AĞIZİÇİ PORSELEN TAMİR SETLERİNİN KESME BAĞLANMA DAYANIMINA GARGARA KULLANIMININ ETKİSİ

Year 2020, Volume: 30 Issue: 4, 620 - 625, 15.10.2020

Nihal Özcan Merve Arslan

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.661449

Abstract

Amaç
Porselen tamir setlerinin gargara kullanımı durumunda metal ve porselen sistemleri üzerinde başarısının kesme bağlanma dayanımı yöntemi ile değerlendirilmesidir.
Gereç ve Yöntem
160 Krom- Kobalt örnek; yarısı metal, diğer yarısı porselen olacak şekilde ikiye ayrılmıştır. Porselen kısımlara Vita VM13 ve Ceramco II işlenmiştir(n=80) örneklerin diğer kısımları metal kalmıştır (n=160). Örnekler distile su, Klorheksidin, Listerine ve Cervitec ağız gargaraları ile muamele edilmiştir. Her örneğe 2 adet simante edilecek şekilde 5x5x5 mm boyutlarında 320 kompozit rezin blok hazırlanmıştır. Örneklere üniversal test cihazında 1 mm/dk hız ile makaslama kuvveti uygulanmıştır. Veriler iki yönlü ANOVA analizi ve post hoc Tukey testi kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir.
Bulgular
Ortalama değerler Bisco grubunda Vita= 9,23, Ceramco=7,7, Metal=7,02 ve Ultradent grubunda Vita= 7,93, Ceramco=10,1, Metal=5,16 MPa şeklindedir. Ultradent tamir setinde Vita porselende(4,97MPa, p=0,05) ve metalde (3,85Mpa, p=0,05) Klorheksidin anlamlı derecede düşük değerler verirken, Ceramco grubunda gargara kullanımı anlamlı bir fark oluşturmamıştır. Bisco tamir setinde Vita grubunda gargara kullanımı kesme bağlanma dayanımı açısından anlamlı bir farklılık oluşturmazken, Ceramco ve metal gruplarında Klorheksidin ve Cervitec, Kontrol ve Listerin grubundan anlamlı derecede düşük değerler göstermiştir.
Sonuç
Tamir setlerinin başarısını porselen sistemi ve gargara çeşidi etkilemektedir. Metal üzerinde Listerin ve Cervitec anlamlı etki göstermezken, tamir seti fark etmeksizin Klorheksidin kullanımı bağlanma dayanımı açısından dezavantajlıdır.
Anahtar kelimeler: gargara, kesme bağlanma dayanımı, porselen tamiri
Effect of Mouthwash on Shear Bond Strength of Intraoral Porcelain Repair Sets
Aim
The aim of this study is to evaluate the success of porcelain repair sets on metal and porcelain systems by using shear bond strength method.
Material and Methods
160 Cobalt Chrome specimens were prepared in the dimensions of 7 × 15 × 30 mm and divided into two parts, reflecting metal and porcelain. Vita VM13 and Ceramco II were processed in porcelain parts(n= 80) and the other parts remain metal (n=160). Specimens were treated with distilled water, Chlorhex, Listerine and Cervitec. 320 composite resin blocks were prepared in the dimensions of 5x5x5 mm to be cemented on specimens. Specimens were kept in distilled water for one day and shear bond strength was tested at universal test device (1 mm / min). Data was evaluated by two-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test.
Results
The mean values for Bisco group were respectively Vita = 9.23, Ceramco = 7.7, Metal = 7.02 and for Ultradent group Vita = 7.93, Ceramco = 10.1, Metal = 5.16 MPa. In Ultradent group Vita (4.97MPa, p = 0.05) and Metal (3.85 MPa, p = 0.05) subgroups showed significantly lower values with the usage of Chlorhexidine, use of mouthwash did not make significant difference in Ceramco subgroup. In Bisco group while the use of mouthwash in Vita subgroup did not create a significant difference, but Chlorhexidine and Cervitec showed significantly lower values than the Control and Listerine groups in the Ceramco and Metal subgroups.
Conclusion
The porcelain system and mouthwashes have a significant effect on the success of the repair kits. Listerine and Cervitec has no negative effect but Chlorheksidine regardless of the repair set, will be disadvantageous in metal groups.
Keywords: mouthwash; porcelain repair; shear bond strength

