BibTex RIS Cite

-

Year 2013, Volume: 17 Issue: 1, 1 - 22, 18.06.2013

Abstract

This study examines why and how resistance to institutional change occurs, through the change of institutional logics, with a particular case in the Turkish National Police. The study mainly employs sub methods of grounded theory. Resistance to change from the logics of authoritarian law enforcement to the democratic one is studied. Three categories of resistance, as follows, motivation by contextual conditions, tendency for political struggle, and focusing on deprivation are identified. Then, two main categories of resistance strategies, -individual and collectivist-, are defined in relation to the former. In conclusion, it is found possible for actors against institutional change with certain stimulus to go into action and resist to change

References

  • Aldrich, E.H., (2010). Beam me up Scott(ie) Institutional Theorists’ Struggles with the Emergent Nature of Entrepreneurship. Reserach in the Sociology of Work, 21, 329-364.
  • Altındal, H., (2010). Türk Silahlı Kuvvetleri’nin Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi Adına Sayıştay Tarafından Denetimi: Değişen Anayasa ve Yasal Düzenlemeler Çerçevesinde Bir Değerlendirme. Sayıştay Dergisi, 79, 3-70.
  • Altınay, A. G., (2004). The Myth of Military Nation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Arndt, M. & Bigelow, B., (2006). Toward the Creation of an Institutional Logic for the Management of Hospitals: Efficiency in the Early Nineteen Hundreds. Medical Care Research and Review, 63(3), 369-394.
  • Ashworth, R., Boyne, G., & Delbridge, R., (2007). Escape from the Iron Cage? Organizational Change and Isomorphic Pressures in the Public Sector. Journal of Public Administration Research, 19, 165–187.
  • Beckert, J., (1999). Agency, Entrepreneurs, and Institutional Change. The Role of Strategic Choice and Institutionalized Practices in Organizations, Organization Studies, 20, 777-799.
  • Bjerregaard, T., (2011). Institutional change at the Frontlines. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 6(1), 26-45.
  • Boxenbaum, E. & Battilana, J., (2006). Importation as innovation: transposing managerial practices across fields. Strategic Organization, 3, 355-383.
  • Charmaz K. 1998. “Grounded Theory”. Ed. Smith J.A. Harre R. ve Langenhove L.V. Rethinking Methods in Psychology içinde s. 27-50. London: Sage
  • Dacin, M., T., Ventresca, J. M., & Beal, D. B., (1999). The Embeddedness of Organizations: Debates, Dialogue & Directions. Journal of Management, 25(3), 317-356.
  • DeJordy R. 2010. Institutional Guardianship: The Role of Agency in Preserving Threatened Institutional Arrangements. A Dissertation for Doctor of Philosophy in Management. Boston College.
  • Delbridge, R. & Edwards, T., (2008). Challenging conventions: Roles and processes during non-isomorphic institutional change. Human Relations, 61(3), 299– 325.
  • DiMaggio P. 1988. “Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory”. Ed. Zucker L. Institutional Patterns and Organizations içinde s. 3-21. Massachusetts: Ballinger
  • DiMaggio, J. P. & Powell, W. W., (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
  • DiMaggio and Powell. 1991. “Introduction”. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis içinde s.1-38. Powell W.W. ve DiMaggio P.J. (Ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
  • Doğan F. 2010. Polis ve Jandarma Teşkilatları Açısından İç Güvenlik Yönetimi, Sorunları ve Değişimi. Ankara Üniversitesi SBE, Kamu Yönetimi Bölümü. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi
  • Durmaz H. 2007. Officer Attitudes toward Organizational Change in the Turkish National Police. University of North Texas. PhD Dissertation.
  • Fligstein, N., (1996). Markets as Politics: A Political-Cultural Approach to Market Institutions. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 656-673.
