OUR ANESTHESIA EXPERIENCES OF SEDOANALGESIA FOR MINOR DENTAL SURGERY APPROACHES

Year 2015, Volume: 25 Issue: 1, 1 - 6, 21.05.2015

Ayşe Arpacı , Poyzan Bozkurt

https://doi.org/10.17567/dfd.71811

Abstract

Purpose: The majority of dental practice is implemented under local anesthesia and do not require monitorization. However it is crucial to monitor the patient and apply the appropriate treatment when dental care is accompanied by health problems. In this study our goal is to present and evaluate the data obtained by Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) of patients who couldn’t be administered local anesthesia, instead been applied sedoanalgesia. Material and Method: Data of 621 patients between the age of 1-75 years who administered to the operating room of Ankara University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery during one year for minor surgery attempts (tooth extraction) were examined. Intraoperative and postoperative side effects as well as parameters recorded on the anesthesia forms were evaluated. Results: As result of evaluations; in all patients aged between 1-75, minor surgery attempts (tooth extraction) were carried out under MAC which Observer Assessment of the Alertness/Sedation Scale (OAA/S): 3 level was aimed. Intraoperatively rashes occurred in %4, nausea was observed in %3.2 of all patients. Postoperatively nausea was observed in %6.4, vomitus was seen in %7.2 of all patients. No other side effects or complications were observed. Conclusion: When OAA/S:3 level is achieved in MAC with intravenous anesthetics, minor surgery attempts (tooth extractions) can be trustfully carried out

Keywords

MAC, tooth extraction, anesthesia, sedoanalgesia

Sedoanaljezi altında minör dental cerrahi girişimlerde anestezi deneyimlerimiz

Abstract

Giriş ve Amaç: Dental uygulamaların önemli bir kısmı lokal anestezi altında gerçekleştirilmekte, sistemik fonksiyonların monitorizasyonu gerekmemektedir. Ancak dental tedaviye eşlik eden sağlık sorunları varlığında yakın monitorizasyon ve uygun tedavilerin yapılması zorunludur. Bu araştırmada; dental tedavileri lokal anestezi altında gerçekleştirilemeyen olguların sedoanaljezi altında Monitörize Anestezi Bakımı (MAB)  ile uygulamalarına ait verileri değerlendirilerek sonuçları sunulmuştur.

Gereç ve Yöntem: Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Ağız, Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi Anabilim Dalı’nda genel ameliyathanede bir yıl süresince minör cerrahi girişim (diş çekimi) gerçekleştirilen 1-75 yaş arası  621 olguya ait veri kayıtları incelendi. Anestezi formlarında kayıt altına alınan parametreler yanı sıra, işlem sırası ve sonrasında  ortaya çıkan yan etkiler değerlendirildi.

Bulgular: Değerlendirme sonucunda; 1-75 yaş arası tüm olgularda Gözlemcinin

Uyanıklık/Sedasyon Değerlendirme Skalası (OAA/S):3 düzeyi hedeflenerek uygulanan MAB ile minör cerrahi girişimi (diş çekimi) gerçekleştirildi. İşlem sırasında %4 olguda döküntü, %3.2 olguda bulantı,  işlem sonrası %6.4 olguda bulantı, %7.2 olguda kusma  dışında yan etki veya komplikasyon saptanmadı.

Sonuç: İntravenöz anestezikler ile  MAB’ da   OAA/S:3 düzeyi sağlandığında  minör cerrahi girişimlerin (diş çekimi) güvenle gerçekleştirilebileceği düşüncesindeyiz.

