THE STRESS DISTRIBUTION EVALUATION OF TWO DIFFERENT POST TYPES WHICH USED IN ANTERIOR TEETH WITH COMPLICATED CROWN-ROOT FRACTURE: A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS METHOD

Abdullah Emre Karaali; Mehmet Sinan Doğan; Ayşe Günay

doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.473231

THE STRESS DISTRIBUTION EVALUATION OF TWO DIFFERENT POST TYPES WHICH USED IN ANTERIOR TEETH WITH COMPLICATED CROWN-ROOT FRACTURE: A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS METHOD

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the stress distribution under artificial forces that simulate the biting forces of the two different post types used in maxillary anterior teeth that had complicated crown-root fractures and to determine the region where the stress occurred. For this purpose, a finite element analysis method was used.

Material and method: In the study, Glass fiber post (Group I) and carbon fiber post (Group II) were used to model tooth with complicated crown-root fracture, which would be horizontal in the cervical region of the fracture line. In the model, fractured teeth fragment (coronal and root fragments) were reattachment to by post. The force of 100N was applied to the incisal of the teeth at 90⁰ angles to the groups (longitudinal axis). Finite element analysis method was used to evaluate stress resulting from force and to obtain a three-dimensional model. Analyzes were done with the ANSYS program (ANSYSRel.6.0, ANSYS Inc., Houston, TX, USA).

Results: As the results of the analysis, the resistance of glass fiber post against the forces was higher than the carbon fiber post. The stresses were concentrated mostly at the palatinal regions in group I and II.

Conclusion: The rehabilitation of esthetic and functional for anterior group teeth with complicated crown-root fractures was favorable glass fiber post than carbon fiber post.

Keywords: Dental trauma, crown-root fracture, glass fiber post, carbon fiber post, FEM

KOMPLİKE KRON-KÖK KIRIĞI OLUŞMUŞ ÖN GRUP DİŞLERDE KULLANILAN İKİ FARKLI POST TİPİNİN STRES DAĞILIMININ DEĞERLENDIİRİLMESİ: SONLU ELEMENT ANALİZ YÖNTEMİ

ÖZ

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, komplike kron-kök kırığı gerçekleşen ön grup dişlerde kullanılan iki farklı post tipinin ısırma kuvvetlerini taklit eden yapay kuvvetler altında stres dağılımının karşılaştırılması ve stresin oluştuğu bölgenin belirlenmesidir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda sonlu elemanlar analiz yöntemi kullanıldı.

Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmada kırık hattı dişin kole bölgesinde yatay olacak şekilde komplike kron-kök kırığı oluşturulan diş modeline cam fiber post (Grup I) ve karbon fiber post (Grup II) kullanıldı. Modeldeki kırık diş parçaları (kronal ve kök parçaları) post yardımıyla yeniden yapıştırıldı. Gruplara 100N kuvvet dişlerin insizal kenarına 90 derecelik açı ( dişin uzun aksına) ile uygulandı. Kuvvet sonucu oluşan stresi değerlendirmek ve üç boyutlu model elde etmek için sonlu elemanlar analiz yöntemi kullanıldı. Analizler ANSYS programı ile yapıldı.

Bulgular: Analiz sonuçlarına göre, cam fiber postun kuvvetlere karşı direnci karbon fiber posta göre daha yüksek bulundu. Ayrıca stresler çoğunlukla her iki grupta dişin palatinal bölgelerinde yoğunlaşmıştır.

Sonuç: Komplike kron- kök kırıklarına maruz kalan üst ön grup dişlerde estetik ve fonksiyonel iyileştirme sağlamak için karbon fiber posta göre cam fiber postun kullanımı daha uygun bulundu.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Dental travma, kron-kök kırığı, cam fiber post, karbon fiber post, FEM

Keywords

Dental trauma,crown-root fracture,glass fiber post,carbon fiber post

References

1. Brown GJ, Welbury RR. Case report: Root extrusion, a practical solution in complicated crown-root incisor fractures. Br Dent J.2000;9:477-8.
2. Pavone AF, Ghassemian M, Mancini M, Condò R, Cerroni L, Arcuri C, Pasquantonio G. Autogenous Tooth Fragment Adhesive Reattachment for a Complicated Crown Root Fracture: Two Interdisciplinary Case Reports. Case Rep Dent. 2016;2016:9352129.
3. Bajaj P, Chordiya R, Rudagi K, Patil N. Multidisciplinary approach to the management of complicated crown-root fracture: a case report. J Int Oral Health. 2015;4:88-91
4. Adanir N, Ok E, Erdek Y. Re-attachment of subgingivally oblique fractured central incisor using a fiber post. Eur.J.Dent, 2008; 2:138-41.
5. Jang JH, Park SJ, Min KS, Lee BN, Chang HS, Oh WM, et al. Stress behavior of cemented fiber-reinforced composite and titanium posts in the upper central incisor according to the post length: Two-dimensional finite element analysis. J Dent Sci, 2012;4:384-9.
6. Vafaei A, Ranjkesh B, Lovschall H, Erfanparast L, Jafarabadi MA, Oskouei SG, Isidor F. Survival of Composite Resin Restorations of severely Decayed Primary Anterior Teeth retained by Glass Fiber Posts or Reversed-orientated Metal Posts. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;2:109-13.
7. Cheung W. A review of the management of endodontically treated teeth. Post, core and the final restoration. JADA. 2005;5:611-9.
8. Tuğut F, Demir H, Doğan OM. Restoration of a fractured anterior tooth supported with prefabric post and original tooth fragment: A case report. Anat J Clin. Invest, 2011;3;144-8.