  • Garud, R., H., C. & Maguire, S., (2007). Institutional Entrepreneurship as Embedded Agency: An Introduction to the Special Issue. Organization Studies, 28(07), 957–969.
  • Greenwood, R. & Hinings, C. B., (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1022–1054.
  • Hallet, T. & Ventresca, J. M., (2006). Inhabited institutions: Social interactions and organizational forms in Gouldner’s Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy. Theory and Society, 3, 213–236.
  • Haveman, A. H. & Rao, H., (1997). Structuring a Theory of Moral Sentiments: Institutional and Organizational Coevolution in the Early Thrift Industry. The American Journal of Sociology, 102 (6), 1606-1651.
  • Hensmans, M., (2003). Social Movement Organizations: A Metaphor for Strategic Actors in Institutional Fields. Organization Studies, 24(3), 355–381.
  • Hirsch, M. P. & Lounsbury, M., (1997). Ending the Family Quarrel : Toward a Reconciliation of ‘’Old’’ and ‘’New’’. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 406-418.
  • Karatay A. 2009. An Assessment of Democratic Policing in the Turkish National Police: Police Officers’ Attitudes toward recent Police Reforms. The University of Southern Mississippi. PhD Dissertation.
  • Kıvrak A. 2008. Avrupa Birliği Sürecinde Türk Polis Teşkilatının Yönetim, Eğitim ve Politikalarının Avrupa Birliği Polis Teşkilatları ile Karşılaştırılması. Ankara Üniversitesi SBE, Halkla İlişkiler ve Tanıtım ABD. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi
  • Koca, E. A., (2010). Güvenlik Alanında Oluşturulan AB Eksenli Politika ve Kurumsal Dönüşüm Çabalarının Polisler Arasındaki Yansıması. Ankara Üniversitesi SBE, Antropoloji ABD. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi.
  • Kopenhag Kriterleri. 1993. http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/komisyon/insanhaklari/pdf01/437- 438.pdf (12.03.2012)
  • Lawrence B. Thomas ve Suddaby Roy (2006), “lnstitutions and institutional work”, Eds: Steward R. Clegg, Cynthia Hardy, Thomas B. Lawrence ve Walter R. Nord, Handbook of Organization Studies, London: Sage
  • Lawrence, B. T., (2008). Power, Institutions and Organizations. Greenwood, R.; Oliver, C.; Sahlin-Andersson, S. ve Suddaby, Roy., (Ed.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. ss.170-197, London: Sage.
  • Lawrence, B. T. & Suddaby, R. & Leca, B., (2011). Institutional Work: Refocusing Institutional Studies of Organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 52-58.
  • Lounsbury, M., (2002). Institutional Transformation and Status Mobility: The Professionalization of the Field of Finance. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 255-266.
  • Marquis, C. & Lounsbury, M., (2007). Vive la Resistance: Competing Logics and the Consolidation of U.S. Community Banking. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 799–820.
  • McAdam D. ve Scott W.R. 2002. “Organizations and Movements”. Ed: Davis G.F., McAdam G., Scott R. W., Zald N.M. Social Movements and Organization Theory içinde ss. 4-41.Cambridge:Cambridge University Pres.
  • Meyer, W. J. & Rowan, B., (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
  • Meyer, E. R. & Hammerschmid, G., (2006). Changing Institutional Logics and Executive Identities”, American Behavioral Scientist, S.49(7), ss.1000-1014.
  • MGK Tutanak Dergisi. 1980. http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/tutanaklar/TUTANAK/MGK_/ d01/c001/mgk_01001001.pdf (07.04.2012)
  • Oliver, C., (1991). Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes. The Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145-179.
  • Oliver, C. (1992). The Antecedents of Deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies. 13(4), 563-588.
  • Ocnaschek, T., Moran, R. N. & Hanser, D. R., (2006). Turkey. Kurian T.G., (Ed.), World Encyclopedia of Police Forces and Correctional Systems, ss. 906-912, Detroit: Gale.
  • Pache, A-C. & Santos, F., (2010). When Worlds Collide: The Internal Dynamics of Organizational Responses to Conflicting Institutional Demands. The Academy of Management Review. S.35(3), 455-476.
