Review
BibTex RIS Cite

DENTAL RADYOGRAFİK GÖRÜNTÜLEMEDE ÜÇÜNCÜ BOYUT: BİR LİTERATÜR GÜNCELLEMESİ

Year 2021, Volume: 31 Issue: 4, 652 - 661, 14.10.2021

Nezaket Ezgi Özer B. Güniz Baksı Şen

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.821983

Abstract

Dentomaksillofasiyal bölgenin üç boyutlu görüntülenmesi ve üç farklı düzlemde kesitsel olarak incelenebilmesine olanak tanıyan Dental Volümetrik Tomografi (DVT)’nin kullanımı, diş hekimliğinin birçok disiplininde yaygınlaşmaktadır. DVT’nin, farklı disiplinleri için değişen kullanım alanları, ne zaman, hangi durumlarda ve hangi çekim parametreleri ile kullanılmasına yönelik kurallar bulunmakta ve her disipline ait bu özel raporlar ilgili birlik ve organizasyonlar tarafından tek tek yayımlanmaktadır. Bu derlemenin amacı; DVT’nin diş hekimliğinin farklı uzmanlık alanları için ayrı ayrı yayımlanan güncel durum raporlarını bir araya getirmek ve bütün olarak irdelemektir.
Anahtar kelimeler: Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi; radyografi, dental görüntüleme

THIRD DIMENSION IN DENTAL RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGING: A LITERATURE UPDATE
ABSTRACT
Dental volumetric tomography (DVT) provides three-dimensional and sectional images in three different planes of dentomaxillofacial region and its use becomes increasingly more common in various disciplines of dentistry. Individual associations and organizations published separate position statements for indications, when and how to use DVT for different disciplines of dentistry. The aim of this review article is to compile recent position papers and systematic reviews for current applications and trends of DVT and principles of its use in various dental specialities.
Keywords: Cone-beam computed tomography; radiography, dental imaging

Keywords

Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomograf radyografi dental görüntüleme

