Review
BibTex RIS Cite

PORSELEN LAMİNATE VENEERLER

Year 2016, Supplement 16, 170 - 183, 24.11.2016
https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.290734

Abstract

Hastaların
kaybolan estetik görüntülerinin yeniden kazandırılmasında dental estetik önemli
bir yer tutmaktadır. Bu amaçla günden güne bir çok gereç ve yöntem
üretilmektedir. Mevcut diş yapısının mümkün olduğunca korunduğu estetik
restorasyonlar diş hekimleri tarafından daha çok tercih edilmektedir. Bu
restorasyonlardan biri olan porselen laminate veneer restorasyonlar, diş
anomalilerini düzeltebilmek ve diş renklenmelerini maskeleyebilmek amacıyla
sıklıkla kullanılmaktadır. Bu restorasyonların uzun süre ağızda başarılı bir
şekilde kullanılmasında; laminate veneer yapımında kullanılan madde çeşidi,
preparasyon şekli, simantasyon prosedürü ve hasta alışkanlıkları önemlidir. Bu
nedenle uygun endikasyonun konulması ve klinikte ve laboratuarda hassas çalışma
laminate veneerlerde anahtar rol oynamaktadır. Bu literatür derlemesinin amacı;
porselen laminate veneerler konusunda geniş ve güncel çalışmaları sunmak ve
laminate veneerlerde madde çeşidi, preparasyon, simantasyon ve başarı oranı
hakkında bilgi vermektir.



Anahtar Kelimeler: Dental estetik,  dental laminat, seramikler 



PORCELAIN LAMINATE
VENEERS

ABSTRACT

 

Dental
esthetic is an important topic to re-establish patients’ lost esthetic
appearance. For this aim, new materials and methods have been improved day by
day. Esthetic restorations which prevent much more residual tooth structure
have been preferred by the dentists. Porcelain laminate veneers which are one
of these restorations are used to correct tooth abnormalities and to mask tooth
discolorations. Material type of laminate veneer restoration, preparation,
cementation, and patient related habits are important for the long-term
successful using of these restorations in the oral cavity. Thus, appropriate
indication and presicion laboratory and clinical work are crucial factors for
laminate veneers. The aim of this literature review is to summarize
comprehensive and current studies on this field and to give information about
material type, preparation, cementation, and success rate of laminate veneers.







Key
words:

