FARKLI KİMYASAL YAPILARA SAHİP DİŞ MACUNLARININ FELDSPATİK PORSELENİN YÜZEY PÜRÜZLÜLÜĞÜNE ETKİSİ

Year 2019, Volume: 29 Issue: 1, 44 - 48, 15.01.2019

Alper Özdoğan Zeynep Yeşil Duymuş Esra İncesu Merve Köseoğlu

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.522684

Abstract

Amaç:
Bu çalışmanın amacı, farklı kimyasal yapılara sahip diş macunlarının feldspatik
porselenin yüzey pürüzlülüğüne etkisinin incelenmesidir.

Gereç ve Yöntem:
Çalışma kapsamında toplam 40 adet disk şeklinde porselen örnek kullanıldı.
Örneklerin yüzey bitim ve cila işlemlerinden sonra profilometre cihazı ile
pürüzlülükleri ölçülüp kaydedildi ve rastgele dört gruba ayrıldı. Örnek
yüzeyleri dört farklı kimyasal yapıya sahip diş macunu ve elektronik diş
fırçası ile günde iki kere iki dakika olmak üzere toplam bir aya denk gelecek
şekilde iki saat boyunca fırçalandı. Birinci ayın sonunda profilometre ile
tekrar yüzey pürüzlülükleri ölçüldü ve kaydedildi. Verilerin istatistiksel
değerlendirmesi varyans analizi kullanılarak yapıldı.

Bulgular:
Varyans analizinin sonuçları farklı kimyasal yapıdaki diş macunlarının
feldspatik porselenin yüzey pürüzlülüğünü anlamlı derecede arttırdığını
(p<0.05) gösterdi. En yüksek pürüzlülük değeri (2.60 ± 0.48 µm)
siyah renk koduna sahip diş macununda, en düşük pürüzlülük değerinin ise (1.96 ± 0.43
µm) kırmızı renk koduna sahip diş macununda olduğu tespit edildi.

Sonuç: Elde
edilen verilere göre, diş macunlarının feldspatik porselenin yüzey
pürüzlülüğünü arttırdığı, macunların kimyasal içeriğine bağlı olarak da bu
artışın değişebildiği sonucuna varıldı.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Diş macunu, porselen,
yüzey pürüzlülüğü 

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION TOOTHPASTES ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF FELDSPATHIC PORCELAIN

ABSTRACT

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different chemical
composition toothpastes on surface roughness of feldspathic porcelain.

Material and
Methods: Totally, 40 disc-shaped porcelain specimens were used
in this study. After the surface polishing, the surface roughness of specimens
was measured by profilometer and divided into four groups randomly. The surface
of specimens was brushed two hours instead of two times a day through two
minutes for a month by electric toothbrush and toothpastes, which have four
different chemical compositions. After a month the surface roughness were
measured by profilometer again and recorded. The statistically analysis
obtained data were performed with repeated measures analysis of variance test.

Results: The results of variance test showed that statistically significant
differences between different chemical composition toothpastes on surface
roughness of feldspathic porcelain (p<0.05). The highest surface roughness
value (2.60 ± 0.48 µm) was identified in black color code toothpaste, the
lowest surface roughness value (1.96 ± 0.43 µm) was identified in red color
code toothpaste.

Conclusion: The obtained data presented that, the toothpastes have increased the
surface roughness of feldspathic porcelain and this increasing has changed depending
on the chemical composition of toothpastes.

