Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

REHBER YOLU OLUŞTURULMASINDA FARKLI EĞE SİSTEMLERİNİN ETKİNLİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Year 2018, Volume: 28 Issue: 1, 13 - 17, 28.03.2018

Taha Özyürek Gülşah Uslu Koray Yılmaz

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.410339
Cited By: 1

Abstract






Amaç: Farklı nikel-titanyum döner rehber yol eğelerinin
şekillendirme etkinliklerinin J şekilli yapay kanallarda değerlendirilmesi




Gereç ve Yöntem: Otuz adet J şekilli kanallara sahip rezin
blok PathFile, ProGlider ve manuel eğeler (n: 10 kanal/grup) kullanılarak
şekillendirildi. Şekillendirme öncesi ve sonrası elde edilen fotoğraflar
dijital ortamda üst üste getirilerek çakıştırılmış görüntüler elde edildi.
Eğeler tarafından uzaklaştırılan rezin miktarı dijital ölçüm kalıbı ve fotoğraf
analiz programı kullanılarak ölçüldü. Kanal düzensizlikleri de kayıt edildi.
Elde edilen veriler tek yönlü varyans analizi ve post hoc Tukey testi
kullanılarak istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi.



Bulgular: Eğelerin uzaklaştırdığı rezin miktarları
arasında gruplar arasında istatistiksel fark bulunmadı (P > 0,05). Kanal şekillendirmesi sırasında manuel eğe grubunda 1
örnekte basamak oluşumu gözlendi.

Sonuç: Çalışmamızın sınırları dahilinde test edilen
PathFile, ProGlider ve manuel eğelerin 5 farklı ölçüm noktasında göstermiş
olduğu sapmalar arasında fark bulunamamıştır.



Anahtar Kelimeler: Endodonti, Nikel-Titanyum, PathFile,
ProGlider, Rehber Yol
















Keywords

Endodonti Nikel-Titanyum PathFile ProGlider

References

  • 1. Roland DD, Andelin WE, Browning DF, et al. The effect of preflaring on the rates of separation for 0.04 taper nickel titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2002;28:543-5.
  • 2. Berutti E, Cantatore G, Castellucci A, et al. Use of nickel-titanium rotary Pathfile to create the glide path: comparison with manual preflaring in simulated root canals. J Endod 2009;35:408-12.
  • 3. Platino PV, Biedma BM, Liebana CR, et al. The influence of a manual glide path on the separation rate of NiTi rotary instruments. J Endod 2005; 31:114-6.
  • 4. Berutti E, Negro AR, Lendini M, et al. Influence of manual preflaring and torque on the failure rate of Protaper rotary instruments. J Endod 2004;30:228-30.
  • 5. Jafarzadeh H, Abbott PV. Ledge formation: Review of a great challenge in endodontics. J Endod 2007;33:1155-62.
  • 6. Blum JY, Machtou P, Ruddle C, et al. Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient. J Endod 2003;29:567-75.
  • 7. Berutti E, Paolino DS, Chiandussi G, Alovisi M, Cantatore G, Castellucci A, Pasqualin D. Root canal anatomy preservation of WaveOne reciprocating files with or without glide path. J Endod 2012;38:101-4.
  • 8. Zanette F, Grazziotin-Soares R, Flores ME, Fontanella VRC, Gavini G, Barletta FB. Apical root canal transportation and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Universal with and without PathFile. J Endod 2014;40:688-93.
  • 9. Capar ID, Kaval ME, Ertas H, et al. Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of 5 different rotary pathfinding instruments made of conventional nickel-titanium wire, M-wire and controlled memory wire. J Endod 2015;41:535–8.
  • 10. Thompson M, Sidow SJ, Lindsey K, Chuang A, McPherson JC. Evaluation of a new filing system’s ability to maintain canal morphology. J Endod 2014;40:867-70.
  • 11. Altunbaş D, Akpınar KE, Kuştarcı A. An in vitro study of the effects of different torque values applied to the nickel titanium rotary canal instruments for curved root canal preparation. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2015;25:172-80.
  • 12. Sonntag D, Guntermann A, Kim SK, Stachniss V. Root canal shaping with manual stainless steel files and rotary Ni–Ti files performed by students. Int Endod J 2003;36:246-55.
  • 13. Jafarzadeh H, Abbott PV. Ledge formation: review of a great challenge in endodontics. J Endod 2007;33:1155-62.
  • 14. Calberson FLG, Deroose CAJG, Hommez GMG, De Moor RJG. Shaping ability of ProTaper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin root canals. Int Endod J 2004;37:613-23.
  • 15. Schäfer E, Tepel J, Hoppe W. Properties of endodontic hand instruments used in rotary motion Part 2. instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod 1995;21:493-7.
  • 16. Kum KY, Spängberg L, Cha BY, Il-Young J, Seung-Jong L, Chan-Young L. Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals. J Endod 2000;26:719-23.
  • 17. Franco V, Fabiani C, Taschieri S, Malentacca A, Bortolin M, Del Fabbro M. Investigation on the shaping ability of nickel-titanium files when used with a reciprocating motion. J Endod 2011;7:1398-401.
  • 18. Altunbas D, Kutuk B, Kustarci A. Shaping ability of reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems in simulated curved canals. Eur J Dent 2015;9:346.
  • 19. Berutti E, Alovisi M, Pastorelli MA, Chiandussi G, Scotti N, Pasqualini D. Energy consumption of ProTaper Next X1 after glide path with PathFiles and ProGlider. J Endod 2014;40:2015-8.
  • 20. Kirchhoff AL, Chu R, Mello I, Garzon ADP, dos Santos M, Cunha RS. Glide Path Management with Single-and Multiple-instrument Rotary Systems in Curved Canals: A Micro–Computed Tomographic Study. J Endod 2015;41:1880-3.

