GÜNCEL NANOSERAMİK VE HİBRİT CAD/CAM MATERYALLERİ

Year 2018, Volume: 28 Issue: 4, 592 - 598, 14.10.2018

Hamiyet Kılınıç Sedanur Turgut Elif Aydoğan Ayaz Bora Bağış

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.474131

Cited By: 2

Abstract

CAD/CAM teknolojisi; indirekt
restorasyonların üretim sürecini kolaylaştırması, daha estetik ve üniform
kalite- de restorasyonların elde edilmesi gibi avantajlarla, diş hekimliği
alanında her geçen gün daha da popüler hale gelmektedir. Nanoteknolojideki
ilerlemeler ile üretilen gelişmiş özelliklere sahip nanoseramik ve hibrit malze-
melerin kullanımı, seramik ve kompozit materyallerinin avantajlarını bir araya
getirmiştir. Bu derlemede; CAD/ CAM ile kullanılabilen farklı içerik ve ticari
markadaki güncel nanoseramik ve hibrit materyallerin, genel özel- likleri ve klinik
prosedürleri hakkında bilgi vermek amaçlanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler: CAD/CAM, nanoseramik,
hibrit materyali

CURRENT NANOCERAMIC AND
HYBRID CAD/CAM MATERIALS

ABSTRACT

CAD/CAM
technology is becoming more popular with the advantages of facilitating the
production process of indirect restorations, obtaining more esthetic and
uniform restorations, in the field of dentistry each passing day. With
developments in nanotechnology, produced ebhanced features nenoceramic and
hybrid materials has brought the advantages of ceramic and composite materials
together. This review purposed to give information about the general
characteristics and clinical procedures of current nanoceramic and hybrid
materials with different content and trademarks.

