Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

EVALUATION OF REFERRAL OF CONE-BEAM CT INVESTIGATIONS AT A DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY CLINIC OF UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

Year 2020, Volume: 30 Issue: 2, 167 - 173, 15.04.2020

Hakan Eren Beste İnceoğlu Burcu Kirşan Büyükkoçak İrem Eren Kaan Orhan

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.674728

Abstract

Abstract:
Objective: Recent researches provided an overview for advantages, disadvantages and indications/contraindications of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) as well as some thoughts on the current educational status of CBCT in dental schools. Reviews of recent publications reveal that CBCT is an important tool in the diagnostic process, even it plays an integral role in treatment planning and outcome assessment at different departments like maxillofacial surgery, orthodontics, periodontology and endodontics.
The aim of present study is to find out the indications and the most frequently used ones by reviewing the indications of CBCT at Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) clinic, which were referred by other clinics/departments of the hospital.
Materials and Method:1590 CBCT indications defined from 1503 patients and their reports retrieved from the archieves of the DMFR clinic. Besides; referral reports, and Field of View (FOV- region) were also noted.
Results: CBCT imaging has mostly focused on applications for dental implant planning, impacted tooth extraction, orthodontic purposes and temporomandibular joint imaging.
Conclusion:CBCT is a 3D diagnostic tool contributing additional information to the clinical situation if the appropriate indication is used with the right FOV selection. In addition, the recent spread of implant treatments has led to the use of CBCT for implant planning.
Key words: CBCT, Indication, FOV, Applications of CBCT
Öz
Amaç:Son araştırmalar, Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi'nin (KIBT) avantajları, dezavantajları ve endikasyonları / kontrendikasyonları yanı sıra dişhekimliği okullarında verilen mevcut KIBT eğitimi ile ilgili geliştirilen fikirler hakkında genel bir bakış sağlamıştır. Son yayınların değerlendirmeleri KIBT'nin tanısal süreçte önemli bir araç olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Hatta maksillofasiyal cerrahi, ortodonti, periodontoloji ve endodonti gibi farklı bölümlerin tedavi planlama ve sonuç değerlendirmesinde ayrılmaz bir rol oynamaktadır.
Bu çalışmanın amacı, hastanenin diğer klinikleri / bölümleri tarafından yönlendirilen Dentomaksillofasiyal Radyoloji (DMFR) kliniğindeki KIBT endikasyonlarını gözden geçirerek KIBT endikasyonları ile bunlardan en sık kullanılanları ortaya çıkarmaktır.
Gereç ve Yöntem:1503 hastadan 1590 KIBT endikasyonu tanımlandı ve raporları DMFR kliniğinin arşivlerinden alındı, sevk raporları ve İnceleme Alanı (FOV bölgesi) da not edildi.
Bulgular:KIBT görüntüleme çoğunlukla implant planlaması, gömülü diş çekimi, ortodontik amaçlar ve temporomandibuler eklem görüntülemesi uygulamalarına odaklanmıştır.
Sonuç:KIBT, uygun FOV bölgesi seçiminde uygun endikasyon kullanıldığında klinik duruma ek bilgi sağlayan 3B tanılama aracıdır. Ek olarak implant tedavilerinin yaygınlaşması, implant planlaması için KIBT kullanımının da artmasına yol açmıştır.
Anahtar kelimeler: KIBT, Endikasyon, FOV, KIBT Uygulamaları

