ANALYZING CLINICAL RESEARCHES THAT EVALUATING EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTEMPORARY ADHESIVES ON NON-CARIOUS CERVICAL LESION RESTORATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Year 2015, Supplement 12, 104 - 116, 24.11.2015

Neslihan Tekçe Mustafa Demirci Safa Tuncer Merve Serim

https://doi.org/10.17567/dfd.85239

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to review the clinical assessment researches which reviewed by clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives at noncarious cervical lesions and also to analyze the clinical investigation methods, patient and restoration selection and evaluation criterias. 46 clinical researches which analyzed of effectiveness of adhesives on non-carious cervical lesions and also published on Pubmed between 2004-2014 years, were examinated. In the 46 studies that analyzed in this review were determined three-step etch and rinse adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives exhibited successful clinical effectiveness, whereas two-step etch and rinse adhesives effectiveness. Also, the contemporary all-in-one dentin bonding adhesives showed good clinical effectiveness as much as gold standard (Optibond FL and Clearfil SE Bond) dentin bonding agents. The number of restorations and patients was found very different from each other in every study. Also, the investigation methods that used in researches demonstrated variability and a standard protocol was not observed associated this

Keywords

Adhesive systems, systematic review, non-carious cervical lesions

GÜNÜMÜZ ADEZİVLERİNİN ÇÜRÜKSÜZ SERVİKAL LEZYON RESTORASYONLARINDAKİ ETKİNLİĞİNİN İNCELENMESİ: SİSTEMATİK DERLEME

Abstract

Bu derlemenin amacı, günümüz adeziv sistemlerin çürüksüz servikal lezyonlardaki etkinliğini inceleyen klinik değerlendirme çalışmalarını derlemek ve bu çalışmalarda uygulanan araştırma metotları, hasta ve restorasyon seçim kriterleri ile klinik değerlendirme kriterlerini incelemektir. 2004-2014 yılları arasında Pubmed’de yayınlanmış olan ve çürüksüz servikal lezyonlarda adezivlerin etkinliğini inceleyen 46 araştırma incelenmiştir. Bu derlemede incelenen 46 çalışmada, üç aşamalı ‘etch and rinse’ adeziv sistemler ile iki aşamalı ‘self etch’ adeziv sistemlerin kinik başarı oranlarının iki aşamalı ‘etch and rinse’ sistemlerden daha yüksek olduğu saptandı. Ayrıca, güncel ‘all-in-one’ dentin bonding ajanların, altın standart olarak kullanılan bonding ajanlar (üç aşamalı total-etch Optibond FL, iki aşamalı self-etch Clearfil SE Bond) kadar başarılı olduğu gösterilmiştir. İncelenen çalışmalarda, hasta ve restorasyon sayılarının çok farklı aralıklarda olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca çalışmalarda uygulanan araştırma yöntemlerinin her çalışmada değişkenlik gösterdiği ve bununla ilgili standart bir protokolün olmadığı gözlemlenmiştir.

