Abstract
Giriş ve Amaç: Monoblok
itriyum stabilize tetragonal zirkonya polikristal ( Y- TZP ) seramikler, diğer
seramikler ile karşılaştırıldığında yüksek mekanik ve estetik özellikler
sergileyen en güncel materyallerden biri olmuştur. Monoblok
zirkonya biyouyumluluk, nontoksik etkileri, düşük bakteriyel adezyon gibi
özellikleri ile tabakalı seramiklerin önüne geçmiştir. Bu vaka raporunun amacı,
tam seramik restorasyonlar ile maksiller anterior dişlerin estetik olmayan
görünümünü restore etmektir.
Olgu: 27
yaşındaki erkek hasta anterior dişlerinin estetik olmayan görünümü şikayetiyle
başvurmuştur. Klinik ve radyografik inceleme sonucunda bruksizmi olan hastada
çiğneme yüzeyleri ve insizal kenarlarda aşınma olduğu gözlenmiştir. Ön bölge
estetik restorasyonlar için translusensi ve dayanıklılık avantajları nedeniyle
monolitik zirkonya materyali seçilmiştir.
Sonuç: 12 aylık
takip sonucunda hiçbir estetik ve fonksiyonel komplikasyon rapor edilmemiştir.
Protetik rehabilitasyonda çift tabakalı seramik sistemleri ile ilişkili
komplikasyonları önlemek için monolitik zirkonya sistemleri kullanılabilir.
Anahtar kelimeler: monoblok zirkonya, estetik; kron
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
Monoblock yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP) ceramics,
became one of the most current material which exhibits high mechanical and
aesthetic properties compared with other ceramics. Monoblock zirconia is a
biocompatible non toxic material with low bacterial adhesion and which
eliminates multilayering of ceramics. The purpose of this report was to restore
unaesthetics appearance of maxillary anterior teeth with full ceramic
restoration.
Case
presentation: A 27-year-old man referred because of the unaesthetic appearance
of anterior teeth. As a result of clinical and radiographical examinations, it is
indicated that patient with wear on occlusal surfaces is the patient having
bruxism. Monolithic zirconia was chosen for its’ translucency for anterior
esthetics and strength.
Results: No
esthetic and functional complications were reported after 12 months. Prosthetic
rehabilitation using monolithic zirconia may help to prevent complications
associated with bilayered ceramics systems.
Key words: monoblock zirconia; esthetic; crown
Keywords
References
- 1. Beuer F, Edelhoff D, Gernet W, Naumann M. Effect of preparation angles on the precision of zirconia crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM system. Dent Mater J 2008; 27: 814–20.
- 2. Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: Basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent 2007; 35: 819-26.
- 3. Nakamura K, Harada A, Inagaki R et al. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia molar crowns with reduced thickness. Acta Odontol Scand 2015; 73(8): 602-8.
- 4. Heintze SD, Rousson V. Survival of zirconia and metal-supported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2010; 23(6): 493-502.
- 5. Guess PC, Bonfante EA, Silva NR, Coelho PG, Thompson VP. Effect of core design and veneering technique on damage and reliability of Y-TZP supported crowns. Dent Mater 2013; 29: 307-16.
- 6. Albashaireh ZS, Ghazal M, Kern M. Two-body wear of different ceramic materials opposed to zirconia ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 104: 105-113.
- 7. Nordahl, Vult von Steyern P, Larsson C. Fracture strength of ceramic monolithic crown systems of different thickness. J Oral Sci 2015; 57(3): 255-61.
- 8. Çelik M, Bural C, Bayraktar G. Diş Hekimliğinde Zirkonya Uygulamaları. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2014; 8: 106-116
- 9. Sulaiman TA, Abdulmajeed AA, Donovan TE et al. Optical properties and light irradiance of monolithic zirconia at variable thicknesses. Dent Mater 2015; 31(10): 1180-7.
- 10. Zhang Y. Making yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia translucent. Dent Mater 2014; 30(10): 1195-203.
Abstract
References
- 1. Beuer F, Edelhoff D, Gernet W, Naumann M. Effect of preparation angles on the precision of zirconia crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM system. Dent Mater J 2008; 27: 814–20.
- 2. Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: Basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent 2007; 35: 819-26.
- 3. Nakamura K, Harada A, Inagaki R et al. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia molar crowns with reduced thickness. Acta Odontol Scand 2015; 73(8): 602-8.
- 4. Heintze SD, Rousson V. Survival of zirconia and metal-supported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2010; 23(6): 493-502.
- 5. Guess PC, Bonfante EA, Silva NR, Coelho PG, Thompson VP. Effect of core design and veneering technique on damage and reliability of Y-TZP supported crowns. Dent Mater 2013; 29: 307-16.
- 6. Albashaireh ZS, Ghazal M, Kern M. Two-body wear of different ceramic materials opposed to zirconia ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 104: 105-113.
- 7. Nordahl, Vult von Steyern P, Larsson C. Fracture strength of ceramic monolithic crown systems of different thickness. J Oral Sci 2015; 57(3): 255-61.
- 8. Çelik M, Bural C, Bayraktar G. Diş Hekimliğinde Zirkonya Uygulamaları. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2014; 8: 106-116
- 9. Sulaiman TA, Abdulmajeed AA, Donovan TE et al. Optical properties and light irradiance of monolithic zirconia at variable thicknesses. Dent Mater 2015; 31(10): 1180-7.
- 10. Zhang Y. Making yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia translucent. Dent Mater 2014; 30(10): 1195-203.
Details
| Subjects | Health Care Administration |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Olgu Sunumu |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | July 16, 2019 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2019 Volume: 29 Issue: 3 |
Cite
Bu eser Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır. Tıklayınız.