Keywords

MAB, diş çekimi, anestezi, sedoanaljezi

References

• Akarslan ZZ, Erten H. Diş hekimliği korkusu ve kaygısı. Hacettepe Diş Hek Fak Derg 2009; 33: 62- 8.
• Beringer RM, Segar P, Pearson A, Greamspet M, Kilpatrick perioperative behavior changes in children having teeth extracted under general anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth 2014; 24: 499-504. OE, Hertz study of 3. Ogle MB. the dental patient. Dent Clin North Am 2012; 56: 1-16. Anxiety control in
• Schniering CA, Hudson JL, Rapee RM. Issues in the diagnosis and assessment of anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. Clin Psychol Rev 2000; 20: 453-78.
• Birch BR, Anson KM, Miller RA. Sedoanalgesia in urology: a safe, cost-effective alternative to general anaesthesia. A review of 1020 cases Br J Urol 1990; 66: 342-50.
• Morgan GE, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ, Larson CP: Clinical Anesthesiology. 3rd (ed), Mc Graw Hill, New York 2002. p.882-8.
• White PF, Freire AR: Ambulatory (Outpatient) anesthesia: Anesthesia. 6th ed Miller RD (ed). Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia 2005. p. 2589- 637.
• ASA. Position on monitored anesthesia care (Approved by the ASA House of House of Delegates on October 21, 1986,and last amended on URL:http://www.asahq.org/ Services/ standards/23.pdf Available publicationsAnd
• Novak LC. ASA updates its position on monitored anesthesia care. ASA Newsletter 62: 12, 1998. Available from URL: www.asahq.org/Newsletters/ 1998/12 _98/ASAupdates_1298.html
• Cavaliere F, Antonelli M, Arcangeli A, Conti G, Costa R, Pennisi MA, Proietti R. A low-dose remifentanil infusion is well tolerated for sedation in mechanically ventilated, critically-ill patients. Can J Anesth 2002; 49: 1088-94.
• Glass PS, Bloom M, Kearse L, Rosow C, Sebel P, Manberg P. Bispectral analysis measures sedation and memory effects of propofol, midazolam, isoflurane, and alfentanil in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 836-47.
• Nicolas E, Collado V, Faulks D, Bullier B, Hennequin M. A national cross-sectional survey of dental anxiety in the French adult population. BMC Oral Health 2007; 7: 12
• Gisler V, Bassetti R, Mericske-Stern R, Bayer S, Enkling N. A crosssectional analysis of the prevalence of dental anxiety and its relation to the oral health-related quality of life in patients with dental treatment needs at a university clinic in Switzerland. Gerodontology 2012; 29: 290-6.
• Ünlü G, Gülsün B. Pediatrik Diş Hekimliğinde Sedasyon. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 1996; 6: 108-14.
• Muğlalı M, Kömerik N. Ağız cerrahisi ve anksiyete. Cumhuriyet Ü Diş Hek Fak Derg 2005; 8: 83-8.
• Chanpong B, Haas DA, Locker D. Need and demand for sedation or general anesthesia in dentistry: a national survey of the Canadian population. Anesth Prog 2005; 52: 3-11.
• Saenz MC, Gomez LM, Goig MR, Cuesta US, Martim MI. Results of a major ambulatory oral surgery program using general inhalational anesthesia on disabled patients. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009; 14: 605-11.
• Enever GR, Nunn JH, Sheehan JK. A comparison of post-operative morbidity following outpatient dental care under general anaesthesia in paediatric patients with and without disabilities. Int J Paediatr Dent 2000; 10: 120-5.
• Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK. Hillier SC: Monitored anesthesia care. Clinical anesthesia. 3 rd ed. Philadelphia. Lippincott-Raven 1997. p. 1159- 71.
• Savoia G, Loreto M, Gravino E, Canfora G, Frangiosa A, Cortesano P, Russo F: Monitored anesthesia care and loco-regional anesthesia. Vascular surgery use. Minerva Anestesiol 2005; 71: 539-42.
• Xu J, Lei H. Ketamine-an update on its clinical uses and abuses. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2014; 20: 1015- 20.
• Gravino E, Griffo S, Gentile M, Storti M, Grossi N, Gily B: Comparison of two protocols of conscious analgosedation in video-assisted talc pleurodesis. Minerva Anestesiol 2005; 71: 157-65.
• Hernandez-Gancedo C, Pestana D, Pena N, Royo C, Perez-Chrzanowska H, Criado A: Monitoring sedation in critically ill patients: bispecteral index Ramsay and observer scales. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006; 23: 649-53.
• Nishiyama T, Yokoyama T, Hanaoka K: Sedation guidelines for midazolam infusion during combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 2004; 16: 568-72.
• Lau CE, Wang Y, Ma F: Pharmacokinetic- pharmacodynamic modeling of the coexistence of stimulatory and sedative components for midazolam. Eur J Pharmacol 1998; 346: 131-44.
• Lee JS, Jeon WC, Park EJ, Min YG, Kim GW, Jung YS, Choi SC. Does ondansetron have an effect on intramusculer ketamine-associated vomiting in children? A prospective, randomised, open, controlled study. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 2014; 50: 557-61.
• Harris EA, Lubarsky DA, Candiotti KA. Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) sedation: clinical utility of fospropofol. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2009; 5: 949-59.
• Gupta A, Wu CL, Elkassabany N, Krug CE, Parker SD, Fleisher LA. Does the routine prophylactic use of postdischarge nausea and vomiting following ambulatory surgery?: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology 2003; 99: 488-95. the incidence of
• Wathen JE, Roback MG, Mackenzie T, Bothner JP. Does midazolam alter the clinical effects of intravenous ketamine sedation in children? A double-blind, randomized, controlled, emergency department trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2000; 36: 579- 88.