Year 2018, Volume: 28 Issue: 1, 13 - 17, 28.03.2018

Taha Özyürek Gülşah Uslu Koray Yılmaz

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.410339
Cited By: 1

Abstract

References

  • 1. Roland DD, Andelin WE, Browning DF, et al. The effect of preflaring on the rates of separation for 0.04 taper nickel titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2002;28:543-5.
  • 2. Berutti E, Cantatore G, Castellucci A, et al. Use of nickel-titanium rotary Pathfile to create the glide path: comparison with manual preflaring in simulated root canals. J Endod 2009;35:408-12.
  • 3. Platino PV, Biedma BM, Liebana CR, et al. The influence of a manual glide path on the separation rate of NiTi rotary instruments. J Endod 2005; 31:114-6.
  • 4. Berutti E, Negro AR, Lendini M, et al. Influence of manual preflaring and torque on the failure rate of Protaper rotary instruments. J Endod 2004;30:228-30.
  • 5. Jafarzadeh H, Abbott PV. Ledge formation: Review of a great challenge in endodontics. J Endod 2007;33:1155-62.
  • 6. Blum JY, Machtou P, Ruddle C, et al. Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient. J Endod 2003;29:567-75.
  • 7. Berutti E, Paolino DS, Chiandussi G, Alovisi M, Cantatore G, Castellucci A, Pasqualin D. Root canal anatomy preservation of WaveOne reciprocating files with or without glide path. J Endod 2012;38:101-4.
  • 8. Zanette F, Grazziotin-Soares R, Flores ME, Fontanella VRC, Gavini G, Barletta FB. Apical root canal transportation and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Universal with and without PathFile. J Endod 2014;40:688-93.
  • 9. Capar ID, Kaval ME, Ertas H, et al. Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of 5 different rotary pathfinding instruments made of conventional nickel-titanium wire, M-wire and controlled memory wire. J Endod 2015;41:535–8.
  • 10. Thompson M, Sidow SJ, Lindsey K, Chuang A, McPherson JC. Evaluation of a new filing system’s ability to maintain canal morphology. J Endod 2014;40:867-70.
  • 11. Altunbaş D, Akpınar KE, Kuştarcı A. An in vitro study of the effects of different torque values applied to the nickel titanium rotary canal instruments for curved root canal preparation. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2015;25:172-80.
  • 12. Sonntag D, Guntermann A, Kim SK, Stachniss V. Root canal shaping with manual stainless steel files and rotary Ni–Ti files performed by students. Int Endod J 2003;36:246-55.
  • 13. Jafarzadeh H, Abbott PV. Ledge formation: review of a great challenge in endodontics. J Endod 2007;33:1155-62.
  • 14. Calberson FLG, Deroose CAJG, Hommez GMG, De Moor RJG. Shaping ability of ProTaper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin root canals. Int Endod J 2004;37:613-23.
  • 15. Schäfer E, Tepel J, Hoppe W. Properties of endodontic hand instruments used in rotary motion Part 2. instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod 1995;21:493-7.
  • 16. Kum KY, Spängberg L, Cha BY, Il-Young J, Seung-Jong L, Chan-Young L. Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals. J Endod 2000;26:719-23.
  • 17. Franco V, Fabiani C, Taschieri S, Malentacca A, Bortolin M, Del Fabbro M. Investigation on the shaping ability of nickel-titanium files when used with a reciprocating motion. J Endod 2011;7:1398-401.
  • 18. Altunbas D, Kutuk B, Kustarci A. Shaping ability of reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems in simulated curved canals. Eur J Dent 2015;9:346.
  • 19. Berutti E, Alovisi M, Pastorelli MA, Chiandussi G, Scotti N, Pasqualini D. Energy consumption of ProTaper Next X1 after glide path with PathFiles and ProGlider. J Endod 2014;40:2015-8.
  • 20. Kirchhoff AL, Chu R, Mello I, Garzon ADP, dos Santos M, Cunha RS. Glide Path Management with Single-and Multiple-instrument Rotary Systems in Curved Canals: A Micro–Computed Tomographic Study. J Endod 2015;41:1880-3.
There are 20 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Araştırma Makalesi
Authors