References

  • 1. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 1998;8(9):1558–64.
  • 2. Baksı Şen BG, Şener E. Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi ve endodontik uygulamalar. Kamburoğlu K, editör. Dentomaksillofasiyal Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi: Temel Prensipler, Teknikler ve Klinik Uygulamalar. 1. Baskı. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri; 2019. p.106-18.
  • 3. The SEDENTEXCT Project Radiation protection: cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Evidence based guidelines. Geneva, Switzerland: European Commission; 2012.
  • 4. Benavides E, Rios HF, Ganz SD, An CH, Resnik R, Reardon GT, Feldman SJ, Mah JK, Hatcher D, Kim MJ, Sohn DS, Palti A, Perel ML, Judy KW, Misch CE, Wang HL.Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists consensus report. 2012 Apr;21(2):78-86.
  • 5. Tyndall DA, Price JB, Tetradis S, Ganz SD, Hildebolt C, Scarfe WC; American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012 Jun;113(6):817-26.
  • 6. Carter JB, Stone JD, Clark RS, Mercer JE. Applications of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: An Overview of Published Indications and Clinical Usage in United States Academic Centers and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Practices. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Apr;74(4):668-79.
  • 7. Kim IH, Singer SR, Mupparapu M. Review of cone beam computed tomography guidelines in North America. Quintessence Int. 2019 Jan 25;50(2):136-145.
  • 8. Nakagawa, Y.; Ishii, H.; Nomura, Y.;Watanabe, N.Y.; Hoshiba, D.; Kobayashi, K.; Ishibashi, K. Third Molar Position: Reliability of Panoramic Radiography. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2007, 65, 1303–1308.
  • 9. Rood JP, Shehab BA. The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990; 28:20–25.
  • 10. Gilvetti C, Haria S, Gulati A. Is juxta-apical radiolucency a reliable risk factor for injury to the inferior alveolar nerve during removal of lower third molars? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jun;57(5):430-434.
  • 11. Tantanapornkul W, Okouchi K, Fujiwara Y, Yamashiro M, Maruoka Y, Ohbayashi N, Kurabayashi T. A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Feb;103(2):253-9.
  • 12. Ghaeminia H, Meijer GJ, Soehardi A, Borstlap WA, Mulder J, Vlijmen OJ, Bergé SJ, Maal TJ. The use of cone beam CT for the removal of wisdom teeth changes the surgical approach compared with panoramic radiography: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Aug;40(8):834-9.
  • 13. Matzen LH, Berkhout E. Cone beam CT imaging of the mandibular third molar: a position paper prepared by the European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology (EADMFR). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2019; 48: 20190039.
  • 14. Weiss R 2nd, Read-Fuller A. Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: An Evidence-Based Review. Dent J (Basel). 2019 May 2;7(2).
  • 15. AAE and AAOMR Joint Position Statement: Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Endodontics 2015 Update. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015 Oct;120(4):508-12.
  • 16. Shintaku WH, Venturin JS, Azevedo B, Noujeim M. Applications of cone-beam computed tomography in fractures of the maxillofacial complex. Dent Traumatol. 2009 Aug;25(4):358-66.
  • 17. Lozano-Carrascal N, Salomó-Coll O, Gehrke SA, Calvo-Guirado JL, Hernández-Alfaro F, Gargallo-Albiol J. Radiological evaluation of maxillary sinus anatomy: A cross-sectional study of 300 patients. Ann Anat. 2017;214(4):1-8.
  • 18. Tavelli L, Borgonovo AE, Re D, Maiorana C. Sinus presurgical evaluation: a literature review and a new classification proposal. Minerva Stomatol 2017;66:115-31.
  • 19. Alkhader M, Ohbayashi N, Tetsumura A, Nakamura S, Okochi K, Momin MA, Kurabayashi T. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting osseous abnormalities of the temporomandibular joint and its correlation with cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010 Jul;39(5):270-6.
  • 20. Hussain AM, Packota G, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Role of different imaging modalities in assessment of temporomandibular joint erosions and osteophytes: a systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008 Feb;37(2):63-71.
  • 21. Al-Saleh MA, Punithakumar K, Lagravere M, Boulanger P, Jaremko JL, Major PW. Three-Dimensional Assessment of Temporomandibular Joint Using MRI-CBCT Image Registration. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 17;12(1):e0169555.
  • 22. Special Committee to Revise the Joint AAE/AAOMR Position Statement on use of CBCT in Endodontics. AAE and AAOMR Joint Position Statement: Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Endodontics 2015 Update. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015 Oct;120(4):508-12.
  • 23. Yi J, Sun Y, Li Y, Li C, Li X, Zhao Z. Cone-beam computed tomography versus periapical radiograph for diagnosing external root resorption: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Angle Orthod. 2017 Mar;87(2):328-337.
  • 24. Davies A, Mannocci F, Mitchell P, Andiappan M, Patel S. The detection of periapical pathoses in root filled teeth using single and parallax periapical radiographs versus cone beam computed tomography - a clinical study. Int Endod J.2015 Jun;48(6):582-92.