  • Perkman, M., Salter, A. & Tartari, V., (2011). Reaching Across Institutional Logics: Arbitrage vs. Contamination. http://druid8.sit.aau.dk/druid/acc_papers/ q3xk6p9fdvvie3ys6lit4ogu2ldx.pdf (erişim tarihi: 12.10.2011).
  • Piran, L., (2011). Turkey and the European Union Reforms: Institutional Change in the Turkish National Police. The Catholic University of America, PhD. Dissertation.
  • Powell, W. W. & Colyvas, A. J., (2008). Microfoundations of Institutional Theory. Greenwood R., Oliver C., Sahlin K. ve Suddaby R. (Ed.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism , ss. 276-298, California: Sage.
  • Rao, H., Monin, P. & Durand, R., (2003). Institutional Change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle Cuisine as an Identity Movement in French Gastronomy. American Journal of Sociology, S.108(4), 795-843.
  • Reay, T, & Golden-B., K., & Germann, K. , (2006). Legitimizing a new Role: Small Wins and Micro Processes of Change. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 977–998.
  • Ruef, M., Scott, W. R. & (1998), A Multidimensional Model of Organizational Legitimacy: Hospital Survival in Changing Institutional Environnnents. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 877-904.
  • Scott, W. R., Chard, R. M. & Mendel, J. P. & Caronna, A. C., (2000). Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Scott, W. R. , (1995). Institutions and Organizations, California: Sage.
  • Scott, W. R., (1987). The Adolescence of Institutional Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4), 493-511.
  • Scott, W. R., (2001). Institutions and Organizations, California: Sage.
  • Scott, W. R., (2008). Approaching adulthood: the maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society, 37, 427–442.
  • Seo, M-G. & Creed, W. E. D., (2002). Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective. The Academy of Management Review. 27(2), 222-247.
  • Slack, T. & Hinings, B., (1995). Institutional Pressures Isomorphic Change: An Empirical Test. Organization Studies, 15(6), 803-827.
  • Strauss, A. & Corbin, J., (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research, 2nd Edition. California: Sage.
  • Suddaby, R. & Greenwood, R., (2005). Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy, Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 35-67.
  • Suddaby, R., (2010). Challenges for Institutional Theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19, 14-20.
  • Thornton, H. P. & Ocasio, W., (2008). Institutional Logics. R. Greenwood R., Oliver C. Sahlin- Andersson K. & Suddaby R. (Ed.) Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, ss.99-129, Sage: California.
  • Thornton, H. P., (2002). The Rise of the Corporation in a Craft Industry: Conflict and Conformity in Institutional Logics. The Academy of Management Journal. 45(1), 81-101.
  • Townley, B., (2002). The Role of Competing Rationalities in Institutional Change. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 163-179.
  • Usul, A. R., (2011). Democracy in Turkey, New York: Routledge.
  • Van de Ven, H. A. & Hargrave, J. T., (2004). Social, Technical and Institutional Change: A Literature Review and Synthesis. Poole, M. S. ve Van de Ven, H. Andrew, (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Change and Innovation, ss. 259-304, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Yılmaz, A., (2004). Avrupa Polis Modelleri ve Türk Polis Sistemi. Ankara Üniversitesi SBE, Kamu Yönetimi ve Siyaset Bilimi Anabilim Dalı, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  • Yin, R., (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Method, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Zucker, G. L., (1983). Organizations as Institutions. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 2, 1-47.
  • Yasal Metinler, PVSK (2559 s. Polis Vazife ve Selahiyet Kanunu), (1934), RG Tarih: 14.07.1934, S. 2751.

