CERAMIC INLAY RESTORATIONS

Abstract

The use of ceramic restorations in the posterior region has become widespread due to the development of physical properties of dental ceramics and ceramic-resin cement bonding. Ceramic inlays when used with adhesive technique protect the remaining tooth structure and offer an aesthetics alternative treatment. The aim of this review was to provide general information about indications, contraindications, advantages, disadvantages and factors of affecting the success of the ceramic inlays

Keywords

• Dental Inlays,Dental Porcelain,Dental Prosthesis

SERAMİK İNLEY RESTORASYONLAR

Abstract

Dental seramiklerin fiziksel özelliklerinin ve seramik-rezin siman bağlantısının geliştirilmesi ile seramik restorasyonların posterior bölgede kullanımı yaygınlaşmıştır. Seramik inleyler adeziv teknikle beraber kullanıldığında minimal preparasyonla kalan diş yapısını koruyan estetik bir tedavi alternatifi sunarlar. Bu derlemenin amacı seramik inleylerin endikasyon ve kontrendikasyonları, avantaj ve dezavantajları, restorasyonun başarısını etkileyen faktörler hakkında genel bilgi vermektir.

Keywords

• Dental İnlayler, Dental Porselen, Diş Protezi

References

1. Fron Chabouis H, Smail Faugeron V, Attal JP. Clinical efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: A systematic review. Dent Mater. 2013 Oct 10.1016/j.dental.2013.09.009. doi:
2. Zarrati S, Mahboub F. Marginal adaptation of indirect composite, glass-ceramic inlays and direct composite: an in vitro evaluation. J Dent (Tehran) 2010;7:77-83.
3. Arıkan S. Posterior kompozit restorasyonlar. Cumhuriyet Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg 2005; 8:63- 70.
4. Milleding P. Microleakage of indirect composite inlays. An in vitro comparison with the direct technique. Acta Odontol Scand 1992; 50:295-301.
5. Hopp CD, Land MF. Considerations for ceramic inlays in posterior teeth: a review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2013;18:21-32.
6. Cubas GB, Habekost L, Camacho GB, Pereira-Cenci T. Fracture resistance of premolars restored with inlay and onlay ceramic restorations and luted with two different two different agents. J Prosthodont Res 2011;55:53-9.
7. Pol CW, Kalk W. A systematic review of ceramic inlays in posterior teeth: an update. Int J Prosthodont 2011;24:566-75.
8. Başbuğ S, Gözneli R. Tam seramik sistemler: konvansiyonel yöntemler. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg 2012;6: 147-154.

