DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDE KULLANILAN BAĞLANMA DAYANIMI TEST METOTLARI

Year 2021, Volume: 31 Issue: 2, 283 - 288, 15.04.2021

M. Saygın Elmas Emine Göncü Başaran Ayça Deniz İzgi

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.820990

Abstract

Günümüz diş hekimliğinde, materyallerin yapışma kuvvetlerinin miktarını ölçmek için çeşitli metotlar geliştirilmiştir. Bağlanma dayanımı testleri bu amaç için yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Bununla birlikte birçok bağlanma dayanımı test metodu vardır. Bu yöntemlerin her birinin avantajları ve dezavantajları vardır. Mikro çekme ve mikro makaslama testleri daha hassas sonuçlar verebilir, ancak daha karmaşık test kurulumlarına ihtiyaç duydukları için bazı dezavantajlar meydana gelmektedir ve bu test yöntemlerinde standardizasyonun sağlanması zordur. Bu nedenle bağlanma dayanım testlerinin kendi aralarında kıyaslanması zordur. Bağlanma dayanımı test metotları kullanılırken, testi yapan kişinin test cihazlarının standardizasyonunu bilmesi ve standardizasyon sorunlarının çözümünü yapabilmesi gerekmektedir.
Anahtar kelimeler: Bağlanma dayanımı, bağlanma dayanımı test metotları, diş hekimliği

BONDING STRENGTH TEST METHODS IN DENTISTRY
Abstract
In today's dentistry, various methods have been developed to measure the amount of adhesive strength of materials. Bonding strength test methods can be used for this commonly. There are many bonding strength test methods for use. Each one of these methods have their advantage and disadvantage. Micro tensile and micro shear test can be more accurate but they have their disadvantage as they need more complicated testing setups and these testing methods have their weakness such as these tests hard to standardize. For that reason, it is hard to compare to bonding force between themselves. When bonding strength test methods going to be used, tester should know and take care that standardization issue.
Keywords: Bonding strength, bonding strength test methods, dentistry

