ZİRKONYA DENTAL İMPLANTLAR: KLİNİK PARAMETRELER, YAPISAL ÖZELLİKLER, GÜNCEL SİSTEMLER

Gonca Deste; Rukiye Durkan; Perihan Oyar

doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.604083

ZİRKONYA DENTAL İMPLANTLAR: KLİNİK PARAMETRELER, YAPISAL ÖZELLİKLER, GÜNCEL SİSTEMLER

Abstract

Bütün dünyada implant sistemleri ve materyal üretim endüstrisindeki gelişmeler ile biyoteknoloji ürünleri olan titanyum implantlara alternatif olabilecek zirkonya dental implantlar üretilmiştir. Zirkonya seramik implantlar özellikle üst çene anterior bölge estetik implant protezlerinin yapımında tercih edilen yöntemlerden biridir. Bu makalede protetik diş hekimliğinde kullanımları giderek artan tek parça veya iki parçalı sistemleri bulunan zirkonya dental implantlarda klinik parametreler, zirkonya implantların avantaj ve dezavantajları ile yapısal özellikleri ve güncel zirkonya implant sistemleri anlatılmıştır.

Anahtar kelimeler: zirkonya dental implant, tek parça zirkonya implant, iki parçalı zirkonya implant

ZIRCONIA DENTAL IMPLANTS: CLINICAL PARAMETERS, STRUCTURAL FEATURES, CURRENT SYSTEMS

ABSTRACT

All over the world zirconia dental implants are made as an alternative to biotechnology products of titanium implants by the advances in implant systems and material production industry. Zirconia ceramic implant is one of the preferred methods for the construction of maxillary anterior region aesthetic implant prostheses. This article describes the clinical parameters of single or two-pieces zirconia dental implant systems which is increasingly used in prosthetic dentistry and the advantages and disadvantages of zirconia implants, structural properties of them and current zirconia implant systems.

Key words: zirconia dental implant, one-piece zirconia implant, two-pieces zirconia implant

Keywords

References

1.Ananth H, Kundapur V, HS Mohammed, Anand M, GS. Amarnath, Mankar S. A Review on Biomaterials in Dental Implantology. Int J Biomed Sci 2015;11:113-20.
2. Hashim D, Cionca N, Courvoisier DS, Mombelli A. A systematic review of the clinical survival of zirconia implants. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;1853-9
3. Kohal RJ, Bächle M, Renz A, Butz F.Evaluation of alumina toughened zirconia implants with a sintered, moderately rough surface: An experiment in the rat. Dent Mater 2016;32:65-72.
4. Wenz HJ, Bartsch J, Wolfart S, Kern M. Osseointegration and clinical success of zirconia dental implants: A systematic review. Int J Prosthodont. 2008;21:27-36.
5. Regish KM, Sharma D, Prithviraj DR. An overview of immediate root analogue zirconia implants. J Oral Implantol 2013;39:225-33.
6. Vanlıoğlu B, Özkan Y, Özkan YK. Estetik bölgede implant-üstü restorasyonlarda güçlendirilmiş seramik dayanaklar. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2012;5:58-64.
7. Holländer J, Lorenz J, Stübinger S, Hölscher W, Heidemann D, Ghanaati S, Sader R. Zirconia dental implants: Investigation of clinical parameters, patient satisfaction, and microbial contamination. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016;31:855-64.
8. Akagawa Y, Ichikawa Y, Nikai H, Tsuru H. Interface histology of unloaded and early loaded partially stabilized zirconia endosseous implant in initial bone healing. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:599-604.