Aktörler Kurumsal Değişime Direnir mi? Türk Emniyet Teşkilatı Örneği

Year 2013, Volume: 17 Issue: 1, 1 - 22, 18.06.2013

Abstract

Bu çalışmada kurumsal mantıkların değişimi üzerinden ele alınan kurumsal de-
ğişime direnişin neden ve nasılı Türk Emniyet Teşkilatı örnekliğinde araştırılmıştır. Gö-
mülü Teori yöntemleri kullanılarak yapılan incelemede; otoriteryan kolluk mantığından
demokratik kolluk mantığına geçişe direniş açısından “bağlamsal koşullarca güdülenme,
politik mücadele yönelimi ve yoksunluklara odaklanma” olarak üç ana direniş nedeni
kategorisi ile bunlarla bağlantılı “bireysel ve kolektif direniş stratejileri” olarak iki ana
direniş stratejisi kategorisi ile alt kategorileri tanımlanmıştır. Nihayet kurumsal değişim
karşısında belirli bir niyetle harekete geçip eyleyenleşen aktörlerin direniş göstermelerinin
mümkün olabileceği belirlenmiştir.

References

  • Aldrich, E.H., (2010). Beam me up Scott(ie) Institutional Theorists’ Struggles with the Emergent Nature of Entrepreneurship. Reserach in the Sociology of Work, 21, 329-364.
  • Altındal, H., (2010). Türk Silahlı Kuvvetleri’nin Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi Adına Sayıştay Tarafından Denetimi: Değişen Anayasa ve Yasal Düzenlemeler Çerçevesinde Bir Değerlendirme. Sayıştay Dergisi, 79, 3-70.
  • Altınay, A. G., (2004). The Myth of Military Nation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Arndt, M. & Bigelow, B., (2006). Toward the Creation of an Institutional Logic for the Management of Hospitals: Efficiency in the Early Nineteen Hundreds. Medical Care Research and Review, 63(3), 369-394.
  • Ashworth, R., Boyne, G., & Delbridge, R., (2007). Escape from the Iron Cage? Organizational Change and Isomorphic Pressures in the Public Sector. Journal of Public Administration Research, 19, 165–187.
  • Beckert, J., (1999). Agency, Entrepreneurs, and Institutional Change. The Role of Strategic Choice and Institutionalized Practices in Organizations, Organization Studies, 20, 777-799.
  • Bjerregaard, T., (2011). Institutional change at the Frontlines. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 6(1), 26-45.
  • Boxenbaum, E. & Battilana, J., (2006). Importation as innovation: transposing managerial practices across fields. Strategic Organization, 3, 355-383.
  • Charmaz K. 1998. “Grounded Theory”. Ed. Smith J.A. Harre R. ve Langenhove L.V. Rethinking Methods in Psychology içinde s. 27-50. London: Sage
  • Dacin, M., T., Ventresca, J. M., & Beal, D. B., (1999). The Embeddedness of Organizations: Debates, Dialogue & Directions. Journal of Management, 25(3), 317-356.
  • DeJordy R. 2010. Institutional Guardianship: The Role of Agency in Preserving Threatened Institutional Arrangements. A Dissertation for Doctor of Philosophy in Management. Boston College.
  • Delbridge, R. & Edwards, T., (2008). Challenging conventions: Roles and processes during non-isomorphic institutional change. Human Relations, 61(3), 299– 325.
  • DiMaggio P. 1988. “Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory”. Ed. Zucker L. Institutional Patterns and Organizations içinde s. 3-21. Massachusetts: Ballinger
  • DiMaggio, J. P. & Powell, W. W., (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
  • DiMaggio and Powell. 1991. “Introduction”. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis içinde s.1-38. Powell W.W. ve DiMaggio P.J. (Ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
  • Doğan F. 2010. Polis ve Jandarma Teşkilatları Açısından İç Güvenlik Yönetimi, Sorunları ve Değişimi. Ankara Üniversitesi SBE, Kamu Yönetimi Bölümü. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi
  • Durmaz H. 2007. Officer Attitudes toward Organizational Change in the Turkish National Police. University of North Texas. PhD Dissertation.
  • Fligstein, N., (1996). Markets as Politics: A Political-Cultural Approach to Market Institutions. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 656-673.
  • Garud, R., H., C. & Maguire, S., (2007). Institutional Entrepreneurship as Embedded Agency: An Introduction to the Special Issue. Organization Studies, 28(07), 957–969.
  • Greenwood, R. & Hinings, C. B., (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1022–1054.