Ceramics; dental esthetics; dental laminate

References

  • 1. Aboushelib MN, Elmahy WA, Ghazy MH. Internal adaptation, marginal accuracy and microleakage of a pressable versus a machinable ceramic laminate veneers. J Dent 2012;40:670-7.
  • 2. Pini NP, Aguiar FH, Lima DA, Lovadino JR, Terada RS, Pascotto RC. Advances in dental veneers: materials, applications, and techniques. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2012;4:9-16.
  • 3. Batalocco G, Lee H, Ercoli C, Feng C, Malmstrom H. Fracture resistance of composite resin restorations and porcelain veneers in relation to residual tooth structure in fractured incisors. Dent Traumatol 2012;28:75-80.
  • 4. Wakiaga J, Brunton P, Silikas N, Glenny AM. Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2004(1):CD004347.
  • 5. Gresnigt MM, Ozcan M. Fracture strength of direct versus indirect laminates with and without fiber application at the cementation interface. Dent Mater 2007;23:927-33.
  • 6. Hussain SK, McDonald A, Moles DR. In vitro study investigating the mass of tooth structure removed following endodontic and restorative procedures. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:260-9.
  • 7. Schmidt KK, Chiayabutr Y, Phillips KM, Kois JC. Influence of preparation design and existing condition of tooth structure on load to failure of ceramic laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105:374-82.
  • 8. Friedman MJ. A 15-year review of porcelain veneer failure--a clinician's observations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998;19:625-8.
  • 9. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:503-9.
  • 10. Atsu SS, Aka PS, Kucukesmen HC, Kilicarslan MA, Atakan C. Age-related changes in tooth enamel as measured by electron microscopy: implications for porcelain laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:336-41.
  • HE. Minimally invasive porcelain veneers: indications for a conservative esthetic dentistry treatment modality. Gen Dent 2007;55:686-94.
  • 22. Beier US, Kapferer I, Burtscher D, Dumfahrt H. Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers for up to 20 years. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:79-85.
  • 23. D'Arcangelo C, De Angelis F, Vadini M, D'Amario M. Clinical evaluation on porcelain laminate veneers bonded with light-cured composite: results up to 7 years. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:1071-9.
  • 24. Della Bona A, Kelly JR. The clinical success of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:8S-13S.
  • 25. McLaren EA, Whiteman YY. Ceramics: rationale for material selection. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2010;31:666-8.
  • 26. McLaren EA, LeSage B. Feldspathic veneers: what are their indications? Compend Contin Educ Dent 2011;32:44-9.
  • 27. Alghazzawi TF, Lemons J, Liu PR, Essig ME, Janowski GM. The failure load of CAD/CAM generated zirconia and glass-ceramic laminate veneers with different preparation designs. J Prosthet Dent 2012;108:386-93.
  • 28. Chen S, Wei YJ, Chen MM, Zhang ZT. Bilateral treatment: a strategy for enhancing the mechanical strength of machinable veneers. Dent Mater 2010;26:961-7.
  • 29. Layton D, Walton T. An up to 16-year prospective study of 304 porcelain veneers. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:389-96.
  • 30. Giordano R, McLaren EA. Ceramics overview: classification by microstructure and processing methods. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2010;31:682-4
  • 41. Lin TM, Liu PR, Ramp LC, Essig ME, Givan DA, Pan YH. Fracture resistance and marginal discrepancy of porcelain laminate veneers influenced by preparation design and restorative material in vitro. J Dent 2012;40:202-9.
  • 42. Bagis B, Turgut S. Optical properties of current ceramics systems for laminate veneers. J Dent 2013;41:e24-30.
  • 43. Magne P, Douglas WH. Design optimization and evolution of bonded ceramics for the anterior dentition: a finite-element analysis. Quintessence Int 1999;30:661-72.
  • 44. Calamia JR, Calamia CS. Porcelain laminate veneers: reasons for 25 years of success. Dent Clin North Am 2007;51:399-417.
  • 45. Dhawan P, Prakash H, Shah N. Clinical and scanning electron microscopic assessments of porcelain and ceromer resin veneers. Indian J Dent Res 2003;14:264-78.
  • 46. Fradeani M, Redemagni M, Corrado M. Porcelain laminate veneers: 6- to 12-year clinical evaluation--a retrospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005;25:9-17.
  • 47. Hahn P, Gustav M, Hellwig E. An in vitro assessment of the strength of porcelain veneers dependent on tooth preparation. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:1024-9.
  • 48. Park DJ, Yang JH, Lee JB, Kim SH, Han JS. Esthetic improvement in the patient with one missing maxillary central incisor restored with porcelain laminate veneers. J Adv Prosthodont 2010;2:77-80.
  • 49. Gresnigt M, Ozcan M, Kalk W. Esthetic rehabilitation of worn anterior teeth with thin porcelain laminate veneers. J Eur Esthet Dent 2011;6:298-313.
  • 50. Rotoli BT, Lima DA, Pini NP, Aguiar FH, Pereira GD, Paulillo LA. Porcelain veneers as an alternative for esthetic treatment: clinical report. Oper Dent 2013;38:459-66.
  • 61. Iseri U, Oztoprak MO, Ozkurt Z, Kazazoglu E, Arun T. Effect of Er:YAG laser on debonding strength of laminate veneers. Eur J Dent 2014;8:58-62.
  • 62. Aykor A, Ozel E. Five-year clinical evaluation of 300 teeth restored with porcelain laminate veneers using total-etch and a modified self-etch adhesive system. Oper Dent 2009;34:516-23.