9. Vohra F, Al-Kheraif AAA, Ghani SM, Hassan MIA, Alnassar T, Javed F. Crestal bone loss and peri implant inflammatory parameters around zirconia implants: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:351-7.
10. Depprich R, Naujoks C, Ommerborn M, Schwarz F, Kubler NR, Handschel J. Current findings regarding zirconia implants. Clin Implant Dent Rel Res 2014;16:124-37.
11. Coray R, Zeltner M, Özcan M. Fracture strength of implant abutments after fatigue testing: A systematic review and a meta-analysis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016;62:333-46.
12. Osman RB, Swain MV A critical review of dental implant materials with an emphasis on titanium versus zirconia. Materials 2015;8:932-58.
13. Andreiotelli M, Wenz HJ, Kohal RJ. Are ceramic implants a viable alternative to titanium implants? A systematic literature review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;4:32-47.
14. Rohr N, Coldeab A, Zitzmannc NU, Fischera J.Loading capacity of zirconia implant supported hybrid ceramic crowns. Dent Mater 2015;31:279-88.
15. Pearce AI, Richards RG, Milz S, Schneider E, et al. Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: A review. Euro Cells Mater 2007;13:1-10.
16. Duymuş ZY, Güngör H Dental İmplant Materyalleri. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2013;1:145-52.
17. Pjetursson BE, Thoma D, Jung R, Zwahlen M, Zembic A. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of the implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:22-38.
18. Özkurt Z, Kazazoğlu E. Zirkonia dental implants: A literature review. J Oral Implantol 2011;367-76.
19. Sollazzo V, Pezzetti F, Scarano A, Piattelli A, Bignozzi CA, Massari L, Brunelli G, Carinci F. Zirconium oxide coating improves implant osseointegration in vivo. Dent Mater. 2008;24:357-61.
20. Jacobi-Gresser E, Huesker K, Schutt S. Genetic and immunological markers predict titanium implant failure: A retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;42:537-43.
21. Sicilia A, Cuesta S, Coma G, Arregui I, Guisasola C, Ruiz E, et al. Titanium allergy in dental implant patients: A clinical study on 1500 consecutive patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:823-35. 22. Javed F, Al-Hezaimi K, Almas K, Romanos GE. Is titanium sensitivity associated with allergic reactions in patients with dental implants? A systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013;15:47-52
23. Mihatovic I, Golubovic V, Becker J, Schwarz F.Bone tissue response to experimental zirconia implants. Clin Oral Invest 2017;21:523-32.
24. Yamauchi R, Morita A, Tsuji T. Pacemaker dermatitis from titanium. Contact Dermatitis. 2000;42:52-3.
25. Çelik M, Bural C, Bayraktar G. Diş Hekimliğinde Zirkonya Uygulamaları. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2014;8:106-16.
26. Kammermeier A, Rosentritt M, Behr M, Schneider-Feyrer S, Preis V. In vitro performance of one- and two-piece zirconia implant systems for anterior application. J Dent. 2016;53:94-101.
27. Markhoff J, Mick E, Mitrovic A, Pasold J, Wegner K, Bader R. Surface modifications of dental ceramic implants with different glass solder matrices: In vitro analyses with human primary osteoblasts and epithelial cells. BioMed Res Int 2014;9:1-7.
28. Scarano A, Piattelli M, Caputi S, Favero GA, Piattelli A. Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zirconium oxide disks: an in vivo human study. J Periodontol 2004;75:292-6.
29. Depprich R, Zipprich H, Ommerborn M, et al. Osseointegration of zirconia implants compared with titanium: An in vivo study. Head Face Med. 2008;11:30.
30. Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterial. 1999;20:1-25
31. Kohal RJ, Weng D, Bächle M, Strub JR. Loaded custom made zirconia and titanium implants show similar osseointegration: An animal experiment. J Periodontol 2004;75:1262-8.
32. Duymuş ZY, Güngör H Dental İmplant Materyalleri. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2013;1:145-52.
33. Chappuis V, Çavuşoğlu Y, Gruber R, Kuchler U, Buser D, Bosshardt DD. Osseointegration of zirconia in the presence of multinucleated giant cells. Clin Implant Dent Rel Res 2016;18:686-98.
34. Saldana JM, Ramirez H, Vigueras DJ, Iga T, Schneider GA. Mechanical properties and low temperature aging of tetragonal zirconia polycrystals processed by hot isostatic pressing. J Mater Res 2003;18:2415-26.
35. Paolo FM, Pierfrancesco RI, luca R. An overview of zirconia cermics; Basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent 2007;35:819-26.
36. Hisbergues M, Vendeville S, Vendeville P. Zirconia: Established facts and perspectives for a biomaterial in dental implantology. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2009;88:519-29.
37. Oliva J, Oliva X, Oliva JD. One-year follow-up of first consecutive 100 zirconia dental implants in humans: A comparison of 2 different rough surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:430-5.
38. Al-Radha AS, Dymock D, Younes C, O'Sullivan D. Surface properties of titanium and zirconia dental implant materials and their effect on bacterial adhesion. J Dent 2012;40:146-53. 39. Gahlert M, Gudehus T, Eichhorn S, Steinhauser E, Kniha H, Erhardt W. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:662-8. 40. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants: requirements for ensuring a longlasting, direct bone-to implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-70.
41. Mueller CK, Solcher P, Peisker A et al. Analysis of the influence of the macro-and microstructure of dental zirconium implants on osseointegration: A minipig study. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pat Oral Rad 2013;116:1-8.
42. Gahlert M, Roehling S, Sprecher CM, Kniha H, Milz S, Bormann K. In vivo performance of zirconia and titanium implants: A histomorphometric study in mini pig maxillae. Clin Oral Imp Res 2012;23:281-6.
43. Borgonovo AE, Censi R, Vavassori V, Dolci M, Guirado JLC, Ruiz RAD, Maiorana C. Evaluation of the success criteria for zirconia dental implants: A four-year clinical and radiological study. Int J Dent 2013;7:1-5.
44. Becker J, John G, Becker K, Mainusch S, Diedrichs G, Frank Schwarz. Clinical performance of two-piece zirconia implants in the posterior mandible and maxilla: A prospective cohort study over 2 years. Clin Oral Impl Res 2015;0:1-7.
45. Cionca N, Müller N, Mombelli A. Two-piece zirconia implants supporting all-ceramic crowns: A prospective clinical study.Clin Oral Impl Res 2015;26:413-18.
46. Aydın C, Yılmaz H, Bankoğlu M. A single-tooth, two-piece zirconia implant located in the anterior maxilla: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;109:70-4.
47. Spies BC, Balmer M, Patzelt SBM, Vach K, Kohal RJ. Clinical and Patient-reported Outcomes of a Zirconia Oral Implant: Three-year Results of a Prospective Cohort Investigation J Dent Res 2015;94:1385-91.
48. Brull F, van Winklehoff AJ, Cune MS. Zirconia dental implants: A clinical, radiographic and microbiologic evaluation up to 3 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:914-20.
49. Preis V, Kammermeier A, Handel G, Rosentritt M. In vitro performance of two-piece zirconia implant systems for anterior application. Dent Mater 2016;32:765-74.
50. Thoma DS, Benic GI, Mu~noz F, Kohal R, Sanz Martin I, Cantalapiedra AG, Hammerle CHF, Jung RE. Histological analysis of loaded zirconia and titanium dental implants: An experimental study in the dog mandible. J Clin Periodontol 2015;42:967-75.
51. Jayaswal G P, Dange SP, Khalikar AN. Bioceramic in Dental Implants: A Review. J Indian Prosthod Soc 2010;10:8-12.
52. Spies BC, Nold J, Vach K, Kohal RJ. Two-piece zirconia oral implants withstand masticatory loads: An investigation in the artificial mouth. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016;53:1-10.
53. Kohorst P, Borchers L, Strempel J, Stiesch M, Hassel T, BachFW, et al. Low-temperature degradation of different zirconia ceramics for dental applications. Acta Biomater 2012;8:1213-20.
54. Regish KM, Sharma D, Prithviraj DR. An overview of immediate root analogue zirconia implants. J Oral Implantol 2013;39:225-33.
55. Pirker W, Kocher A. True anatomical zirconia implants for molar replacement: A case report from an ongoing clinical study with a 2-year follow up. Oral Surg 2009;2:144-8.
56. Patankar A, Kshirsagar R, Patankar S, Pawar S. Immediate, Non Submerged Root Analog Zirconia Implant in Single Rooted Tooth Replacement: Case Report with 2 years Follow Up. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2016;15:270-3.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Dentistry

