ÇOCUK DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDE KULLANILAN KAVİTE DEZENFEKSİYON YÖNTEMLERİ

Year 2019, Volume: 29 Issue: 1, 124 - 132, 15.01.2019

İpek Arslan Özgül Baygın

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.523033

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Son dönemde estetik
kaygıların artması neticesinde rezin esaslı materyallerin kullanımının
yaygınlaşmasıyla diş dokularının korunmasına yönelik koruyucu kavite
preperasyonu teknikleri gündeme gelmiştir. Dentin dokusunun rengine ve
sertliğine bakılarak çürüğün uzaklaştırılmasına karar verilen koruyucu
yöntemler görsel ve dokunma duyularına dayanması nedeniyle subjektif veriler sunmakta
ve diş dokularının içinde yer alan bakterileri uzaklaştırmakta yetersiz
kalmaktadır. Dentinin içinde yer alan bu rezidüel bakteriler; enzimatik
aktivetelerini sürdürerek sayılarını artırmakta, postoperatif hassasiyet,
ikincil çürük ve pulpal enflamasyona sebep olabilmektedirler. Günümüzde bu
problemleri önlemek amacıyla kavite dezenfeksiyon yöntemleri önerilmektedir.
Bununla birlikte kullanılan kavite dezenfektanlarının antibak- teriyel
özelliklerine ilaveten; restoratif materyallerin diş sert dokularına bağlanma
dayanımına ve mikrosızıntıya etkilerinin de bilinmesi önem taşımaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Çürük, bakteri, kavite dezenfeksiyonu

 CAVITY DISINFECTION
METHODS USED IN PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY

ABSTRACT 

Recently, preventive cavity
preperation has gained popularity due to widespreading resin based materials
for esthetic reasons.  Preventive methods
which examine tooth color and structure provide subjective data and they are
insufficient to eliminate bacterias in dental tissues. These residual bacterias
in dentin continue to enzimatic activities and increase the numbers so cause
postoperative sensivity, secondary caries and pulpal inflamation. Today, cavity
disinfection methods are recommended to avoid these problem. In addition to
their antibacterial properties it is also important to know their effects on
the bond strength of restorative materials to dental hard tissues and effects
on microleakage.

