BibTex RIS Cite

Clinical approach to contemporary matrix systems

Year 2011, Volume: 2011 Issue: 4, 40 - 48, 01.04.2011

Dt. Fatma Ayaz Doç. Dr. Dilek Tağtekin Prof. Dr. Funda Yanıkoğlu

Abstract

-

Keywords

-

References

  • Demarco FF, Cenci MS, Lima FG et al. Class II composite restorations with metallic and translucent matrices: 2-year follow-up findings. J Dent 2008;35:231-237.
  • Aaron D. Puckett, James G. Fitchie, Pia Chaterjee Kirk, Jefferson Gamblin. Direct Composite Restorative Materials. Dent Clin N Am 2007;51:659-675.
  • Boksman L., Margeas R., Buckner S. Predictable interproksimal contacts in Class II composite restorations –A fusion of seperation armamentarium, composite material selection, and insertion technique. Oral Health 2008;98(3):10-19.
  • Ash MM. Wheeler’s dental anatomy physiology and occlusion. Dental anatomy, Phisiology and Occlusion. 8th ed. Philadelphia Saunders: 2003.
  • Türkün M. Aproksimal restorasyonlarda ideal kontak ve kontur oluşturmada güncel yaklaşımlar. Akad Dent Dişhek Derg 2004;6:25-36.
  • Varian CM, Dimitriu BA, Bodnar DC et al. Contemporary approach for establishment of proximal contacts in direct class II resin composite restorations. TMJ 2008;58:236-243.
  • Lowe RA. Class II direct composite restorations with the use of sectional matrix systems. Oral Health 2006;96(3):8-17.
  • Loomans BAC, Roeters FJM, Opdam NJM, Kujis RH. The effect of proximal contour on marginal ridge fracture of Class II composite restorations. J Dent 2008;36:828-832.
  • Scherer W, Calıskan F, Kaim JM, Cooper H, Zimmerman M. Microleakage comparison in opaque and transparent matrix systems. Gen Dent 1989;37:482-484.
  • Brackett MG, Conreas S, Contreas R, Brackett WW. Restoration of proximal contact in direct class II resin composites. Oper Dent 2006; 31(1) 155- 56.
  • Müllejans R, Badawi MOF,Raab WHM, Lang H. An in vitro comparison of metal and transparent matrices used for bonded Class II resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2003;28(2):122-126.
  • Gilmour AS, James T, Bryant S et al. An in vitro study on the use of circumferential matrix bands in the placement of Class II amalgam restorations. Bri Dent J 2008;204:1-4.
  • Cenci MS, Lund RG, Pereira CL, de Carvalho RM. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations with different matrix systems. J Adhes Dent 200; 8(2): 127-32.
  • Ermiş RB, Kam Ö, Temel UB. Bölümlü matris sistemleri. Türk Dişhek Derg 2007;67:56-60.
  • Loomans BA, Opdam NJ, Brankhorst EM, Roeters FJ, Dörfer CE. A clinical study on interdental separation techniques. Oper Dent. 2007; 32(3): 207-11.
  • Saber MH, Loomans BA, El Zohairy A, Dörfer CE, El-Badrawy W. Evaluation of proximal contact tightness of Class II resin composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2010; 35(1): 37-43.
  • Loomans BA, Opdam NJ, Roeters JF, Bronkhorst EM, Plasschaert AJ. Influence of composite resin consistency and placement technique on proximal contact tightness Class II restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2006; 8(5): 305-10.
  • Peumans M et al. Do condansable composites help to achieve beter proximal contacts? Dent Mater 2001; 17(6): 533-41.
  • Loomans BA, Roeters FJ.M, Opdam NJM. Restoration techniques and marginal overhang in Class II composite restorations. J Dent 2009; 37: 712-717.
  • Loomans BA, Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Bronkhorst EM, Burgersdijk RC, Dörfer CE. A randomized clinical trial on proximal contacts of posterior composites. J Dent 2006; 34(4): 292-7.
  • James B. Summitte, J. William Robbins, Thomas J. Hilton, Richard S. Schwartz. Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry. A Contemporary Approach. Third Edition. 2006 Quintessence Publishing.
  • Ghavamnasiri M, Moosavi H, Tahvildarnejad N. Effect of centripetal and incremental methods in Class II composite resin restorations on gingival microleakage.J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8(2): 113-120

Güncel matris sistemlerine klinik yaklaşım

Year 2011, Volume: 2011 Issue: 4, 40 - 48, 01.04.2011

Dt. Fatma Ayaz Doç. Dr. Dilek Tağtekin Prof. Dr. Funda Yanıkoğlu

Abstract

maddelerinin posterior dişlerde kullanımı da artmıştır. Posterior rezin kompozit restorasyonların yapımı sırasındaki en büyük problemlerden biri, restorasyonun komşu diş ile sıkı bir temasının ve proksimal konturunun uygun bir şekilde oluşturulmasıdır. Bu derlemede, uygun aproksimal temas ve kontur oluşturmak için kullanılan matris bantları, kamalar ve separasyonun önemi vurgulanmış, güncel çevresel ve bölümlü matris sistemleri hakkında bilgi verilmiş ve klinik uygulamaları anlatılmıştır

Keywords

matris sistemleri restorations proximal contour kompozit restorasyonlar proksimal temas

