INDIRECT POSTERIOR RESTORATIONS

Abstract

The increasing interest of patients’ and dentists’ esthetic desire and long-lasting restorations led the increased use of indirect esthetic posterior restorations which may bond to tooth structure and other restoratives by means of adhesive resin cements. In this review, along with the definitions indirect restorative techniques, indications and contraindications, advantages and disadvantages of ceramic and resin composite indirect restorations are described. Comparison of ceramic indirect restorations with resin composite indirect restoration have been made from different point of views. Ceramics and composite resins are appropriate restorative materials for indirect restorations because of their esthetic, long clinic lifetime, postoperative sensitivity

Keywords

• Ceramic, composite resin, indirect restorations

İNDİREK POSTERİOR RESTORASYONLAR

Abstract

Hasta ve hekimlerin estetik ve uzun ömürlü restorasyonlarla ilgili beklentisindeki artış, adeziv rezin simanlar ile diş dokusu ve diğer restoratif materyallere bağlanabilen, indirek estetik posterior restorasyonların kullanımını arttırmıştır. Bu derlemede, indirek restoratif tekniklerin tanıtılması ile birlikte, indirek porselen ve rezin kompozit restorasyonların, endikasyon ve kontrendikasyonları, avantaj ve dezavantajları farklı açılardan karşılaştırılmaktadır; porselen ve kompozit rezinler, estetik görüntüleri, uzun klinik ömürleri, dayanıklı olmaları, daha az mikrosızıntı ve postoperatif hassasiyet göstermeleri nedeniyle indirek restorasyonlarda kullanılmaya uygun materyallerdir.

Keywords

• Porselen, kompozit rezin, indirek restorasyon

References

1. Freedman G. Contemporary esthetic dentistry. 1st ed, Mosby, Inc., an imprint of Elsevier Inc., St.Louis,Missouri 2012, p.469-74.
2. St-Georges AJ, Sturdevant Jr, Swift Jr EJ, Thompson JY. Fracture resistance of prepared teeth restored with bonded inlay restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 551-7.
3. Manhart J, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Chen HY, Hickel R. A 2-year clinical study of composite and ceramic inlays.Clin Oral Investig. 2000;4: 192- 8.
4. Roulet JF, Spreafico R. Esthetic posterior indirect restorations In:Roulet JF, Wilson NHF, Fuzzi M. Advances in Operative Dentistry. Contemporary Clinical Practice. Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc, Illionis 2001, p.165-190.
5. Özakar İlday N, Urvasızoğlu N, Seven N. İndirekt kompozit inley restorasyonlar ile direkt kompozit restorasyonların karşılaştırılması. Atatürk Üniv Dis Hek Fak Derg 2009; 19: 76-84 yönünden 6.Shillinburg HT. Fundementals of Fixed Prosthodontics, 3rd ed, Quintessence Publishing Co. Illinois 1997, p.171-79
6. Qualtrough AJE, Satterthwaite JD, Morrow LA, Brunton PA. Principles of operative dentistry, Blackwell Munksgaard, a Blackwell Publishing company, Corwall 2005; 107-26
7. Van Dijken JW, Hasselrot L, Ormin A, Olofsson AL. Restorations with extensive dentin/enamel bonded ceramic coverage. A 5 year follow-up. Eur J Oral Sci 2001; 109:222-9.
8. Van Dijken JW. All-ceramic restoration: classification and clinical evaluation. Compend Contin Educ 1999; 20:1115-26.

