Farklı Arazi Kullanımı Altındaki Podzolik Toprakların Kalite Parametrelerinin Belirlenmesi

Year 2019, Volume: 50 Issue: 2, 128 - 135, 28.05.2019

Miraç Gülnar Kenan Barik

https://doi.org/10.17097/ataunizfd.480971

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı Doğu
Karadeniz Bölgesinde yaygın olarak bulunan podzolik toprakların farklı kullanım
koşulları altındaki durumlarını toprak kalite parametrelerine göre değerlendirmek
amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Rize ili sınırları içerisinde çay tarımı yapılan arazi,
çayır ve orman örtüsüyle kaplı araziler çalışma alanı olarak belirlenmiştir.
Belirlenen her bir arazide toprak profili açılmış ve profil tanımlaması
yapılmıştır. Alınan toprak örnekleri ile toprak kalitesini belirleyen
parametrelere göre çeşitli kimyasal ve fiziksel analizler yapılmıştır.
Araştırmada, alınan toprak örneklerinin tekstür, toprak reaksiyonu, kireç,
organik madde, elektrik iletkenliği, katyon değişim kapasitesi, değişebilir
katyon, azot, fosfor, mikroelement, tane yoğunluğu, agregat stabilitesi,
hidrolik iletkenlik durumları değerlendirilmiştir. Yapılan değerlendirmeler
sonucunda arazi kullanım şekline göre her üç şekilde kullanılan arazilerinde
değerledirilen 4 farklı yöteme göre kaliteli oldukları görülmüş olup; çayır ve
orman örtüsüyle kaplı arazilerin toprak kalitesinin çay tarımı yapılan araziye
göre daha yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Keywords

Toprak kalitesi, Toprak kalite indeksi, Podzolik topraklar

Supporting Institution

Atatürk Üniversitesi BAP birimi

Project Number

2012-406

Determination of Quality Parameters of Podzolic Soils Under Different Land Use

Abstract

The aim of this study is to
evaluate the status of podzolic soils commonly found in the Eastern Black Sea
Region, under different land use conditions in terms of soil quality parameters.
Cultivated area used for tea garden, meadow and forest lands were determined as
the study area. The soil profiles for each determined lands were excavated and
defined. The study was done with soil samples taken from each horizonsof
profiles. Some chemical and physical analyses were carried out with these
samples based on soil quality parameters. In this study, the texture, soil
acidity, lime contend, organic material, electric conductivity, cation exchange
capacity, exchangeable cation, nitrogen, phosphorus, microelement, particle
density, aggregate stability, hydraulic conductivity of these soil samples were
evaluated. As a result of these evaluations, it is found all land use types has
high land quality. On the other hand, it was also determined that the soil
quality of meadow and forest lands were higher than the tea cultivating lands.