References

  • Demarco FF, Cenci MS, Lima FG et al. Class II composite restorations with metallic and translucent matrices: 2-year follow-up findings. J Dent 2008;35:231-237.
  • Aaron D. Puckett, James G. Fitchie, Pia Chaterjee Kirk, Jefferson Gamblin. Direct Composite Restorative Materials. Dent Clin N Am 2007;51:659-675.
  • Boksman L., Margeas R., Buckner S. Predictable interproksimal contacts in Class II composite restorations –A fusion of seperation armamentarium, composite material selection, and insertion technique. Oral Health 2008;98(3):10-19.
  • Ash MM. Wheeler’s dental anatomy physiology and occlusion. Dental anatomy, Phisiology and Occlusion. 8th ed. Philadelphia Saunders: 2003.
  • Türkün M. Aproksimal restorasyonlarda ideal kontak ve kontur oluşturmada güncel yaklaşımlar. Akad Dent Dişhek Derg 2004;6:25-36.
  • Varian CM, Dimitriu BA, Bodnar DC et al. Contemporary approach for establishment of proximal contacts in direct class II resin composite restorations. TMJ 2008;58:236-243.
  • Lowe RA. Class II direct composite restorations with the use of sectional matrix systems. Oral Health 2006;96(3):8-17.
  • Loomans BAC, Roeters FJM, Opdam NJM, Kujis RH. The effect of proximal contour on marginal ridge fracture of Class II composite restorations. J Dent 2008;36:828-832.
  • Scherer W, Calıskan F, Kaim JM, Cooper H, Zimmerman M. Microleakage comparison in opaque and transparent matrix systems. Gen Dent 1989;37:482-484.
  • Brackett MG, Conreas S, Contreas R, Brackett WW. Restoration of proximal contact in direct class II resin composites. Oper Dent 2006; 31(1) 155- 56.
  • Müllejans R, Badawi MOF,Raab WHM, Lang H. An in vitro comparison of metal and transparent matrices used for bonded Class II resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2003;28(2):122-126.
  • Gilmour AS, James T, Bryant S et al. An in vitro study on the use of circumferential matrix bands in the placement of Class II amalgam restorations. Bri Dent J 2008;204:1-4.
  • Cenci MS, Lund RG, Pereira CL, de Carvalho RM. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations with different matrix systems. J Adhes Dent 200; 8(2): 127-32.
  • Ermiş RB, Kam Ö, Temel UB. Bölümlü matris sistemleri. Türk Dişhek Derg 2007;67:56-60.
  • Loomans BA, Opdam NJ, Brankhorst EM, Roeters FJ, Dörfer CE. A clinical study on interdental separation techniques. Oper Dent. 2007; 32(3): 207-11.
  • Saber MH, Loomans BA, El Zohairy A, Dörfer CE, El-Badrawy W. Evaluation of proximal contact tightness of Class II resin composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2010; 35(1): 37-43.
  • Loomans BA, Opdam NJ, Roeters JF, Bronkhorst EM, Plasschaert AJ. Influence of composite resin consistency and placement technique on proximal contact tightness Class II restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2006; 8(5): 305-10.
  • Peumans M et al. Do condansable composites help to achieve beter proximal contacts? Dent Mater 2001; 17(6): 533-41.
  • Loomans BA, Roeters FJ.M, Opdam NJM. Restoration techniques and marginal overhang in Class II composite restorations. J Dent 2009; 37: 712-717.
  • Loomans BA, Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Bronkhorst EM, Burgersdijk RC, Dörfer CE. A randomized clinical trial on proximal contacts of posterior composites. J Dent 2006; 34(4): 292-7.
  • James B. Summitte, J. William Robbins, Thomas J. Hilton, Richard S. Schwartz. Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry. A Contemporary Approach. Third Edition. 2006 Quintessence Publishing.
  • Ghavamnasiri M, Moosavi H, Tahvildarnejad N. Effect of centripetal and incremental methods in Class II composite resin restorations on gingival microleakage.J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8(2): 113-120
There are 22 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Dt. Fatma Ayaz This is me

Doç. Dr. Dilek Tağtekin This is me

Prof. Dr. Funda Yanıkoğlu This is me

Publication Date April 1, 2011
Published in Issue Year 2011 Volume: 2011 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Ayaz, D. F., Tağtekin, D. D. D., & Yanıkoğlu, P. D. F. (2011). Güncel matris sistemlerine klinik yaklaşım. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 2011(4), 40-48.
AMA Ayaz DF, Tağtekin DDD, Yanıkoğlu PDF. Güncel matris sistemlerine klinik yaklaşım. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. April 2011;2011(4):40-48.
Chicago Ayaz, Dt. Fatma, Doç. Dr. Dilek Tağtekin, and Prof. Dr. Funda Yanıkoğlu. “Güncel Matris Sistemlerine Klinik yaklaşım”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2011, no. 4 (April 2011): 40-48.
EndNote Ayaz DF, Tağtekin DDD, Yanıkoğlu PDF (April 1, 2011) Güncel matris sistemlerine klinik yaklaşım. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2011 4 40–48.
IEEE D. F. Ayaz, D. D. D. Tağtekin, and P. D. F. Yanıkoğlu, “Güncel matris sistemlerine klinik yaklaşım”, Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg, vol. 2011, no. 4, pp. 40–48, 2011.
ISNAD Ayaz, Dt. Fatma et al. “Güncel Matris Sistemlerine Klinik yaklaşım”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2011/4 (April 2011), 40-48.
JAMA Ayaz DF, Tağtekin DDD, Yanıkoğlu PDF. Güncel matris sistemlerine klinik yaklaşım. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2011;2011:40–48.
MLA Ayaz, Dt. Fatma et al. “Güncel Matris Sistemlerine Klinik yaklaşım”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 2011, no. 4, 2011, pp. 40-48.
Vancouver Ayaz DF, Tağtekin DDD, Yanıkoğlu PDF. Güncel matris sistemlerine klinik yaklaşım. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2011;2011(4):40-8.

Bu eser Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır. Tıklayınız.