FARKLI IŞIK KAYNAKLARININ RENKLİ KOMPOMERLERİN MİKROSERTLİĞİ ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Year 2021, Volume: 31 Issue: 1, 22 - 26, 15.01.2021

Münevver Kılıç Gönül Yeter

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.806638

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı üç farklı ışık cihazı ile polimerize edilen renkli kompomerlerin yüzey sertlik değerini karşılaştırmaktır.
Gereç ve yöntem: A2 glossiosit (Voco Almanya) pembe Twinky Star (Voco, Almanya), mavi Twinky star (Voco Almanya) kullanılarak, 5mm-2mm kalınlığında 72 örnek hazırlanmıştır. Örnekler Valo Cordless (Ultradent – ABD), D-Light Pro (GC – Almanya) ve Woodpecker (Çin) ışık cihazları ile polimerize edilmiştir. Örneklerin yüzey sertlik değer ölçümleri Vickers mikrosertlik cihazı ile yapılmıştır.
Bulgular: Yüzey sertliği değerlendirildiğinde kompomer rengi ve ışık cihazı arasında etkileşim bulunmamaktadır (p=0,104) (Univariate analysis, Two way anova). Kompomerlerin yüzey sertlik değerleri karşılaştırıldığında GC ışık cihazı Valo’dan istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede düşük bulunmuştur (p<0,001).
Sonuçlar: Işık cihazları içerisinde en yüksek sertlik değerini Valo Cordless (Ultradent – ABD) cihazı gösterirken, mavi renk kompomer en düşük sertlik değerine sahiptir.
Anahtar kelimeler: Twinky star, glossiosit, mikrosertlik, ışık cihazı
The Effect of Different Light - Curing Units On The Microhardness of Colored Compomers
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the microhardness value of colored compomers polymerized by three light curing units.
Material- Methods: A2 glossiosit (Voco Germany), pink Twinky Star (Voco Germany), blue Twinky star (Voco Germany) branded compomers with a thickness of 5mm-2mm 72 samples were prepared. Samples have been polymerized by light curing units by Valo Cordless (Ultradent – USA), D-Light Pro (GC – Germany) ve Woodpecker (China). The hardness values of the samples have been measured by the Vickers microhardness device.
Results: When assessing microhardness, there is no interaction between the colored compomer and light curing unit (p=0,104) (Univariate analysis, Two way ANOVA). Comparing the microhardness values of the compomers, the GC light curing unit was found to be statistically significantly lower than Valo unit (p< 0.001).
Conclusions: While Valo Cordless (Ultradent - USA) shows the highest microhardness value among light-curing units, the blue compomer has the lowest microhardness value.
Key Words: Twinky Star, Glossiosit, Microhardness, Light curing unit

