PLACE OF FULL CERAMICS IN DENTISTRY

Abstract

Stress analysis techniques are being used in All of the dental treatments in current, together with technological progress, the aesthetic is also kept in mind by patients. In parallel with these developments, prosthetic treatment options is shifting to more aesthetic the choice of materials. All ceramics which developed by cause of the aesthetic requirements are used much more widely in dentistry. All seramics subject is also important for scientific researches. However, in addition to the exact aesthetics properties of all ceramics, vulnerabilities creates a significant disadvantage. In this review, the history of all ceramics, the strengthening of the methods, their advantages, disadvantages and indications are presented by the support of a wide literature

Keywords

• Prosthodontic restoration, full ceramic, aesthetic

TAM SERAMİKLERİN DİŞHEKİMLİĞİNDEKİ YERİ

Abstract

Teknolojinin gelişmesiyle birlikte günümüzde uygulanan tüm dental tedavilerde estetik, hastalar tarafından ön planda tutulmaktadır. Bu gelişmelerin paralelinde, protetik tedavi seçenekleri de daha estetik malzeme seçimine doğru kaymaktadır. Bu gereksinimler nedeniyle geliştirilen tam seramikler, diş hekimliğinde gün geçtikçe daha da yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır.  Tam seramikler konusu bilimsel araştırmalar içinde de önemli bir yer tutmaktadır. Ancak tam seramiklerin üstün estetik özelliklerinin yanında kırılganlıkları önemli bir dezavantaj oluşturur. Derlemede tam seramiklerin tarihçesi, güçlendirilme yöntemleri, avantajları, dezavantajları ve endikasyonları geniş literatür desteğiyle sunulmuştur.

Keywords

• Estetik,Protetik restorasyon,Tam seramik

References

1. Efeoğlu A. Diş Hekimliği Tarihi. Alemdar Ofset; İstanbul:1992. p.23-87.
2. Alkumru H, Hullah WR, Marquis PM, Wilson HJ. Factors affecting the fit of porcelain jacket crowns. British Den J 1988;164:39-43.
3. Boening KW, Walter MH, Reppel PD. Non-cast titanium restorations in fixed prosthodontics. J. Oral Rehabil 1992;19: 281-7.
4. Mehulić M, Mehulić K, Kos P, Komar D, Katunarić M. Expression of contact allergy in undergoing prosthodontic therapy patients with oral diseases. Minerva Stomatol. 2005 May;54:303-9
5. Rosentiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. The C. V. Mosby Company, 643-72, 2001.
6. Schwickerath H. Ceramic-metal crowns, Quintessenz Zahntech. 988;14: 1147- 51.
7. Akın E. Diş Hekimliğinde Porselen. III. Baskı. G.Ü Basım Evi ve Film Merkezi; İstanbul: 1990.p.7-10, 232-4.
8. Heather J.C., Wook-Jin S. Igor J.P. Current ceramic materials and recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthetic Dent. 2007;98:389-404. clinical

9. McLean JW. The Science and art of dental ceramics. Vol.I. Quintessence Publishing Co; Tokyo: 1980.p.30-57.
10. Yavuzyılmaz H. Metal Destekli Estetik (Veneer- kaplama) Kuronlar. Gazi Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Basım Evi; Ankara: 1996.p.13-25.
11. Sadowsky SJ. An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:433-42.
12. James D.W., Glen H.J., David J.B. Marginal adaptation of castable ceramic crowns.J Prosthetic Dent. 1991;66:747-53.
13. Reich S, Schierz O. Chair-side generated posterior lithium disilicate crowns after 4 years. Clin Oral Investig 2012 (Epub ahead of print)
14. Suarez MJ, Lozano JF, Paz Salido M, Martinez F. Three-year clinical evaluation of In-Ceram Zirconia posterior FPDs. Int. J Prosthodont 2004;17:35-8.
15. Zhao K, Pan Y, Guess PC, Zhang XP, Swain MV Influence of veneer application on fracture behavior of crowns. Dent Mater 2012;28:653-60. ceramic
16. Heintze S.D, Rousson V. Fracture rates of IPS Empress all-ceramic crowns-a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:129-33.
17. Pascal M., Kung-Rock K., Urs C.B., James S.H., William H.D. Crack Propensity of porcelain laminate veneers: a simulated operatory evaluation. J Prosthetic Dent. 1999;81:327-34
18. Craig RG. Restorative dental materials, 10th ed, Mosby Yearbook; St Louis: 1997.p.113-147.
19. O'Brien WJ. Dental Materials and their selection. Quintessence Publishing Co.Inc; Chicago: 1997.p. 91-125.
20. Zaimoglu A, Can G. Sabit protezler, A. Ü. Diş Hek. Fak. Yayınları; Ankara: 2004.p. 25-77.
21. Esquivel-Upshaw J, Rose W, Oliveira E, Yang M, Clark AE, Anusavice K. Randomized. Controlled Clinical Trial of Bilayer Ceramic and Metal-Ceramic Crown Performance. J Prosthodont. 2012 Sep 14. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00913.
22. Crispin B. J. Contemporary Esthetic Dentistry: Practice Fundamentals. Quintessence Pub Co, Inc; Tokyo:1994.p. 71-123.
23. Lofstrom L. H, Barakat MM. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of clinically cemented cast gold restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:664-9.
24. Ricardo S., Igor S.M., Paulo F.C., Adeliani A.C., Porcelain Antonio porcelain/alumina bilayers Al2O3/GdAlO3. J Mechanical Behav. of Biomedical M. 2012;5:110-5. monolayers reinforced by dental porselenlerin eğilme porselen sistemleri II, G. Ü. Diş Hek Fak Derg 2005;22:49-60.
25. Luthardt RG, Holzhüter M, Sandkuhl O, Herold V, Schnapp JD, Kuhlisch E, Walter M. Reliability and properties of ground Y-TZP-Zirconia ceramics, J Dent Res 2002;81:487-91.
26. Lehner CR, Scharer P. All ceramic crowns.Current Opinion in Dentistry 1992;2:42-45.
27. Wall GJ, Cipra DL. Alternative crown systems. Dental Clinics of North America 1992; 36:765-79.
28. Giordano RA. Dental ceramic restorative systems. Compendium 1996;17:779-94.
29. Toksavul S, Artunç C, Ulusoy M, Toman M. Tüm Seramik Kronlar. Meta Basım Bornova; İzmir: 2002. p.3-8.
30. Boening, KW, Wolf BH, Schmidt AE, Kastner K, Walter MH.Clinical fit of procera all-ceram crowns, J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:419-24.