA. Esthetic post-and-core treatment. Dent Clin North Am 2001;45:103-16.
32. Isidor F, Brondum K. Intermittent loading of teeth with tapered, individually cast or prefabricated, parallel-sided posts. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:257- 61.
33. Cheung W. A review of the management of endodontically treated teeth. Post, core and the final restoration. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:611-9.
34. Raiden G, Costa L, Koss S, Hernandez JL, Acenolaza V. Residual thickness of root in first maxillary premolars with post space preparation. J Endod 1999;25:502-5.
35. Burns DA, Krause WR, Douglas HB, Burns DR. Stress distribution surrounding endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:412-8.
36. Standlee JP, Caputo AA. The retentive and stress distributing properties of split threaded endodontic dowels. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:436-42.
37. Butz F, Lennon AM, Heydecke G, Strub JR. Survival rate and fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with moderate defects restored with different post-and-core systems: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:58-64.
38. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: effects of cement, dowel length, diameter, and design. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39:400-5.
39. Stockton LW. Factors affecting retention of post systems: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:380-5.
40. Leary JM, Aquilino SA, Svare CW. An evaluation of post length within the elastic limits of dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:277-81.
41. Mattison GD, Delivanis PD, Thacker RW, Jr., Hassell KJ. Effect of post preparation on the apical seal. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:785-9.
42. Pilo R, Tamse A. Residual dentin thickness in mandibular premolars prepared with gates glidden and ParaPost drills. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:617- 23.
43. Wu XH, Chen XM, Yang Y, Niu L, Yao W. [Effects of post diameter on retention of post-core crown system]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2005;23:220-2.