Keywords: CAD/CAM; nanoceramic; hybrid materials

Keywords

CAD/CAM, nanoseramik

References

• 1. Giordano R. Materials for chairside CAD/CAM-produced restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:14-21.
• 2. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204:505-11.
• 3. Karaalioğlu OF, Duymuş ZY. Diş hekimliğinde uygulanan CAD/CAM sistemleri. J Dent Fak Ataturk Uni 2008;18:25-32.
• 4. Kalaycı BB, Bayındır F. Güncel bilgisayar destekli tasarım/bilgisayar destekli üretim sistemleri. J Dent Fak Ataturk Uni 2015;11:129-36.
• 5. Poticny DJ, Klim J. CAD/CAM in-office technology: innovations after 25 years for predictable, esthetic outcomes. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:5-9.
• 6. O’brien W.J. Dental Materials And Their Selection. 3th ed, Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc. Chicago, 2002. P. 48-52.
• 7. Christensen GJ. In-office CAD/CAM milling of restorations. The future? J Amer Dent Assoc 2008;139:83-5.
• 8. Li RW, Chow TW, Matinlinna JP. Ceramic dental biomaterials and CAD/CAM technology: State of art. J Prosthodont Res 2014;58:208-16.
• 9. Liebermann A, Wimmer T, Schmidlin PR, Scherer H, Löffler P, Roos M. Physicomechanical characterization of polyetheretherketone and current esthetic dental CAD/CAM polymers after aging in different storage media. J Prosthet Dent 2015;115:321-8.
• 10. Pop-Ciutrila IS, Dudea D, Badea ME, Moldovan M, Cimpean SI, Ghinea R. Shade Correspondence, Color, and Translucency Differences between Human Dentine and a CAD/CAM Hybrid Ceramic System. J Esthet Restor Dent 2016;28:46-55.
• 11. Kingery WD, Uhlmann DR, Bowen HK. Introduction to ceramics. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2013. p. 46-76.
• 12. Saravana KR, Vıjayalakshmı R. Nanotechnology in dentistry. Ind J Dent Res 2006;17:62–5.
• 13. Kong LX, Peng Z, Lı SD, Bartold PM. Nanotechnology and its role in the management of periodontal diseases. Periodontol. 2006,40:184-96.
• 14. Atabek D, Sıllelıoglu H, Olmez A. The efficiency of a new polishing material: nanotechnology liquid polish. Oper Dent 2010;35:362-9.
• 15. Magne P, Paranhos MP, Burnett LH Jr, Magne M, Belser UC. Fatigue resistance and failure mode of novel-design anterior single-tooth implant restorations: influence of material selection for type III veneers bonded to zirconia abutments. Clin Oral Impl Res 2011;22:195-200.
• 16. Poticny DJ, Klim J. CAD/CAM in-office technology. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:5-9.
• 17. Ab-Ghani Z, Jaafar W, Foo SF, Ariffin Z, Mohamad D. Shear bond strength of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing feldspathic and nano resin ceramics blocks cemented with three different generations of resin cement. J Conserv Dent 2015;18:355-9.
• 18. Koizumi H, Saiki O, Nogawa H, Hiraba H , Okazaki T, Matsumura H. Surface roughness and gloss of current CAD/CAM resin composites before and after toothbrush abrasion. Dent Mater J 2015;34:881–7.
• 19. Lava™ Ultimate CAD/CAM Restorative Instructions for Use, 3M ESPE Dental Products, St. Paul United States. 2016;www.3m.com.
• 20. GC Cerasmart Product Description. 2014; 800.323.7063 www.gcamerica.com.
• 21. Güth JF, Zuch T, Zwinge S, Engels J, Stimmelmayr M, Edelhoff D. Optical properties of manually and CAD/CAM-fabricated polymers. Dent Mater J 2013;32:865-71.
• 22. Magne P, Paranhos MP, Burnett LH Jr, Magne M, Belser UC. Fatigue resistance and failure mode of novel-design anterior single-tooth implant restorations: influence of material selection for type III veneers bonded to zirconia abutments. Clin Oral Impl Res 2011;22:195-200.
• 23. Acar Ö. Farklı yüzey hazırlıklarının CAD/CAM hibrit seramiğin kompozit rezin ile tamirine etkisi. Acta Odontologica Turcica 2016;33:121-5.
• 24. Chen C, Trindade FZ, de Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. The fracture resistance of a CAD/CAM resin nano ceramic and a CAD ceramic at different thicknesses. Dent Mater 2014;30:954-62.
• 25. Johnson AC, Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Ahuja S. Fracture strenght of CAD/ CAM composite and composite-ceramic occlusal veneers. J Prosthodont Res 2014;58:107-14.
• 26. Dupriez ND, Koeckritz AK, Kunzelmann KH. A comparative study of sliding wear of nonmetallic dental restorative materials with emphasis on micromechanical wear mechanisms. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2015;103:925-34.
• 27. Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials. Dent Mater 2013;29:419-26.
• 28. Dirxen C, Blunck U, Preissner S. Clinical performance of a new biomimetic double network material. Open Dent J 2013;7:118-22.
• 29. Della Bona A, Corazza PH, Zhang Y. Characterization of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material. Dent Mater 2014;30:564-9.
• 30. Güth JF, Zuch T, Zwinge S, Engels J, Stimmelmayr M, Edelhoff D. Optical properties of manually and CAD/CAM-fabricated polymers. Dent Mater J 2013;32:865-71.
• 31. Pieger S, Salman A, Bidra AS. Clinical outcomes of lithium disilicate single crowns and partial fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:22-30.
• 32. Working Instructions of VITA Suprinity. VITA Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH & Co. KG Postfach 1338, Bad Säckingen, Germany, 2014; D-54812 www.vita-zahnfabrik.com.
• 33. Awad D, Stawarczyk B, Liebermann A, Ilie N.Translucency of esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials and composite resins with respect to thickness and surface roughness. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:534-40.
• 34. Frankenberger R, Hartmann VE, Krech M, Krämer N, Reich S, Braun A, Roggendorf M. Adhesive luting of new CAD/CAM materials. Int J Comput Dent 2015;18:9-20.
• 35. D'Arcangelo C, Vanini L, Rondoni GD, De Angelis F. Wear properties of dental ceramics and porcelains compared with human enamel. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:350-5.
• 36. Frankenberger R, Zeilinger I, Krech M, Mörig G, Naumann M, Braun A, Krämer N, Roggendorf MJ. Stability of endodontically treated teeth with differently invasive restorations: Adhesive vs. non-adhesive cusp stabilization. Dent Mater 2015; 31:1312-20.
• 37. Preis V, Behr M, Hahnel S, Rosentritt M. Influence of cementation on in vitro performance, marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM-fabricated ZLS molar crowns. Dent Mater 2015; 31:1363-9.
• 38. Awada A, Nathanson D. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:587-93.
• 39. Ercan E, İbrahimova D, Hamidi MM. Kompozit inley, indirekt porselen inley ve cad/cam inley sistemi ile restore edilen dişlerin kenar sızıntılarının incelenmesi: in vitro çalışma. 2004;14:59-66.
• 40. Alberto A, Pascual A, Camps I, Grau-Benitez M. Comparative characterization of a novel cad-cam polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network. J Clin Exp Dent 2015;7:495-500.
• 41. Battersby PD, Battersby SJ. Measurements and modelling of the influence of dentine colour and enamel on tooth colour. 2015;43:373-81.
• 42. Arocha M, Basilio J, Llopis J. Colour stainability of indirect CAD/CAM processed composites vs conventionally laboratory processed composites after immersion in staining solutions. J Prosthet Dent 2014;8:831-8.
• 43. Lawson NC, Burgess JO.Gloss and Stain Resistance of Ceramic-Polymer CAD/CAM Restorative Blocks. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2016;28:40-5.
• 44. Awad A, Stawarczyk B, Liebermann A, Eichberger M, Güth JF. Evaluation of mechanical and optical behavior of current esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM composites. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2015; 55:1-11.
• 45. Fasbinder DJ, Neiva GF. Surface Evaluation of Polishing Techniques for New Resilient CAD/CAM Restorative Materials. J Esthet Restor Dent 2016;28:56-66.