Keywords

Adeziv sistemler, sistematik derleme, çürüksüz servikal lezyonlar

References

• Van Meerbeek B, Perdiagao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998;26:1-20.
• Manhart J, Chen HY, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore memorial lecture, Review of the clinical survival of direct ond indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 2004;29:481-508.
• Mjör IA, Gordan VV. Failure, repair, refurbishing and longevity of restorations. Oper Dent 2002;27:528-34.
• Mjör IA, Shen C, Eliasson ST, Richter S. Placement and replacement of restorations in general dental practice in Iceland. Oper Dent 2002;27:117-23.
• Mandras RS, Thurmond JW, Latta MA, Matranga LF, Kildee JM, Barkmeier WW. Three year clinical evaluation of the ClearŞl Liner Bond System. Oper Dent 1997;22:266-70.
• Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Hashimoto M, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Suzuki K. Technique-sensitivity of contemporary adhesives. Dent Mater J 2005;24:1- 13.
• Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28:215-35.
• Munck JD, Landuyt KV, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Meerbeek BV. A critical review of durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: Methods and results. J Dent Res 2005;84:118-32.
• Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 2005;21:864-81.
• Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayami Y, Okazaki M,Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suziki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 2004:83:454-8.
• Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Ende AV, Neves A, Munck JD. Relationship between bond strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater 2010;26:100-21.
• Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J, Heymann HO, Wilder AD Jr, Bayne SC, May KN Jr, Sturdevant JR, Roberson TM. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of a filled and unfilled dentin adhesive. J Dent 2001;29:1-6.
• Brackett MG, Dib A, Franco G, Estrada BE, Brackett WW. Two-year clinical performance of Clearfil SE and Clearfil S3 in restoration of unabraded non-carious class V lesions. Oper Dent 2010;35:273-8.
• Peumans M, Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts B. effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:512-8.
• Heymann HO, Bayne SC. Current concepts in dentin bonding: Focusing on dentinal adhesion factors. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:26-36.
• Reeves BC, Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Wells GA. Including non-randomized studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated Collaboration. 2011. The Cochrane
• Van Landuyt K, Fieuws S, Meerbeek BR. Sample size considerations for restoration-longevity randomized controlled trials. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:247.
• Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, Fieuws S, De Munck J, Cardoso MV, Ermis RB, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. A randomized controlled clinical trial of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions at 1 year. J Dent 2008;36:847-55.
• Gresnigt MM, Kalk W, Ozcan M. Randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial of direct laminate veneers with two micro-hybrid resin composites. J Dent 2012;40:766-75.
• Kubo S, Kawasaki K, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Five- year clinical evaluation of two adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 2006;34:97- 105.
• Council on dental materials, instruments and equipment. Revised American Dental Association acceptance program guidelines for dentin and enamel adhesive materials, January 1994.
• Van Dijken JWV. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions. Dent Mater 2000;16:285-91.
• van Dijken JW, Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K, Lindberg A. Clinical long-term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. A 13 years evaluation. Dent Mater 2007;23:1101-7.
• Ritter AV, Heymann HO, Swift EJ Jr, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD Jr. Clinical evaluation of an all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions with different degrees of dentin sclerosis. Oper Dent 2008;33:370-8.
• Türkün LS. The clinical performance of one- and two-step self-etching adhesive systems at one year. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:656-64.
• Türkün LS, Celik EU. Noncarious class V lesions restored with a polyacid modified resin composite and a nanocomposite: a two-year clinical trial. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:399-405.
• Tuncer D, Yazici AR, Özgünaltay G, Dayangac B. Clinical evaluation of different adhesives used in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: 24- month results. Aust Dent J 2013;58:94-100.
• Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, Mancl L. One-year clinical evaluation of an ethanol-based and a solvent-free dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 2004;17:451-6.
• van Dijken JW. Durability of three simplified adhesive systems in Class V non-carious cervical dentin lesions. Am J Dent 2004;17:27-32.
• Bittencourt DD, Ezecelevski IG, Reis A, Van Dijken JW, Loguercio AD. An 18-months' evaluation of self-etch and etch & rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. Acta Odontol Scand 2005;63:173- 8.
• Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, Mancl LA. A three- year clinical evaluation of two-bottle versus one- bottle adhesives. Assoc 2005;136:311-22. J Am Dent 34. Brackett WW, Brackett MG, Dib A, Franco clinical G, Estudillo performance of a self-etching primer in unprepared class V resin restorations. Oper Dent 2005;30:424- 9.
• Perdigão J, Carmo AR, Anauate-Netto C, Amore R, Lewgoy HR, Cordeiro HJ, Dutra-Corrêa M, Castilhos N. Clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive at 18 months. Am J Dent 2005;18:135-40.
• Meerbeek BV, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel. Dent Mater 2005;21:375-83.
• Abdalla AI, García-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of self-etch adhesives in Class V non-carious lesions. Am J Dent 2006;19:289-92.
• Saboia Vde P, Almeida PC, Rittet AV, Swift EJ Jr, Pimenta LA. 2-year Clinical evaluation of sodium hypochlorite treatment in the restoration of non- carious cervical lesions: a pilot study. Oper Dent 2006;31:530-5.
• Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems for the restoration of non- carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2007;32:11-5.
• Matis BA, Cochran MJ, Carlson TJ, Guba C, Eckert GJ. A three-year clinical evaluation of two dentin bonding agents. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135:451-7.
• van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non- carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater 2008;24:915- 22.
• Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. A clinical trial comparing two all-in-one adhesive systems used to restore non- carious cervical lesions: results at one year. Aust Dent J 2008;53:235-8.
• Reis A, Loguercio AD. A 36-month clinical evaluation of ethanol/water and acetone-based ‘etch-and-rinse’ adhesives in non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2009;34:384-91.
• Ritter AV, Swift EJ Jr, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD Jr. An eight-year clinical evaluation of filled and unfilled one-bottle dental adhesives. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140:28-37.
• Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Two- year clinical evaluation of one-step self-etch systems in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent
• Kim SY, Lee KW, Seong SR, Lee MA, Lee IB, Son HH, Kim HY, Oh MH, Cho BH. Two-year clinical effectiveness of adhesives and retention form on resin composite restorations of non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2009;34:507-15.
• Loguercio AD, Mânica D, Ferneda F, Zander- Grande C, Amaral R, Stanislawczuk R, de Carvalho RM, Manso A, Reis A. A randomized clinical evaluation of a one- and two-step self-etch adhesive over 24 months. Oper Dent 2010;35:265- 72.
• Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater 2010;26:1176-84.
• Santiago SL, Passos VF, Vieira AH, Navarro MF, Lauris JR, Franco EB. Two-year clinical evaluation of resinous restorative systems in non-carious cervical lesions. Braz Dent J 2010;21:229-34.
• Van Dijken JW. A prospective 8-year evaluation of a mild two-step self-etching adhesive and a heavily filled two-step ‘etch-and-rinse’ system in non- carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater 2010;26:940- 6.
• Burrow MF. Clinical evaluation of non-carious cervical lesion restorations using a HEMA-free adhesive: J 2011;56:401-5. results. Aust Dent
• Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, De Munck J, Cardoso MV, Ermis B, Van MeerbeekB. Three-year clinical performance of a HEMA-free one-step self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. Eur J Oral Sci 2011;119:511-6.
• Fron H, Vergnes JN, Moussally C, Cazier S, Simon AL, Chieze JB, Savard G, Tirlet G, Attal JP. Effectiveness of a new one-step self-etch adhesive in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: 2-year results of a randomized controlled practice- based study. Dent Mater 2011;27:304-12.
• Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Clinical investigation of G- Bond resin-based adhesive to non-carious cervical lesions over five years. Aust Dent J 2012;57:458- 63.
• Van Dijken JWV. Pallesen U. A 7-year randomized prospective study of a one-step self-etching adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. The effect of curing modes and restorative material. J Dent 2012;40:1060-7.
• Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Comparison of two all-in-one adhesives bonded to non-carious cervical lesions-- results at 3 years. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:1089- 94.
• Perdigão J, Dutra-Corrêa M, Saraceni SH, Ciaramicoli MT, Kiyan VH. Randomized clinical trial of two resin-modified glass ionomer materials: 1- year results. Oper Dent 2012;37:591-601.
• Söderholm KJ, Ottenga M, Nimmo S. Four-year clinical evaluation of two self-etching dentin adhesives of different pH values used to restore non-retentive cervical lesions. Am J Dent 2013; 26:28-32.
• Dutra-Correa M, Saraceni CH, Ciaramicoli MT, Kiyan VH, Queiroz CS. Effect of chlorhexidine on the 18-month clinical adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2013;15:287-92. performance of two
• Moosavi H, Kimyai S, Forghani M, Khodadadi R. The clinical effectiveness of various adhesive systems: an 18-month evaluation. Oper Dent 2013; 38:134-41.
• Da Costa TR, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Effect of enamel bevel on the clinical performance of resin composite restorations placed in non-carious cervical lesions. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013;25:346- 56.
• Can Say E, Ozel E, Yurdagüven H, Soyman M. Three-year clinical evaluation of a two-step self- etch adhesive with or without selective enamel etching in non-carious cervical sclerotic lesions. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:1427-33.
• Zander-Grande C, Amaral RC, Loguercio AD, Barroso LP, Reis A. Clinical performance of one- step self-etch adhesives applied actively in cervical lesions: 24-month clinical trial. Oper Dent 2014; 39:228-38.
• Preussker S, Pöschmann M, Kensche A, Natusch I, Koch R, Klimm W, Hannig C. Three-year prospective clinical performance of a one-step self- etch adhesive and a nanofiller hybrid resin composite in Class V lesions. Am J Dent 2014;27:73-8.
• Torres RGC, Barcellos DC, Batista GR, Pucci CR, Antunes MJ, de La Cruz DB, Borges AB. Five-year clinical performance of the dentine deproteinization technique in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent.
• Kurokawa H, Miyazaki M, Takamizawa T, Rikuta A, Tsubota K, Uekusa S. One-year clinical evaluation of five single-step self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater J 2007; 26: 14-20.
• Hayashi M, Tsuchitani Y, Kawamura Y, Miura M, Takeshige F, Ebisu S. Eight year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 2000;25:473-81.
• Mjor IA. Clinical diagnosis of recurrent caries. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:1426-33.
• Hayashi M, Wilson NH. Failure risk of posterior composites with post-operative sensitivity. Oper Dent 2003;28:681-8.
• Heintze S. Systematic Reviews: I. The correlation between laboratory tests on marginal quality and bond strength. II. The correlation between marginal quality and clinical outcome. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:77-106.
• Brunthaler A, König F, Lucas T, Sperr W, Schedle A. Longevity of direct resin composite restoration in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig 2003;7:63-70.
• Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Dent Mater 2007;23:2-8.
• Ülker E, Tuncdemir T, Erkan Aİ, Malkoc MA, Cobanoglu N. İki self-etch bonding sistemin biyouyumluluklarının ve bağlanma dayanımlarının değerlendirilmesi. Atatürk Üni Diş Hek Fak Derg 2014;24:44-9.
• Loguercio AD, Lorini E, Weiss RV, Tori AP, Picinatto CC, Ribeiro NR, Reis A. A 12-month clinical evaluation of composite resins in class III restorations. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:57-64.
• Yuan Y, Shimada Y, Ichinose S, Tagami J. Effect of dentin depth on hybridization quality using different bonding tactics in vivo. J Dent 2007;35:664-72.
• Mine A, De Munck J, Cardoso MV, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Kuboki T, Yoshida Y, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding effectiveness of two contemporary self-etch adhesives to enamel and dentin. J Dent 2009;37:872-3.