Key
words: Dental caries,
bacteria, cavity disinfection

Keywords

Çürük, bakteri

References

• 1. Maupome G, Hernandez-Guerrero JC, Garcia-Luna M, Trejo-Alvarado A, Hernandez-Perez M, Diez-de-Bonilla J. In vivo diagnostic assessment of dentinal caries utilizing acid red and povidone-iodine dyes. Oper Dent 1995;20:119-22.
• 2. Ersin NK, Candan U, Aykut A, Eronat C, Belli S. No adverse effect to bonding following caries disinfection with chlorhexidine. J Dent Child (Chic) 2009;76:20-7.
• 3. Boston DW, Graver HT. Histobacteriological analysis of acid red dye-stainable dentin found beneath intact amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 1994;19:65-9.
• 4. van Strijp AJ, van Steenbergen TJ, ten Cate JM. Effects of chlorhexidine on the bacterial colonization and degradation of dentin and completely demineralized dentin in situ. Eur J Oral Sci 1997;105:27-35.
• 5. McDonnell G, Russell AD. Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 1999;12:147-79.
• 6. Arslan S, Yazici AR, Gorucu J, Pala K, Antonson DE, Antonson SA. Comparison of the effects of Er,Cr:YSGG laser and different cavity disinfection agents on microleakage of current adhesives. Lasers Med Sci 2012;27:805-11.
• 7. Bin-Shuwaish MS. Effects and effectiveness of cavity disinfectants in operative dentistry: A literature review. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17: 867-79.
• 8. Hamilton IR. Biochemical effects of fluoride on oral bacteria. J Dent Res 1990;69:660-7.
• 9. Mohan PV, Uloopi KS, Vinay C, Rao RC. In vivo comparison of cavity disinfection efficacy with APF gel, Propolis, Diode Laser, and 2% chlorhexidine in primary teeth. Contemp Clin Dent 2016; 7: 45-50.
• 10. Erdem AP, Sepet E, Kulekci G, Trosola SC, Guven Y. Effects of two fluoride varnishes and one fluoride/chlorhexidine varnish on streptococcus mutans and streptococcus sobrinus biofilm formation in vitro. Inter J of Medil Sci 2012;9: 129-36.
• 11. Subramaniam P, Naidu P. Effect of tooth mousse plus and cervitec gel on S. mutans. J Minim Interv Dent 2009;2:164-169
• 12. Tuzuner T, Ulusoy AT, Baygin O, Yahyaoglu G, Yalcin I, Buruk K. Direct and transdentinal (ındirect) antibacterial activity of commercially available dental gel formulations against streptococcus mutans. Med Princ Pract 2013;3:1-5.
• 13. Lessa FC, Nogueira I, Vargas Fda S, Spolidorio DM, Hebling J, Garcia-Godoy F. Direct and transdentinal antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine. Am J Dent 2010;23:255-9.
• 14. Lessa FC, Nogueira I, Huck C, Hebling J, Costa CA. Transdentinal cytotoxic effects of different concentrations of chlorhexidine gel applied on acid-conditioned dentin substrate. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010;92:40-7.
• 15. Baygin O, Tuzuner T, Ozel MB, Bostanoglu O. Comparison of combined application treatment with one-visit varnish treatments in an orthodontic population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2013;18: 362-70.
• 16. Peker DÖB. Sodyum hipokloritin fikse ve fikse olmayan insan pulpa dokularını çözücü etkisi. HÜ Dis Hek Fak Derg 1993;21:21-3.
• 17. Pioch T, Kobaslija S, Schagen B, Gotz H. Interfacial micromorphology and tensile bond strength of dentin bonding systems after NaOCl treatment. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:135-42.
• 18. Arisu HD, Kivanc BH, Saglam BC, Simsek E, Gorgul G. Effect of post-space treatments on the push-out bond strength and failure modes of glass fibre posts. Aust Endod J 2013;39:19-24.
• 19. Berber VB, Gomes BP, Sena NT, Vianna ME, Ferraz CC, Zaia AA. Efficacy of various concentrations of NaOCl and instrumentation techniques in reducing Enterococcus faecalis within root canals and dentinal tubules. Int Endod J 2006; 39:10-7.
• 20. Arslan S, Yazici AR, Gorucu J, Ertan A, Pala K, Ustun Y. Effects of different cavity disinfectants on shear bond strength of a silorane-based resin composite. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011;12:279-86.
• 21. Turkun M, Turkun LS, Ergucu Z, Ates M. Is an antibacterial adhesive system more effective than cavity disinfectants? Am J Dent 2006;19:166-70.
• 22. Özel E, Yurdagüven H, Say EC, Kocagöz S. Fosforik asit ve dezenfektan solüsyonların streptococcus mutans’a karşı antibakteriyel etkisinin saptanması. HÜ Diş Hek Fak Derg 2005;29:8-14.
• 23. Türkün M, Türkün LS, Ateş M. Antibacterial activity of cavity disinfectants. Balk J Stom 2004;8:214-9.
• 24. Ohara P, Torabinejad M, Kettering JD. Antibacterial effects of various endodontic medicaments on selected anaerobic bacteria. J Endod 1993;19: 498-500.
• 25. Say EC KF, Tarım B, Soyman M, Gülmez T. In vitro effect of cavity disinfectants on the bond strength of dentin bonding systems. Quintessence Int 2004;35:56-60.
• 26. Gultz J, Do L, Boylan R, Kaim J, Scherer W. Antimicrobial activity of cavity disinfectants. Gen Dent 1999;47:187-90.
• 27. Ersöz EÖP. The effect of various acids in different concentrations on the dentin surface, a SEM study. Türkiye Klin Diş Hek Bil Derg 1999;5:55-9.
• 28. Steinberg D, Rozen R, Klausner EA, Zachs B, Friedman M. Formulation, development and characterization of sustained release varnishes containing amine and stannous fluorides. Caries Res 2002;36:411-6.
