İMPLANT DESTEKLİ PROTEZLERDE VİDA GEVŞEMESİ

Hamiyet Güngör Erdoğan; Elif Yiğit

İMPLANT DESTEKLİ PROTEZLERDE VİDA GEVŞEMESİ

Abstract

Eksik dişlerin rehabilitasyonunda gün geçtikçe daha yaygın biçimde kullanılan tedavi prosedürlerinden biri de implant destekli restorasyonlardır. Oldukça yüksek başarı oranları bulunan implant destekli restorasyonların kullanım sıklığı arttıkça meydana gelen biyolojik ve mekanik komplikasyon oranları da artmıştır. Meydana gelen mekanik komplikasyonlar daha çok protetik üst yapı ile ilgilidir ve abutment vidasının gevşemesi, abutment vida kırığı, altyapı ve implant kırığı gibi sıralanabilir. Yapılan çalışmalarda en sık karşılaşılan mekanik komplikasyonlardan birinin ise vida gevşemesi olduğu belirtilmiştir. Meydana gelen vida gevşemesinin klinik ve radyografik olarak belirlenememesi ve bu sorunun giderilmemesi durumunda ise abutment vidasının ve implantın kırılması ile karşı karşıya kalınabilir. Abutment vidasının gevşemesinde; ön yük, yerleşme etkisi, implant abutment bağlantı tipi, restorasyon tipi, parafonksiyon ve kantilever varlığı gibi faktörlerin etkili olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu derlemede implant destekli protezlerde meydana gelen vida gevşemesinin önemi, mekanizması ve nedenleri hakkında bilgi vermek amaçlanmıştır. Anahtar Kelimeler: implant destekli protezler, vida gevşemesi, komplikasyon

Screw Loosening on Implant Supported Prosthesis

ABSTRACT

Implant-supported restoration is one of the most commonly used treatment procedures in the rehabilitation of missing teeth. Due to its being a well-established procedure and high success rates, implant-supported restoration is gaining more attraction which also increased the rates of biological and mechanical complications in the implementations. The mechanical complications are mostly related to the prosthetic superstructure and can be listed as abutment screw loosening, abutment screw fracture, substructure and implant fracture. Among these, it is known that the screw loosening is the most commonly encountered mechanical complications. In case undetected in clinical and/or radiographic examination, screw loosening can lead to the screw or implant fractures over time. The factors associated with the screw loosening problem are the preload, the settling effect, the type of implant-abutment connection, the type of restoration, parafunction and the existance of cantilever. In this review, it is aimed to underline the importance of screw loosening in the implant supported prosthesis implementations, providing also the necessary information on the mechanism and the causes of this problem. Key Words: implant supported prosthesis, screw loosening, complication

Keywords

References

1. Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms, J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 39–110.
2. Chang HS, Chen YC, Hsieh YD, Hsu ML. Stress distribution of two commercial dental implant systems: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Dent Sci 2013; 8: 261-71.
3. Prado CJ, Neves FD, Soares CJ, Dantas KA, Dantas TS, Naves LZ. Influence of abutment screw design and surface coating on the bending flexural strength of the implant set. J Oral Implantol 2014; 40:123–8.
4. Zembic A, Kim S, Zwahlen M, Kelly JR. Systematic review of the survival rate and incidence of biologic, technical, and esthetic complications of single implant abutments supporting fixed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29:99–116.
5. Jung RE, Zembic A, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23:2–21.
6. Sailer I, Mühlemann S, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH, Schneider D. Cemented and screw retained implant reconstructions: a systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23:163–201.
7. Borie E, Orsi IA, de Araujo CP. The influence of the connection, length and diameter of an implant on bone biomechanics. Acta Odontol Scand 2015;73: 321-9.
8. Krishnan V, Tony Thomas C, Sabu I. Management of abutment screw loosening: review of literatüre and report of a case. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2014; 14:208-14.

