ENDOKURONLAR: LİTERATÜR DERLEMESİ

Year 2016, Supplement 16, 184 - 188, 24.11.2016

Özlem Acar , Saadet Ünver

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.290735

Abstract

Endodontik
tedavi görmüş dişlerin restorasyonu oldukça tartışmalı bir konudur.
Endokuronlar, aşırı madde kaybına sahip endodontik tedavili dişlerin
restorasyonunda, geleneksel post-kor restorasyonlara alternatif olarak
kullanılmaktadır.
Endokuron restorasyon tekniğinin temeli, pulpa odasından retansiyon ve
stabilite desteği sağlayan adeziv bağlantıya dayanmaktadır.  Basit, hızlı
ve konservatif bir yöntem olması endokuronların avantajlarıdır. Bu derlemenin
amacı, endokuron tekniği hakkında genel bilgiler vererek farklı restorasyon
teknikleriyle birçok açıdan detaylı olarak karşılaştırmaktır.

Anahtar kelimeler: Endodontik tedavi
edilmiş dişler, Endokuron, Kuron

ENDOCROWNS: LITERATURE
REVIEW

ABSTRACT

 The
restoration of endodontically treated teeth is a controversial topic from many
perspectives. The endocrown is an
alternative restorative option for severely damaged endodontically treated teeth instead of traditional
post-core restorations. The foundation of this technique is based on the use of
surface available in the pulpal chamber to assume the stability and retention
of the restoration through adhesive procedures. Ease of application, being a quick
and conservative technique are the advantages of endocrowns. The aim of this
review article is to compare the endocrown technique with different restoration
techniques in many respect by giving general information about this technique.

Key words: Endodontically-treated teeth, Endocrown, Crown

Keywords

Endodontik tedavi edilmiş dişler, Endokuron

References

• Robbins JW. Restoration of the endodontically treated tooth. Dent Clin North Am 2002;46:367-84.
• 2. Kirkevang LL, Orstavik D, Horsted-Bindslev P, Wenzel A. Periapical status and quality of root fillings and coronal restorations in a Danish population. Int Endod J 2000;33:509-15.
• 3. Tronstad L, Asbjornsen K, Doving L, Pedersen I, Eriksen HM. Influence of coronal restorations on the periapical health of endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 2000;16:218-21.
• 4. Gillen BM, Looney SW, Gu LS, Loushine BA, Weller RN, Loushine RJ, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Impact of the quality of coronal restoration versus the quality of root canal fillings on success of root canal treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2011;37:895-902.
• 5. Zarone F, Sorrentino R, Apicella D, Valentino B, Ferrari M, Aversa R, Apicella A. Evaluation of the biomechanical behavior of maxillary central incisors restored by means of endocrowns compared to a natural tooth: a 3D static linear finite elements analysis. Dent Mater 2006;11:1035-44.
• 6. Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:565-7.
• 7. Goodacre CJ, Spolnik KJ. The prosthodontic management of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. Part I. Success and failure data, treatment concepts. J Prosthodont 1994;3:243-50.
• 8. Ahmetoğlu F, Şimşek N, Yıldırım G, Polat NT. Endodontik tedavili dişlerin restorasyonunda post materyalleri. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg 2014;24:153-7.
• 9. Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod 2004;30:289-301.
• 10. Barfeie A, Thomas MB, Watts A, Rees J. Failure Mechanisms of Fibre Posts: A Literature Review. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2015;23:115-27
• CY, Kuo JS, Lin YS, Chang YH. Fracture resistance and failure modes of CEREC endo-crowns and conventional post and core-supported CEREC crowns. Journal of Dentai Sciences 2009;4:110-7.
• 22. Biacchi GR, Mello B, Basting RT. The endocrown: an alternative approach for restoring extensively damaged molars. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013;25:383-90.
• 23. Tsai YL, Petsche PE, Anusavice KJ, Yang MC. Influence of glass-ceramic thickness on Hertzian and bulk fracture mechanisms. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:27-32.
• 24. Mormann WH, Bindl A, Luthy H, Rathke A. Effects of preparation and luting system on all-ceramic computer-generated crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:333-9.
• 25. Bindl A, Richter B, Mormann WH. Survival of ceramic computer-aided design/manufacturing crowns bonded to preparations with reduced macroretention geometry. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:219-24.
• 26. Stricker EJ, Gohring TN. Influence of different posts and cores on marginal adaptation, fracture resistance, and fracture mode of composite resin crowns on human mandibular premolars. An in vitro study. J Dent 2006;34:326-35.
• 27. Lin CL, Chang YH, Chang CY, Pai CA, Huang SF. Finite element and Weibull analyses to estimate failure risks in the ceramic endocrown and classical crown for endodontically treated maxillary premolar. Eur J Oral Sci 2010;118:87-93.
• 28. Valentina V, Aleksander T, Dejan T, Vojkan L. Restoring endodontically treated teeth with all-ceramic endo-crowns- case report. Stom Glas S 2008;55:54-64.
• 29. Biacchi GR, Basting RT. Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber post-retained conventional crowns. Oper Dent 2012;37:130-6.
• 30. Dejak B, Mlotkowski A. 3D-Finite element analysis of molars restored with endocrowns and posts during masticatory simulation. Dent Mater 2013;29:e309-17.