9. Gemalmaz D. Use of heat-pressed, leucite- reinforced ceramic on anterior and posterior onlays: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 133-5.
10. Dietschi D, Bindi G, Krejci I, Davidson C. Marjinal and Internal Adaptation of Stratified Compomer- Composite Class II Restorations. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 500-9.
11. Türkün S, Demirbas Kaya A. Sıkıştırılabilen Kompozit Rezinlerde Mikrosızıntının In Vitro Olarak Degerlendirilmesi. Dishekimligi Fakültesi Dergisi 2002; 26: 10-8.
12. Özcan M, Pfeiffer P, Nergiz I. Marjinal Adaptation of Ceramic Inserts After Cementation. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 132-6.
13. Malmström H, Schlueter M, Roach T, Moss M.E. Effect of Thickness of Flowable Resins on Marginal Leakage in Class II Composite Restorations. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 373-80.
14. Ozakar-Ilday N, Zorba YO, Yildiz M, Erdem V, Seven N, Demirbuga S. Three-year clinical performance of two indirect composite inlays compared to direct composite restorations. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2013; 18:521-8.
15. Zaimoglu A, Can G. Sabit Protezler, Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi, Ankara, 2004, p.165-180.
16. Mak YF, Lai SC, Cheung GS, Chan AW, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Micro-tensile bond testing of resin cements to dentin and an indirect resin composite. Dent Mater 2002;18: 609-21.
17. Santos MJ, Mondelli RF, Navarro MF, Francischone CE, Rubo JH, Santos GC Jr. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: five-year follow-up. Oper Dent 2013; 38:3-11.
18. Krämer N, Ebert J, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Ceramic inlays bonded with two adhesives after 4 years. Dent Mater 2006; 22:13-21.
19. Frankenberger R, Taschner M, Garcia-Godoy F, Petschelt A, Krämer N. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after 12 years. J Adhes Dent 2008; 10:393-8.
20. Rosentritt M, Behr M, Handel G. Fixed partial dentures: all ceramics, fibre-reinforced composites and experimental systems. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30: 873-7.
21. Yüksel G, Çekiç C, Özkan P. Metal desteksiz porselen sistemleri. Atatürk Üniv Dis Hek Fak Derg 2000;10: 79-88.
22. Akın E. Diş Hekimliğinde porselen. İ Ü Diş Hek Fak Yayınları, İstanbul, 1999;35-42.
23. Burgess JO, Haveman CW, Butzin C. Evaluation of resins Dent. 1992;5: 137-9. restorations.Am J
24. Wall JG, Cipra DL. Alternative crown systems. Dental Clinics of North America 1992;36: 765-82.
25. Soares C.J, Soares P.V, Pereira J.C, Fonseca R.B. Surface Treatment Protocols in the Cementation Process of Ceramic and Laboratory-Processed Composite Restorations: A Literature Review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005; 17: 224-35.
26. Yamanel K, Caglar A, Gülsahi K, Ozden UA. Effects of different ceramic and composite materials on stress distribution in inlay and onlay cavities: 3-D finite element analysis.Dent Mater J. 2009;28: 661-70.
27. Schaefer O, Watts DC, Sigusch BW, Kuepper H, Guentsch A Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro: a three- dimensional reproducibility. Dent Mater. 2012;28: 320-6.
28. Gresnigt MM, Kalk W, Ozcan M. Randomized clinical trial of indirect resin composite and ceramic veneers: up to 3-year follow-up. J Adhes Dent 2013; 15: 181–90.
29. Fron Chabouis H, Smail Faugeron V, Attal JP. Clinical efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: a systematic review. Dent Mater. 2013;29: 1209-18.
30. St-Geoerges Annie J, Sturdevant John R, Swift Jr Edward J, Thompson Jeffrey Y. Fracture resistance of prepared teeth restored with bonded inlay restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 551-7.
31. Dalpino PHP, Francischone CE, Ishikiriama A, Franco EB. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials. Am J Dent 2002; 15: 389-94.
32. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Ledwinsky E, Handel G. Fracture resistance and Marginal Adaptation of Conventionally Composite Three-Unit FPDs. The Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 467-72. Fiber-Reinforced
33. Hürmüzlü F, Hergüner Siso S, Isın D. Sınıf II Beş Restorasyonlarda Mikrosızıntı Restoratif Üniversitesi Dishekimligi Fakültesi Dergisi 2002; 5: 67-70. Materyalin Cumhuriyet
34. Scherer W, Putter H, Cooper H. Clinical technique for an in-office porcelain modification. J Esthet Dent. 1991;3:23-6.
35. Palmer DS, Barco MT, Pelleu GB Jr, McKinney JE. Wear of human enamel against a commercial castable ceramic restorative material. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;65:192-5.
36. Cao L, Zhao X, Gong X, Zhao S. An in vitro investigation of wear resistance and hardness of composite resins. Int J Clin Exp Med 2013; 6:423- 30.
37. Zaruba M, Kasper R, Kazama R, Wegehaupt FJ, Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A, Marginal adaptation of ceramic and composite inlays in minimally invasive mod cavities. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:579-87.
38. Tunçdemir AR, Yavuz M, Polat S, Tunçdemir MT, Özcan E. Effect of air-flow polishing on surface roughness of composites and porcelains. Atatürk Üniv Dis Hek Fak Derg 2012; 22: 242-6
39. El-Mowafy O. Management of extensive carious lesions in permanent molars of a child with nonmetallic bonded restorations-a case report. J Can Dent Assoc 2000; 66, 302-7.
40. Schmidseder J, Söderholm KJ, Composite Inlays. Color Atlas of Dental Medicine, Aesthetic Dentistry. Ed. Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart 2000; 149-62.