9. Sailer I, Philipp A, Zembic A, et al. A systematic review of the performance of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20:4–31.
10. Asvanund P, Cheepsathit L. Effect of different angulation angled abutment on screw loosening of implants under cyclic loading. M Dent J 2016;36: 337–24.
11. Vetromilla BM, Brondani LP, Pereira-Cenci T, Bergoli CD. Influence of different implant-abutment connection designs on the mechanical and biological behavior of single-tooth implants in the maxillary esthetic zone: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121: 398-403.
12. Shin HM, Huh JB, Yun MJ, Jeon YC, Chang BM, Jeong CM. Influence of the implant-abutment connection design and diameter on the screw joint stability. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6:126-32.
13. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:121–32. 14.Bickford J H. Introduction to the Design and Behavior of Bolted Joints. CRCPress, BocaRaton, Fla, USA: 2008.
15.C. E. Misch, Dental İmplant Protezler, Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri, İstanbul: 2009.p.363.
16. Kourtis S, Damanaki M, Kaitatzidou S, Kaitatzidou A, Roussou V. Loosening of the fixing screw in single implant crowns: predisposing factors, prevention and treatment options. J Esthet Restor Dent 2017;29:233-46.
17.Farina AP, Spazzin AO, Consani RL, Mesquita MF. Screw joint stability after the application of retorque in implant-supported dentures under simulated masticatory conditions. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111:499-504.
18. Khraisat A, Abu-Hammad O, Dar-Odeh N, Al-Kayed AM. Abutment screw loosening and bending resistance of external hexagon implant system after lateral cyclic loading. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004; 6:157-64.
19.Guzaitis KL, Knoernschild KL, Viana MA. Effect of repeated screw joint closing and opening cycles on implant prosthetic screw reverse torque and implant and screw thread morphology. J Prosthet Dent 2011;106:159-69.
20.Xia D, Lin H, Yuan S, Bai W, Zheng G. Dynamic fatigue performance of implant-abutment assemblies with different tightening torque values. Biomed Mater Eng 2014;24:2143-9.
21.Kim SK, Koak JY, Heo SJ, Taylor TD, Ryoo S, Lee SY. Screw loosening with interchangeable abutments in internally connected implants after cyclic loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:42-7.
22.Saboury A, Neshandar Asli H, Vaziri S. The effect of repeated torque in small diameter implants with machined and premachined abutments. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14: 224-30.
23.Sella GC, Lopes Pereira Neto AR, Maziero Volpato CA, de Vasconcellos DK, Pekkan G, Ozcan M. Influence of different maintenance times of torque application on the removal torque values to loosen the prosthetic abutment screws of external hexagon implants. Implant Dent 2013;22:534-9.
24. Dincer Kose O, Karataslı B, Demircan S, Kose TE, Cene E, Aya SA, Erdem MA, Cankaya AB. In Vitro Evaluation of Manual Torque Values Applied to Implant-Abutment Complex by Different Clinicians and Abutment Screw Loosening. Biomed Res Int 2017;2017:7376261.
25. Assunção WG, Delben JA, Tabata LF, Barão VA, Gomes EA, Garcia IR Jr. Preload evaluation of different screws in external hexagon joint. Implant Dent 2012;21:46-50.
26.Lang LA, Kang B, Wang R-F, Lang BR. Finite element analysis to determine implant preload. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:539-46.
27.Yao KT, Kao HC, Cheng CK, Fang HW, Yip SW, Hsu ML. The effect of clockwise and counterclockwise twisting moments on abutment screw loosening. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:1181-6.
28. Al-Otaibi HN, Almutairi A, Alfarraj J, Algesadi W. The Effect of Torque Application Technique on Screw Preload of Implant Supported Prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2017; 32:259-63.
29. Abou-Obaid AI, Al-Otaibi HN, Akeel RF. Effect of Single Off-Axis Implant Placement on Abutment Screw Stability under Lateral Loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016;31:520–6.
30. Gupta S, Gupta H, Tandan A. Technical complications of implant-causes and management: A comprehensive review. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2015;6:3-8.
31. Freitas-Júnior AC, Almeida EO, Bonfante EA, Silva NR, Coelho PG. Reliability and failure modes of internal conical dental implant connections. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 24:197–202.
32. Schmitt CM, Nogueira-Filho G, Tenenbaum HC, Lai JY, Brito C, Döring H, Nonhoff J. Performance of conical abutment (Morse Taper) connection implants: A systematic review. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2014;102A:552–74.
33. Gracis S, Michalakis K, Vigolo P, Vult von Steyern P, Zwahlen M, Sailer I. Internal vs. external connections for abutments/reconstructions: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:202-16.
34.Schmitt CM, Nogueira-Filho G, Tenenbaum HC, Lai JY, Brito C, Döring H, Nonhoff J. Performance of conical abutment (Morse Taper) connection implants: a systematic review. J Biomed Mater Res A 2014;102:552-74.