  • 25. Patel S, Patel R, Foschi F, Mannocci F. The Impact of Different Diagnostic Imaging Modalities on the Evaluation of Root Canal Anatomy and Endodontic Residents' Stress Levels: A Clinical Study. J Endod. 2019 Apr;45(4):406-413.
  • 26. European Society of Endodontology, Patel S, Durack C, Abella F, Roig M, Shemesh H, Lambrechts P, Lemberg K. European Society of Endodontology position statement: the use of CBCT in endodontics. Int Endod J. 2014 Jun;47(6):502-4.
  • 27. Patel S, Brown J, Semper M, Abella F, Mannocci F. European Society of Endodontology position statement: Use of cone beam computed tomography in Endodontics: European Society of Endodontology (ESE) developed by. Int Endod J. 2019 Dec;52(12):1675-1678. doi: 10.1111/iej.13187.
  • 28. Patel S, Brown J, Pimentel T, Kelly RD, Abella F, Durack C. Cone beam computed tomography in Endodontics- a review of the literature. Int Endod J. 2019 Aug;52(8):1138-1152
  • 29. Ertaş E , Arslan H , Çapar İ , Gök T , Ertaş H .Endodontide konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2015; 24(1): 113-118.
  • 30. Talwar S, Utneja S, Nawal RR, Kaushik A, Srivastava D, Oberoy SS. Role of Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Diagnosis of Vertical Root Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Endod. 2016 Jan;42(1):12-24.
  • 31. Abdelkarim A. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics. Dentistry Journal. 2019; 7(3):89.
  • 32. De Grauwe A, Ayaz I, Shujaat S, Dimitrov S, Gbadegbegnon L, Vande Vannet B, Jacobs R. CBCT in orthodontics: a systematic review on justification of CBCT in a paediatric population prior to orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2019 Aug 8;41(4):381-389.
  • 33. Kapila SD, Nervina JM. CBCT in orthodontics: assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(1):20140282.
  • 34. Scarfe WC, Azevedo B, Toghyani S, Farman AG. Cone Beam Computed Tomographic imaging in orthodontics. Aust Dent J. 2017 Mar;62 Suppl 1:33-50
  • 35. Oenning AC, Jacobs R, Pauwels R, Stratis A, Hedesiu M, Salmon B; DIMITRA Research Group, http://www.dimitra.be. Cone-beam CT in paediatric dentistry: DIMITRA project position statement. Pediatr Radiol. 2018 Mar;48(3):308-316.
  • 36. Bruwier A, Poirrier AL, Limme M, Poirrier R. Upper airway's 3D analysis of patients with obstructive sleep apnea using tomographic cone beam. Rev Med Liege. 2014 Dec;69(12):663-7.
  • 37. Momany SM, AlJamal G, Shugaa-Addin B, Khader YS. Cone Beam Computed Tomography Analysis of Upper Airway Measurements in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Am J Med Sci. 2016 Oct;352(4):376-384.
  • 38. Di Carlo G, Saccucci M, Ierardo G, Luzzi V, Occasi F, Zicari AM, Duse M, Polimeni A. Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Upper Airway Morphology: A Systematic Review on the Role of Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:5460429.
  • 39. Camacho M, Chang ET, Song SA, Abdullatif J, Zaghi S, Pirelli P, Certal V, Guilleminault C. Rapid maxillary expansion for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 2017 Jul;127(7):1712-1719.
  • 40. Machado-Júnior AJ, Zancanella E, Crespo AN. Rapid maxillary expansion and obstructive sleep apnea: A review and meta-analysis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016 Jul 1;21(4):e465- 9.
  • 41. Tso HH, Lee JS, Huang JC, Maki K, Hatcher D, Miller AJ. Evaluation of the human airway using cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108:768-776.
  • 42. Guijarro-Martínez R, Swennen GR. Cone-beam computerized tomography imaging and analysis of the upper airway: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Nov;40(11):1227-37.
  • 43. Mol A. Imaging methods in periodontology. Periodontol 2000. 2004; 34: 34–48.
  • 44. Haas LF, Zimmermann GS, De Luca Canto G, Flores-Mir C, Corrêa M. Precision of cone beam CT to assess periodontal bone defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2018 Feb;47(2):20170084.
  • 45. Corbet EF, Ho DK, Lai SM. Radiographs in periodontal disease diagnosis and management. Aust Dent J. 2009 Sep;54 Suppl 1:S27-43.
  • 46. Mandelaris GA, Scheyer ET, Evans M, Kim D, McAllister B, Nevins ML, Rios HF, Sarment D. American Academy of Periodontology Best Evidence Consensus Statement on Selected Oral Applications for Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. J Periodontol. 2017 Oct;88(10):939-945.
  • 47. Molander B, Ahlqwist M, Gröndahl HG. Panoramic and restrictive intraoral radiography in comprehensive oral radiographic diagnosis. Eur J Oral Sci. 1995 Aug;103(4):191-8.
  • 48. Jeffcoat MK. Radiographic methods for the detection of progressive alveolar bone loss. J Periodontol 1992; 63(4 Suppl): 367–72.
  • 49. Walter C, Schmidt JC, Dula K, Sculean A. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for diagnosis and treatment planning in periodontology: A systematic review. Quintessence Int. 2016 Jan;47(1):25-37.
  • 50. Woelber JP, Fleiner J, Rau J, Ratka-Krüger P, Hannig C. Accuracy and Usefulness of CBCT in Periodontology: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018 Mar/Apr;38(2):289-297.
  • 51. Al-Okshi A, Lindh C, Salé H, Gunnarsson M, Rohlin M. Effective dose of cone beam CT (CBCT) of the facial skeleton: a systematic review. Br J Radiol. 2015 Jan;88(1045):20140658.