Keywords

Bağlanma dayanımı, bağlanma dayanımı test metotları, diş hekimliği

References

• 1. David H. Pashley, Ricardo M, Carvalho, Hidehiko Sano, Masatosiii Nakajima, Masahiro Yoshiyama, YasuoSinono, Carios A. Fernandes, Franklin Tay. The Microtensile Bond Test: A Review. J Addesive Dent 1999; 1:299-309.
• 2. Choudhary K, Nandlal B. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of nano-hydroxyapatite incorporated glass ionomer cement and conventional glass ionomer cement on dense synthetic hydroxyapatite disk: An in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2015 Mar-Apr;26(2):170-5.
• 3. Sirisha K, Rambabu T, Shankar YR, Ravikumar P. Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review: Part I. J Conserv Dent. 2014 Jul;17(4):305-11
• 4. Devatha AB, Lakshmi MN, Kumar NB, Erukala S, Valluri R, Ealla KKR. A Comparative Study of Shear Bond Strength of Direct Bonding System with and without a Liquid Primer: An In Vitro Study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019;11(Suppl 3):S515-S522.
• 5. Kansal R, Rani S, Kumar M, Kumar S, Issar G. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Newer Resin Cement (RelyX Ultimate and RelyX U200) to Lithium Disilicate and Zirconia Ceramics as Influenced by Thermocycling. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018;9(4):601-606.
• 6. Technical specification ISO/TS 11405. Dental materials –testing of adhesion to tooth structure. Switzerland; 2003.
• 7. Inokoshi M, De Munck J, Minakuchi S, Van Meerbeek B. Meta-analysis of bonding effectiveness to zirconia ceramics. J Dent Res. 2014 Apr;93(4):329-34.
• 8. Craigs Restorative Dental Materials pg: 96-98 2012
• 9. Salz U, Bock T. Testing adhesion of direct restoratives to dental hard tissue - a review. J Adhes Dent. 2010 Oct;12(5):343-71
• 10. Braga RR, Meira JB, Boaro LC, Xavier TA: Adhesion to tooth structure: A critical review of “macro” test methods, Dent Mater 26:38–49, 2010.
• 11. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, et al: Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes, Dent Mater 26:100–e121, 2010.
• 12. Sirisha K, Rambabu T, Ravishankar Y, Ravikumar P. Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review-Part II. J Conserv Dent. 2014 Sep;17(5):420-6
• 13. Drummond JL, Toepke TR, King TJ. Thermal and cyclic loading of endodontic posts. Eur J Oral Sci. 1999;107:220–4.
• 14. Otani A, Amaral M, May LG, Cesar PF, Valandro LF. A critical evaluation of bond strength tests for the assessment of bonding to Y-TZP. Dent Mater. 2015 Jun;31(6):648-56.
• 15. Van Noort R, Noroozi S, Howard IC, Cardew G. A critique of bond strength measurements. J Dent. 1989;17:61–7.
• 16. Kelly JR, Benetti P, Rungruanganunt P, Bona AD. The slippery slope: critical perspectives on in vitro research methodologies. Dent Mater. 2012 Jan;28(1):41-51.
• 17. Chen WP, Chen YY, Huang SH, Lin CP. Limitations of push-out test in bond strength measurement. J Endod. 2013;39(2):283-287.
• 18. Ungor M, Onay EO, Orucoglu H. Push-out bond strengths: The Epiphany-Resilon endodontic obturation system compared with different pairings of Epiphany, Resilon, AH Plus and gutta-percha. Int Endod J 2006;39:643–7
• 19. Guan G, Takano-Yamamoto T, Miyamoto M, Hattori T, Ishikawa K, Suzuki K. Shear bond strengths of orthodontic plastic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Apr;117(4):438-43.
• 20. Samsfi S, Van Noort R, Do dentin bond strength tests sefve a useful purpose? J Adhes Dent 1999;1;57-B7.
• 21. Thammajaruk P, Buranadham S, Thanatvarakorn O, Ferrari M, Guazzato M. Influence of glass-ceramic coating on composite zirconia bonding and its characterization. Dent Mater. 2019 Jan;35(1):105-113.
• 22. Versiuis A, Tantbirojn D, Dougias WiH. Why do shear bond tests pull out dentin? J Dent Res 1997:76:1298-1307.
• 23. Wang R, Shi Y, Li T, Pan Y, Cui Y, Xia W. Adhesive interfacial characteristics and the related bonding performance of four self-etching adhesives with different functional monomers applied to dentin. J Dent. 2017 Jul;62:72-80
• 24. Shimada, Yasushi, et al. "Bond strength of two adhesive systems to primary and permanent enamel." J Op Dent 27.4 (2002): 403-409.
• 25. Pamato S, do Valle AL, de Andrade GH, Vidotti HA, Só MV, Pereira JR. Does hybridized dentin affect bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement? J Clin Exp Dent. 2016 Oct 1;8(4):e409-e414. eCollection 2016 Oct.