Keywords

Soil, Soil quality, Soil quality index, Podzolic soils

Project Number

2012-406

References

• Alfredsson, H., Condron, L.M., Clarholm, M. and Davis, M.R. 1998. Changes in soil acidity and organik matter following the establishment of conifers on former grassland in New Zealand. Forest Ecology and Management.
• Arshad, M.A. and Coen, G.M., (1992) Characterization of soil quality: Physical and chemical criteria. Am J Alternative Agric. 7:25–31.
• Aydın A., Sezen Y. 1995. Toprak Kimyası Laboratuvar Kitabı, Atatürk Ünversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Ofset Tesisi, Yayın No: 174, Erzurum.
• Barik K., Aydın A., Aydın C.K., 2013. Leaching of different liming materials from acid soil and determination of liming period. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment Vol.11 (3&4 ): 863 – 866.
• Boyle, M., Frankerberger, J. And Stolzy, L.H., 1989. The Influence of Organic Matter on Soil Aggregation and Water Infiltration. J. Prod. Agric.
• Chen, Y.S.R., Butier, I.N., Stumn, W., 1973. Adsorbtion of Phosphate on Alumina and Kaolonite from Dilute Aqueous Solutions. J. Colloid lnterface Sci., 43: 421-436.
• Chenu, C., Y.LE Bissonnais, And D. Arrouays 2000. Organic Matter Influence on Clay Wettability and Soil Aggregate Stability. Soil Sci. Soc. Am.J. 64, 1479-1486.
• Dalgliesh N., 2006. Measure soil water for better farming decisions. Farming Ahead No:168
• Demiralay, İ. 1993. Toprak Fiziksel Analizleri. Atatürk Üniversitesi. Yayınları No: 143. Erzurum.s:90-95.
• Dumanski, J., Pieri, C., 2000. Land quality indicators: resaarch plan. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 81, 93-102.
• Doran, J.W., Parkin, T.B., 1994. Defining and assessing soil quality. In: Doran, J.W., Coleman, D.C., Bezdicek, D.F., Stewart, B.A. (Eds.), Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. SSSA Special Publication No. 35, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
• Doran, J.W., 2002. Soil Health and Global Sustainability: Translating Science into Practice. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 88, 119-127.
• Gee, G. W. and Bauder J.W., 1986. Particle-Size Analysis. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods Second Edition. Agronomy No: 9. 2. Edition P: 383-441.
• Karlen, D.L., Mausbach, M.J., Doran, J.W., Cline, R.G., Harris, R.F., Schuman, G.E., 1997. Soil quality: a concept, definition, and framework for evaluation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61, 4–10.
• Karlen, D.L., Ditzler, C.A., Andrews, S.S., 2003. Soil quality: why and how? Geoderma 114, 145–156.
• Kacar, B. 1966. Bitki ve Toprağın Kimyasal Analizleri. I. Genel Bilgiler. Ankara Üniversitesi. Ziraat Fakültesi Yayın No: 279, Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi, Ankara.
• Kacar, B., 1984. Çayın gübrelenmesi, Çay İşletmeleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Çay-Kur yayınları No:4, Ankara.
• Karim, Z., Rahman A., Rahman S., 1981. Mineralogy of acidic tea soils and sorption of phosphate. Tea Quartely 50 (4), Siri Lanka.
• Klute, A. and Dırksen, C., 1986. Hydraulic Conductivity and Diffusivity: Laboratory Methods. Methods of Soil Analysis.Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd Edition. Agronomy No: 9. 687-734, 1188 p, Madison, Wisconsin USA.
• Koffa, S.N., Mori, T., 1987. Effects of pH and aluminium toxicity on the grovvth of four strains of Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.)de Wit., Leucaena Research Reports, 8, 58-62
• Kosmas, C, Kırkby M., Geeson N. 1999. The Medalus Project Mediterranean Desertification And Land Use, European Communities
• Islam, K.R. and Weil R.R. 2000. Soil quality indicator properties-in mid-Atlantic soils as influenced by conservation management. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 55(1), 69-78.
• Mc Lean, E. O., 1982. Soil pH and Lime Requirement. Methods of Soil Analysis Part2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties Second Edition. Agronomy. No: 9 Part 2. Edition P: 199-224.
• Michael, C. Amacher, Katherine P. O’Neill, Charles H. Perry, 2007. Soil Vital Signs: A New Soil Quality Index (SQI) for Assessing Forest Soil Health,United States Department of Agriculture,USA
• Mohanty, M Painuli, D.K. Misra, A.K. Ghosh, P.K., 2007. Soil quality effects of tillage and residue under rice–wheat cropping on a Vertisol in India. Soil & Tillage Research, 92, 243–250.
• Müftüoğlu, M., ve Sarımehmet, M., 1993. Doğu Karadeniz Bölgesi’ nde Çay Tarımı Yapılan Toprakların Asitlik Durumu, Ege Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, 30 (3), İzmir.
• Nelson, D.W., and Sommers, L.E. 1982. Organic Matter. Methods of Soil Analysis Part2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties Second Edition. Agronamy. No: 9 Part 2 . Edition P: 574-579.
• Nelson, R.E., 1982. Carbonate and Gypsum. Methods of Soil Analysis.Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 2nd Edition. Agronomy No: 9. 181-197, 1159 p, Madison, Wisconsin USA.
• Rhoades, J.D., 1982. Soluble Salts. Methods of Soil Analysis.Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 2nd Edition. Agronomy No: 9, 167-179, 1159 p, Madison, Wisconsin USA.
• Riquier, J., 1972. A mathematical model for calculation of agricultural productivity in terms of parameters of soil anc climate. Paper AGL: 14.Sept. p:9. FAO.
• Sağlam, T., 1994. Toprak Kimyası. Trakya Üniv. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Yayın No:190, Ders Kitabı No:21, Tekirdağ
• Shukla, M.K. Lal, R., Ebinger M., 2006. Determining soil quality indicators by factor analysis. Soil & Tillage Research 87, 194-204.
• Sivasubramaniam, S., and Talibudeen, O., 1972. Effect of aluminium on growth of tea and uptake of potassium and phosphrus. The Tea Quarterly, 43, 4-13, Ceylon
• Ülgen, N., Yurtsever, N., 1984. Türkiye Gübre ve Gübreleme Rehberi. Tarım ve Orman Köyişleri Bakanlığı, Toprak Su Genel Müdürlüğü Araştırma Dairesi Başkanlığı, 47-8. Ankara
• Ünver İ., Çokuysal B. Anaç D.,Kılıç C., Eryüce N., Kılıç Ö., Esetlili B. 2013. Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme. Anadolu Üniversitesi, Açıköğretim Fakültesi, 231, Eskişehir.
• Wickremasinghe, K.N., Sivasubramaniam, S. and Nalliah, P., 1981. Urea Hiydrolysis in Some Tea Soils. Plant and Soil, 62 (3), 473-477.