Keywords

gargara, kesme bağlanma dayanımı

References

• 1. Kumbuloglu O, Lassila L, User A, Toksavul S, Vallittu P. Shear bond strength of composite resin cements to lithium disilicate ceramics. Journal of oral rehabilitation. 2005;32(2):128-33.
• 2. dos Santos JG, Fonseca RG, Adabo GL, dos Santos Cruz CA. Shear bond strength of metal-ceramic repair systems. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2006;96(3):165-73.
• 3. Duymus Z.Y, Alkurt M. Değişik Yöntemlerle Hazirlanan Metal Alt Yapilar Üzerindeki Veneer Porselenlerinin Kirilma Direncine Farkli Alt Yapi Şekillerinin Etkisinin Incelenmesi. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 2016; 26(3): 457-464.
• 4. Bezzon OL, Ribeiro RF, Rollo JMDA, Crosara S. Castability and resistance of ceramometal bonding in Ni-Cr and Ni-Cr-Be alloys. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85(3):299-304.
• 5. Sailer I, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CHF. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II: Fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Jun;18 Suppl 3: 86–96.
• 6. Kimmich M, Stappert CF. Intraoral treatment of veneering porcelain chipping of fixed dental restorations: a review and clinical application. J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Jan;144(1):31-44.
• 7. Kancyper S, Sierraalta M, Razzoog ME. All-ceramic surveyed crowns for removable partial denture abutments. J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Oct;84(4):400-2.
• 8. KJ A. Phillips’ science of dental materials. 11. Editor: St. Louis Elsevier. 2003. 678 p.
• 9. Wight TA, Bauman JC, Pelleu GB. Variables affecting the strength of the porcelain/nonprecious alloy bond. J Prosthet Dent. 1977; 37(5):570-7.
• 10. Özcan M, Niedermeier W. Clinical Study on the Reasons for and Location of Failures of Metal-Ceramic Restorations and Survival of Repairs. Int J Prosthodont. 2002; 15(3):299-302.
• 11. Daftary F, Donovan T. Effect of four pretreatment techniques on porcelain-to-metal bond strength. J Prosthet Dent. 1986; 56(5):535-9.
• 12. Özcan M. Fracture reasons in ceramic-fused-to-metal restorations. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30(3):265-9.
• 13. Chung K, Hwang YC. Bonding strengths of porcelain repair systems with various surface treatments. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78(3):267-74.
• 14. Özcan M. Evaluation of alternative intra-oral repair techniques for fractured ceramic-fused-to-metal restorations. J Oral Rehabil. 2003 Feb;30(2):194-203.
• 15. Shahverdi S, Canay Ş, Şahin E, Bilge A. Effects of different surface treatment methods on the bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Oral Rehabil. 1998;25(9):699–705.
• 16. Diaz-Arnold AM, Wistrom DW, Aquilino SA, Swift EJ Jr. Bond strengths of porcelain repair adhesive systems. Am J Dent. 1993 Dec;6(6):291-4.
• 17. Gregory WA, Moss SM. Effects of heterogeneous layers of composite and time on composite repair of porcelain. Oper Dent. 1990 Jan-Feb;15(1):18-22. 18. Leibrock A, Degenhart M, Behr M, Rosentritt M, Handel G. In vitro study of the effect of thermo- and load-cycling on the bond strength of porcelain repair systems. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26(2):130–7.
• 19. Latta MA,Barkmeier WW . Approaches for intraoral repair of ceramic restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2000 Aug;21(8):635-9, 642-4.
• 20. Noel LG, Mitchell WC. Porcelain veneer repair of prostheses. Gen Dent. 1997 Mar-Apr;45(2):182-5.
• 21. Almerich JM, Cabedo B, Ortolá JC, Poblet J. Influence of alcohol in mouthwashes containing triclosan and zinc: An experimental gingivitis study. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Jun;32(6):539–44.
• 22. Matthijs S, Adriaens PA. Chlorhexidine varnishes: A review. J Clin Periodontol. 2002 Jan;29(1):1-8.
• 23. Pai MR, Acharya LD,Udupa N. Evaluation of antiplaque activity of Azadirachta indica leaf extract gel—a 6-week clinical study. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004 Jan;90(1):99-103.
• 24. Fine DH, Furgang D, Barnett ML. Comparative antimicrobial activities of antiseptic mouthrinses against isogenic planktonic and biofilm forms of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. J Clin Periodontol. 2001 Jul;28(7):697-700.
• 25. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Mar;89(3):268-74.
• 26. Jain S, Parkash H, Gupta S, Bhargava A. To evaluate the effect of various surface treatments on the shear bond strength of three different intraoral ceramic repair systems: An in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013 Sep;13(3):315–20.
• 27. Ferrando JM, Graser GN, Tallents RH, Jarvis RH. Tensile strength and microleakage of porcelain repair materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1983 Jul;50(1):44-50.
• 28. Hirschfeld Z, Rehany A. Esthetic repair of porcelain in a complete-mouth reconstruction: a case report. Quintessence Int. 1991 Dec;22(12):945-7.
• 29. Festuccia MS, Garcia L da F,Cruvinel DR, Pires-De-Souza F de C. Color stability, surface roughness and microhardness of composites submitted to mouthrinsing action. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012 Mar-Apr;20(2):200-5.
• 30. Derafshi R, Khorshidi H, Kalantari M, Ghaffarlou I. Effect of mouthrinses on color stability of monolithic zirconia and feldspathic ceramic: An in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2017 Nov 7;17(1):129.
• 31. Soygun K, Varol O, Ozer A, Bolayir G. Investigations on the effects of mouthrinses on the colour stability and surface roughness of different dental bioceramics. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017 Jun 1;9(3):200–7.