Keywords

Twinky star, glossiosit, mikrosertlik, ışık cihazı

References

• 1. Ehlers V, Gran K, Callaway A, Azrak B, Ernst C-P. One-year clinical performance of flowable bulk-fill composite vs. Conventional compomer restorations in primary molars. J Adhes Dent 2019; 21: 247-54.
• 2. Olegário IC, Hesse D, Mendes FM, Bonifácio CC, Raggio DP. Glass carbomer and compomer for art restorations: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Invest 2019; 23: 1761-70.
• 3. Hugar SM, Kohli D, Badakar CM, Gokhale NS, Thakkar PJ, Mundada MV. An in vivo comparative evaluation of dental anxiety level and clinical success rate of composite and multicolored compomers in 6 to 12 years of children. International J Clin Pediatr Dent 2018, 11: 483.
• 4. Guler C, Keles A, Guler MS, Karagoz S, Cora ÖN, Keskin GJJOaB, Materials F. Thermal conductivity of different colored compomers. J Appl Biomater & Funct Mater 2017;15: e362-8.
• 5. Ruse ND. What is a" compomer"? J Canadian Dent Assoc 1999; 65: 500-4.
• 6. Hwang S-W, Kwon T-Y, Kim K-H, Kwon Y-H, Kim H, Lee J-B. Optical, mechanical and chemical properties of colored compomer. Biomed Res 2007, 11: 36-42.
• 7. Croll TP, Helpin ML, Donly KJ. Multi-colored dual-cured compomer. Pediatr Dent 2004, 26: 273-6.
• 8. Behnaz E, Hengameh S, Assila V. Hardness evaluation of composite resins cured with qth and led. J Dent Rese Dent Clin Dent Prosp 2014; 4; 8: 40-4
• 9. Atabek D, Bodur H, Kalayci Ş, Tirali E. Conversion degrees of a colored compomer in different colors utilized by various curing times. J Dent Child 2011; 78: 83-7.
• 10. Salgado VE, Borba MM, Cavalcante LM, De Moraes RR, Schneider LF. Effect of photoinitiator combinations on hardness, depth of cure, and color of model resin composites. J Esthetic Res Dent 2015; 27: S41-8.
• 11. Lima RBW, Troconis CCM, Moreno MBP, Murillo‐Gómez F, De Goes MF. Depth of cure of bulk fill resin composites: A systematic review. J Esthetic Res Dent 2018; 30: 492-501. 12. Gan J, Yap A, Cheong J, Arista N, Tan C. Bulk-fill composites: Effectiveness of cure with poly-and monowave curing lights and modes. Oper Dent 2018; 43: 136-43.
• 13. Bakkal M, Yılmaz B, Durmus A, Durmus Z, Ozalp S. Polymerization characteristics of colored compomers cured with different led units. J Appl Biomater Func Mater 2019; 17: 2280800019827805.
• 14. Gorken FN, Kuru S, Batu S, Guven Y, Sepet E. Compomers reinforced with bioactive glass and hydroxyapatite particles. Oral Health & Prev Dent 2018; 16: 431-8
• 15. Park S-H, Kim S-S, Cho Y-S, Lee S-Y, Noh B-D. Comparison of linear polymerization shrinkage and microhardness between qth-cured & led-cured composites. Operativ Dent 2005; 30: 461-7.
• 16. Okte Z, Villalta P, Garcia-Godoy F, Garcia-Godoy F, Murray P. Effect of curing time and light curing systems on the surface hardness of compomers. Oper Dent Univ Washington 2005; 30: 540.
• 17. Yapar Mİ, Çeli̇k N, Sağsöz Ö, Karalar B, Seven N, Bayındır YZ. Farklı poli̇meri̇zasyon teknikleri̇nin kompozi̇t rezi̇nlerin mekani̇ ve fi̇zi̇ksel özelli̇kleri̇ne etki̇si. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fakültesi Derg 2020; 30: 26-32.
• 18. Briso A, Dos PS, Fagundes T. Influence of light-curing units on surface microhardness and color change of composite resins after challenge. J Contemp Dent Practic 2019; 20: 204-10.
• 19. Khodadadi E, Khafri S, Aziznezhad M. Comparison of surface hardness of various shades of twinky star colored compomer light-cured with qth and led units. Electronic physician, 2016, 8: 2355.
• 20. Gonulol N, Ozer S, Tunc ES. Effect of a third‐ generation led lcu on microhardness of tooth‐c olored restorative materials. Int J Pediatr Dent 2016; 26: 376-82.
• 21. Yoshida K, Taira Y, Atsuta M. Properties of opaque resin composite containing coated and silanized titanium dioxide. J Dent Res 2001; 80: 864-8.
• 22. Marigo L, Nocca G, Fiorenzano G, Callà C, Castagnola R, Cordaro M, Paolone G, Sauro S. Influences of different air-inhibition coatings on monomer release, microhardness, and color stability of two composite materials. BioMed Res Int 2019.
• 23. Jafari Z, Javadinejad S, Mirzakochaki P. Evaluation of colored compomer micro-hardness with different colors in various time curing. Daneshvar Med 2015; 22: 17-24.
• 24. Nicholson JW. Polyacid-modified composite resins (“compomers”) and their use in clinical dentistry. Dental materials, 2007, 23: 615-22.
• 25. Deniz Arısu H, Eligüzeloglu Dalkilic E, Alkan F, Erol S, Uctasli MB, Cebi A. Use of artificial neural network in determination of shade, light curing unit, and composite parameters’ effect on bottom/top vickers hardness ratio of composites. BioMed Res Int 2018.
• 26. Duruk G, Kizilci E, Kiliç MÇ. Rezin kompozitlerin mikrosertliğine kompozit kalınlıkları ve ışınlama sürelerinin etkisi. Türkiye Klinikleri Çocuk Diş Hekimliği-Özel Konular 2015; 1: 37-41.