MONOLİTİK ZİRKONYA SERAMİK KULLANILARAK SABİT DENTAL REHABİLİTASYON: KLİNİK VAKA RAPORU

Year 2018, Volume: 28 Issue: 3, 385 - 390, 11.07.2018

Rukiye Durkan Gonca Deste

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.473312

Abstract

Günümüzde
yapılan tam seramik restorasyonların büyük çoğunluğu diğer seramikler ile
karşılaştırıldığı zaman yüksek mekanik özellikler gösteren monolitik
itriyum-stabilize tetragonal zirkonya polikristal (Ytterbium- Y-TZP)
seramiklerden oluşmaktadır. Mono- litik zirkonya sitotoksik etki göstermeyen ve
bakteriyel adezyonun düşük olduğu biyouyumlu bir
materyaldir. Protetik rehabilitasyonda monolitik zirkonya kullanıl- ması ile
çift tabakalı seramik sistemlerde gözlenen komplikasyonlar engellenebilir.
Monolitik zirkonya, zir- konya veya metal alt yapılı sabit bölümlü protezlerin
alternatifi olarak kullanılabilir. Ayrıca translusensi özel- liğinden dolayı
anterior bölgede kullanımı gün geçtikçe yaygınlaşmaktadır. Bu klinik raporda
monolitik zirkonya seramik sistemi ile kantilever restorasyon uygulaması
anlatılmaktadır. 12 aylık sonuçlara göre herhangi bir komplikasyon
görülmemiştir. İyi estetik ve fonksiyonel sonuçlar elde edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Monolitik zirkonya,
sabit parsiyel protez, kantilever

FIXED DENTAL REHABILITATION
USING MONOLITHIC ZIRCONIA CERAMIC: A CLINICAL CASE REPORT

ABSTRACT

Most of the current all-ceramic
restorations are composed of monolithic yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia
polycrystal (Y-TZP) ceramics, which exhibits superior mechanical properties compared
with other ceramics. Monolithic zirconia is a biocompatible material that is
not cytotoxic and has low bacterial adhesion. Prosthetic rehabilitation using
monolithic zirconia may help to prevent complications associated with bilayered
ceramics systems. Monolithic zirconia fixed
partial dentures represent an alternative option to zirconia based or metal
ceramic restorations. Moreover, the use of monolithic zirconia becomes popular
for anterior teeth due to their translucent property. This clinical report
describes the use of a monolithic ceramic restoration. Good esthetic and
functional results were achieved with no complications reported after 12
months