  • 63. Dundar B, Guzel KG. An analysis of the shear strength of the bond between enamel and porcelain laminate veneers with different etching systems: acid and Er,Cr:YSGG laser separately and combined. Lasers Med Sci 2011;26:777-82.
  • 64. Piemjai M, Watanabe A, Iwasaki Y, Nakabayashi N. Effect of remaining demineralised dentine on dental microleakage accessed by a dye penetration: how to inhibit microleakage? J Dent 2004;32:495-501.
  • 65. Piemjai M, Arksornnukit M. Compressive fracture resistance of porcelain laminates bonded to enamel or dentin with four adhesive systems. J Prosthodont 2007;16:457-64.
  • 66. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34:849-53.
  • 67. Chimello-Sousa DT, de Souza AE, Chinelatti MA, Pecora JD, Palma-Dibb RG, Milori Corona SA. Influence of Er:YAG laser irradiation distance on the bond strength of a restorative system to enamel. J Dent 2006;34:245-51.
  • 68. Piemjai M, Miyasaka K, Iwasaki Y, Nakabayashi N. Comparison of microleakage of three acid-base luting cements versus one resin-bonded cement for Class V direct composite inlays. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:598-603.
  • 69. Perdigao J, Carmo AR, Anauate-Netto C, Amore R, Lewgoy HR, Cordeiro HJ, et al. Clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive at 18 months. Am J Dent 2005;18:135-40.
  • 70. Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Self-adhesive resin cements: a literature review. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:251-8
  • Sundfeld Neto D. Considerations about enamel microabrasion after 18 years. Am J Dent 2007;20:67-72.
  • 82. Pontes DG, Correa KM, Cohen-Carneiro F. Re-establishing esthetics of fluorosis-stained teeth using enamel microabrasion and dental bleaching techniques. J Esthet Restor Dent 2012;7:130-7.
  • 83. Martinez-Insua A, Da Silva Dominguez L, Rivera FG, Santana-Penin UA. Differences in bonding to acid-etched or Er:YAG-laser-treated enamel and dentin surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:280-8.
  • 84. Usumez S, Orhan M, Usumez A. Laser etching of enamel for direct bonding with an Er,Cr:YSGG hydrokinetic laser system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:649-56.
  • 85. Addison O, Marquis PM, Fleming GJ. The impact of modifying alumina air abrasion parameters on the fracture strength of a porcelain laminate restorative material. Dent Mater 2007;23:1332-41.
  • 86. Addison O, Marquis PM, Fleming GJ. The impact of hydrofluoric acid surface treatments on the performance of a porcelain laminate restorative material. Dent Mater 2007;23:461-8.
  • 87. Moraes RR, Correr-Sobrinho L, Sinhoreti MA, Puppin-Rontani RM, Ogliari FA, Piva E. Light-activation of resin cement through ceramic: relationship between irradiance intensity and bond strength to dentin. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;85:160-5.
  • 88. da Cunha LF, Pedroche LO, Gonzaga CC, Furuse AY. Esthetic, occlusal, and periodontal rehabilitation of anterior teeth with minimum thickness porcelain laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1315-8.
  • 89. Runnacles P, Correr GM, Baratto Filho F, Gonzaga CC, Furuse AY. Degree of conversion of a resin cement light-cured through ceramic veneers of different thicknesses and types. Braz Dent J 2014;25:38-42.
  • 90. Kilinc E, Antonson SA, Hardigan PC, Kesercioglu A. Resin cement color stability and its influence on the final shade of all-ceramics. J Dent 2011;39:e30-6.
  • 101. Grannel-Ruiz M, Fons-Font A, Labaig-Rueda C, Martinez-Gonzalez A, Roman-Rodruigez JL, Sola-Ruiz FM. A clinical longitudinal study 323 porcelain laminate veneers. Period of study from 3 to 11 years. Med Oral Patol Cir Buccal 2010;15:531-7.
  • 102. Meijering AC, Creugers NH, Mulder J, Roeters FJ. Treatment times for three different types of veneer restorations. J Dent1995;23:21-6.
  • 103. Gresnigt MM, Kalk W, Ozcan M. Randomized clinical trial of indirect resin composite and ceramic veneers: up to 3-year follow-up. J Adhes Dent 2013;15:181-90.
  • 104. Farhan D, Sukumar S, von Stein-Lausnitz A, Aarabi G, Alawneh A, Reissmann DR. Masking ability of bi- and tri- laminate all-ceramic veneers on tooth-colored ceramic discs. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014;26:232-9.
  • 105. Granell-Ruiz M, Agustin-Panadero R, Fons-Font A, Roman-Rodriguez JL, Sola-Ruiz MF. Influence of bruxism on survival of porcelain laminate veneers. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2014;19:e426-32.
  • 106. Murphy E, Ziada HM, Allen PF. Retrospective study on the performance of porcelain laminate veneers delivered by undergraduate dental students. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2005;13:38-43.
  • 107. Köroğlu A, Ekren O, Kurtoğlu C. Geleneksel ve adeziv dental simanlar hakkinda bir derleme çalişmasi. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2012;22:205-16.
  • 108. Guess PC, Stappert CF. Midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical investigation of extended ceramic veneers. Dent Mater 2008;24:804-13.
  • 109. Cotert HS, Dundar M, Ozturk B. The effect of various preparation designs on the survival of porcelain laminate veneers. J Adhes Dent 2009;11:405-11.
  • 110. Alhekeir DF, Al-Sarhan RA, Al Mashaan AF. Porcelain laminate veneers: Clinical survey for evaluation of failure. Saudi Dent J 2014;26:63-7.
Year 2016, Supplement 16, 170 - 183, 24.11.2016
https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.290734