Keywords

CBCT Indication FOV

References

  • 1. Park JB. The evaluation of digital panoramic radiographs taken for implant dentistry in the daily practice. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010;15:663–666.
  • 2. Rushton VE, Horner K, Worthington HV. The quality of panoramic radiographs in a sample of general dental practices. Br Dent J 1999;186:630–633.
  • 3. Mayil M, Keser G, Namdar Pekiner F. CBCT Images of Anatomic Landmarks in Maxillofacial Region MÜSBED 2014;4(4):232-240.
  • 4. Shetty H, Hegde P, Shetty A, Hegde MN. CBCT Imaging- The Dentists Third Eye: A Literature Based Review. Indian Journal of Stomatology. 2014;5(3):95-101.
  • 5. Venkatesh E, Elluru SV. Cone beam computed tomography: basics and applications in dentistry. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2017;51(3 Suppl 1):102–121.
  • 6. Krishnamoorthy B, Mamatha N, Kumar VA. TMJ imaging by CBCT: Current scenario. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2013;3(1):80–83.
  • 7. Schegerer A, Lechel U, Ritter M, Weisser G, Fink C, Brix G. Dose and Image Quality of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography as Compared With Conventional Multislice Computed Tomography in Abdominal Imaging. Investigative Radiology. 49(10):675–684. 8. Jaju PP, Jaju SP. Clinical utility of dental cone-beam computed tomography: current perspectives. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2014;6:29–43.
  • 9. Adibi S, Zhang W, Servos T, O’Neill PN. Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Dentistry: What Dental Educators and Learners Should Know. J Dent Educ. 2012 Nov;76(11):1437-42.
  • 10. Carter JB, Stone, Clark RS, Mercer JE. Applications of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: An Overview of Published Indications and Clinical Usage in United States Academic Centers and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Practices. J Oral Maxillofac Surg.2016;74:668-79.
  • 11. Temur KT, Hatipoglu O. Awareness And Use Of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Of Turkish Dentist. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni. 2019;29(2):169-175. 12. Stratemann SA, Huang JC, Maki K, et al. Comparison ofcone beam computed tomography imaging with physicalmeasures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008;37:80-93.
  • 13. Eggers G, Klein J, Welzel T, et al. Geometric accuracy of digital volume tomography and conventional computed tomography. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;46:639-44.
  • 14. Stuck BA, Hulse R, Barth TJ. Intraoperative cone beamcomputed tomography in the management of facial fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41:1171-5.
  • 15. Tsapaki V, Radiation protection in dental radiology - Recent advances and future directions. Phys Med. 2017 Dec;44:222-6.
  • 16. European Commission. European Guidelines on Radiation Protection in Dental Radiology; Radiation Protection, Luxembourg 2004:Report 136.
  • 17. Goren A, Prins R, Dauer L, Quinn B, Al-Najjar A, Faber R, et al.Effect of leaded glasses and thyroid shielding on cone beam CT radiation dose in an adult female phantom. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(6):p. 20120260.
  • 18. Longoni S, Sartori M, Braun M, et al. Lingual vascular canals of the mandible: The risk of bleeding complications during implant procedures. Implant Dent. 2007;16:131-8.
  • 19. Makris N, Stamatakis H, Syriopoulos K, et al. Evaluation of the visibility and the course of the mandibular incisive canal and the lingual foramen using cone-beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:766-71.
  • 20. Stuart J. Implant complications associated with two and three dimensional diagnostic imaging technologies. In: Ganz SD, eds. Dental Implant Complications: Etiology, Prevention, and Treatment. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Jhon Wiley & Sons; 2015:102-31.
  • 21. Nascimento HAR, Andrade MEA, Frazão MAG, Nascimento EHL, Ramos-Perez FMM, Freitas DQ. Dosimetry in CBCT with Different Protocols: Emphasis on Small FOVs Including Exams for TMJ. Braz Dent J. 2017 Jul-Aug;28(4):511-516.
  • 22. White SC, Scarfe WC, Schulze RK, Lurie AG, Douglass JM, Farman AG, et al. The image gently in dentistry campaign: promotion of responsible use of maxillofacial radiology in dentistry for children. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2014; 118: 257–61.
  • 23. Kiljunen T, Kaasalainen T, Suomalainen A, Kortesniemi M.Dental cone beam CT: A review. Physica Medica. 2015;31:844-60.
  • 24. ScarfeWC, Li Z, Aboelmaaty W, Scott SA, Farman AG. Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: essence, elements and steps to interpretation. Aust DentJ. 2012;57(Suppl. 1):46–60.
  • 25. Isman O, Yilmaz HH, Aktan AM, Yilmaz B. Indications for cone beam computed tomography in childrenand young patients in a Turkish subpopulation. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2017; 27:183-90.
  • 26. Mandelaris GA, Scheyer ET, Evans M, Kim D, McAllister B, Nevins ML, et al. American Academy of PeriodontologyBest Evidence Consensus Statementon Selected Oral Applications forCone-Beam Computed Tomography. J Periodontol. 2017;88(10):939-45.
  • 27. Nematolahi H, Abadi H, Mohammadzade Z, Soofiani Ghadim M. The use of cone beam computed tomography(CBCT) to determine supernumerary and impacted teeth position in pediatric patients: a case report. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2013;7:47–50.
  • 28. Kapila S, Conley RS, Harrell WE Jr. The currentstatus of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011; 40:24–34.
  • 29. European Commission on Radiation Protection. Evidence Based Guidelines on Cone Beam CT for Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2012:Report 172.