• 26. Sadr A, Ghasemi A, Shimada Y, Tagami J. Effects of storage time and temperature on the properties of two self-etching systems. J Dent. 2007 Mar;35(3):218-25.
• 27. Flury S, Peutzfeldt A, Lussi A. Two pre-treatments for bonding to non-carious cervical root dentin. Am J Dent. 2015 Dec;28(6):362-6.
• 28. Armstrong S, Geraldeli S, Maia R, Raposo LH, Soares CJ, Yamagawa J. Dent Mater. 2010 Feb;26(2): 50-62.
• 29. Ezoji F, Tabari K, Jaberi Ansari Z, Torabzadeh H, Kharrazi Fard MJ. Shear Bond Strength of a Resin Cement to Different Alloys Subjected to Various Surface Treatments. J Dent (Tehran). 2016 Jan;13(1):29-39.
• 30. Price, Richard BT, and Gordon C. Hall. "In vitro comparison of 10-minute versus 24-hour shear bond strengths of six dentin bonding systems." Quintessence int 30.2 (1999).
• 31. Meiers JC, Kazemi RB, Donadio M. The influence of fiber reinforcement of composites on shear bond strengths to enamel. J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Apr;89(4):388-93.
• 32. Triolo Jr, P. T., and E. J. Swift Jr. "Shear bond strengths of ten dentin adhesive systems." Dent Mater 8.6 (1992): 370-374.
• 33. Andrade de Freitas SL, Brandt WC, Miranda ME, Vitti RP. Effect of Thermocycling, Teeth, and Polymerization Methods on Bond Strength Teeth-Denture Base. Int J Dent. 2018 Jun 4;2018:2374327.
• 34. al-Salehi SK, Burke FJ. Methods used in dentin bonding tests: an analysis of 50 investigations on bond strength. Quintessence Int. 1997 Nov;28(11):717-23.
• 35. Peterson J, Rizk M, Hoch M, Wiegand A. Bonding performance of self-adhesive flowable composites to enamel, dentin and a nano-hybrid composite. Odontology. 2018 Apr;106(2):171-180.
• 36. P.M. Mason, M. Ferrari, M.C. Cagidiaco, C.L Davidson, Shear bond strength of four dentinal adhesives applied in vivo and in vitro, J Dent, Volume 24, Issue 3,1996, Pages 217-222, ISSN 0300-5712,
• 37. Lyann SK, Takagaki T, Nikaido T, Uo M, Ikeda M, Sadr A, Tagami J. Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Tensile Bond Strength to Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramics. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(3):261-268.
• 38. Paul, S. J., et al. "Nanoleakage at the Dentin Adhesive Interface vs ĩ-Tensile Bond Strength." J Op Dent (1999): 181.
• 39. Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015 Jul;43(7):765-76.
• 40. *El Zohairy, Ahmed A., et al. "Efficacy of microtensile versus microshear bond testing for evaluation of bond strength of dental adhesive systems to enamel." Dent Mater 26.9 (2010): 848-854.
• 41. Mallick R, Sarangi P, Mohanty S, Behera S, Nanda S, Satapathy SK. Micro-tensile bond strength of different adhesive systems on sound dentin and resin-based composite: An in-vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2015 Sep-Oct;18(5):379-83.
• 42. Costa LA, Carneiro KK, Tanaka A, Lima DM, Bauer J. Evaluation of pH, ultimate tensile strength, and micro-shear bond strength of two self-adhesive resin cements. Braz Oral Res. 2014;28:1-7.
• 43. Ritter AV, Sulaiman TA, Rodgers BM, Baratto-Filho F, Cunha L, Gonzaga CC, Correr GM. Effect of surface treatment and cement type on dentin bonding of processed resin composite. Am J Dent. 2019 Dec;32(6):271-275.
• 44. Román-Rodríguez JL, Agustín-Panadero R, Alonso-Pérez-Barquero J, Fons-Font A, Solá-Ruíz MF. Shear bond strength of partial coverage restorations to dentin. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015 Jul 1;7(3):e396-9.
• 45. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength-evaluation of a microtensile test. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 236-40
• 46. Kasraie S, Shokripour M, Safari M. Evaluation of micro-shear bond strength of resin modified glass-ionomer to composite resins using various bonding systems. J Conserv Dent. 2013 Nov;16(6):550-4.
• 47. Başaran G, Göncü Başaran E, Ayna E, Değer Y, Ayna B, Tuncer MC. Microtensile bond strength of root canal dentin treated with adhesive and fiber-reinforced post systems. Braz Oral Res. 2019 Jul 1;33:e027.
• 48. Tekçe N, Demirci M MİKROGERİLİM BAĞLANMA DAYANIM TESTİ VE SONUÇLARINI ETKİLEYEN ETKENLER. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2015; 24(1): 152-134.