Abstract

References

  • 1. Aboushelib MN, Elmahy WA, Ghazy MH. Internal adaptation, marginal accuracy and microleakage of a pressable versus a machinable ceramic laminate veneers. J Dent 2012;40:670-7.
  • 2. Pini NP, Aguiar FH, Lima DA, Lovadino JR, Terada RS, Pascotto RC. Advances in dental veneers: materials, applications, and techniques. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2012;4:9-16.
  • 3. Batalocco G, Lee H, Ercoli C, Feng C, Malmstrom H. Fracture resistance of composite resin restorations and porcelain veneers in relation to residual tooth structure in fractured incisors. Dent Traumatol 2012;28:75-80.
  • 4. Wakiaga J, Brunton P, Silikas N, Glenny AM. Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2004(1):CD004347.
  • 5. Gresnigt MM, Ozcan M. Fracture strength of direct versus indirect laminates with and without fiber application at the cementation interface. Dent Mater 2007;23:927-33.
  • 6. Hussain SK, McDonald A, Moles DR. In vitro study investigating the mass of tooth structure removed following endodontic and restorative procedures. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:260-9.
  • 7. Schmidt KK, Chiayabutr Y, Phillips KM, Kois JC. Influence of preparation design and existing condition of tooth structure on load to failure of ceramic laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105:374-82.
  • 8. Friedman MJ. A 15-year review of porcelain veneer failure--a clinician's observations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998;19:625-8.
  • 9. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:503-9.
  • 10. Atsu SS, Aka PS, Kucukesmen HC, Kilicarslan MA, Atakan C. Age-related changes in tooth enamel as measured by electron microscopy: implications for porcelain laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:336-41.
  • HE. Minimally invasive porcelain veneers: indications for a conservative esthetic dentistry treatment modality. Gen Dent 2007;55:686-94.
  • 22. Beier US, Kapferer I, Burtscher D, Dumfahrt H. Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers for up to 20 years. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:79-85.
  • 23. D'Arcangelo C, De Angelis F, Vadini M, D'Amario M. Clinical evaluation on porcelain laminate veneers bonded with light-cured composite: results up to 7 years. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:1071-9.
  • 24. Della Bona A, Kelly JR. The clinical success of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:8S-13S.
  • 25. McLaren EA, Whiteman YY. Ceramics: rationale for material selection. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2010;31:666-8.
  • 26. McLaren EA, LeSage B. Feldspathic veneers: what are their indications? Compend Contin Educ Dent 2011;32:44-9.
  • 27. Alghazzawi TF, Lemons J, Liu PR, Essig ME, Janowski GM. The failure load of CAD/CAM generated zirconia and glass-ceramic laminate veneers with different preparation designs. J Prosthet Dent 2012;108:386-93.
  • 28. Chen S, Wei YJ, Chen MM, Zhang ZT. Bilateral treatment: a strategy for enhancing the mechanical strength of machinable veneers. Dent Mater 2010;26:961-7.
  • 29. Layton D, Walton T. An up to 16-year prospective study of 304 porcelain veneers. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:389-96.
  • 30. Giordano R, McLaren EA. Ceramics overview: classification by microstructure and processing methods. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2010;31:682-4
  • 41. Lin TM, Liu PR, Ramp LC, Essig ME, Givan DA, Pan YH. Fracture resistance and marginal discrepancy of porcelain laminate veneers influenced by preparation design and restorative material in vitro. J Dent 2012;40:202-9.
  • 42. Bagis B, Turgut S. Optical properties of current ceramics systems for laminate veneers. J Dent 2013;41:e24-30.
  • 43. Magne P, Douglas WH. Design optimization and evolution of bonded ceramics for the anterior dentition: a finite-element analysis. Quintessence Int 1999;30:661-72.
  • 44. Calamia JR, Calamia CS. Porcelain laminate veneers: reasons for 25 years of success. Dent Clin North Am 2007;51:399-417.
  • 45. Dhawan P, Prakash H, Shah N. Clinical and scanning electron microscopic assessments of porcelain and ceromer resin veneers. Indian J Dent Res 2003;14:264-78.
  • 46. Fradeani M, Redemagni M, Corrado M. Porcelain laminate veneers: 6- to 12-year clinical evaluation--a retrospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005;25:9-17.
  • 47. Hahn P, Gustav M, Hellwig E. An in vitro assessment of the strength of porcelain veneers dependent on tooth preparation. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:1024-9.
  • 48. Park DJ, Yang JH, Lee JB, Kim SH, Han JS. Esthetic improvement in the patient with one missing maxillary central incisor restored with porcelain laminate veneers. J Adv Prosthodont 2010;2:77-80.
  • 49. Gresnigt M, Ozcan M, Kalk W. Esthetic rehabilitation of worn anterior teeth with thin porcelain laminate veneers. J Eur Esthet Dent 2011;6:298-313.
  • 50. Rotoli BT, Lima DA, Pini NP, Aguiar FH, Pereira GD, Paulillo LA. Porcelain veneers as an alternative for esthetic treatment: clinical report. Oper Dent 2013;38:459-66.
  • 61. Iseri U, Oztoprak MO, Ozkurt Z, Kazazoglu E, Arun T. Effect of Er:YAG laser on debonding strength of laminate veneers. Eur J Dent 2014;8:58-62.
  • 62. Aykor A, Ozel E. Five-year clinical evaluation of 300 teeth restored with porcelain laminate veneers using total-etch and a modified self-etch adhesive system. Oper Dent 2009;34:516-23.