Taha Özyürek

Gülşah Uslu This is me

Koray Yılmaz This is me

Publication Date March 28, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 28 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Özyürek, T., Uslu, G., & Yılmaz, K. (2018). REHBER YOLU OLUŞTURULMASINDA FARKLI EĞE SİSTEMLERİNİN ETKİNLİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(1), 13-17. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.410339
AMA Özyürek T, Uslu G, Yılmaz K. REHBER YOLU OLUŞTURULMASINDA FARKLI EĞE SİSTEMLERİNİN ETKİNLİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. March 2018;28(1):13-17. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.410339
Chicago Özyürek, Taha, Gülşah Uslu, and Koray Yılmaz. “REHBER YOLU OLUŞTURULMASINDA FARKLI EĞE SİSTEMLERİNİN ETKİNLİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 28, no. 1 (March 2018): 13-17. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.410339.
EndNote Özyürek T, Uslu G, Yılmaz K (March 1, 2018) REHBER YOLU OLUŞTURULMASINDA FARKLI EĞE SİSTEMLERİNİN ETKİNLİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 28 1 13–17.
IEEE T. Özyürek, G. Uslu, and K. Yılmaz, “REHBER YOLU OLUŞTURULMASINDA FARKLI EĞE SİSTEMLERİNİN ETKİNLİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”, Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 13–17, 2018, doi: 10.17567/ataunidfd.410339.
ISNAD Özyürek, Taha et al. “REHBER YOLU OLUŞTURULMASINDA FARKLI EĞE SİSTEMLERİNİN ETKİNLİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 28/1 (March 2018), 13-17. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.410339.
JAMA Özyürek T, Uslu G, Yılmaz K. REHBER YOLU OLUŞTURULMASINDA FARKLI EĞE SİSTEMLERİNİN ETKİNLİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2018;28:13–17.
MLA Özyürek, Taha et al. “REHBER YOLU OLUŞTURULMASINDA FARKLI EĞE SİSTEMLERİNİN ETKİNLİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 28, no. 1, 2018, pp. 13-17, doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.410339.
Vancouver Özyürek T, Uslu G, Yılmaz K. REHBER YOLU OLUŞTURULMASINDA FARKLI EĞE SİSTEMLERİNİN ETKİNLİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2018;28(1):13-7.

Cited By

KÖK KANAL ŞEKİLLENDİRİLMESİNDE REHBER YOL OLUŞTURMANIN ÖNEMİ
Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi
Damla ÖZSU KIRCI
https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.417015

Bu eser Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır. Tıklayınız.