Year 2021, Volume: 31 Issue: 4, 652 - 661, 14.10.2021

Nezaket Ezgi Özer B. Güniz Baksı Şen

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.821983

Abstract

References

  • 1. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 1998;8(9):1558–64.
  • 2. Baksı Şen BG, Şener E. Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi ve endodontik uygulamalar. Kamburoğlu K, editör. Dentomaksillofasiyal Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi: Temel Prensipler, Teknikler ve Klinik Uygulamalar. 1. Baskı. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri; 2019. p.106-18.
  • 3. The SEDENTEXCT Project Radiation protection: cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Evidence based guidelines. Geneva, Switzerland: European Commission; 2012.
  • 4. Benavides E, Rios HF, Ganz SD, An CH, Resnik R, Reardon GT, Feldman SJ, Mah JK, Hatcher D, Kim MJ, Sohn DS, Palti A, Perel ML, Judy KW, Misch CE, Wang HL.Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists consensus report. 2012 Apr;21(2):78-86.
  • 5. Tyndall DA, Price JB, Tetradis S, Ganz SD, Hildebolt C, Scarfe WC; American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012 Jun;113(6):817-26.
  • 6. Carter JB, Stone JD, Clark RS, Mercer JE. Applications of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: An Overview of Published Indications and Clinical Usage in United States Academic Centers and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Practices. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Apr;74(4):668-79.
  • 7. Kim IH, Singer SR, Mupparapu M. Review of cone beam computed tomography guidelines in North America. Quintessence Int. 2019 Jan 25;50(2):136-145.
  • 8. Nakagawa, Y.; Ishii, H.; Nomura, Y.;Watanabe, N.Y.; Hoshiba, D.; Kobayashi, K.; Ishibashi, K. Third Molar Position: Reliability of Panoramic Radiography. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2007, 65, 1303–1308.
  • 9. Rood JP, Shehab BA. The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990; 28:20–25.
  • 10. Gilvetti C, Haria S, Gulati A. Is juxta-apical radiolucency a reliable risk factor for injury to the inferior alveolar nerve during removal of lower third molars? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jun;57(5):430-434.
  • 11. Tantanapornkul W, Okouchi K, Fujiwara Y, Yamashiro M, Maruoka Y, Ohbayashi N, Kurabayashi T. A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Feb;103(2):253-9.
  • 12. Ghaeminia H, Meijer GJ, Soehardi A, Borstlap WA, Mulder J, Vlijmen OJ, Bergé SJ, Maal TJ. The use of cone beam CT for the removal of wisdom teeth changes the surgical approach compared with panoramic radiography: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Aug;40(8):834-9.
  • 13. Matzen LH, Berkhout E. Cone beam CT imaging of the mandibular third molar: a position paper prepared by the European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology (EADMFR). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2019; 48: 20190039.
  • 14. Weiss R 2nd, Read-Fuller A. Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: An Evidence-Based Review. Dent J (Basel). 2019 May 2;7(2).
  • 15. AAE and AAOMR Joint Position Statement: Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Endodontics 2015 Update. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015 Oct;120(4):508-12.
  • 16. Shintaku WH, Venturin JS, Azevedo B, Noujeim M. Applications of cone-beam computed tomography in fractures of the maxillofacial complex. Dent Traumatol. 2009 Aug;25(4):358-66.
  • 17. Lozano-Carrascal N, Salomó-Coll O, Gehrke SA, Calvo-Guirado JL, Hernández-Alfaro F, Gargallo-Albiol J. Radiological evaluation of maxillary sinus anatomy: A cross-sectional study of 300 patients. Ann Anat. 2017;214(4):1-8.
  • 18. Tavelli L, Borgonovo AE, Re D, Maiorana C. Sinus presurgical evaluation: a literature review and a new classification proposal. Minerva Stomatol 2017;66:115-31.
  • 19. Alkhader M, Ohbayashi N, Tetsumura A, Nakamura S, Okochi K, Momin MA, Kurabayashi T. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting osseous abnormalities of the temporomandibular joint and its correlation with cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010 Jul;39(5):270-6.
  • 20. Hussain AM, Packota G, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Role of different imaging modalities in assessment of temporomandibular joint erosions and osteophytes: a systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008 Feb;37(2):63-71.
  • 21. Al-Saleh MA, Punithakumar K, Lagravere M, Boulanger P, Jaremko JL, Major PW. Three-Dimensional Assessment of Temporomandibular Joint Using MRI-CBCT Image Registration. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 17;12(1):e0169555.
  • 22. Special Committee to Revise the Joint AAE/AAOMR Position Statement on use of CBCT in Endodontics. AAE and AAOMR Joint Position Statement: Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Endodontics 2015 Update. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015 Oct;120(4):508-12.
  • 23. Yi J, Sun Y, Li Y, Li C, Li X, Zhao Z. Cone-beam computed tomography versus periapical radiograph for diagnosing external root resorption: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Angle Orthod. 2017 Mar;87(2):328-337.
  • 24. Davies A, Mannocci F, Mitchell P, Andiappan M, Patel S. The detection of periapical pathoses in root filled teeth using single and parallax periapical radiographs versus cone beam computed tomography - a clinical study. Int Endod J.2015 Jun;48(6):582-92.