  • 63. Dundar B, Guzel KG. An analysis of the shear strength of the bond between enamel and porcelain laminate veneers with different etching systems: acid and Er,Cr:YSGG laser separately and combined. Lasers Med Sci 2011;26:777-82.
  • 64. Piemjai M, Watanabe A, Iwasaki Y, Nakabayashi N. Effect of remaining demineralised dentine on dental microleakage accessed by a dye penetration: how to inhibit microleakage? J Dent 2004;32:495-501.
  • 65. Piemjai M, Arksornnukit M. Compressive fracture resistance of porcelain laminates bonded to enamel or dentin with four adhesive systems. J Prosthodont 2007;16:457-64.
  • 66. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34:849-53.
  • 67. Chimello-Sousa DT, de Souza AE, Chinelatti MA, Pecora JD, Palma-Dibb RG, Milori Corona SA. Influence of Er:YAG laser irradiation distance on the bond strength of a restorative system to enamel. J Dent 2006;34:245-51.
  • 68. Piemjai M, Miyasaka K, Iwasaki Y, Nakabayashi N. Comparison of microleakage of three acid-base luting cements versus one resin-bonded cement for Class V direct composite inlays. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:598-603.
  • 69. Perdigao J, Carmo AR, Anauate-Netto C, Amore R, Lewgoy HR, Cordeiro HJ, et al. Clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive at 18 months. Am J Dent 2005;18:135-40.
  • 70. Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Self-adhesive resin cements: a literature review. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:251-8
  • Sundfeld Neto D. Considerations about enamel microabrasion after 18 years. Am J Dent 2007;20:67-72.
  • 82. Pontes DG, Correa KM, Cohen-Carneiro F. Re-establishing esthetics of fluorosis-stained teeth using enamel microabrasion and dental bleaching techniques. J Esthet Restor Dent 2012;7:130-7.
  • 83. Martinez-Insua A, Da Silva Dominguez L, Rivera FG, Santana-Penin UA. Differences in bonding to acid-etched or Er:YAG-laser-treated enamel and dentin surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:280-8.
  • 84. Usumez S, Orhan M, Usumez A. Laser etching of enamel for direct bonding with an Er,Cr:YSGG hydrokinetic laser system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:649-56.
  • 85. Addison O, Marquis PM, Fleming GJ. The impact of modifying alumina air abrasion parameters on the fracture strength of a porcelain laminate restorative material. Dent Mater 2007;23:1332-41.
  • 86. Addison O, Marquis PM, Fleming GJ. The impact of hydrofluoric acid surface treatments on the performance of a porcelain laminate restorative material. Dent Mater 2007;23:461-8.
  • 87. Moraes RR, Correr-Sobrinho L, Sinhoreti MA, Puppin-Rontani RM, Ogliari FA, Piva E. Light-activation of resin cement through ceramic: relationship between irradiance intensity and bond strength to dentin. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;85:160-5.
  • 88. da Cunha LF, Pedroche LO, Gonzaga CC, Furuse AY. Esthetic, occlusal, and periodontal rehabilitation of anterior teeth with minimum thickness porcelain laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1315-8.
  • 89. Runnacles P, Correr GM, Baratto Filho F, Gonzaga CC, Furuse AY. Degree of conversion of a resin cement light-cured through ceramic veneers of different thicknesses and types. Braz Dent J 2014;25:38-42.
  • 90. Kilinc E, Antonson SA, Hardigan PC, Kesercioglu A. Resin cement color stability and its influence on the final shade of all-ceramics. J Dent 2011;39:e30-6.
  • 101. Grannel-Ruiz M, Fons-Font A, Labaig-Rueda C, Martinez-Gonzalez A, Roman-Rodruigez JL, Sola-Ruiz FM. A clinical longitudinal study 323 porcelain laminate veneers. Period of study from 3 to 11 years. Med Oral Patol Cir Buccal 2010;15:531-7.
  • 102. Meijering AC, Creugers NH, Mulder J, Roeters FJ. Treatment times for three different types of veneer restorations. J Dent1995;23:21-6.
  • 103. Gresnigt MM, Kalk W, Ozcan M. Randomized clinical trial of indirect resin composite and ceramic veneers: up to 3-year follow-up. J Adhes Dent 2013;15:181-90.
  • 104. Farhan D, Sukumar S, von Stein-Lausnitz A, Aarabi G, Alawneh A, Reissmann DR. Masking ability of bi- and tri- laminate all-ceramic veneers on tooth-colored ceramic discs. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014;26:232-9.
  • 105. Granell-Ruiz M, Agustin-Panadero R, Fons-Font A, Roman-Rodriguez JL, Sola-Ruiz MF. Influence of bruxism on survival of porcelain laminate veneers. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2014;19:e426-32.
  • 106. Murphy E, Ziada HM, Allen PF. Retrospective study on the performance of porcelain laminate veneers delivered by undergraduate dental students. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2005;13:38-43.
  • 107. Köroğlu A, Ekren O, Kurtoğlu C. Geleneksel ve adeziv dental simanlar hakkinda bir derleme çalişmasi. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2012;22:205-16.
  • 108. Guess PC, Stappert CF. Midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical investigation of extended ceramic veneers. Dent Mater 2008;24:804-13.
  • 109. Cotert HS, Dundar M, Ozturk B. The effect of various preparation designs on the survival of porcelain laminate veneers. J Adhes Dent 2009;11:405-11.
  • 110. Alhekeir DF, Al-Sarhan RA, Al Mashaan AF. Porcelain laminate veneers: Clinical survey for evaluation of failure. Saudi Dent J 2014;26:63-7.
There are 60 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Hamit Fatih Erkun This is me