• 29. Özan Ü Hİ, Sümer Z. Sodyum hipoklorit, klorheksidin ve propolis içerikli solüsyonların Potasyum Titanyum Fosfat Lazer ile birlikte kullanımlarının Candida Albicans üzerine etkilerinin incelenmesi. Cumhuriyet Üniv Dişhek Fak Derg 2009;12:33-8.
• 30. Ndhlala AR, Amoo SO, Stafford GI, Finnie JF, Van Staden J. Antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory and mutagenic investigation of the South African tree aloe (Aloe barberae). J Ethnopharmacol 2009; 124:404-8.
• 31. Azarpazhooh A, Limeback H. The application of ozone in dentistry: a systematic review of literature. J Dent 2008;36:104-16.
• 32. Knight GM, McIntyre JM, Craig GG, Mulyani, Zilm PS. The inability of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus to form a biofilm in vitro on dentine pretreated with ozone. Aust Dent J 2008;53:349-53.
• 33. Johansson E, Claesson R, van Dijken JW. Antibacterial effect of ozone on cariogenic bacterial species. J Dent 2009;37:449-53.
• 34. Dinç G. Kavite dezenfektanlarının antibakteriyel özellikleri, bağlanma dayanımı ve mikrosızıntı üzerine etkileri. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2012;6;66-75.
• 35. Schmidlin PR, Zimmermann J, Bindl A. Effect of ozone on enamel and dentin bond strength. J Adhes Dent 2005;7:29-32.
• 36. Cadenaro M, Delise C, Antoniollo F, Navarra OC, Di Lenarda R, Breschi L. Enamel and dentin bond strength following gaseous ozone application. J Adhes Dent 2009;11:287-92.
• 37. Magni E, Ferrari M, Hickel R, Huth KC, Ilie N. Effect of ozone gas application on the mechanical properties of dental adhesives bonded to dentin. Dent Mater 2008;24:1428-34.
• 38. Konopka K, Goslinski T. Photodynamic therapy in dentistry. J Dent Res 2007;86:694-707.
• 39. Komerik N, MacRobert AJ. Photodynamic therapy as an alternative antimicrobial modality for oral infections. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 2006; 25:487-504.
• 40. Kubler A, Niziol C, Sidhu M, Dunne A, Werner JA. Analysis of cost effectiveness of photodynamic therapy with Foscan (Foscan-PDT) in comparison with palliative chemotherapy in patients with advanced head-neck tumors in Germany. Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie 2005;84:725-32.
• 41. Zanin IC, Lobo MM, Rodrigues LK, Pimenta LA, Hofling JF, Goncalves RB Photosensitization of in vitro biofilms by toluidine blue O combined with a light-emitting diode. Eur J Oral Sci 2006;114:64-9.
• 42. Longo JP, Leal SC, Simioni AR, de Fatima Menezes Almeida-Santos M, Tedesco AC, Azevedo RB. Photodynamic therapy disinfection of carious tissue mediated by aluminum-chloride-phthalocyanine entrapped in cationic liposomes: an in vitro and clinical study. Lasers Med Sci 2012;27:575-84.
• 43. Goldman L, Gray JA, Goldman J, Goldman B, Meyer R. Effect of Laser Beam Impacts on Teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1965;70:601-6.
• 44. Uysal D, Güler Ç. Diş hekimliğinde lazer: bir literatür derlemesi. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2012;6:44-53.
• 45. Bader C, Krejci I. Indications and limitations of Er:YAG laser applications in dentistry. Am J Dent 2006;9:178-86.
• 46. Whitters CJ, Strang R. Preliminary investigation of a novel carbon dioxide laser for applications in dentistry. Lasers Surg Med 2000;26:262-9.
• 47. Usumez A, Aykent F. Bond strengths of porcelain laminate veneers to tooth surfaces prepared with acid and Er,Cr:YSGG laser etching. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:24-30.
• 48. Coluzzi DJ. An overview of laser wavelengths used in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2000; 44: 753-65.
• 49. Milliard MJ ML, Aronoff BL, Hults D. Soft tissue studies with 805 nm Diode laser radiation: Thermal effects with contact tips and comparison with 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser radiation. Lasers Surg Med 1993; 13: 528-36.
• 50. Prabhakar AR, Karuna YM, Yavagal C, Deepak BM. Cavity disinfection in minimally invasive dentistry - comparative evaluation of Aloe vera and propolis: A randomized clinical trial. Contemp Clin Dent 2015;6:S24-31.
• 51. Sulieman M. An overview of the use of lasers in general dental practice: 1. Laser physics and tissue interactions. Dent Update 2005;32:228-330.
• 52. Mehrvarzfar P, Saghiri MA, Asatourian A, Fekrazad R, Karamifar K, Eslami G. Additive effect of a diode laser on the antibacterial activity of 2.5% NaOCl, 2% CHX and MTAD against Enterococcus faecalis contaminating root canals: an in vitro study. J Oral Sci 2011;53:355-60.
• 53. Basso FG, Oliveira CF, Fontana A, Kurachi C, Bagnato VS, Spolidorio DM In Vitro effect of low-level laser therapy on typical oral microbial biofilms. Braz Dent J 2011;22:502-10.
• 54. Turkun M, Turkun LS, Celik EU, Ates M. Bactericidal effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser on Streptococcus mutans. Dent Mater J 2006;25:81-6.
• 55. Lee BS, Lin YW, Chia JS, Hsieh TT, Chen MH, Lin CP. Bactericidal effects of diode laser on Streptococcus mutans after irradiation through different thickness of dentin. Lasers Surg Med 2006;38:62-9.