35. Schmitt J, Holst S, Eitner S, Schlegel A, Wichmann M, Hamel J. Prosthetic screw detorque values in implants retained as cast bar superstructures or bars modified by the Cresco Ti Precision technique—a comparative in vivo study. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22:193–200.
36. Jo JY, Yang DS, Huh JB, et al. Influence of abutment materials on the implant-abutment joint stability in internal conical connection type implant systems. J Adv Prosthodont 2014; 6:491– 7.
37. Neumann EAF, Villar CC, França FMG. Fracture resistance of abutment screws made of titanium, polyetheretherketone, and carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone. Braz Oral Res 2014; 28:1–5.
38. Pintinha M, Camarini ET, Sábio S, Pereira JR. Effect of mechanical loading on the removal torque of different types of tapered connection abutments for dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 2013; 110: 383-8.
39. Gehrke SA, Pereira Fde A. Changes in the abutment-implant interface in Morse taper implant connections after mechanical cycling: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29: 791-7.
40.Ferreiroa A, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Pradíes G, Sola-Ruiz MF, Agustín-Panadero R. Cemented and screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth restorations in the molar mandibular region: A retrospective comparison study after an observation period of 1 to 4 years. J Clin Exp Dent 2015; 7: 89-94.
41.Salvi G, Brägger U. Mechanical and technical risks in implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24:69–85.
42. Rinke S, Lattke A, Eickholz P, Kramer K, Ziebolz D. Practice-based clinical evaluation of zirconia abutments for anterior single-tooth restorations. Quintessence Int 2015;46:19–29.
43. Wittneben JG, Millen C, Brägger U. Clinical performance of screwversus cement-retained fixed implant-supported reconstructions-a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:84–98.
44. Kim SK, Koak JY, Heo SJ, Taylor TD, Ryoo S, Lee SY. Screw loosening with interchangeable abutments in internally connected implants after cyclic loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:42–7.
45.Tekin S, Değer Y, Demirci F. Evaluation of the use of PEEK material in implant-supported fixed restorations by finite element analysis. Niger J Clin Pract 2019;22:1252-8.
46. Shafie HR, Martyna S. Clinical and Laboratory Manual of Dental Implant Abutments. 1st ed. Hoboken NJ; Wiley-Blackwell: 2014.p. 23-32.
47. Chen X, Ma R, Min J, Li Z, Yu P, Yu H. Effect of PEEK and PTFE coatings in fatigue performance of dental implant retaining screw joint: An in vitro study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2020;103:103530.
48. Junqueira MC, Silva TE, Ribeiro RF, Faria AC, Macedo AP, de Almeida RP. Abutment rotational freedom evaluation of external hexagon single-implant restorations after mechanical cycling. Clin Implant Dent Res 2013; 15:927–33.
49. De Barros Carrilho GP, Dias RP, Elias CN. Comparison of external and internal hex implants rotational freedom: a pilot study. Int J Prosthodont 2005; 18:165–6.
50. Pjetursson BE, Brägger U, Lang NP, Zwahlen M. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs). Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18:97–113.
51. Koyano K, Esaki D. Occlusion on oral implants: current clinical guidelines. J Oral Rehabil 2015;42:153–11.
52. Bakaeen LG, Winkler S, Neff PA. The effect of implant diameter, restoration design, and occlusal table variations on screw loosening of posterior single-tooth implants restorations. J Oral Implantol 2001; 27:63–72.
53. Manfredini D, Lobbezoo F. Relationship between bruxism and temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review of literature from 1998 to 2008. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:26–50.
54. Gothberg C, Bergendal T, Magnusson T. Complications after treatment with implant-supported ﬁxed prostheses: a retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:201–17.
55. Manfredini D, Poggio CE, Lobbezoo F. Is bruxism a risk factor for dental implants? A systematic review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014;16:460-9.
56.Mumcu E, Bilhan H, Cekici A. Marginal bone loss around implants supporting fixed restorations. J Oral Implantol 2011;37:549-58.
57. Abichandani S, Ramesh Nadiger R, Abhishek S Kavlekar A. Abutment selection, designing, and its influence on the emergence profile: a comprehensive review. Eur J Prosthodont 2013; 1:1–10.
58. Sahin C, Ayyildiz S. Correlation between microle- akage and screw loosening at implant-abutment connection. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6:35-8.
59.Tsuruta K, Ayukawa Y, Matsuzaki T, Kihara M, Koyano K. The influence of implant-abutment connection on the screw loosening and microleakage. Int J Implant Dent 2018; 9:11.
60. Koosha S, Toraji S, Mostafavi AS. Effect of fluid contaminationon the reverse torque values of abutment screws at implant-abutment connections. J Prosthet Dent 2020; 123:618-21
61. Polat S, Tokar E, Uzun O. Removal of fractured ımplant abutment screws using dental operating microscope: technical report. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2016; 26:478-81.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Dentistry

