WAVEONE, RECIPROC VE TWISTED FILE ADAPTIVE DÖNER SİSTEM EĞELERİN ÇİFT KURVATÜRLÜ (S-ŞEKİLLİ) KANALLARDA DÖNGÜSEL YORULMA DİRENÇLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Year 2018, Volume: 28 Issue: 2, 199 - 203, 22.04.2018

Mehmet Adıgüzel Pelin Tüfekçi

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.418979

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, WaveOne (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, İsviçre),
Reciproc (VDW, Münih, Almanya) ve Twisted File Adaptive (Axis/SybronEndo,
Orange, CA, ABD) döner sistem nikel titanyum (Ni-Ti) eğelerin çift kurvatürlü
(S-şekilli) kanallarda döngüsel yorgunluğa bağlı kırılma dirençlerinin
karşılaştırılmasıdır.

Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada 45 adet (WaveOne primary, Reciproc R25 ve Twisted
File Adaptive M-L1) eğe kullanıldı. Her
bir sistemden 15 eğe kırılıncaya kadar çift kurvatürlü (S-şekilli) yapay bir
kanalda döndürüldü. Kırılıncaya kadar olan tur sayısı hesaplandı ve kırılmış
parçaların uzunluğu kaydedildi. Veriler, ANOVA ve Tukey post hoc testleri
kullanılarak istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi. İstatistiksel anlamlılık
düzeyi p < 0.05 olarak belirlendi.

Bulgular: Reciproc R25 eğeleri hem apikal hem de koranal kurvatürde, WaveOne
primary ve Twisted File Adaptive M-L1 eğelerine göre döngüsel yorgunluğa karşı
daha dirençli bulundu (p < 0.05).
WaveOne primary ve Twisted File Adaptive M-L1 eğeleri arasında her iki
kurvatürde de istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık saptanmadı (p > 0.05). Bütün gruplar arasında
aletlerin kırılmış fragmanlarının uzunluğu istatistiksel olarak benzer bulundu
(p > 0.05).

Sonuç: Reciproc R25 eğeler, WaveOne primary ve Twisted File Adaptive eğelere
göre çift kurvatürlü kanallarda kırılmaya karşı daha dirençli bulundu.

Anahtar
Kelimeler: Döngüsel yorgunluk, Reciproc, WaveOne, S-şekilli
kana

 COMPARISON
OF THE CYCLIC FATIGUE RESISTANCE OF WAVEONE, RECIPROC AND TWISTED FILE ADAPTIVE
FILES IN CANALS WITH  A DOUBLE
CURVATURE (S-SHAPED)

ABSTRACT

Aim: The purpose of this study was
to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne (Dentsply Maillefer,
Ballaigues, Switzerland), Reciproc (VDW, Münich, Germany) and Twisted
File Adaptive (Axis/SybronEndo, Orange, CA, USA) nickel titanium (Ni-Ti)
systems in canals with a double curvature.

Materials and Methods: Forty five rotary NiTi files (WaveOne
primary, Reciproc R25 and Twisted File Adaptive M-L1) were used in this study. Fifteen files from each system were rotated in canals
with a double curvature until fracture. The number of cycles to fracture was
calculated and the length of each fractured fragment was recorded. The data
were statistically analysed using ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests. The
statistical significance level was set at p
< 0.05.

Results: The Reciproc R25 file had higher cyclic
fatigue resistance than WaveOne primary and Twisted File Adaptive in the apical and coronal curvatures (p < 0.05). There was no significant
distinction in the cyclic fatigue resistance of the WaveOne primary and Twisted
File Adaptive files in either the apical or coronal curvature. The length of
the fractured part of the instruments was similar among all the groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: The
Reciproc R25 file indicated better cyclic fatigue resistance than WaveOne
primary and Twisted File Adaptive in an artificial canal with an S-shape.

Keywords: Cyclic fatigue, Reciproc,
WaveOne, S-shaped canal.