  • Hallet, T. & Ventresca, J. M., (2006). Inhabited institutions: Social interactions and organizational forms in Gouldner’s Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy. Theory and Society, 3, 213–236.
  • Haveman, A. H. & Rao, H., (1997). Structuring a Theory of Moral Sentiments: Institutional and Organizational Coevolution in the Early Thrift Industry. The American Journal of Sociology, 102 (6), 1606-1651.
  • Hensmans, M., (2003). Social Movement Organizations: A Metaphor for Strategic Actors in Institutional Fields. Organization Studies, 24(3), 355–381.
  • Hirsch, M. P. & Lounsbury, M., (1997). Ending the Family Quarrel : Toward a Reconciliation of ‘’Old’’ and ‘’New’’. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 406-418.
  • Karatay A. 2009. An Assessment of Democratic Policing in the Turkish National Police: Police Officers’ Attitudes toward recent Police Reforms. The University of Southern Mississippi. PhD Dissertation.
  • Kıvrak A. 2008. Avrupa Birliği Sürecinde Türk Polis Teşkilatının Yönetim, Eğitim ve Politikalarının Avrupa Birliği Polis Teşkilatları ile Karşılaştırılması. Ankara Üniversitesi SBE, Halkla İlişkiler ve Tanıtım ABD. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi
  • Koca, E. A., (2010). Güvenlik Alanında Oluşturulan AB Eksenli Politika ve Kurumsal Dönüşüm Çabalarının Polisler Arasındaki Yansıması. Ankara Üniversitesi SBE, Antropoloji ABD. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi.
  • Kopenhag Kriterleri. 1993. http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/komisyon/insanhaklari/pdf01/437- 438.pdf (12.03.2012)
  • Lawrence B. Thomas ve Suddaby Roy (2006), “lnstitutions and institutional work”, Eds: Steward R. Clegg, Cynthia Hardy, Thomas B. Lawrence ve Walter R. Nord, Handbook of Organization Studies, London: Sage
  • Lawrence, B. T., (2008). Power, Institutions and Organizations. Greenwood, R.; Oliver, C.; Sahlin-Andersson, S. ve Suddaby, Roy., (Ed.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. ss.170-197, London: Sage.
  • Lawrence, B. T. & Suddaby, R. & Leca, B., (2011). Institutional Work: Refocusing Institutional Studies of Organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 52-58.
  • Lounsbury, M., (2002). Institutional Transformation and Status Mobility: The Professionalization of the Field of Finance. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 255-266.
  • Marquis, C. & Lounsbury, M., (2007). Vive la Resistance: Competing Logics and the Consolidation of U.S. Community Banking. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 799–820.
  • McAdam D. ve Scott W.R. 2002. “Organizations and Movements”. Ed: Davis G.F., McAdam G., Scott R. W., Zald N.M. Social Movements and Organization Theory içinde ss. 4-41.Cambridge:Cambridge University Pres.
  • Meyer, W. J. & Rowan, B., (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
  • Meyer, E. R. & Hammerschmid, G., (2006). Changing Institutional Logics and Executive Identities”, American Behavioral Scientist, S.49(7), ss.1000-1014.
  • MGK Tutanak Dergisi. 1980. http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/tutanaklar/TUTANAK/MGK_/ d01/c001/mgk_01001001.pdf (07.04.2012)
  • Oliver, C., (1991). Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes. The Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145-179.
  • Oliver, C. (1992). The Antecedents of Deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies. 13(4), 563-588.
  • Ocnaschek, T., Moran, R. N. & Hanser, D. R., (2006). Turkey. Kurian T.G., (Ed.), World Encyclopedia of Police Forces and Correctional Systems, ss. 906-912, Detroit: Gale.
  • Pache, A-C. & Santos, F., (2010). When Worlds Collide: The Internal Dynamics of Organizational Responses to Conflicting Institutional Demands. The Academy of Management Review. S.35(3), 455-476.
  • Perkman, M., Salter, A. & Tartari, V., (2011). Reaching Across Institutional Logics: Arbitrage vs. Contamination. http://druid8.sit.aau.dk/druid/acc_papers/ q3xk6p9fdvvie3ys6lit4ogu2ldx.pdf (erişim tarihi: 12.10.2011).
  • Piran, L., (2011). Turkey and the European Union Reforms: Institutional Change in the Turkish National Police. The Catholic University of America, PhD. Dissertation.
