TÜRKİYE’DEKİ DİŞ HEKİMLERİNİN KONJENİTAL DAİMİ DİŞ EKSİKLİĞİNDE TEDAVİ YAKLAŞIMI ve TUTUMU

Year 2020, Volume: 30 Issue: 4, 579 - 585, 15.10.2020

Aslı Soğukpınar K. Tuğçe Temur Ömer Hatipoğlu

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.780163

Abstract

Aim: Although the etiology of congenital permanent tooth agenesis is not known entirely, it is thought that it is due to genetic and environmental factors. It is known that tooth aganesis causes chewing, speech, nutrition, aesthetic and psychological problems. The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge and behaviour of the dental practitioners working in Turkey about congenital permanent tooth agenesis; and to improve cognizance for the treatment.
Materials and Methods: 244 dentists who were reached via social media (facebook, instagram, e-mail) were included in our study. The questionnaire which include 13 questions was sent to dental practitioners. In the first part, the demographical data were asked. In the second part, general approaches of dental practitioners about congenital permanent tooth agenesis were asked, too. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square test.
Results: While 52.5% of the dental practitioners who participated in this cross-sectional study stated that they had sufficient information about congenital tooth deficiency, 47.5% thought that they did not have enough information. As the participants are deciding to treatment planning about congenital permanent tooth agenesis, they took into account the factors of function of the tooth (78.1%) and short period of time (0.6%) much more and less, respectively.
Conclusion: Education in Turkey related to congenital permanent tooth agenesis is not enough and the dental practitioners need more practical and theoretical training on this subject.
Keywords: Congenital, Knowledge, Paediatric, Tooth agenesis

TÜRKİYE’DEKİ DİŞ HEKİMLERİNİN KONJENİTAL DAİMİ DİŞ EKSİKLİĞİNDE TEDAVİ YAKLAŞIMI ve TUTUMU
Öz
Amaç: Konjenital daimi diş eksikliğinin etiyolojisi tam olarak bilinmemekle birlikte genetik ve çevresel faktörlerden kaynaklandığı düşünülmektedir. Diş eksikliğinin çiğneme, konuşma, beslenme, estetik ve psikolojik sorunlara yol açtığı bilinmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı Türkiye’de çalışan diş hekimlerinin konjenital daimi diş eksikliği konusunda bilgi ve tutumlarının değerlendirilmesi ve tedavi farkındalığının artırılmasıdır.
Materyal ve Metot: Çalışmamıza sosyal medya üzerinden (facebook, instagram, e-mail) ulaşılan Türkiye’de çalışan 244 diş hekimi dahil edildi. 13 soruyu içeren anket formu diş hekimlerine gönderildi. Birinci bölümde demografik veriler soruldu. İkinci bölümde ise diş hekimlerine konjenital daimi diş eksikliği konusunda genel yaklaşımları hakkında sorular soruldu. Veriler tanımlayıcı istatistikler ve Ki-kare testi ile analiz edildi.
Bulgular: Bu kesitsel çalışmaya katılan diş hekimlerinin %52,5’i konjenital daimi diş eksikliği konusunda yeterli bilgiye sahip olduklarını belirtmişken, %47,5’i yeterli bilgiye sahip olmadıklarını düşünmüştür. Çalışmaya katılanların konjenital daimi diş eksikliğinde tedavi planlamasını yaparken sırasıyla %78,1’i dişin fonksiyon görmesine ve %0,6’sı işlemin kısa sürmesine göre karar vermiştir.
Sonuç: Türkiye’de diş hekimlerinin konjenital daimi diş eksikliğine ilişkin eğitimi yeterli olmayıp, diş hekimlerinin bu konuda daha fazla pratik ve teorik eğitime ihtiyacı vardır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Konjenital, Bilgi, Çocuk, Diş eksikliği

