ANALİTİK AĞ SÜRECİ YAKLAŞIMI VE TOPSIS YÖNTEMİ İLE ÖĞRENCİ İŞLERİ BİLGİ SİSTEMİ YAZILIMI SEÇİMİ

Year 2013, Volume: 27 Issue: 4, 1 - 18, 12.10.2013

Yusuf Ayık Yavuz Kılavuz

Abstract

ANALİTİK AĞ SÜRECİ YAKLAŞIMI VE TOPSIS YÖNTEMİ İLE ÖĞRENCİ İŞLERİ BİLGİ SİSTEMİ YAZILIMI SEÇİMİ

Keywords

Analitik Ağ Süreci, TOPSIS yöntemi, Bilgi Sistemi Yazılımı Seçimi

References

• Alptekin, N. (2010). “Analitik Ağ Süreci Yaklaşımı ile Türkiye’de Beyaz Eşya Sektörünün Pazar Payı Tahmini”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 11(1), ss. 18-27.
• Arditi, D. ve Singh, S. (1991). “Selection Criteria for Commercially Available Software in Constructing Accounting”, Project Management, 9 (1), ss. 39-44.
• Aslay, F.Y., Baran, A. Ve Kılavuz, Y. (2011). “Yükseköğretim Öğrenci Bilgi Sistemlerinin Problemleri", International Higher Education Congress: New Trends and Issues, ss. 1-9.
• Blanc, L. ve Jelassi, M. (1989). “DSS Software Selection: A Multiple Criteria Decision Methodology”, Information and Management, 17, ss. 49-65.
• Bulut, K. ve Soylu, B. (2009). “Öğretim Üyelerinin iş Yükü Seviyelerinin Analitik Ağ Modeli ile Değerlendirilmesi: Mühendislik Fakültesinde Bir Uygulama”, Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 25(1-2), ss. 150-167.
• Cochran, J.K. ve Chen, H. (2005). “Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Selection of ObjectOriented Simulation Software for Production System Analysis”, Computers and Operations Research, 32, ss. 153-168.
• Collier, K., Carey, B., Sautter, D. Ve Marjanierni, C. (1999). “A Methodologyfor Evaluating and Selecting Data Mining Software”, 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , ss. 1-11.
• Colombo, E. veFrancalanci, C. (2004). “Selecting CRM Packages Based on Architectural, Functional, and Cost Requirements: Empirical Validation of a Hierarchical Ranking Model”, Requirements Engineering, 9, ss. 186-203.
• Çebi, S., Çelik, M. ve Kahraman, C. (2008). “ Analitik Ağ Süreci Yöntemi Üzerine Bilgi Aksiyomu Açılımı”, Endüstri Mühendisliği Dergisi, 20(1), ss. 5-18.
• Demirli, E. (2010). “ TOPSIS Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Sistemi: Türkiye’deki Kamu Bankaları üzerine Bir Uygulama”, Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 5(1), ss. 101-112.
• Erol, V. ve Başlıgil H. (2005), “İşletmelerde Yönetim Bilişim Sistemi Yazılımı Seçimi İçin Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi ve Yapay Sinir Ağları Modeli”, Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 4, ss. 107-120.
• Forman, E. ve Sally, M. (2000). Decision by Objectives, Expert Choice Inc. Pittsburgh, US. Görener, A. (2011). “ Bütünleşik ANP-Vikor Yaklaşımı ile ERP Yazılımı Seçimi”, Havacılık ve Uzay Teknolojileri Dergisi, 5(1), ss. 97-110.
• Hlupic, V. ve Paul, R.J. (1996). “Methodological Approach to Manufacturing Simulation Software Selection”, Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 9 (1), ss. 49-55.
• Hwang, C.L. ve Yoon, P. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making In: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer, Berlin.
• Jadhav, A.S. ve Sonar, R.M. (2009). “Evaluating and Selecting Software Packages: A Review”, Information and Software Technology, 51, ss. 555-563.
• Lai, V.S., Trueblood, R.P. ve Wong, B.K. (1999). “Software Selection: A Case Study of the Application of the Analytical Hierarchical Process to the Selection of a Multimedia Authoring System”, Information and Management, 36, ss. 221-232.
• Lawlis, P.K., Mark, K.E., Thomas, D.A. ve Courtheyn, T. (2001), “A Formal Process for Evaluating COST Software Products”, IEEE, ss. 58-63.
• Liao, X., Li, Y. ve Lu, B. (2007), “ A Model for Selecting an ERP System Based on Linguistic Information Processing”, Information Systems, 32, ss. 1005-1017.
• Mollaghasemi, M., Pet-Edwards, J. (1997). Technical Briefing: Making Multiple Objective Decisions, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA.
• Monjezi, M., Dehghani, H., Singh, T.N., Sayadi, A.R. ve Gholinejad, A. (2012). “Application of TOPSIS Method for Selecting the Most Appropriate Blast Design”, Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 5(1), ss. 95-101.
• Muralidhar, K., Santhanam, R. ve Wilson, R. (1990). “Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Information System Project Selection”, Information and Management, 18, ss. 87-95.
• Ngai, E.W.T. ve Chan, E.W.C. (2005). “Evaluation of Knowledge Management Tools Using AHP”, Expert Systems with Applications, ss. 1-11.
• Ossadnik, W. ve Lange, O. (1999). “AHP-Based Evaluation of AHP-Software”, European Journal of Operational Research, 118, ss. 578-588.
• Plessis, A.L. (1993). “A Method for Case Tool Evaluation”, Information and Management, 25, ss. 93-102.
• Saaty T.L. (1990). “How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process”, European Journal of Operational Research, 48, ss. 9-26.
• Saaty T.L. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The Analytic Network Process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, US.
• Saaty, T.L. ve Vargas, L.G. (2006). Decision making with the Analytic Network Process: Economic, political, social and technological applications with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks, Sipringer,
• Pittsburgh, US. Sahay, B.S. ve Gupta, A.K. (2003), “Development of Software Selection Criteria for Supply Chain Solutions”, Industrial Management and Data
• Systems, 103(2), ss. 97-110.
• Shyjith, K., Ilangkumaran, M. ve Kumanan, S. (2008), “Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach to Evaluate Optimum Maintenance Strategy in Textile Industry”, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 14(4), ss. 375-386.
• Stylianou, A.C., Madey, G. ve Smith, R.D. (1992). “Selection Criteria for Expert System Shells: a Socio-Technical Framework”, Communications of the ACM, 32 (10), ss. 30-48.
• Tewoldeberhan, T.W., Verbraeck, A., Valentin, E. ve Bardonnet, G. (2002). “An Evaluation and Selection Methodology for Discrete-Event Simulation Software”, 2002 Winter Simulation Conference, ss. 67-75.
• Wu, W.W. ve Lee, Y.T. (2007). “Selecting Knowledge Management Strategies by Using The Analytic Network Process”, Expert Systems with Applications, 32(3), ss. 841-847.
• Yazgan, H.R., Boran, S. ve Göztepe, K. (2009). “An ERP Software Selection Process With Using Artificial Neural Network Based on Analytic Network Process Approach”, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, ss. 9214-9222.
• Yoon, K., Hwang, C. (1995). Multiple Attribute Decision-Making: An Introduction, Sage Publisher, UK.