DENTAL İMPLANTIN PRİMER STABİLİTESİNDE OSSEODENSİFİKASYON KAVRAMI

Year 2021, Volume: 31 Issue: 2, 316 - 323, 15.04.2021

Gözde Işık İrem Asya Kafadar , Tayfun Günbay

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.744003

Abstract

Osteointegrasyon, canlı kemik doku ile dental implantın yüzeyi arasında kurulan yapısal ve işlevsel bir bağlantı olarak tanımlanır. Dental implantın stabilitesi, osteointegrasyonun sağlanmasında etkili bir faktördür. Dental implantın mekanik bağlantısı olarak tanımlanan primer stabilite ve hücresel aktivite sonucu oluşan sekonder stabilite, birbirini takip eden süreçlerdir. Primer stabilite kaybı veya bu mekanik stabilitenin sağlanamaması, sekonder stabilite için gerekli olan kemik tamir mekanizmasının bozulmasına neden olur ve bu durum, dental implant kaybına yol açabilir. Son dönemde, tedavi başarısında etkili bir faktör olan primer stabilitenin arttırılması için dental implant yuvasının hazırlanmasında, yeni bir frezleme tekniği tanıtılmıştır. Bu sayede, dental implant yuvası hazırlanırken kemik dokunun korunduğu ve yoğunluğunun arttırıldığı belirtilmiştir. Bu derleme, osseodensifikasyon tekniği ve bu tekniğin konvansiyonel osteotomiye avantajları üzerine odaklanmıştır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: İmplantlar, osteotomi, teknikler, derleme
OSSEODENSIFICATION CONCEPT IN PRIMARY STABILITY OF DENTAL IMPLANT
SUMMARY
Osseointegration is defined as a structural and functional connection between the bone tissue and the surface of the dental implant. Dental implant stability is an effective factor in achieving osseointegration. Primary stability which defined as the mechanical connection of the dental implant, and secondary stability as a result of cellular activity, are consecutive processes. The primary stability loss or failure results in degradation of the bone repair mechanism that required for secondary stability and this situation may lead to dental implant loss. Recently, a new drilling technique has been introduced in the preparation of dental implant bed to increase primary stability, which is an effective factor in treatment success. It is stated that density of the bone tissue is increased and protected while preparing dental implant bed. This review focuses on the osteodensification technique and its advantages over conventional osteotomy.
Key words: Implants; osteotomy; techniques; review