9. Alharbi F, Nathanson D, Morgano SM, Baba NZ. Fracture resistance and failure mode of fatigued endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber‐reinforced resin posts and metallic posts in vitro. Dent Traumatology, 2014;4:317-25.
10. Kurthukoti AJ, Paul J, Gandhi K, Rao DB. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated permanent anterior teeth restored with three different esthetic post systems: An in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2015;33:296-301.
11. Teixeira CS, Pasternak-Junior B, Borges AH, Paulino SM, Sousa-Neto MD. Influence of endodontic sealers on the bond strength of carbon fiber posts. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008;2:430-5.
12. Vichi A, Grandini S, Ferrari M. Clinical procedure for luting glass-fiber posts. J Adhes. Dent 2001; 3: 353-9.
13. Schmage P, Pfeiffer P, Pinto E, Platzer U, Nergiz I. Influence of oversized dowel space preparation on the bond strengths of FRC posts. Op. dentistry 2009;1:93-101.
14. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandini S, Goracci C. Efficacy of a self-curing adhesive resin cement system on luting glass-fiber posts into root canals: an SEM investigation. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14: 543-9.
15. Goracci C, Corciolani G, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Light transmitting ability of marketed fiber posts. J Dent. Rest. 2008;87:1122-6.
16. Mallmann A, Jacques LB, Valandro LF, Muench A. Microtensile bond strength of photoactivated and autopolymerized adhesive systems to root dentin using translucent and opaque fiber-reinforced composite posts. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:165-72.
17. Guven S, Akdogan M, Oz C, Dogan MS, Unal M, Unal S, Sahbaz C. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of two ceramic inlay restorations with different cavity designs, Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 2015;3:579-585.
18. Bulut AC, Atsü SS. Diş hekimliğinde restoratif materyallerin yaşlandırma işlemleri ve çiğneme simülatörleri. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2016;26: 180-6.
19. Pegoretti A, Fambri L, Zappini G, Bianchetti M. Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post. Biomaterials. 2002;23:2667-82.
20. Kulkarni VK, Sridhar R, Duddu MK, Banda NR, Sharma DS. Biological restoration in a young patient with a complicated crown root fracture with an autogenous tooth fragment. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013;2:117-21.
21. Kulkarni VK, Sridhar R, Duddu MK, Banda NR, Sharma DS.J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013;38:117-21.
22. Lamichhane A, Xu C, Zhang FQ. Dental fiber-post resin base material: a review.J Adv Prosthodont. 2014;1:60-5.
23. Kumar P, Rao RN. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution in a tooth restored with metal and fiber posts of varying diameters: An in-vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2015;2:100-4
24. Geramy A, Sharofoddin F. Abfraction: 3D analysis by means of the finite element method. Quint. Int. 2003;7:526-33.
25. Pereira JR, do Valle AL, Shiratori FK, Ghizoni JS, Bonfante EA. The effect of post material on the characteristic strength of fatigued endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthetic dent. 2014; 112:1225-30.
26. Karre D, Muppa R, Duddu MK, Nallachakrava S. Fracture resistance of reattached fragments using three different techniques with emphasis on vertical grooves and fiber-reinforced composite post: A novel technique. J Conserv Dent. 2017; 20:474-8.
27. Akkayan B, Gülmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. Jprosthetic dent. 2002; 87:431-7.
28. Qing H, Zhu Z, Chao Y, Zhang W. In vitro evaluation of the fracture resistance of anterior endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber and zircon posts. J Prosthetic Dent. 2007;2:93-8.
29. Sorrentino R, Aversa R, Ferro V, Auriemma T, Zarone F, Ferrari M, Apicella A. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strain and stress distributions in endodontically treated maxillary central incisors restored with different post, core and crown materials. Dent Mater. 2007; 23:983-93.
30. Hayashi M, Takahashi Y, Imazato S, Ebisu S. Fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with post-cores and crowns. Dent Materials 2006;5:477-85.
31. Rodrigues MP, Soares PBF, Valdivia ADCM, Pessoa RS, Veríssimo C, Versluis A, Soares CJ. Patient-specific Finite Element Analysis of Fiber Post and Ferrule Design. J Endod. 2017;9:1539-44.
32. Silva NR, Castro CG, Santos-Filho PC, Silva GR, Campos RE, Soares PV, Soares CJ. Influence of different post design and composition on stress distribution in maxillary central incisor: Finite element analysis. Indian J Dent Res 2009;20:153-8.
33. Değer Y, Adigüzel Ö, Yiğit Özer S, Kaya S, Seyfioğlu Polat Z, Bozyel B. Evaluation of Temperature and Stress Distribution on 2 Different Post Systems Using 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Med Sci Monit. 2015; 29:3716-21
34. Chen A, Feng X, Zhang Y, Liu R, Shao L. Finite element analysis of stress distribution in four different endodontic post systems in a model canine. Biomed Mater Eng. 2015; 26: 629-35.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Abdullah Emre Karaali This is me
0000-0002-6286-5347

