BibTex RIS Cite

Anıza Doğrudan Ekim Makinalarının Performansına Etkili Faktörler

Year 2009, Volume: 40 Issue: 2, 101 - 108, 11.02.2013

Abstract

Anıza doğrudan ekim makinalarının performansı üzerinde; toprak, anız, bitki, iklim ve işletme koşulları gibi çeşitli
faktörlerin etkisi bulunmaktadır. Bir anıza doğrudan ekim makinasının tasarımı, seçimi ve etkin kullanımı için bu faktörlerin ve her
birinin değişik alt seviyelerinden oluşan kombinasyonlarının sistematik olarak değerlendirilmesi gerekir. Bu çalışmada, anıza
doğrudan ekim makinalarının performansına etkili önemli bazı faktörler çeşitli araştırmalardan elde edilen bulgular ışığında
değerlendirilmiştir.

References

  • ASAE, 2006a. ASAE Standard EP291.3. Terminology and Definitions for Soil Tillage and Soil-Tool Relationships. In ASAE Standards 2006, 131-134. St. Joseph, MI: ASABE.
  • ASAE, 2006b. ASAE Standard S477. Terminology for Soil- Engaging Components for Conservation-Tillage Planters, Drills, and Seeders. In ASAE Standards 2006, 364-369. St. Joseph, MI: ASABE.
  • Bahrani, M.J., M.H. Raufat ve H. Ghadiri, 2007. Influence of wheat residue management on irrigated corn grain production in a reduced tillage system. Soil & Tillage Research 94, p: 305–309.
  • Chen, Y., S. Tessier ve B. Irvine, 2004. Drill and crop performances as affected by different drill configurations for no-till seeding. Soil & Tillage Research 77, 147–155.
  • Doan, V., Y. Chen ve B. Irvine, 2005. Effect of oat stubble height on the performance of no-till seeder openers. Canadian Biosystems Engng. 47, P:2,37-2,44.
  • Gill, W.R. ve E.V. Glen, 1968. Soil Dynamics in Tillage and Traction. Agriculture Handbook No: 316, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, USA.
  • Green, M. ve D. Poisson, 1999. Residue management for successful direct seeding. Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development. www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/ deptdocs-nsfall/agdex1205
  • Green, M. ve M. Eliason, 1999. Equipment issues in crop residue management for direct seeding. Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development. www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/ $department/-deptdocs.nsf/all/agdex1352.
  • Grisso, R., D. Holshouser ve R. Pitman, 2006. Planter/drill considerations for conservation tillage systems. Virginia Coop. Ext. Public. No: 442-457, Virginia State Univ., USA.
  • Guerif, J., G. Richard, C. Dürr, J.M. Machet, S. Recous ve J. Roger-Estrade, 2001. A review of tillage effects on crop residue management, seedbed conditions and seedling establishment. Soil & Tillage Research, 61, p:13-32.
  • Herbek, J., L. Murdock, J. James ve D. Call, 2008. Corn residue management for no-till wheat. Department of Agronomy. http://www.ca.uky.edu/ukrec/RR%201999%20- %202000/99-00pg20.pdf
  • Hewitt, J.S., ve A.R. Dexter. 1980. Effects of tillage and stubble management on the structure of a swelling soil. J. Soil Sci. 31:203-215.
  • Hughes, K.A., ve C.J. Baker. 1977. The effects of tillage and zero tillage systems on soil aggregates in a silt loam. J. Agric. Engr. Research 22(3):291-301.
  • McVay, K.A., 2003. The value of crop residue. MF-2604, Kansas State University, Department of Agronomy. http://www.oznet.ksu.edu.
  • Morrison, J.E. ve R.R. Allen, 1987. Planter and drill requirements for soils with surface residues. Southern Region No-till Conf. Proc., p:44-58, College Station, Texas, USA.
  • NRCS, 2005. Conservation Practice Standard 329-1. Residue and Tillage Management No Till/Strip Till/Direct Seed. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/standards/nhcp.html
  • Price, T., 1999. What should my no-till planter look like? https://transact.nt.gov.au/ebiz/ dbird/techpublications.nsf/b2ff165af0ec6aeb69256efe004f5a 7f/$file/311.pdf
  • Prior, S.A., D.C. Reicosky, D.W. Reevesa, G.B. Runionc ve R.L. Raper, 2000. Residue and tillage effects on planting implement-induced short-term CO2 and water loss from a loamy sand soil in Alabama. Soil & Tillage Research 54, p:197-199.
  • Singh, B. ve S.S. Malhi, 2006. Response of soil physical properties to tillage and residue management on two soils in a cool temperate environment. Soil & Tillage Research 85, p:143- 153.
Year 2009, Volume: 40 Issue: 2, 101 - 108, 11.02.2013