  • Powell, W. W. & Colyvas, A. J., (2008). Microfoundations of Institutional Theory. Greenwood R., Oliver C., Sahlin K. ve Suddaby R. (Ed.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism , ss. 276-298, California: Sage.
  • Rao, H., Monin, P. & Durand, R., (2003). Institutional Change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle Cuisine as an Identity Movement in French Gastronomy. American Journal of Sociology, S.108(4), 795-843.
  • Reay, T, & Golden-B., K., & Germann, K. , (2006). Legitimizing a new Role: Small Wins and Micro Processes of Change. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 977–998.
  • Ruef, M., Scott, W. R. & (1998), A Multidimensional Model of Organizational Legitimacy: Hospital Survival in Changing Institutional Environnnents. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 877-904.
  • Scott, W. R., Chard, R. M. & Mendel, J. P. & Caronna, A. C., (2000). Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Scott, W. R. , (1995). Institutions and Organizations, California: Sage.
  • Scott, W. R., (1987). The Adolescence of Institutional Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4), 493-511.
  • Scott, W. R., (2001). Institutions and Organizations, California: Sage.
  • Scott, W. R., (2008). Approaching adulthood: the maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society, 37, 427–442.
  • Seo, M-G. & Creed, W. E. D., (2002). Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective. The Academy of Management Review. 27(2), 222-247.
  • Slack, T. & Hinings, B., (1995). Institutional Pressures Isomorphic Change: An Empirical Test. Organization Studies, 15(6), 803-827.
  • Strauss, A. & Corbin, J., (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research, 2nd Edition. California: Sage.
  • Suddaby, R. & Greenwood, R., (2005). Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy, Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 35-67.
  • Suddaby, R., (2010). Challenges for Institutional Theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19, 14-20.
  • Thornton, H. P. & Ocasio, W., (2008). Institutional Logics. R. Greenwood R., Oliver C. Sahlin- Andersson K. & Suddaby R. (Ed.) Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, ss.99-129, Sage: California.
  • Thornton, H. P., (2002). The Rise of the Corporation in a Craft Industry: Conflict and Conformity in Institutional Logics. The Academy of Management Journal. 45(1), 81-101.
  • Townley, B., (2002). The Role of Competing Rationalities in Institutional Change. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 163-179.
  • Usul, A. R., (2011). Democracy in Turkey, New York: Routledge.
  • Van de Ven, H. A. & Hargrave, J. T., (2004). Social, Technical and Institutional Change: A Literature Review and Synthesis. Poole, M. S. ve Van de Ven, H. Andrew, (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Change and Innovation, ss. 259-304, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Yılmaz, A., (2004). Avrupa Polis Modelleri ve Türk Polis Sistemi. Ankara Üniversitesi SBE, Kamu Yönetimi ve Siyaset Bilimi Anabilim Dalı, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  • Yin, R., (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Method, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Zucker, G. L., (1983). Organizations as Institutions. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 2, 1-47.
  • Yasal Metinler, PVSK (2559 s. Polis Vazife ve Selahiyet Kanunu), (1934), RG Tarih: 14.07.1934, S. 2751.
There are 66 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language tr;en
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Oktay Koç This is me

İrfan Demir This is me

Publication Date June 18, 2013
Published in Issue Year 2013 Volume: 17 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Koç, O., & Demir, İ. (2013). Aktörler Kurumsal Değişime Direnir mi? Türk Emniyet Teşkilatı Örneği. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(1), 1-22.

Creative Commons Lisansı
ATASOBEDAtatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari-AynıLisanslaPaylaş 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.