Mehmet Sinan Doğan
0000-0002-3089-1305

Ayşe Günay This is me
0000-0002-0918-7962

Publication Date

July 11, 2018

Submission Date

August 23, 2017

Acceptance Date

February 22, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 28 Number: 3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.473231

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA99MA75KB

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Karaali, A. E., Doğan, M. S., & Günay, A. (2018). THE STRESS DISTRIBUTION EVALUATION OF TWO DIFFERENT POST TYPES WHICH USED IN ANTERIOR TEETH WITH COMPLICATED CROWN-ROOT FRACTURE: A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS METHOD. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(3), 326-332. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.473231

AMA

1.Karaali AE, Doğan MS, Günay A. THE STRESS DISTRIBUTION EVALUATION OF TWO DIFFERENT POST TYPES WHICH USED IN ANTERIOR TEETH WITH COMPLICATED CROWN-ROOT FRACTURE: A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS METHOD. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2018;28(3):326-332. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.473231

Chicago

Karaali, Abdullah Emre, Mehmet Sinan Doğan, and Ayşe Günay. 2018. “THE STRESS DISTRIBUTION EVALUATION OF TWO DIFFERENT POST TYPES WHICH USED IN ANTERIOR TEETH WITH COMPLICATED CROWN-ROOT FRACTURE: A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS METHOD”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 28 (3): 326-32. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.473231.

EndNote

Karaali AE, Doğan MS, Günay A (July 1, 2018) THE STRESS DISTRIBUTION EVALUATION OF TWO DIFFERENT POST TYPES WHICH USED IN ANTERIOR TEETH WITH COMPLICATED CROWN-ROOT FRACTURE: A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS METHOD. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 28 3 326–332.

IEEE

[1]A. E. Karaali, M. S. Doğan, and A. Günay, “THE STRESS DISTRIBUTION EVALUATION OF TWO DIFFERENT POST TYPES WHICH USED IN ANTERIOR TEETH WITH COMPLICATED CROWN-ROOT FRACTURE: A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS METHOD”, Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 326–332, July 2018, doi: 10.17567/ataunidfd.473231.

ISNAD

Karaali, Abdullah Emre - Doğan, Mehmet Sinan - Günay, Ayşe. “THE STRESS DISTRIBUTION EVALUATION OF TWO DIFFERENT POST TYPES WHICH USED IN ANTERIOR TEETH WITH COMPLICATED CROWN-ROOT FRACTURE: A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS METHOD”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 28/3 (July 1, 2018): 326-332. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.473231.

JAMA

1.Karaali AE, Doğan MS, Günay A. THE STRESS DISTRIBUTION EVALUATION OF TWO DIFFERENT POST TYPES WHICH USED IN ANTERIOR TEETH WITH COMPLICATED CROWN-ROOT FRACTURE: A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS METHOD. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2018;28:326–332.

MLA

Karaali, Abdullah Emre, et al. “THE STRESS DISTRIBUTION EVALUATION OF TWO DIFFERENT POST TYPES WHICH USED IN ANTERIOR TEETH WITH COMPLICATED CROWN-ROOT FRACTURE: A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS METHOD”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 28, no. 3, July 2018, pp. 326-32, doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.473231.

Vancouver

1.Abdullah Emre Karaali, Mehmet Sinan Doğan, Ayşe Günay. THE STRESS DISTRIBUTION EVALUATION OF TWO DIFFERENT POST TYPES WHICH USED IN ANTERIOR TEETH WITH COMPLICATED CROWN-ROOT FRACTURE: A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS METHOD. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2018 Jul. 1;28(3):326-32. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.473231