Keywords:
Monolithic
zirconia, fixed partial prothesis, cantilever

Keywords

Monolitik zirkonya, sabit parsiyel protez

References

• 1. Takeichi T, Katsoulis J, Blatz MB. Clinical outcome of single porcelain-fused-to-zirconium dioxide crowns: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110:455-61.
• 2. Marchack BW, Sato S, Marchack CB, White SN. Complete and partial contour zirconia designs for crowns and fixed dental prostheses: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2011;106:145-52.
• 3. Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 2008;24:299–307.
• 4. Al-Amleh B, Lyons K, Swain M. Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37: 41–52.
• 5. Thulasidas S, Givan DA, Lemons JE, O'Neal SJ, Ramp LC, Liu PR. Influence of implant angulation on the fracture resistance of zirconia abutments. J Prosthodont 2015;24:127-35.
• 6. Stober T, Bermejo JL, Rammelsberg P, Schmitter M. Enamel wear caused by monolithic zirconia crowns after 6 months of clinical use. J Oral Rehabil 2014;41:314-22.
• 7. Yoon HI, Han JS. Prosthetic rehabilitation with an implant-supported fixed prosthesis using computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing dental technology for a patient with a mandibulectomy: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:133-6.
• 8. Heintze SD, Rousson V. Survival of zirconia- and metal-supported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:493–502.
• 9. Thalji GN, Cooper LF. Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Rehabilitation with Monolithic Zirconia: A Clinical Case Report . J Esthet Restor Dent 2014;26:88-96.
• 10. Papaspyridakos P, Lal K. Computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing zirconia implant fixed complete prostheses: clinical results and technical complications up to 4 years of function. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:659–65.
• 11. Uludamar A, Aygün Ş, Kulak Özkan Y. Zirconıa full ceramic restorations.J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni Supplement. 2012;5:132-41.
• 12. Schmitter M, Lotze G, Bömicke W, Rues S. Influence of surface treatment on the in-vitro fracture resistance of zirconia-based all-ceramic anterior crowns. Dent Mater 2015;31:1552-60.
• 13. Guess PC, Schultheis S, Bonfante EA, Coelho PG, Ferencz JL, Silva NR. All-ceramic systems: laboratory and clinical performance. Dent Clin North Am 2011;55:333–52.
• 14. Rojas-Vizcaya F. Full zirconia fixed detachable implant-retained restorations manufactured from monolithic zirconia: clinical report after two years in service. J Prosthodont 2011;20:570–6.
• 15. Lameira DP, Buarque e Silva WA, Andrade e Silva F, De Souza GM. Fracture Strength of Aged Monolithic and Bilayer Zirconia-Based Crowns. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:418641. 16. Ha SR. Biomechanical three-dimensional finite element analysis of monolithic zirconia crown with different cement type. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7:475-83.
• 17. Jiang L, Liao Y, Wan Q, Li W. Effects of sintering temperature and particle size on the translucency of zirconium dioxide dental ceramic. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2011;22:2429-35.
• 18. Matsuzaki F, Sekine H, Honma S, Takanashi T, Furuya K, Yajima Y et al. Translucency and flexural strength of monolithic translucent zirconia and porcelain-layered zirconia. Dent Mater J 2015;34:910-7.
• 19. Zhang Y, Lee JJW, Srikanth R, Lawn BR. Edge chipping and flexural resistance of monolithic ceramics. Dent Mater 2013;29:1201-8.
• 20. Lan TH, Liu PH, Chou MM, Lee HE. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns with different occlusal thicknesses in implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:76-83.
• 21. Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Gueth JF, Edelhoff D, Naumann M. In vitro performance of full-contour zirconia single crowns. Dent Mater 2012;28:449–56
• 22. Bindl A, Lüthy H, Mörmann WH. Strength and fracture pattern of monolithic CAD/CAM-generated posterior crowns. Dent Mater 2006;22:29-36.
• 23. Ilie N, Stawarczyk B. Quantification of the amount of blue light passing through monolithic zirconia with respect to thickness and polymerization conditions. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:114-21.
• 24. Tong H, Tanaka CB, Kaizer MR, Zhang Y. Characterization of three commercial Y-TZP ceramics produced for their high-translucency, high-strength and high-surface area. Ceram Int 2016;42:1077-1085.
• 25. Sulaiman TA, Abdulmajeed AA, Donovan TE, Ritter AV, Vallittu PK, Närhi TO et al. Optical properties and light irradiance of monolithic zirconia at variable thicknesses. Dent Mater. 2015;31:1180-7.
• 26. Ebeid K, Wille S, Hamdy A, Salah T, El-Etreby A, Kern M. Effect of changes in sintering parameters on monolithic translucent zirconia. Dent Mater 2014;3:419-24.
• 27. Kim HKK, Kim SH, Lee JB, Han JS. Effect of polishing and glazing on the color and spectral distribution of monolithic zirconia. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:296-304.
• 28. Lameira DP, Buarque e Silva WA, Andrade e Silva F, De Souza GM. Fracture Strength of Aged Monolithic and Bilayer Zirconia-Based Crowns. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:418641.
• 29. Rosentritt M, Rembs A, Behr M, Hahnel S, Preis V. In vitro performance of implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns: Influence of patient-specific tooth-coloured abutments with titanium adhesive bases. J Dent 2015;43:839-845.
• 30. Sulaiman TA, Abdulmajeed AA, Donovan TE, Ritter AV, Vallittu PK, Närhi TO et al. Optical properties and light irradiance of monolithic zirconiaat variable thicknesses. Dent Mater 2015;31:1180-7. 31. Prasanna BG, Reddy KK, Harsha TV, Ramesh GC. Clinical evaluation of conventional cantilever and resin bonded cantilever fixed partial dentures: a comparative study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13:793-8. 32. Somogyi E, Fejérdy P, Lindeisz F, Linninger M. Cantilever bridges--a cross-sectional study. Fogorv Sz 2000;93:335-41