9. Desai PD, Das UK. Comparison of fracture ressitance of teeth restored with ceramic inlay and resin composite: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2011;22:877-82.
10. Field C, Li Q, Li W, Thompson M, Swain M. A comparative mechanical and bone remodelling study of all-ceramic posterior inlay and onlay fixed partial dentures. J Dent 2012;40:48-56.
11. Küçükeşmen HC. Porselen İnley-Onleyler. Türkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci-Specia Topics 2011; 2: 22-8.
12. Zaruba M, Göhring TN, Wegehaupt FJ, Attin T. Influence of a proximal magrin elevation technique onmarginal adaptation of ceramic inlays.Acta Odontol Scand 2013;71:317-24.
13. Holberg C, Winterhalder P, Wichelhaus A, Hickel R, Huth ceramic nlays: Mater 2013;29:1244-50. Dent
14. Cekic I, Ergun G, Uctasli S, Lassila LV. In vitro evaluation of pushout bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber- reinforced composite at the interface. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:271-8.
15. Morimoto S, Vieira GF, Agra CM, Sesma N, Gil C. Fracture strength of teeth restored with ceramic inlays and overlays. Braz Dent J 2009;20:143-8.
16. Soares PV, Santos- Filho PC, Martins LRM, Soares CJ. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behaviour of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: Fracture resistance and fracture mode. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 99:30-7.
17. Dejak B, Mlotkowski A, Romanowicz M. Strength estimation of different designs of ceramic inlays and onlays in molars based on the Tsai-Wu failure criterion. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:89-100.
18. Öztürk N, Aykent F. İki farklı seramik inley sisteminin bağlanma dayanımına kalan dentin kalınlığının etkisinin araştırılması. Cumhuriyet Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2001;4:75-79.
19. Keshvad A, Hooshmand T, Asefzadeh F, Khalilinejad F, Alihemmati M, Van Noort R. Marginal gap, internal fit and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques. J Prosthodont 2011;20:535-40.
20. Schmalz G, Federlin M, Reich E. Effect of dimension of luting space and luting composite on marginal adaptation of a class II ceramic inlay. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:392-9.
21. O'Neal SJ, Miracle RL, Leinfelder KF. Evaluating interfacial gaps for esthetic inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:48-54.
22. Sheets CG. The periodontal–restorative interface: enhancement Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1999;11:925-31.
23. magnification. Pract
24. Özyeşil AG, Kesim B. Estetik inleylerin marjinal adaptasyonunun incelenmesi. Cumhuriyet Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2001;4:110-114.
25. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hörsted-Bindslev P. Comparison of marginal fit and microleakage of ceramic and composite inlays: an in vitro study. J Dent 1994;22:147-53.
26. Uludağ B, Ozturk O, , Ozturk AN. Microleakage of ceramic inlays with different resin cements and dentin adhesives. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:235- 41.
27. Çelik EU, Kumbaracı N, Çal E, Turkun M. Influence of two desensitizer agents on the microleakage of adhesively luted ceramic inlays. Eur J Dent 2011;5:77-83.
28. Peumans M, Voet M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B. Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:739-50.
29. Kitayama S, Nasser NA, Pilecki P, Wilson RF, Nikaido T, Tagami J, Watson TF, Foxton RM. Effect of resin coating and occlusal loading on microleakage of manufacturing fabricated ceramic restorations:a confocal microscopic study. Acta Odontol Scand 2011;69:182-92. II
30. computer-aided seramik inley restorasyonlarda
31. Filho AM, Vieira LCC, Araujo E, Baratieri LN. Ceramic inlays and onlays: clinical procedures for predictable results. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15:338–351.
32. Michelini FS, Belser UC, Scherrer SS, De Rijk WG. Tensile bond strength of gold and porcelain inlays to extracted teeth using three cements. Int J Prosthodont 1995; 8:324-331.
33. Karakoca S, Yılmaz H. Zirkonyum ve sabit protezlerde kullanımı. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek Fak Derg 2006; 36-44.
34. Stoll R, Cappel I, Jablonski-Momeni A, Pieper K, Stachniss V. Survival of inlays and partial crowns made of IPS Empress after a 10-year observation period and in relation to various treatment parameters. Oper Dent 2007;32:556-63.
35. Banditmahakun S, Kuphausuk W, Kanchanavasita W, Kuphasuk C. The effect of base materials with different elastic moduli on the fracture loads of machinable 2005;31:180-7. inlays. Oper Dent
36. Hitz T, Ozcan M, Göhring TN. Marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of root-canal treated mandibular molars with intracoronal restorations: effect of thermocycling and mechanical loading. J Adhes Dent 2010;12:279-86.
37. Yıkılgan İ, Bala O. Endodontik tedavi görmüş dişlerin konservatif restorasyonları. Acta Odontol Turc 2013;30:44-8.
38. Jiang W, Bo H, Yongchun G, LongXing N. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three- dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:6-12.
39. Eyüboğlu TF, Önal B, Erdilek N, Gören B, ergücü Z. Molar dişlerde inley restorasyonların mekanik performansının incelenmesi: 3-boyutlu sonlu elemanlar analizi. Gazi Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2008;25:27-33.
40. Ona M, Watanabe C, Igarashi Y, Wakabayashi N. Influence of preparation design on failure risks of ceramic inlays: a finite element analysis. J Adhes Dent 2011;13:367-73.
41. Habekost L de V, Camacho GB, Demarco FF, Powers JM. Tensile bond strength and flexural modulus of resin cements-influence on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 2007;32:488-95.
42. Fron Chabouis H, Prot C, Fonteneau C, Nasr K, Chabreron O, Cazier S, Moussally C, Gaucher A, Khabthani Ben Jaballah I, Boyer R, Leforestier JF, Caumont-Prim A, Chemla F, Maman L, Nabet C, Attal JP. Efficiacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: study protocol for the CECOIA randomized doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-278. trial. 2012;14:278.
43. Costa A, Xavier T, Noritomi P, Saavedra G, Borges A. The Influence of Elastic Modulus of Inlay Materials on Stress Distribution and Fracture of Premolars. Oper Dent. 2014;39:160-70. 45. Lange RT, Pfeiffer P. Clinical to composite of ceramic inlays compared restorations. Oper Dent 2009;34:263-72.