Keywords

Döngüsel yorgunluk, Reciproc, WaveOne

References

• 1. Arias A, Perez-Higueras JJ, de la Macorra JC. Differences in cyclic fatigue resistance at apical and coronal levels of Reciproc and WaveOne new files. J Endod. 2012;38:1244-8.
• 2. Perez-Higueras JJ, Arias A, de la Macorra JC. Cyclic fatigue resistance of K3, K3XF, and twisted file nickel-titanium files under continuous rotation or reciprocating motion. J Endod 2013;39:1585-8.
• 3. Capar ID, Ertas H, Arslan H. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium coronal flaring instruments. J Endod 2014;40:1182-5.
• 4. Göktürk H, Yücel AÇ, Şişman A. The shaping ability of five different nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2014;24:58-66
• 5. Knowles KI, Hammond NB, Biggs SG, Ibarrola JL. Incidence of instrument separation using LightSpeed rotary instruments. J Endod 2006;32:14-6.
• 6. Parashos P, Messer HH. Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences. J Endod 2006;32:1031-43.
• 7. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod 2000;26:161-5.
• 8. Bouska J, Justman B, Williamson A, DeLong C, Qian F. Resistance to cyclic fatigue failure of a new endodontic rotary file. J Endod 2012;38:667-9.
• 9. Kim HC, Kwak SW, Cheung GS, Ko DH, Chung SM, Lee W. Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two new nickel-titanium instruments used in reciprocation motion: Reciproc versus WaveOne. J Endod 2012;38:541-4.
• 10. Setzer FC, Bohme CP. Influence of combined cyclic fatigue and torsional stress on the fracture point of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2013;39:133-7.
• 11. Cheung GS, Peng B, Bian Z, Shen Y, Darvell BW. Defects in ProTaper S1 instruments after clinical use: fractographic examination. Int Endod J 2005;38:802-9.
• 12. Dederich DN, Zakariasen KL. The effects of cyclical axial motion on rotary endodontic instrument fatigue. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986;61:192-6.
• 13. Ozyurek T. Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Reciproc, WaveOne, and WaveOne Gold Nickel-Titanium Instruments. J Endod 2016; 42:1536-9.
• 14. Elsaka SE, Elnaghy AM, Badr AE. Torsional and bending resistance of WaveOne Gold, Reciproc and Twisted File Adaptive instruments. Int Endod J 2017;50:1077-83.
• 15. Karatas E, Arslan H, Kirici DO, Alsancak M, Capar ID. Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris with Twisted File Adaptive instruments in straight root canals: reciprocation with different angles, adaptive motion and continuous rotation. Int Endod J 2016;49:382-5.
• 16. Topcuoglu HS, Duzgun S, Akti A, Topcuoglu G. Laboratory comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne Gold, Reciproc and WaveOne files in canals with a double curvature. Int Endod J 2017;50:713-7.
• 17. Al-Sudani D, Grande NM, Plotino G, et al. Cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium rotary instruments in a double (S-shaped) simulated curvature. J Endod 2012;38:987-9.
• 18. De-Deus G, Leal Vieira VT, Nogueira da Silva EJ, Lopes H, Elias CN, Moreira EJ. Bending resistance and dynamic and static cyclic fatigue life of Reciproc and WaveOne large instruments. J Endod 2014;40:575-9.
• 19. Gao Y, Gutmann JL, Wilkinson K, Maxwell R, Ammon D. Evaluation of the impact of raw materials on the fatigue and mechanical properties of ProFile Vortex rotary instruments. J Endod 2012;38:398-401.
• 20. Topcuoglu HS, Topcuoglu G, Akti A, Duzgun S. In Vitro Comparison of Cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Next, HyFlex CM, OneShape, and ProTaper Universal Instruments in a canal with a double curvature. J Endod 2016;42:969-71.
• 21. Capar ID, Kaval ME, Ertas H, Sen BH. Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of 5 different rotary pathfinding instruments made of conventional nickel-titanium wire, m-wire, and controlled memory wire. J Endod 2015;41:535-8.
• 22. Higuera O, Plotino G, Tocci L, Carrillo G, Gambarini G, Jaramillo DE. Cyclic fatigue resistance of 3 different nickel-titanium reciprocating instruments in artificial canals. J Endod 2015;41:913-5.
• 23. Ertaş H, Capar ID, Arslan H. Cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Universal, Twisted File Adaptive, Reciproc and WaveOne systems. Turk Endod J 2016;1:30-4.
• 24. Plotino G, Grande NM, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. Cyclic fatigue of Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating instruments. Int Endod J 2012;45:614-8.