Abstract

References

  • ASAE, 2006a. ASAE Standard EP291.3. Terminology and Definitions for Soil Tillage and Soil-Tool Relationships. In ASAE Standards 2006, 131-134. St. Joseph, MI: ASABE.
  • ASAE, 2006b. ASAE Standard S477. Terminology for Soil- Engaging Components for Conservation-Tillage Planters, Drills, and Seeders. In ASAE Standards 2006, 364-369. St. Joseph, MI: ASABE.
  • Bahrani, M.J., M.H. Raufat ve H. Ghadiri, 2007. Influence of wheat residue management on irrigated corn grain production in a reduced tillage system. Soil & Tillage Research 94, p: 305–309.
  • Chen, Y., S. Tessier ve B. Irvine, 2004. Drill and crop performances as affected by different drill configurations for no-till seeding. Soil & Tillage Research 77, 147–155.
  • Doan, V., Y. Chen ve B. Irvine, 2005. Effect of oat stubble height on the performance of no-till seeder openers. Canadian Biosystems Engng. 47, P:2,37-2,44.
  • Gill, W.R. ve E.V. Glen, 1968. Soil Dynamics in Tillage and Traction. Agriculture Handbook No: 316, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, USA.
  • Green, M. ve D. Poisson, 1999. Residue management for successful direct seeding. Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development. www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/ deptdocs-nsfall/agdex1205
  • Green, M. ve M. Eliason, 1999. Equipment issues in crop residue management for direct seeding. Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development. www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/ $department/-deptdocs.nsf/all/agdex1352.
  • Grisso, R., D. Holshouser ve R. Pitman, 2006. Planter/drill considerations for conservation tillage systems. Virginia Coop. Ext. Public. No: 442-457, Virginia State Univ., USA.
  • Guerif, J., G. Richard, C. Dürr, J.M. Machet, S. Recous ve J. Roger-Estrade, 2001. A review of tillage effects on crop residue management, seedbed conditions and seedling establishment. Soil & Tillage Research, 61, p:13-32.
  • Herbek, J., L. Murdock, J. James ve D. Call, 2008. Corn residue management for no-till wheat. Department of Agronomy. http://www.ca.uky.edu/ukrec/RR%201999%20- %202000/99-00pg20.pdf
  • Hewitt, J.S., ve A.R. Dexter. 1980. Effects of tillage and stubble management on the structure of a swelling soil. J. Soil Sci. 31:203-215.
  • Hughes, K.A., ve C.J. Baker. 1977. The effects of tillage and zero tillage systems on soil aggregates in a silt loam. J. Agric. Engr. Research 22(3):291-301.
  • McVay, K.A., 2003. The value of crop residue. MF-2604, Kansas State University, Department of Agronomy. http://www.oznet.ksu.edu.
  • Morrison, J.E. ve R.R. Allen, 1987. Planter and drill requirements for soils with surface residues. Southern Region No-till Conf. Proc., p:44-58, College Station, Texas, USA.
  • NRCS, 2005. Conservation Practice Standard 329-1. Residue and Tillage Management No Till/Strip Till/Direct Seed. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/standards/nhcp.html
  • Price, T., 1999. What should my no-till planter look like? https://transact.nt.gov.au/ebiz/ dbird/techpublications.nsf/b2ff165af0ec6aeb69256efe004f5a 7f/$file/311.pdf
  • Prior, S.A., D.C. Reicosky, D.W. Reevesa, G.B. Runionc ve R.L. Raper, 2000. Residue and tillage effects on planting implement-induced short-term CO2 and water loss from a loamy sand soil in Alabama. Soil & Tillage Research 54, p:197-199.
  • Singh, B. ve S.S. Malhi, 2006. Response of soil physical properties to tillage and residue management on two soils in a cool temperate environment. Soil & Tillage Research 85, p:143- 153.
There are 19 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language tr;en
Journal Section DERLEMELER
Authors

Ahmet Çelik

Publication Date February 11, 2013
Published in Issue Year 2009 Volume: 40 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Çelik, A. (2013). Anıza Doğrudan Ekim Makinalarının Performansına Etkili Faktörler. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 40(2), 101-108.
AMA Çelik A. Anıza Doğrudan Ekim Makinalarının Performansına Etkili Faktörler. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. February 2013;40(2):101-108.
Chicago Çelik, Ahmet. “Anıza Doğrudan Ekim Makinalarının Performansına Etkili Faktörler”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 40, no. 2 (February 2013): 101-8.
EndNote Çelik A (February 1, 2013) Anıza Doğrudan Ekim Makinalarının Performansına Etkili Faktörler. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 40 2 101–108.
IEEE A. Çelik, “Anıza Doğrudan Ekim Makinalarının Performansına Etkili Faktörler”, Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 101–108, 2013.
ISNAD Çelik, Ahmet. “Anıza Doğrudan Ekim Makinalarının Performansına Etkili Faktörler”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 40/2 (February 2013), 101-108.
JAMA Çelik A. Anıza Doğrudan Ekim Makinalarının Performansına Etkili Faktörler. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 2013;40:101–108.
MLA Çelik, Ahmet. “Anıza Doğrudan Ekim Makinalarının Performansına Etkili Faktörler”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 40, no. 2, 2013, pp. 101-8.
Vancouver Çelik A. Anıza Doğrudan Ekim Makinalarının Performansına Etkili Faktörler. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 2013;40(2):101-8.

Articles published in this journal are published under the Creative Commons International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). This allows the work to be copied and distributed in any medium or format provided that the original article is appropriately cited. However, the articles work cannot be used for commercial purposes.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/