Keywords

İmplantlar, osteotomi, teknikler

References

• 1-Gayathri S. Osseodensification technique: A novel bone preservation method to enhance dental implant stability. Acta Scient Dent Sci. 2018; 2: 17-22.
• 2-Podaropoulos L. Increasing the stability of dental implants: The concept of osseodensification. Balk J Dent Med. 2017; 21: 133-140.
• 3-Almutairi AS, Walid MA, Alkhodary MA. The effect of osseodensification and different thread designs on the dental implant primary stability. F1000 Res. 2018; 7: 1998.
• 4-Szmukler-Moncler S, Salama H, Reingewirtz Y, Dubruille JH. Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone-implant interface: review of experimental literature. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998; 43:192-203.
• 5-Degidi M, Daprile G, Piattelli A. Influence of stepped osteotomy on primary stability of implants inserted in low-density bone sites: An in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017; 32: 37-41.
• 6-Dundar S, Cakmak O, Solmaz MY. Primer stabilizasyonu olan ve olmayan implantlarda kemik implant kaynaşmasının biyomekanik incelenmesi: in vivo bir çalışma. Atatürk Üniv. Diş. Hek. Fak. Derg. 2018; 28: 188-193.
• 7-Mavrogenis AF, Dimitriou R, Parvizi J, Babis GC. Biology of implant osseointegration. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2009; 9: 61-71.
• 8-Trisi P, Berardini M, Falco A, Podaliri Vulpiani M. New osseodensification implant site preparation method to increase bone density in low-density bone: in vivo evaluation in sheep. Dental Implant Dent. 2016; 25: 24-31.
• 9-Al-Sabbagh M, Eldomiaty W, Khabbaz Y. Can osseointegration be achieved without primary stability? Dent Clin North Am. 2019; 63: 461-473.
• 10-Raghavendra S, Wood MC, Taylor TD. Early wound healing around endosseous implants: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005; 20: 425-431.
• 11-Fini M, Giavaresi G, Torricelli P, Borsari V, Giardino R, Nicolini A, Carpi A. Osteoporosis and biomaterial osteointegration. Biomed Pharmacother. 2004; 58: 487-493.
• 12-Atsumi M, Park SH, Wang HL. Methods used to assess implant stability: current status. Int J Oral Maxillofac Dental Implants. 2007; 22: 743-754.
• 13-Tabassum A, Meijer GJ, Walboomers XF, Jansen JA. Evaluation of primary and secondary stability of titanium implants using different surgical techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 25: 487-492.
• 14-Lundgren D, Sennerby L, Lundgren AK. The effect of mechanical intervention on jaw bone density. An experimental study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995; 6: 54-60.
• 15-Lioubavina-Hack N, Lang NP, Karring T. Significance of primary stability for osseointegration of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006; 17: 244-250.
• 16-El-Kholey KE, Elkomy A. Does the drilling technique for implant site preparation enhance implant success in low-density bone? A systematic review. Implant Dent. 2019; 28: 500-509.
• 17-Marquezan M, Osório A, Sant’Anna E, Sauza MM, Maia L. Does bone mineral density influence the primary stability of dental implants? A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23: 767-774.
• 18-Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Bone quality and quantity and dental implant failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Prosthodont. 2017; 30: 219-237.
• 19-Yoon HG, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Kim SK, Lee SY. Effect of bone quality and implant surgical technique on implant stability quotient (ISQ) value. J Adv Prosthodont. 2011; 3: 10-15.
• 20-Dos Santos MV, Elias CN, Cavalcanti Lima JH. The effects of superficial roughness and design on the primary stability of dental implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011; 13: 215-223.
• 21-Tabassum A, Meijer GJ, Wolke JG, Jansen JA. Influence of the surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21: 213–220.
• 22-Tabassum A, Walboomers XF, Meijer GJ, Jansen JA. Biological limits of the undersized surgical technique: a study in goats. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22: 129–134.
• 23-Elias CN, Rocha FA, Nascimento AL, Coelho PG. Influence of dental implant shape, surface morphology, surgical technique and bone quality on the primary stability of dental implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2012; 16: 169-180.
• 24- Misch CE. Bone density: A key determinant for clinical success. In: Misch CE, editor. Contemporary Implant Dentistry, 2nd ed. St Louis: CV Mosby Company; 1999. p. 109-118.
• 25-Abuhussein H, Pagni G, Rebaudi A, Wang HL. The effect of thread pattern upon implant osseointegration. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21(2): 129-136.
• 26-Lan TH, Du JK, Pan CY, Lee HE, Chung WH. Biomechanical analysis of alveolar bone stress around implants with different thread designs and pitches in the mandibular molar area. Clin Oral Investig. 2012; 16(2): 363-369.
• 27-Wu SW, Lee CC, Fu PY, Lin SC. The effects of flute shape and thread profile on the insertion torque and primary stability of dental implants. Med Eng Phys. 2012; 34: 797-805.
• 28-Blanco J, Suarez J, Novio S, Villaverde G, Ramos I, Segade LAG. Histomorphometric assessment in cadavers of the peri-implant bone density in maxillary tuberosity following implant placement using osteotome and conventional techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19: 505-510.
• 29-Wang L, Wu Y, Perez KC, Hyman S, Brunski JB, Tulu U, Bao C, Salmon B, Helms JA. Effects of condensation on peri-implant bone density and remodeling. J Dent Res. 2017; 96: 413-420.
• 30-Kim SK, Lee HN, Choi YC, Heo SJ, Lee CW, Choie MK. Effect of anodized oxidation or turned implants on bone healing after using conventional drilling or trabecular compaction technique: Histomorphometric analysis and RFA. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2006; 17: 644-650.