  • 25. Patel S, Patel R, Foschi F, Mannocci F. The Impact of Different Diagnostic Imaging Modalities on the Evaluation of Root Canal Anatomy and Endodontic Residents' Stress Levels: A Clinical Study. J Endod. 2019 Apr;45(4):406-413.
  • 26. European Society of Endodontology, Patel S, Durack C, Abella F, Roig M, Shemesh H, Lambrechts P, Lemberg K. European Society of Endodontology position statement: the use of CBCT in endodontics. Int Endod J. 2014 Jun;47(6):502-4.
  • 27. Patel S, Brown J, Semper M, Abella F, Mannocci F. European Society of Endodontology position statement: Use of cone beam computed tomography in Endodontics: European Society of Endodontology (ESE) developed by. Int Endod J. 2019 Dec;52(12):1675-1678. doi: 10.1111/iej.13187.
  • 28. Patel S, Brown J, Pimentel T, Kelly RD, Abella F, Durack C. Cone beam computed tomography in Endodontics- a review of the literature. Int Endod J. 2019 Aug;52(8):1138-1152
  • 29. Ertaş E , Arslan H , Çapar İ , Gök T , Ertaş H .Endodontide konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2015; 24(1): 113-118.
  • 30. Talwar S, Utneja S, Nawal RR, Kaushik A, Srivastava D, Oberoy SS. Role of Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Diagnosis of Vertical Root Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Endod. 2016 Jan;42(1):12-24.
  • 31. Abdelkarim A. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics. Dentistry Journal. 2019; 7(3):89.
  • 32. De Grauwe A, Ayaz I, Shujaat S, Dimitrov S, Gbadegbegnon L, Vande Vannet B, Jacobs R. CBCT in orthodontics: a systematic review on justification of CBCT in a paediatric population prior to orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2019 Aug 8;41(4):381-389.
  • 33. Kapila SD, Nervina JM. CBCT in orthodontics: assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(1):20140282.
  • 34. Scarfe WC, Azevedo B, Toghyani S, Farman AG. Cone Beam Computed Tomographic imaging in orthodontics. Aust Dent J. 2017 Mar;62 Suppl 1:33-50
  • 35. Oenning AC, Jacobs R, Pauwels R, Stratis A, Hedesiu M, Salmon B; DIMITRA Research Group, http://www.dimitra.be. Cone-beam CT in paediatric dentistry: DIMITRA project position statement. Pediatr Radiol. 2018 Mar;48(3):308-316.
  • 36. Bruwier A, Poirrier AL, Limme M, Poirrier R. Upper airway's 3D analysis of patients with obstructive sleep apnea using tomographic cone beam. Rev Med Liege. 2014 Dec;69(12):663-7.
  • 37. Momany SM, AlJamal G, Shugaa-Addin B, Khader YS. Cone Beam Computed Tomography Analysis of Upper Airway Measurements in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Am J Med Sci. 2016 Oct;352(4):376-384.
  • 38. Di Carlo G, Saccucci M, Ierardo G, Luzzi V, Occasi F, Zicari AM, Duse M, Polimeni A. Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Upper Airway Morphology: A Systematic Review on the Role of Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:5460429.
  • 39. Camacho M, Chang ET, Song SA, Abdullatif J, Zaghi S, Pirelli P, Certal V, Guilleminault C. Rapid maxillary expansion for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 2017 Jul;127(7):1712-1719.
  • 40. Machado-Júnior AJ, Zancanella E, Crespo AN. Rapid maxillary expansion and obstructive sleep apnea: A review and meta-analysis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016 Jul 1;21(4):e465- 9.
  • 41. Tso HH, Lee JS, Huang JC, Maki K, Hatcher D, Miller AJ. Evaluation of the human airway using cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108:768-776.
  • 42. Guijarro-Martínez R, Swennen GR. Cone-beam computerized tomography imaging and analysis of the upper airway: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Nov;40(11):1227-37.
  • 43. Mol A. Imaging methods in periodontology. Periodontol 2000. 2004; 34: 34–48.
  • 44. Haas LF, Zimmermann GS, De Luca Canto G, Flores-Mir C, Corrêa M. Precision of cone beam CT to assess periodontal bone defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2018 Feb;47(2):20170084.
  • 45. Corbet EF, Ho DK, Lai SM. Radiographs in periodontal disease diagnosis and management. Aust Dent J. 2009 Sep;54 Suppl 1:S27-43.
  • 46. Mandelaris GA, Scheyer ET, Evans M, Kim D, McAllister B, Nevins ML, Rios HF, Sarment D. American Academy of Periodontology Best Evidence Consensus Statement on Selected Oral Applications for Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. J Periodontol. 2017 Oct;88(10):939-945.
  • 47. Molander B, Ahlqwist M, Gröndahl HG. Panoramic and restrictive intraoral radiography in comprehensive oral radiographic diagnosis. Eur J Oral Sci. 1995 Aug;103(4):191-8.
  • 48. Jeffcoat MK. Radiographic methods for the detection of progressive alveolar bone loss. J Periodontol 1992; 63(4 Suppl): 367–72.
  • 49. Walter C, Schmidt JC, Dula K, Sculean A. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for diagnosis and treatment planning in periodontology: A systematic review. Quintessence Int. 2016 Jan;47(1):25-37.
  • 50. Woelber JP, Fleiner J, Rau J, Ratka-Krüger P, Hannig C. Accuracy and Usefulness of CBCT in Periodontology: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018 Mar/Apr;38(2):289-297.
  • 51. Al-Okshi A, Lindh C, Salé H, Gunnarsson M, Rohlin M. Effective dose of cone beam CT (CBCT) of the facial skeleton: a systematic review. Br J Radiol. 2015 Jan;88(1045):20140658.
There are 51 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Dentistry
Journal Section Derleme
Authors

