AĞIZ VE ÇENE CERRAHİSİNDE PERİOSTEUMUN GREFT OLARAK KULLANIMI:  LİTERATÜR DERLEMESİ

Year 2016, Supplement 16, 137 - 140, 24.11.2016

Hızır İlyas Köse , Bora Özden

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.290610

Abstract

Ağız ve
çene cerrahisinde sert doku kayıplarının ona- rılmasında birçok materyal
kullanılmaktadır. Kemik greftleri bu materyallerin başında gelmekte olup, oto- jen,
allojen, ksenojen veya alloplastik olarak sınıflan- dırılırlar. Kemik
greftlerinin osteokondüktif, osteojenik veya osteoindüktif özellikleri, bu
materyallerin kulla- nılmasında ve iyileşme paterninde belirleyicidir.

Periosteum;
travma, tümör ve lenfosit mitojenlerin etkisiyle çoğalabilmek için uyarılabilme
yetisine sahip osteoprogenitör hücreler ihtiva eden, bir kemik örtüsü olarak
tanımlanabilir. Yapılan birçok çalışmada perios- teumun progenitör hücreleri
sayesinde kıkırdak ve kemik rejenerasyonuna katkı sağladığı gösterilmiştir.

Bu derleme
çalışmasında, periosteal greftlerin osteojenik kapasitelerinin literatür
ışığında açıklanması amaçlanmıştır.

Anahtar kelimeler: Kemik grefti,  periosteum  kritik boyutlu defekti

THE USAGE OF PERIOSTEUM AS
A GRAFT MATERIAL IN ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY: LITERATURE REVIEW 

ABSTRACT

In maxillofacial
surgery, many graft materials have been used for the treatment of bony defects.
Bone grafts are the main graft materials and they are classified as autogenous,
allogeneic, xenogenic or alloplastic. The osteoconductive, osteogenic and
osteoinductive properties of bone grafts determines the pattern of healing
process and the utilization of the material.

Periosteum
can be defined as a bony cover that has osteoprogenitor cells with an ability
of proliferation by trauma, tumor and lymphocyte mitogens. Most studies have
shown periosteum promotes the bone and cartilage tissue regeneration.

The aim of this
review is the investigation of osteogenic capacity of periosteal grafts in
literature.

Keywords: Bone graft; periosteum; critcal size defect

Keywords

Kemik grefti

References

• 1. Aaboe M, Pinholt EM, Hjorting-Hansen E. Healing of Experimentally Cretaed Defects: A review. British J O MaxilloFac Surg 1995;33:312-8.
• 2. Develioğlu H. Krı̇tı̇k Boyutlu ve Krı̇tı̇k Boyutlu Olmayan Defektler. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2003; 6:60-4.
• 3. Trotta DR, Gorny C Jr, Zielak JC, Gonzaga CG, Giovanini AF, Deliberador TM. Bone Repair of Critical Size Defects Treated With Mussel Powder Associated or not With Bovine Bone Graft: Histologic and Histomorphometric Study in Rat Calvaria. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surg 2013;1:1-6.
• 4. Wang HL, Greenwell H, Fiorellini J. The Research, Science and Therapy Committe. Periodontal regeneration. Journal of Periodontology 2005;76:1601-22.
• 5. Mish CM. Comparison of Intraoral Donor Sites for Onlay Grafting Prior to Implant Placement. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 1997;12:767-76.
• 6. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. Bayram B, Çubuk S, Güven MA, Pektaş ZÖ, Uçkan S. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2012;22: 52-6.
• 7. Clavero J, Lundgren S. Ramus or Chin Grafts for Maxillary Sinus Inlay and Local Onlay Augmentation: Comparison of Donor Site Morbidity and Complications. Clinical Implant Dentistry Related Research 2003;5:154–60.
• 8. Malizos K.N, Papatheodorou L.K. The Healing Potential of The Periosteum Molecular Aspects. Int. J. Care Injured 2005;36:13-9.
• 9. Asaumi K, Nakanishi T, Asahara H, Inoue H, Takigawa M. Expression of Neurotrophins and Their Receptors (TRK) During Fracture Healing. Bone 2000;26:625-33.
• 10. Fang J, Hall BK. Chondrogenic Cell Differentiation From Membrane Bone Periostea. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1997;196:349-62.
• 20. Reynders P, Becker JH, Broos P. Osteogenic Ability of Free Periosteal Autografts in Tibial Fractures with Severe Soft Tissue Damage: An Experimental Study. J Orthop Trauma 1999;13:121-8.
• 21. Ueno T, Kagawa T, Mizukawa N, Nakamura H, Sugahara H, Yamamoto T. Cellular Origin of Endochondral Ossification From Grafted Periosteum. The Anatomıcal Record 2001;264:348–57.
• 22. Dailiana ZH, Shiamishis G, Niokou D, Ioachim E, Malizos KN. Heterotopic Neo-osteogenesis from Vascularized Periosteum and Bone Grafts. The Journal of TRAUMA, Injury, Infection, and Critical Care 2002;934-8.
• 23. Ueno T, Kagawa T, Kanou M, Shirasu N, Sawaki M, Imura H, Hirata A, Yamachika E, Mizukawa N, Sugahara T. Evaluation of Osteogenic Potential of Cultured Periosteum Derived Cells -Preliminary Animal Study. J Hard Tissue Biology 2007;16:50-3.
• 24. Ueno T, Honda K, Hirata A, Kagawa T, Kanou M, Shirasu N, Sawaki M, Yamachika E, Mizukawa N, Sugahara T. Histological Comparison of Bone Induced from Autogenously Grafted Periosteum with Bone Induced from Autogenously Grafted Bone Marrow in The Rat Calvarial Defect Model. Acta histochemica 2008;110: 217-23.
• 25. Bigham-Sadegh A, Oryan A, Mirshokraei P, Shadkhast M, Basiri E. Bone Tissue Engineering with Periosteal-free Graft and Pedicle Omentum. ANZ J Surg 2013;83: 255-61.
• 26. Gemalmaz HC, Bolukbasi S, Esen E, Erdogan D, Gürgen SG, Bardakci Y. Periosteal Adventitia is a Valuable Bone Graft Alternative. Int J Artif Organs 2013;36(5):341-9.
• 27. Kanou M, Ueno T, Kagawa T, Fujii T, Sakata Y, Ishida N, Fukunaga J, Sugahara T. Osteogenic Potential of Primed Periosteum Graft in the Rat Calvarial Model. Ann Plast Surg 2005;54:71–8