FARKLI PREPARASYON TEKNİKLERİ VE FARKLI SİMAN ARALIKLARINDA HAZIRLANAN CAD/CAM LAMİNATE VENEERLERİN KIRILMA DAYANIMLARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Year 2017, Volume: 27 Issue: 1, 12 - 18, 16.04.2017

Orhan Rıdvan Vurgeç Özcan Karataş Ömer Sağsöz Yiğit Kaan Polat Nilgün Seven

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.307093

Abstract

FRACTURE STRENGTH
EVALUATION OF CAD/CAM LAMINATE VENEERS PREPARED WITH DIFFERENT METHODS AND DIFFERENT
CEMENT THICKNESSES

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı; 2 farklı siman
aralığında ve 2 farklı preparasyon tekniği ile CAD/CAM kullanılarak hazırlanan
laminate veneerlerin kırılma direncini karşılaştırmaktadır.

Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmada 40 adet
benzer boyut- larda seçilen üst anterior diş kullanıldı. Her dişe lamina- te
preparasyonu yapıldıktan sonra laminate veneer ile restore edildi. Dişler,
preparasyon teknikleri; insizalde sonlanan geleneksel kesim ve insizali içine
alan kesim ile siman aralıkları; 50 µm ve 200 µm olacak şekilde 4 gruba
ayrıldı. Laminateler feldspatik seramik bloklar kullanılarak Cerec CAD/CAM
cihazı yardımıyla hazırlanıp self etch rezin siman ile uygulandı. 125 derecelik
açıyla kendinden sertleşen akril silindirik bloklara gömülen dişlere üniversal
test cihazıyla (Instron 3344) sabit hızda kuvvet uygulanarak kırma testi
gerçekleştirildi. Laminatelerin kırılma kuvvetleri kaydedildi. Elde edilen sonuçlar
SPSS 20 istatistik yazılımı kullanılarak tek yönlü varyans analizi ve Tukey
post hoc testi kullanılarak istatiksel olarak değerlendirildi.

Bulgular: Siman aralığı karşılaştırıldığında 50
µm, 200 µm siman aralığına göre daha yüksek kırılma direnci gösterdi. Kesim
teknikleri karşılaştırıldığında geleneksel kesim insizale overlap kesime göre
daha yüksek kırılma direnci gösterdi. En yüksek ortalama kırılma direnci
geleneksel kesim ve 50 µm siman aralığında (643 N), en düşük değer insizale
overlap kesim ve 200 µm siman aralığında (359.8 N) kaydedildi.

Sonuç: Geleneksek kesim tekniği laminate
veneerlerin kırılma direncini arttırır. Siman aralığı azaldıkça kırılma direnci
artar.

Anahtar kelimeler: Kesim tekniği, kırılma direnci, laminate veneer, siman aralığı

ABSTRACT

 

Aim: The aim of this investigation is to evaluate fracture resistance of
veneer materials which prepared in two different methods with two different
cement thicknesses by CAD/CAM.

Material and
Method: Forty maxillary
incisors in similar sizes were used in this study. Each tooth restored with
laminate after preparation. Teeth were divided into 4 groups according to
preparation techniques; traditional preparation and incisal-overlap
preparation, and cement thicknesses; 50 µm and 200 µm. Laminates were milled with Cerec CAD/CAM device (Sirona) from
feldspathic ceramic blocks and applied using self etch resin cement. Fracture
tests were performed applying load with constant speed using a universal
testing machine (Instron 3344) to teeth embedded into cylindrical self-cure
acrylic resin blocks with 125-degree angle. Fracture load values of laminates
were recorded. Results were evaluated statistically with one-way ANOVA and
Tukey post hoc tests using SPSS 20 software.

Results: In terms of cement thickness, 50 µm showed statistically higher fracture
strength values than 200 µm. In terms of preparation technique, traditional
technique showed higher fracture strength than incisal-overlap technique. The
highest mean fracture strength was recorded for traditional preparation with 50
µm (643 N), while the lowest was for incisal-overlap preparation with 200 µm
(359.8 N).

Conclusion: Traditional preparation technique increa- ses fracture strength of
laminate veneers. Fracture strength increases as cement thickness reduced.

