TREATMENT OF EARLY CLASS III MALOCCLUSION WITH BUÑO APPLIANCE

Year 2020, Volume: 30 Issue: 1, 126 - 129, 15.01.2020

Dinan Demiröz Nihat Kılıç Hüsamettin Oktay

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.548760

Abstract

Abstract:

Skeletal Class III
malocclusion is one of the most challenging, complex and difficult problems to
treat. Functional orthopedic appliances can produce favorable outcomes during
early mixed dentition in cases with Class III malocclusion. The purpose of this
case report was to present a successfully treated 8-years-old female patient
having skeletal Class III malocclusion due to maxillary retrusion by means of a
simple Class III corrector, the
bimaxillar prognathism upper plate according to Buño.

Key words: Class
III malocclusion, Class III corrector

ERKEN SINIF 3 MALOKLUZYONUN BUÑO APAREYİ İLE TEDAVİSİ

Öz

İskeletsel Sınıf III
malokluzyon tedavisi en zor ve karmaşık problemlerden biridir. Fonksiyonel
ortopedik apareyler erken karışık dişlenme dönemimdeki Sınıf III malokluzyonlu
vakalarda olumlu sonuçlar oluşturabilir. Bu vaka raporunun amacı, maksiller
retrüzyona bağlı olarak gelişen  iskeletsel
Sınıf III malokluzyonlu 8 yaşındaki bir kız çocuğunun basit bir Sınıf III
düzeltme apareyi (“Buno  apareyi) ile
başarılı şekilde tedavisini göstermektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Sınıf III maloklüzyon, Sınıf III

Keywords

Class III malocclusion, Class III corrector

References

• 1. A.J Kapust, P.M Sinclair and P.K Turley, “Cephalometric effects of face mask/expansion therapy in Class III children: a comparison of three age groups,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 204-212, 1998.
• 2. B. Cai, X. Zhao and Lu. Xiang, “Orthodontic decompensation and correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion with gradual dentoalveolar remodeling in a growing patient,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 145, no. 3, pp. 367-80, 2014.
• 3. P. Cozza, A. Marino and M. Mucedero, “An orthopaedic approach to the treatment of Class III malocclusions in the early mixed dentition,” European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 191-199, 2004.
• 4. R. Miethke, S. Lindenau and K. Dietrich, “The effect of Fränkel’s function regulator type III on the apical base,” European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 311-318, 2003.
• 5. F. Falck and K. Zimmermann, “Cephalometric changes in the treatment of Class III using the Fränkel appliance,” Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 99-109, 2008.
• 6. R. Frankel, “Maxillary retrusion in Class III and treatment with the function corrector III,” Trans Eurupean Orthodontic Society, pp. 249-259, 1970.
• 7. http://www.o-atlas.de/eng/kapitel4_126.php
• 8. J. A. McNamara Jr., “An orthopedic approach to the treatment of Class III malocclusion in young patients,” Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 598–608, 1987.
• 9. F. P. Ferreira, M. D. Goulart, R. R. de Almeida-Pedrin, A. C. Conti, M. A. Cardoso. Treatment of Class III Malocclusion: Atypical Extraction Protocol. Case Reports in Dentistry. 2017;2017:4652685. doi: 10.1155/2017/4652685
• 10. J. Sugawara, Z. Aymach, H. Hin and R. Nanda, “One-phase vs 2-phase treatment for developing Class III malocclusion: a comparison of identical twins,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 141, no. 1, pp. e11-22, 1968.
• 11. J. Jiang, J. Lin, C. Ji, “Two-stage treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion during the early permanent dentition, ” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 520-527, 2005.
• 12. Z. Kanno, Y. Kim and K. Soma “Early correction of a developing skeletal Class III malocclusion, ” Angle Orthodontist, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 549-556, 2007.
• 13. M. Ülgen and F. Sönmez, “The effects of the Frankel's function regulator on the Class III malocclusion,”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 105, no. 6, pp. 561-567, 1994.