Journal Section

Review

Authors

Hamiyet Güngör Erdoğan This is me
0000-0001-7449-6297
Andorra

Elif Yiğit This is me
0000-0003-3256-062X
Andorra

Publication Date

January 15, 2021

Submission Date

November 16, 2019

Acceptance Date

March 20, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 31 Number: 1

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA83DA98ER

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Güngör Erdoğan, H., & Yiğit, E. (2021). İMPLANT DESTEKLİ PROTEZLERDE VİDA GEVŞEMESİ. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(1), 138-146. https://izlik.org/JA83DA98ER

AMA

1.Güngör Erdoğan H, Yiğit E. İMPLANT DESTEKLİ PROTEZLERDE VİDA GEVŞEMESİ. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2021;31(1):138-146. https://izlik.org/JA83DA98ER

Chicago

Güngör Erdoğan, Hamiyet, and Elif Yiğit. 2021. “İMPLANT DESTEKLİ PROTEZLERDE VİDA GEVŞEMESİ”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 31 (1): 138-46. https://izlik.org/JA83DA98ER.

EndNote

Güngör Erdoğan H, Yiğit E (January 1, 2021) İMPLANT DESTEKLİ PROTEZLERDE VİDA GEVŞEMESİ. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 31 1 138–146.

IEEE

[1]H. Güngör Erdoğan and E. Yiğit, “İMPLANT DESTEKLİ PROTEZLERDE VİDA GEVŞEMESİ”, Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 138–146, Jan. 2021, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA83DA98ER

ISNAD

Güngör Erdoğan, Hamiyet - Yiğit, Elif. “İMPLANT DESTEKLİ PROTEZLERDE VİDA GEVŞEMESİ”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 31/1 (January 1, 2021): 138-146. https://izlik.org/JA83DA98ER.

JAMA

1.Güngör Erdoğan H, Yiğit E. İMPLANT DESTEKLİ PROTEZLERDE VİDA GEVŞEMESİ. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2021;31:138–146.

MLA

Güngör Erdoğan, Hamiyet, and Elif Yiğit. “İMPLANT DESTEKLİ PROTEZLERDE VİDA GEVŞEMESİ”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 31, no. 1, Jan. 2021, pp. 138-46, https://izlik.org/JA83DA98ER.

Vancouver

1.Hamiyet Güngör Erdoğan, Elif Yiğit. İMPLANT DESTEKLİ PROTEZLERDE VİDA GEVŞEMESİ. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi [Internet]. 2021 Jan. 1;31(1):138-46. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA83DA98ER