DENTAL DİJİTAL GÖRÜNTÜLEMEDE ÜÇÜNCÜ BOYUT

Year 2019, Volume: 29 Issue: 1, 133 - 142, 15.01.2019

Selin Ergün , Pelin Güneri

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.523071

Abstract

DENTAL DİJİTAL GÖRÜNTÜLEMEDE ÜÇÜNCÜ BOYUT

 

Son yıllarda hızla ilerleyen dijital
radyoloji teknolojisinin ürünü olan ve özellikle dentomaksillofasiyal yapıların
görüntülenmesi amacıyla geliştirilen dental volumetrik tomografi (DVT), diş
hekimliği uygulamalarında her geçen gün daha fazla kullanım alanı bulmaktadır.
Medikal bilgisayarlı tomografi cihazlarına göre daha ucuz ve daha düşük
radyasyon dozuna sahip olan DVT cihazları, diş hekimliğinde üç boyutlu
verilerin elde edilmesine ve görüntüler üzerinde rekonstrüksiyon işlemlerinin
yapılabilmesine olanak sağlamaktadır. Bu derlemede DVT görüntüleme
sistemlerinin çalışma prensipleri, teknik özellikleri, kullanım alanları,
avantaj ve dezavantajları ile ilgili genel bilgiler sunulmaktadır.

Anahtar
kelimeler: Radyoloji, diş hekimliği,
dental volumetrik tomografi, konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi

THIRD
DIMENSION IN DENTAL DIGITAL IMAGING

ABSTRACT

Dental volumetric tomography (DVT), which
is developed uniquely for dentomaxillofacial imaging, appeared in the dental
world concurrently with recent rapid developments in digital radiology
technology, and is becoming more popular in dental practice. DVT devices that
generate lower radiation doses and have lower cost when compared to medical CT
enable acquirement of three dimensional data and reconstruction of these
digital images on personal computers. In this review, the principles, technical
features, indications, advantages and disadvantages of DVT systems are
presented.

Keywords:
Radiology, dentistry, dental
volumetric tomography, cone beam computed tomography.