Nezaket Ezgi Özer 0000-0002-5733-0954

B. Güniz Baksı Şen This is me 0000-0001-5720-2947

Publication Date October 14, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021 Volume: 31 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Özer, N. E., & Baksı Şen, B. . G. (2021). DENTAL RADYOGRAFİK GÖRÜNTÜLEMEDE ÜÇÜNCÜ BOYUT: BİR LİTERATÜR GÜNCELLEMESİ. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(4), 652-661. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.821983
AMA Özer NE, Baksı Şen BG. DENTAL RADYOGRAFİK GÖRÜNTÜLEMEDE ÜÇÜNCÜ BOYUT: BİR LİTERATÜR GÜNCELLEMESİ. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. October 2021;31(4):652-661. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.821983
Chicago Özer, Nezaket Ezgi, and B. Güniz Baksı Şen. “DENTAL RADYOGRAFİK GÖRÜNTÜLEMEDE ÜÇÜNCÜ BOYUT: BİR LİTERATÜR GÜNCELLEMESİ”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 31, no. 4 (October 2021): 652-61. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.821983.
EndNote Özer NE, Baksı Şen BG (October 1, 2021) DENTAL RADYOGRAFİK GÖRÜNTÜLEMEDE ÜÇÜNCÜ BOYUT: BİR LİTERATÜR GÜNCELLEMESİ. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 31 4 652–661.
IEEE N. E. Özer and B. . G. Baksı Şen, “DENTAL RADYOGRAFİK GÖRÜNTÜLEMEDE ÜÇÜNCÜ BOYUT: BİR LİTERATÜR GÜNCELLEMESİ”, Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 652–661, 2021, doi: 10.17567/ataunidfd.821983.
ISNAD Özer, Nezaket Ezgi - Baksı Şen, B. Güniz. “DENTAL RADYOGRAFİK GÖRÜNTÜLEMEDE ÜÇÜNCÜ BOYUT: BİR LİTERATÜR GÜNCELLEMESİ”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 31/4 (October 2021), 652-661. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.821983.
JAMA Özer NE, Baksı Şen BG. DENTAL RADYOGRAFİK GÖRÜNTÜLEMEDE ÜÇÜNCÜ BOYUT: BİR LİTERATÜR GÜNCELLEMESİ. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2021;31:652–661.
MLA Özer, Nezaket Ezgi and B. Güniz Baksı Şen. “DENTAL RADYOGRAFİK GÖRÜNTÜLEMEDE ÜÇÜNCÜ BOYUT: BİR LİTERATÜR GÜNCELLEMESİ”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 31, no. 4, 2021, pp. 652-61, doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.821983.
Vancouver Özer NE, Baksı Şen BG. DENTAL RADYOGRAFİK GÖRÜNTÜLEMEDE ÜÇÜNCÜ BOYUT: BİR LİTERATÜR GÜNCELLEMESİ. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2021;31(4):652-61.
 Download Cover Image

Bu eser Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır. Tıklayınız.