Merve Bankoğlu Güngör This is me

Handan Yılmaz This is me

Publication Date November 24, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016 Supplement 16

Cite

APA Erkun, H. F., Bankoğlu Güngör, M., & Yılmaz, H. (2016). PORSELEN LAMİNATE VENEERLER. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi170-183. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.290734
AMA Erkun HF, Bankoğlu Güngör M, Yılmaz H. PORSELEN LAMİNATE VENEERLER. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. Published online November 1, 2016:170-183. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.290734
Chicago Erkun, Hamit Fatih, Merve Bankoğlu Güngör, and Handan Yılmaz. “PORSELEN LAMİNATE VENEERLER”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, November (November 2016), 170-83. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.290734.
EndNote Erkun HF, Bankoğlu Güngör M, Yılmaz H (November 1, 2016) PORSELEN LAMİNATE VENEERLER. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 170–183.
IEEE H. F. Erkun, M. Bankoğlu Güngör, and H. Yılmaz, “PORSELEN LAMİNATE VENEERLER”, Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg, pp. 170–183, November 2016, doi: 10.17567/ataunidfd.290734.
ISNAD Erkun, Hamit Fatih et al. “PORSELEN LAMİNATE VENEERLER”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. November 2016. 170-183. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.290734.
JAMA Erkun HF, Bankoğlu Güngör M, Yılmaz H. PORSELEN LAMİNATE VENEERLER. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2016;:170–183.
MLA Erkun, Hamit Fatih et al. “PORSELEN LAMİNATE VENEERLER”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 2016, pp. 170-83, doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.290734.
Vancouver Erkun HF, Bankoğlu Güngör M, Yılmaz H. PORSELEN LAMİNATE VENEERLER. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2016:170-83.

Bu eser Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır. Tıklayınız.