Year 2020, Volume: 30 Issue: 2, 167 - 173, 15.04.2020

Hakan Eren Beste İnceoğlu Burcu Kirşan Büyükkoçak İrem Eren Kaan Orhan

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.674728

Abstract

References

  • 1. Park JB. The evaluation of digital panoramic radiographs taken for implant dentistry in the daily practice. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010;15:663–666.
  • 2. Rushton VE, Horner K, Worthington HV. The quality of panoramic radiographs in a sample of general dental practices. Br Dent J 1999;186:630–633.
  • 3. Mayil M, Keser G, Namdar Pekiner F. CBCT Images of Anatomic Landmarks in Maxillofacial Region MÜSBED 2014;4(4):232-240.
  • 4. Shetty H, Hegde P, Shetty A, Hegde MN. CBCT Imaging- The Dentists Third Eye: A Literature Based Review. Indian Journal of Stomatology. 2014;5(3):95-101.
  • 5. Venkatesh E, Elluru SV. Cone beam computed tomography: basics and applications in dentistry. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2017;51(3 Suppl 1):102–121.
  • 6. Krishnamoorthy B, Mamatha N, Kumar VA. TMJ imaging by CBCT: Current scenario. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2013;3(1):80–83.
  • 7. Schegerer A, Lechel U, Ritter M, Weisser G, Fink C, Brix G. Dose and Image Quality of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography as Compared With Conventional Multislice Computed Tomography in Abdominal Imaging. Investigative Radiology. 49(10):675–684. 8. Jaju PP, Jaju SP. Clinical utility of dental cone-beam computed tomography: current perspectives. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2014;6:29–43.
  • 9. Adibi S, Zhang W, Servos T, O’Neill PN. Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Dentistry: What Dental Educators and Learners Should Know. J Dent Educ. 2012 Nov;76(11):1437-42.
  • 10. Carter JB, Stone, Clark RS, Mercer JE. Applications of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: An Overview of Published Indications and Clinical Usage in United States Academic Centers and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Practices. J Oral Maxillofac Surg.2016;74:668-79.
  • 11. Temur KT, Hatipoglu O. Awareness And Use Of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Of Turkish Dentist. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni. 2019;29(2):169-175. 12. Stratemann SA, Huang JC, Maki K, et al. Comparison ofcone beam computed tomography imaging with physicalmeasures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008;37:80-93.
  • 13. Eggers G, Klein J, Welzel T, et al. Geometric accuracy of digital volume tomography and conventional computed tomography. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;46:639-44.
  • 14. Stuck BA, Hulse R, Barth TJ. Intraoperative cone beamcomputed tomography in the management of facial fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41:1171-5.
  • 15. Tsapaki V, Radiation protection in dental radiology - Recent advances and future directions. Phys Med. 2017 Dec;44:222-6.
  • 16. European Commission. European Guidelines on Radiation Protection in Dental Radiology; Radiation Protection, Luxembourg 2004:Report 136.
  • 17. Goren A, Prins R, Dauer L, Quinn B, Al-Najjar A, Faber R, et al.Effect of leaded glasses and thyroid shielding on cone beam CT radiation dose in an adult female phantom. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(6):p. 20120260.
  • 18. Longoni S, Sartori M, Braun M, et al. Lingual vascular canals of the mandible: The risk of bleeding complications during implant procedures. Implant Dent. 2007;16:131-8.
  • 19. Makris N, Stamatakis H, Syriopoulos K, et al. Evaluation of the visibility and the course of the mandibular incisive canal and the lingual foramen using cone-beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:766-71.
  • 20. Stuart J. Implant complications associated with two and three dimensional diagnostic imaging technologies. In: Ganz SD, eds. Dental Implant Complications: Etiology, Prevention, and Treatment. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Jhon Wiley & Sons; 2015:102-31.
  • 21. Nascimento HAR, Andrade MEA, Frazão MAG, Nascimento EHL, Ramos-Perez FMM, Freitas DQ. Dosimetry in CBCT with Different Protocols: Emphasis on Small FOVs Including Exams for TMJ. Braz Dent J. 2017 Jul-Aug;28(4):511-516.
  • 22. White SC, Scarfe WC, Schulze RK, Lurie AG, Douglass JM, Farman AG, et al. The image gently in dentistry campaign: promotion of responsible use of maxillofacial radiology in dentistry for children. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2014; 118: 257–61.
  • 23. Kiljunen T, Kaasalainen T, Suomalainen A, Kortesniemi M.Dental cone beam CT: A review. Physica Medica. 2015;31:844-60.
  • 24. ScarfeWC, Li Z, Aboelmaaty W, Scott SA, Farman AG. Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: essence, elements and steps to interpretation. Aust DentJ. 2012;57(Suppl. 1):46–60.
  • 25. Isman O, Yilmaz HH, Aktan AM, Yilmaz B. Indications for cone beam computed tomography in childrenand young patients in a Turkish subpopulation. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2017; 27:183-90.
  • 26. Mandelaris GA, Scheyer ET, Evans M, Kim D, McAllister B, Nevins ML, et al. American Academy of PeriodontologyBest Evidence Consensus Statementon Selected Oral Applications forCone-Beam Computed Tomography. J Periodontol. 2017;88(10):939-45.
  • 27. Nematolahi H, Abadi H, Mohammadzade Z, Soofiani Ghadim M. The use of cone beam computed tomography(CBCT) to determine supernumerary and impacted teeth position in pediatric patients: a case report. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2013;7:47–50.
  • 28. Kapila S, Conley RS, Harrell WE Jr. The currentstatus of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011; 40:24–34.
  • 29. European Commission on Radiation Protection. Evidence Based Guidelines on Cone Beam CT for Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2012:Report 172.
There are 27 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Dentistry
Journal Section Araştırma Makalesi
Authors