Keywords: Preparation technique, fracture resistance, laminate veneer, cement
thickness 

*Atatürk Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı

Keywords

sim tekniği, kırılma direnci, laminate veneer

References

• 1. Rosenblum MA, Schulman A. A review of all-ceramic restorations. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 1997, 128: 297-307.
• 2. Shenoy A, Shenoy N. Dental ceramics: An update. Journal of conservative dentistry, 2010, 13: 195.
• 3. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. Journal of dentistry, 2000, 28: 163-77.
• 4. Kelleher MG DS, Lewis N. Ethical marketing in 'aesthetic' ('esthetic') or 'cosmetic dentistry' part 2. Dent Update, 2012: 39: 390-2, 394-6, 398-400 passim. Baskı.
• 5. KARAALİOĞLU AGDOF, DUYMUŞ ZY. Diş hekimliğinde uygulanan CAD/CAM sistemleri. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2008; 18.
• 6. Nakamura M, Matsumura H. The 24-year clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneer restorations bonded with a two-liquid silane primer and a tri-n-butylborane-initiated adhesive resin. Journal of oral science, 2014, 56: 227-30.
• 7. Rizkalla AS, Jones DW. Indentation fracture toughness and dynamic elastic moduli for commercial feldspathic dental porcelain materials. Dental Materials, 2004, 20: 198-206.
• 8. Friedman M. A 15-year review of porcelain veneer failure--a clinician's observations. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, NJ: 1995), 1998, 19: 625-8, 630, 2 passim; quiz 638.
• 9. BARGHI N, BERRY TG. Post‐bonding Crack Formation in Porcelain Veneers. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 1997, 9: 51-4.
• 10. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2002, 87: 503-9.
• 11. Magne P, Kwon K-R, Belser UC, Hodges JS, Douglas WH. Crack propensity of porcelain laminate veneers: a simulated operatory evaluation. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1999, 81: 327-34.
• 12. Stevenson B, Ibbetson R. The effect of the substructure on the colour of samples/restorations veneered with ceramic: a literature review. Journal of dentistry, 2010, 38: 361-8.
• 13. Stappert CF, Ozden U, Gerds T, Strub JR. Longevity and failure load of ceramic veneers with different preparation designs after exposure to masticatory simulation. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2005, 94: 132-9.
• 14. Magne P, Douglas WH. Design optimization and evolution of bonded ceramics for the anterior dentition: a finite-element analysis. Quintessence international, 1999, 30.
• 15. Gürel G. Predictable, precise, and repeatable tooth preparation for porcelain laminate veneers. Practical procedures & aesthetic dentistry: PPAD, 2002, 15: 17-24; quiz 26.
• 16. Garber D. Rational tooth preparation for porcelain laminate veneers. Compendium (Newtown, Pa.), 1991, 12: 316, 318, 20 passim.
• 17. Castelnuovo J, Tjan AH, Phillips K, Nicholls JI, Kois JC, of Washington U, of Dentistry S. Fracture load and mode of failure of ceramic veneers with different preparations. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2000, 83: 171-80.
• 18. Magne P, Douglas WH. Porcelain veneers: dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic recovery of the crown. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 1999, 12.
• 19. Zarone F, Apicella D, Sorrentino R, Ferro V, Aversa R, Apicella A. Influence of tooth preparation design on the stress distribution in maxillary central incisors restored by means of alumina porcelain veneers: a 3D-finite element analysis. Dental Materials, 2005, 21: 1178-88.
• 20. Zarone F, Epifania E, Leone G, Sorrentino R, Ferrari M. Dynamometric assessment of the mechanical resistance of porcelain veneers related to tooth preparation: a comparison between two techniques. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2006, 95: 354-63.
• 21. Tuntiprawon M, Wilson PR. The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all‐ceramic crowns. Australian dental journal, 1995, 40: 17-21.
• 22. Schittly E, Le Goff S, Besnault C, Sadoun M, Ruse N. Effect of water storage on the flexural strength of four self-etching adhesive resin cements and on the dentin-titanium shear bond strength mediated by them. Operative dentistry, 2014, 39: E171-7.
• 23. Keul C, Liebermann A, Roos M, Uhrenbacher J, Stawarczyk B. The effect of ceramic primer on shear bond strength of resin composite cement to zirconia: a function of water storage and thermal cycling. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 2013, 144: 1261-71.