Keywords

Radyoloji, diş hekimliği, dental volumetrik tomografi

References

• 1. Scarfe WC, Li Z, Aboelmaaty W, Scott SA, Farman AG. Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: esence, elements and steps to interpretation. Aust Dent J 2012;51:46-60.
• 2. Dawood A, Patel S, Brown J. Cone beam CT in dental practice. Br Dent J 2009;207:23-8.
• 3. Kamburoğlu K, Acar B, Yakar EN, Paksoy CS. Dentomaksillofasiyal konik ışın demetli bilgisayarlı tomografi bölüm 1: Temel prensipler. ADO Klinik Bilim Derg 2012;6:1125-36.
• 4. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 2006;72:75-80.
• 5. Borahan MO, Dumlu A, Pekiner FN. Diş hekimliğinde yeni bir çağın başlangıcı: Dental volumetrik tomografi. İstanbul Dişhek Odası Derg 2012;143:32-5.
• 6. Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am 2008;52: 707-30.
• 7. Evlice BK, Öztunç H. Dijital radyografi ve diş hekimliğinde ileri görüntüleme yöntemleri. Arşiv Kaynak Tarama Dergisi 2013;22:230-8.
• 8. Büyük SK, Ramoğlu Sİ. Ortodontik teşhiste konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi. Sağlık Bilim Derg 2011;20:227-34.
• 9. Hounsfield GN. Nobel Lecture. Computed medical imaging. J Radiol 1980;61:459-68.
• 10. Erdem T, Aydın KC. Diş hekimliğinde kullanılan ileri görüntüleme teknikleri. TDBD 2006;96:48-52.
• 11. Kumar M, Shanavas M, Sidappa A, Kiran M. Cone beam computed tomography-Know its secrets. J Int Oral Health 2015;7:64-8.
• 12. Angelopoulos C, Scarfe WC, Farman AG. A comparison of maxillofacial CBCT and medical CT. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2012;20:1-17.
• 13. White SC. Cone-beam imaging in dentistry. Health Phys 2008;95:628-37.
• 14. Pauwels R, Araki K, Siewerdsen JH, Thongvigitmanee SS. Technical aspects of dental CBCT: state of the art. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015;44: 20140224.
• 15. Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D, Bruellmann DD, Dranischnikow E, Schwanecke U, Schoemer E. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011;40:265-73.
• 16. Brown AA, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Linear accuracy of cone beam CT derived 3D images. Angle Orthod 2009;79:150-7.
• 17. Sukovic P. Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res 2003;6:31-6.
• 18. Sur J, Seki K, Koizumi H, Nakajima K, Okano T. Effects of tube current on cone-beam computerized tomography image quality for presurgical implant planning in vitro. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;110:e29-33.
• 19. Barghan S, Tetradis S, Mallaya SM. Application of cone beam computed tomography for assessment of the temporamandibular joints. Aust Dent J 2012;57:109-18.
• 20. Kau CH, Bozic M, English J, Lee R, Bussa H, Ellis RK. Cone-beam computed tomography of the maxillofacial region-an update. Int J Med Robot 2009;5:366-80
• 21. Lofthag-Hansen S, Thilander-Klang A, Gröndahl K. Evaluation of subjective image quality in relation to diagnostic task for cone beam computed tomography with different fields of view. Eur J Radiol 2011;80:483-8. 22. Horner K, Islam M, Flygare L, Tsiklakis K, Whaites E. Basic principles for use of dental cone beam computed tomography: consensus guidelines of the European Academy of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009;38:187-95.
• 23. Aktan AM, Güngör E, Çiftçi ME, İşman Ö. Diş hekimliğinde konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi kullanımı. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2015;25:71-6
• 24. Kamburoğlu K, Yakar EN, Acar B, Paksoy CS. Dentomaksillofasiyal Konik Işın Demetli Bilgisayarlı Tomografi Bölüm 2: Klinik Uygulamaları. ADO Klinik Bilim Derg 2012;6:1160-65.
• 25. Singh P. Cone beam computed tomography: A new trend for craniafacial treatment planning. Letter to Editor. Biomed J 2013;36:152.
• 26. Worthington P, Rubenstein J, Hatcher DC. The role of cone-beam computed tomography in the planning and placement of implants. JADA 2010;141:19-24.
• 27. Ziegler CM, Woertche R, Brief J, Hassfeld S. Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002;31:126-30.
• 28. Moreira CR, Sales MA, Lopes PM, Cavelcanti JP. Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographic images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:430-6.
• 29. Curley A, Hatcher DC. Cone beam CT: anatomic assessment and legal issues-the new standards of care. J Calif Dent Assoc 2009;37:653-62.
• 30. Pandharbale AA, Gadgil RM, Bhoosreddy AR, Kunte VR, Ahire BS, Shinde MR, Joshi SS. Evaluation of the posterior superior alveolar artery using cone beam computed tomography. Pol J Radiol 2016;81:606-10.
• 31. Kamburoğlu K. Use of dentomaxillofacial cone beam computed tomography in dentistry. World J Radiol 2015;7:128-30.
• 32. Al-Saleh MAQ, Alsufyani NA, Saltaji H, Jaremko JL, Major PW. MRI and CBCT image registration of temporomandibular joint: a systemic review. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;45:30.
• 33. Acar B, Kamburoğlu K. Use of computed cone beam tomography in periodontology. World J Radiol 2014;6:139-47.
• 34. Walter C, Schmidt JC, Dula K, Sculean A. Cone beam computed tomography(CBCT) for diagnosis and treatment planning in periodontology: A systemic review. Quintessence Int 2016;47:25-37.
• 35. Khasnis SA, Kidiyoor KH, Patil AB, Kenganal SB. Vertical root fractures and their management. J Conserv Dent 2014;17:103-10.
• 36. Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, Pauwels R, Vanheusden S, Suetens P, Marchal G, Sanderink G, Jacobs R. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol 2009;71:461-8.
• 37. Spin-Neto R, Wenzel A. Patient movement and motion artefacts in cone beam computed tomography of the dentomaxillofacial regio: a systematic literature review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2016;121:425-33.