Journal Section

Review

Authors

Gonca Deste This is me
0000-0002-5481-0063

Rukiye Durkan
0000-0002-3381-4073

Perihan Oyar This is me
0000-0003-3849-9153

Publication Date

July 16, 2019

Submission Date

August 26, 2016

Acceptance Date

November 2, 2016

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Volume: 29 Number: 3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.604083

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA25JX89BD

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Deste, G., Durkan, R., & Oyar, P. (2019). ZİRKONYA DENTAL İMPLANTLAR: KLİNİK PARAMETRELER, YAPISAL ÖZELLİKLER, GÜNCEL SİSTEMLER. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(3), 526-533. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.604083

AMA

1.Deste G, Durkan R, Oyar P. ZİRKONYA DENTAL İMPLANTLAR: KLİNİK PARAMETRELER, YAPISAL ÖZELLİKLER, GÜNCEL SİSTEMLER. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019;29(3):526-533. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.604083

Chicago

Deste, Gonca, Rukiye Durkan, and Perihan Oyar. 2019. “ZİRKONYA DENTAL İMPLANTLAR: KLİNİK PARAMETRELER, YAPISAL ÖZELLİKLER, GÜNCEL SİSTEMLER”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 29 (3): 526-33. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.604083.

EndNote

Deste G, Durkan R, Oyar P (July 1, 2019) ZİRKONYA DENTAL İMPLANTLAR: KLİNİK PARAMETRELER, YAPISAL ÖZELLİKLER, GÜNCEL SİSTEMLER. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 29 3 526–533.

IEEE

[1]G. Deste, R. Durkan, and P. Oyar, “ZİRKONYA DENTAL İMPLANTLAR: KLİNİK PARAMETRELER, YAPISAL ÖZELLİKLER, GÜNCEL SİSTEMLER”, Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 526–533, July 2019, doi: 10.17567/ataunidfd.604083.

ISNAD

Deste, Gonca - Durkan, Rukiye - Oyar, Perihan. “ZİRKONYA DENTAL İMPLANTLAR: KLİNİK PARAMETRELER, YAPISAL ÖZELLİKLER, GÜNCEL SİSTEMLER”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 29/3 (July 1, 2019): 526-533. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.604083.

JAMA

1.Deste G, Durkan R, Oyar P. ZİRKONYA DENTAL İMPLANTLAR: KLİNİK PARAMETRELER, YAPISAL ÖZELLİKLER, GÜNCEL SİSTEMLER. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019;29:526–533.

MLA

Deste, Gonca, et al. “ZİRKONYA DENTAL İMPLANTLAR: KLİNİK PARAMETRELER, YAPISAL ÖZELLİKLER, GÜNCEL SİSTEMLER”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 29, no. 3, July 2019, pp. 526-33, doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.604083.

Vancouver

1.Gonca Deste, Rukiye Durkan, Perihan Oyar. ZİRKONYA DENTAL İMPLANTLAR: KLİNİK PARAMETRELER, YAPISAL ÖZELLİKLER, GÜNCEL SİSTEMLER. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019 Jul. 1;29(3):526-33. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.604083