• 31-Degidi M, Daprile G, Piatelli A. Influence of under preparation on primary stability of implants inserted in poor quality bone sites: An in vitro study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 73: 1084-1088.
• 32-Marković A, Calasan D, Colić S, Stojčev-Stajčić L, Janjić B, Mišić T. Implant stability in posterior maxilla: bone-condensing versus bone-drilling: a clinical study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011; 112: 557-563.
• 33-Stavropoulos A, Nyengaard JR, Lang NP, Karring T. Immediate loading of single SLA implants: drilling vs. osteotomes for the preparation of the implant site. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19: 55-65.
• 34-Toffler M. Site development in the posterior maxilla using osteocompression and apical alveolar displacement. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2001; 22: 775-780.
• 35-Boustany CM, Reed H, Cunningham G, Richards M, Kanawati A. Effect of a modified stepped osteotomy on the primary stability of dental implants in low-density bone: A cadaver study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015; 30: 48-55.
• 36-Friberg B, Ekestubbe A, Mellstrom D, Sennerby L. Branemark implants and osteoporosis: A clinical exploratory study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001; 3: 50-56.
• 37-Tabassum A, Meijer GJ, Wolke JG, Jansen JA. Influence of the surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with a density equivalent to maxillary bone: a laboratory study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20: 327-332.
• 38-Huwais S. Fluted osteotome and surgical method for use. US Patent Application 2013; 18: 196-200.
• 39-Huwais S. Autografting osteotome. World Intellectual Property Organization, 22 May 2014. WO2014/077920
• 40-Huwais S. Enhancing implant stability with osseodensification: a case report with 2-year follow-up. Implant Practic. 2015; 8: 28-34.
• 41-Huwais S, Meyer EG. A novel osseous densification approach in implant osteotomy preparation to increase biomechanical primary stability, bone mineral density, and bone-to-implant contact. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017; 32: 27-36.
• 42-Kanathila H, Pangi A. An insight into the concept of osseodensification-enhancing the implant stability and success. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2018; 12: ZE01-ZE03.
• 43-Jimbo R, Tovar N, Marin C, Teixeira HS, Anchieta RB, Silveira LM, Janal MN, Shibli JA, Coelho PG. The impact of a modified cutting flute implants design on osseointegration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 43: 883-888.
• 44-Trisi P, De Benedittis S, Perfetti G, Berardi D. Primary stability, insertion torque and bone density of cylindrical implant ad modum Brånemark: Is there a relationship? An in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22: 567-570. 55-Neelam Das. The new bone drilling concept: Osseodensification (Hydrodynamic Bone Preparation). EC Dent Sci. 2019; 18: 2345-2355.
• 46-Lahens B, Neiva R, Tovar N, Alifarag AM, Jimbo R, Bonfante EA, Bowers MM, Cuppini M, Freitas H, Witek L, Coelho PG. Biomechanical and histologic basis of osseodensification drilling for endosteal implant placement in low density bone. An experimental study in sheep. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016; 63: 56-65.
• 47- Hofbauer AM, Huwais S. Osseodensification facilitates ridge expansion with enhanced implant stability in the maxilla: Part II case report with 2-year follow-up. Implant Practic. 2015; 8: 14-21.
• 48-Trisi P, Berardini M, Falco A, Vulpiani MP. New osseodensification implant site preparation method to increase bone density in low-density bone: in vivo evaluation in sheep. Implant Dent. 2016; 25: 24.
• 49- Kold S, Bechtold JE, Ding M, Chareancholvanich K, Rahbek O, Søballe K. Compacted cancellous bone has a spring-back effect. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003; 74: 591-595.
• 50-Duncan RL, Turner CH. Mechanotransduction and the functional response of bone to mechanical strain. Calcif Tissue Int. 1995; 57: 344-358.
• 51-Frost HM. A brief review for orthopedic surgeons: Fatigue damage (microdamage) in bone (its determinants and clinical implications). J Orthop Sci. 1998; 3: 272-281.
• 52-Deliverska E, Yordanov B. Osseodensification as an alternative approach in dental implantology for implant sites with insufficient available bone. J of IMAB. 2019; 25: 2606-2610.
• 53-Oliveira PGFP, Bergamo ETP, Neiva R, Bonfante EA, Wiltek L, Tovar N, Coelho PG. Osseodensification outperforms conventional implant subtractive instrumentation: a study in sheep. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2018; 90: 300-307.
• 54-Alifarag AM, Lopez CD, Neiva RF, Tovar N, Witek L, Coelho PG. Temporal osseointegration: early biomechanical stability through osseodensification. J Orthop Res. 2018; 36:2516-2523.
• 55-Koutouzis T, Huwais S, Hasan F, Trahan W, Waldrop T, Neiva R. Alveolar ridge expansion by osseodensification-mediated plastic deformation and compaction autografting: A multicenter retrospective study. Implant Dent. 2019; 28: 349-355.
• 56-Machado RC, da Gama CS, Batista SH, Rizzo D, Valiense H, Moreira RF. Tomographic and clinical findings, pre-, trans-, and post-operative of osseodensification in immediate loading. Int J Growth Factors Stem Cells Dent. 2018; 1:101.
• 57-da Rosa JCM, Pértile de Oliveira Rosa A, Huwais S. Use of the immediate dentoalveolar restoration technique combined with osseodensification in periodontally compromised extraction sites. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019; 39: 527-534.