• 24. Konno ANK, Sinhoreti MAC, Consani S, Sobrinho LC, Consani RLX. Storage effect on the shear bond strength of adhesive systems. Brazilian dental journal, 2003, 14: 42-7.
• 25. Titley K, Chernecky R, Rossouw P, Kulkarni G. The effect of various storage methods and media on shear-bond strengths of dental composite resin to bovine dentine. archives of oral biology, 1998, 43: 305-11.
• 26. IA. M. Testing of dentin adhesives. Journal of dental research, 2000.
• 27. Robbins JW. Color characterization of porcelain veneers. Quintessence international, 1991, 22.
• 28. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. Journal of dentistry, 1998, 26: 1-20.
• 29. Lin T-M, Liu P-R, Ramp LC, Essig ME, Givan DA, Pan Y-H. Fracture resistance and marginal discrepancy of porcelain laminate veneers influenced by preparation design and restorative material in vitro. Journal of dentistry, 2012, 40: 202-9.
• 30. McLaughlin G, Morrison J. Porcelain fused to tooth--the state of the art. Restorative dentistry, 1988, 4: 90-4.
• 31. Christensen GJ, Quart AM, Small CB, Klein RS, Scheitler LE, Arendt DM, Whitt CC, Hon JO, Stubenvol R. Clinical Practice. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 1991, 122: 81-93.
• 32. Cherukara G, Seymour K, Samarawickrama D, Zou L. A study into the variations in the labial reduction of teeth prepared to receive porcelain veneers–a comparison of three clinical techniques. British dental journal, 2002, 192: 401-4.
• 33. Highton R, Caputo AA. A photoelastic study of stresses on porcelain laminate preparations. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1987, 58: 157-161.
• 34. Shetty A, Kaiwar A, Shubhashini N, Ashwini P, Naveen D, Adarsha M, Shetty M, Meena N. Survival rates of porcelain laminate restoration based on different incisal preparation designs: An analysis. Journal of conservative dentistry, 2011, 14: 10.
• 35. May LG, Kelly JR, Bottino MA, Hill T. Effects of cement thickness and bonding on the failure loads of CAD/CAM ceramic crowns: multi-physics FEA modeling and monotonic testing. Dental Materials, 2012, 28: e99-e109.
• 36. Büchi DL, Ebler S, Hämmerle CH, Sailer I. Marginal and internal fit of curved anterior CAD/CAM-milled zirconia fixed dental prostheses: an in-vitro study. Quintessence international, 2014, 45.
• 37. Nakamura T, Dei N, Kojima T, Wakabayashi K. Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 2003, 16.
• 38. Reich S, Uhlen S, Gozdowski S, Lohbauer U. Measurement of cement thickness under lithium disilicate crowns using an impression material technique. Clinical oral investigations, 2011, 15: 521-6.
• 39. Meijering A, Creugers N, Roeters F, Mulder J. Survival of three types of veneer restorations in a clinical trial: a 2.5-year interim evaluation. Journal of dentistry, 1998, 26: 563-8.
• 40. Schmidt KK, Chiayabutr Y, Phillips KM, Kois JC. Influence of preparation design and existing condition of tooth structure on load to failure of ceramic laminate veneers. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2011, 105: 374-82.
• 41. Troedson M, Dérand T. Effect of margin design, cement polymerization, and angle of loading on stress in porcelain veneers. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1999, 82: 518-24.
• 42. Peumans M, De Munck J, Fieuws S, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Van Meerbeek B. A prospective ten-year clinical trial of porcelain veneers. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 2004, 6.
• 43. De Jager N, Pallav P, Feilzer AJ. The apparent increase of the Young's modulus in thin cement layers. Dental Materials, 2004, 20: 457-62.
• 44. Scherrer SS, De Rijk WG, Belser UC, Meyer J-M. Effect of cement film thickness on the fracture resistance of a machinable glass-ceramic. Dental Materials, 1994, 10: 172-7.
• 45. Prakki A, Cilli R, Da Costa AU, De Paiva Gonçalves SE, Mondelli L, Rafael F, Pereira JC. Effect of resin luting film thickness on fracture resistance of a ceramic cemented to dentin. Journal of Prosthodontics, 2007, 16: 172-8.
• 46. Burke F. Maximising the fracture resistance of dentine-bonded all-ceramic crowns. Journal of dentistry, 1999, 27: 169-73.
• 47. Karntiang P, Leevailoj C. Effect of resin cement thickness and ceramic thickness on fracture resistance of enamel-bonded ceramic. Chulalongkorn University Dental Journal, 2014, 37: 161-70.