Keywords: Toothpaste, porcelain, surface roughness

Keywords

Diş macunu, porselen

References

• 1. Kukiattrakoon B, Hengtrakool C, Kedjarune-Leggat U. The effect of acidic agents on surface ion leaching and surface characteristics of dental porcelains. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:148-62.
• 2. Addy M, Hunter ML. Can tooth brushing damage your health?. Effects on oral and dental tissues. Int Dent J 2003;53: Suppl 3:177-86.
• 3. Anil N, Bolay S. Effect of toothbrushing on the material loss, roughness, and color of intrinsically and extrinsically stained porcelain used in metal-ceramic restorations: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:483-7.
• 4. Fischman SL. The history of oral hygiene products: How far have we come in 6000 years? Periodontol 2000;15:7-14.
• 5. Vincentini BC, Braga SRM, Sobral MAP. The measurement in vitro of dentine abrasion by toothpastes. Int Dent J 2007;57:314-8.
• 6. Moore C, Addy M. Wear of dentine in vitro by toothpaste abrasives and detergents alone and combined. J Clin Periodontol 2005 ;32:1242-6.
• 7. Hossain A, Okawa S, Miyakawa O. Effect of toothbrushing on titanium surface: an approach to understanding surface properties of brushed titanium. Dent Mater 2006;22:346-52.
• 8. Abouelatta OB, Abdel-Samad AA, Sakrana AA. Wear and surface roughness of current veneered materials after toothbrush/ dentifrice abrasion. J Mater Process Technol 2005;168:431-7.
• 9. Sharif N, MacDonald E, Hughes J, Newcombe RG, Addy M. The chemical stain removal properties of 'whitening' toothpaste products: studies in vitro. Br Dent J 2000;10:620-4.
• 10. Worschech CC, Rodrigues JA, Martins LR, Ambrosano GM. Brushing effect of abrasive dentifrices during at-home bleaching with 10% carbamide peroxide on enamel surface roughness. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006; 15:25-34.
• 11. Pizzo G, La cara M, Ester Licata M, Pizz I, D'angelo M. The effects of an essential oil and an amine fluoride/stannous fluoride mouthrinse on supragingival plaque regrowth. J Periodontol 2008;79: 1177–83.
• 12. Maldupa I, Brinkmane A, Rendeniece I, Mihailova A. Evidence based toothpaste classification, according to certain characteristics of their chemical composition. Stomatologia 2012;14:12-22.
• 13. Joiner A. Whitening toothpastes: a review of the literature. J Dent 2010;38 Suppl 2:e17-24.
• 14. Camargo IM, Saiki M, Vasconcellos MB, Avila DM. Abrasiveness evaluation of silica and calcium carbonate used in the production of dentifrices. J Cosmet Sci 2001; 52:163-7.
• 15. Walter S, CPP. Illustrated glossary of packaging terminology second edition. ISBN-13: 978-1930268272. DEStech Publications, Inc, 2008.
• 16. Pfarrer AM, White DJ, Featherstone JD. Anticaries profile qualification of an improved whitening dentifrice. J Clin Dent 2001;2:30-3.
• 17. Kleber CJ, Moore MH, Nelson BJ. Laboratory assessment of tooth whitening by sodium bicarbonate dentifrices. J Clin Dent 1998;9:72-5.
• 18. Shubhra V, Dakshi A, Vidya D, Hari P. Comparative evaluation of 0.2% [5]chlorhexidine versus herbal oral rinse on plaque induced gingivitis. J Indian Ass Pub Health Dent 2013;19:55-62.
• 19. Joiner A, Pickles MJ, Lynch S, Cox TF. The measurement of enamel wear by four toothpastes. Int Dent J 2008;58:23-8.
• 20. Whitehead SA, Shearer AC, Watts DC, Wilson NH. Surface texture changes of a composite brushed with "tooth whitening" dentifrices. Dent Mater 1996;12: 315-8.
• 21. Wulknitz P. Cleaning power and abrasivity of European toothpastes. Adv Dent Res 1997;11: 576-9.
• 22. Redmalm G. Dentifrice abrasivity. The use of laser light for determination of the abrasive properties of different silicas. An in vitro study. Swed Dent J 1986;10:243-50.
• 23. Vieira A, Ruben JL, Huysmans MC. Effect of titanium tetrafluoride, amine fluoride and fluoride varnish on enamel erosion in vitro. Caries Res 2005;39:371-9.
• 24. Heintze SD, Forjanic M. Surface roughness of different dental materials before and after simulated toothbrushing in vitro. Oper Dent 2005; 30:617-26.
• 25. Atalı PY, Öksüz M, Topbaşı FB. Fırçalamanın ve beyazlatıcı diş macunlarının kompozitlerin yüzey özelliklerine etkisi, Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2014, 24:22-32.
• 26. Yesil Duymus Z, Orbak R, Dilsiz A. Abrasion resistance of veneering materials to tooth brushing. Dent Mater J, 2003, 22: 460-6.
• 27. Garza LA, Thompson G, Cho SH, Berzins DW. Effect of toothbrushing on shade and surface roughness of extrinsically stained pressable ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:489-94.