Hakan Eren 0000-0001-9006-6836

Beste İnceoğlu This is me 0000-0002-4633-3295

Burcu Kirşan Büyükkoçak This is me 0000-0001-5354-1554

İrem Eren This is me 0000-0001-5347-8137

Kaan Orhan This is me 0000-0001-6768-0176

Publication Date April 15, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 30 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Eren, H., İnceoğlu, B., Kirşan Büyükkoçak, B., Eren, İ., et al. (2020). EVALUATION OF REFERRAL OF CONE-BEAM CT INVESTIGATIONS AT A DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY CLINIC OF UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(2), 167-173. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.674728
AMA Eren H, İnceoğlu B, Kirşan Büyükkoçak B, Eren İ, Orhan K. EVALUATION OF REFERRAL OF CONE-BEAM CT INVESTIGATIONS AT A DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY CLINIC OF UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. April 2020;30(2):167-173. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.674728
Chicago Eren, Hakan, Beste İnceoğlu, Burcu Kirşan Büyükkoçak, İrem Eren, and Kaan Orhan. “EVALUATION OF REFERRAL OF CONE-BEAM CT INVESTIGATIONS AT A DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY CLINIC OF UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 30, no. 2 (April 2020): 167-73. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.674728.
EndNote Eren H, İnceoğlu B, Kirşan Büyükkoçak B, Eren İ, Orhan K (April 1, 2020) EVALUATION OF REFERRAL OF CONE-BEAM CT INVESTIGATIONS AT A DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY CLINIC OF UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 30 2 167–173.
IEEE H. Eren, B. İnceoğlu, B. Kirşan Büyükkoçak, İ. Eren, and K. Orhan, “EVALUATION OF REFERRAL OF CONE-BEAM CT INVESTIGATIONS AT A DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY CLINIC OF UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL”, Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 167–173, 2020, doi: 10.17567/ataunidfd.674728.
ISNAD Eren, Hakan et al. “EVALUATION OF REFERRAL OF CONE-BEAM CT INVESTIGATIONS AT A DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY CLINIC OF UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 30/2 (April 2020), 167-173. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.674728.
JAMA Eren H, İnceoğlu B, Kirşan Büyükkoçak B, Eren İ, Orhan K. EVALUATION OF REFERRAL OF CONE-BEAM CT INVESTIGATIONS AT A DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY CLINIC OF UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2020;30:167–173.
MLA Eren, Hakan et al. “EVALUATION OF REFERRAL OF CONE-BEAM CT INVESTIGATIONS AT A DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY CLINIC OF UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 30, no. 2, 2020, pp. 167-73, doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.674728.
Vancouver Eren H, İnceoğlu B, Kirşan Büyükkoçak B, Eren İ, Orhan K. EVALUATION OF REFERRAL OF CONE-BEAM CT INVESTIGATIONS AT A DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY CLINIC OF UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2020;30(2):167-73.

Bu eser Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır. Tıklayınız.