Keywords

Congenital, Knowledge, Paediatric

References

• 1.Küchler EC, Risso PA, Costa Mde C, Modesto A, Vieira AR. Studies of dental anomalies in a large group of scholl children. Arch Oral Biol 2008; 53: 941-6.
• 2.Borie E, Fuentes R, Beltran V. Multiple tooth agenesis in nonsyndromic patient: a rare case report. Int J Morphol 2012;30:634- 6.
• 3.Sökücü O, Ünal M, Topcuoğlu T, Öztaş N. Çocuklarda daimi dentisyonda hipodonti görülme sıklığı. G Ü Diş Hek Fak Derg 2009;26:33-7.
• 4.Cunha AS, dos Santos LV, Marañón-Vásquez GA, et al. Genetic variants in tooth agenesis–related genes might be also involved in tooth size variations. Clin Oral Invest 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03437-8.
• 5.De Coster P, Marks L, Martens L, Huysseune A. Dental agenesis: genetic and clinical perspectives. J Oral Pathol Med 2009;38:1-17.
• 6.Parkin N, Elcock C, Smith R, Griffin R, Brook A. The aetiology of hypodontia: the prevalence, severity and location of hypodontia within families. Arch Oral Biol 2009;54:52-6.
• 7.Vieira AR, D’Souza RN, Mues G, Deeley K, Hsin H-Y, Küchler EC, et al. Candidate gene studies in hypodontia suggest role for FGF3. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2013;14:405-10.
• 8.Creton MA, Cune MS, Verhoeven W. Patterns of missing teeth in a population of oligodontia patients. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:409-13.
• 9.Ponduri S, Birnie DJ, Sandy JR. Infraocclusion of secondary deciduous molars-an unusual outcome. J Orthod 2009;36:186-9.
• 10.Sabri R. Management of congenitally missing second pemolars with orthodontics and single-tooth implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:634-42.
• 11.Kokich VG, Kokich VO. Congenitally missing mandibular second premolars: clinical options Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:437-44.
• 12.Kokich VG. Early Management of Congenitally Missing Teeth. Semin Orthod 2005;11:146-151.
• 13.Dhanrajani PJ. Hypodontia: etiology, clinical features, and management. Quintessence Int 2002;33:294-302.
• 14.Kılınç DG, Sevinç N. Erken Yaşta Tespit Edilen İki Oligodonti Olgusu. Türkiye Klinikleri J Dent Sci 2012;18:126-30.
• 15.Gambetta-Tessini K, Mariño R, Morgan M, Evans W, Anderson V. Stress and health-promoting attributes in Australian, New Zealand, and Chilean dental students. J Dent Educ 2013;77:801-9.


• 16.Kılıçoğlu H, Gümrü AD, İnal I. İstanbul ilinde serbest çalışan diş hekimlerinin koruyucu ve önleyici tedavi uygulamalarının incelenmesi. Türk Ortodonti Derg 2004;17:312-22.
• 17.Öz E, Kırzıoğlu Z. Mezuniyet Sonrası Diş Hekimlerinin Pedodontik Tedavilere Yaklaşımları. Balıkesir Sağlık Bil Derg Cilt 2018;7:1.
• 18.Yap AU, Chung SM, Chow WS, Tsai KT, Lim CT. Fracture resistance of compomer and composite restoratives. Oper Dent 2004;29:29-34.
• 19.American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Council on Clinical Affairs. Policy on Use of a Caries-risk Assessment Tool (CAT) for Infants, Children, and Adolescents; Reference Manual 2019:24–28.
• 20.Moretti A, Oliveira T, Sakai VT, Santos CFd, Machado MAdAM, Abdo RCC. Mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy of a primary second molar in a patient with agenesis of the permanent successor. Int Endod J 2007;40:738-45.
• 21.Barthel CR, Ro senkranz B, Leuenberg A, Roulet JF. Pulp capping of carious exposures: treatment outcome after 5 and 10 years: a retrospective study, J Endod 2000;26:525–528.
• 22.Bjørndal L, Reit C, Bruun G, Markvart M, Kjaeldgaard M, Näsman P, et al., Treatment of deep caries lesions in adults: randomized clinical trials comparing stepwise vs. direct complete excavation, and direct pulp capping vs. partial pulpotomy. Eur J Oral Sci 2010;118:290–297.
• 23.Camp J. Pediatric endodontics, endodontic treatment for the primary and young permanent dentition. Pathways of the pulp; 2002:833-9.
• 24.O'sullivan SM, Hartwell GR. Obturation of a retained primary mandibular second molar using mineral trioxide aggregate: a case report. J Endod 2001;27:703-5.
• 25.Tunc ES, Bayrak S. Usage of white mineral trioxide aggregate in a non‐vital primary molar with no permanent successor. Aust Dent J 2010;55:92-5.
• 26.Sabri R. Cleft lip and palate management with maxillary expansion and space opening for a single-tooth implant. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:148-55.
• 27.Thilander B, Odman J, Lekholm U. Orthodontic aspects of the use of oral implants in adolescents: a 10-year follow-up study. Eur J Orthod 2001;23:715–31.
• 28.Yap AK, Klineberg I. Dental implants in patients with ectodermal dysplasia and tooth agenesis: a critical review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22:268–76. 29.Kokich VG: Managing orthodontic—restorative treatment for the adolescent patient, in McNamara JA, Brudon WL (eds): Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. Ann Arbor, MI, Needham Press; 2001,423-452.
• 30.Bjerklin K, Bennett J. The long-term survival of lower second primary molars in subjects with agenesis of the premolars. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:245-55.
• 31.Higuchi KW. Ortho-integration: the alliance between orthodontics and osseointegration. In: Higuchi KW, editor. Orthodontic applications of osseointegrated implants. Chicago: Quintessence Co; 2000,1-19.
• 32.Peker MS, Türker ŞB, Çapan B, Akyüz S, Biren S. İzole Çoklu Diş Eksikliği Olgusuna Multidisipliner Yaklaşım Bir Yıllık Takip. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg 2015;25:369-375.