Türkiye’nin En Yüksek Ovasında Tatlı Mısır Çeşitlerinin Agronomik Performansı: Kalite Karakterleri

Year 2020, Volume: 51 Issue: 3, 249 - 257, 25.09.2020

Atom Atanasio Ladu Stanslous Ali Öztürk Selçuk Kodaz

https://doi.org/10.17097/ataunizfd.680520

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Tatlı mısır insan gıdası için üretilir ve tane kalitesi başlıca genotipe bağlıdır. Bu çalışma Erzurum/Türkiye için uygun tatlı mısır çeşitlerini belirlemek amacıyla 2017 ve 2018 sezonlarında tesadüf blokları deneme desenine göre yürütülmüştür. Tatlı mısır çeşitlerinin koçan uzunluğu, koçan çapı, koçan ağırlığı, bin tane ağırlığı, suda çözünür kuru madde oranı, ham protein oranı ve tane nem oranı incelenmiştir. İncelenen özellikler yönünden çeşitler arasında önemli farklar olduğu belirlenmiştir. En yüksek kocan uzunluğu Khan F1 (19.8 cm), koçan çapı Baron F1 (50.5 mm), koçan ağırlığı Baron F1 (323.5 g), 1000-tane ağırlığı Signet (358.8 g), suda çözünür kuru madde oranı Tanem F1 (% 20.3) ve ham protein oranı ise BATEM Tatlı (% 16.5) çeşitlerinden elde edilmiştir. Hasat sonrası yedinci günde, tarla ve buzdolabı koşullarında tane nem içeriğindeki azalma en az Baron F1, suda çözünür kuru madde içeriğindeki azalma en az Khan F1 çeşidinde olmuştur. İki yıllık çalışmanın kalite özelliklerine ait sonuçlar esas alındığında Erzurum yöresinde taze tüketim amacıyla kaliteli tatlı mısır üretimi için Tanem F1 çeşidi tercih edilebilir.

Keywords

Tatlı mısır, Çeşit, Kalite, Protein, Suda çözünür kuru madde

Supporting Institution

Atatürk Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Koordinasyon Birimi

Project Number

FYL-2018-6631

Agronomic Performance of Different Sweet Corn Varieties in the Highest Plain of Turkey: Quality Characteristics

Abstract

Sweet corn is produced for human consumption and its grain quality primarily depends on the genotype. This study was carried out during the 2017 and 2018 seasons, in order to determine the suitable sweet corn varieties for Erzurum, Turkey. A randomized complete block design was used. Ear length (EL), ear diameter (ED), ear weight (EW), 1000-kernel weight (TKW), soluble solid content (SSC), crude protein content (CPC), and grain moisture content (GMC) of the 11 sweet corn varieties were investigated. Significant differences were determined among the varieties in terms of the investigated traits. The highest EL obtained from Khan F1 (19.8 cm), ED from Baron F1 (50.5 mm), EW from Baron F1 (323.5 g), TKW from Signet (358.8 g), SSC at harvest from Tanem F1 (20.3%), and CPC from BATEM Tatlı (16.5 %). At seven days post-harvest, the lowest reductions in grain moisture content were determined in Baron F1 both in the field and refrigerator conditions. The lowest losses in SSC both in the field and refrigerator conditions were determined in Khan F1. Based on the results of the two-year research in terms of all the quality traits, Tanem F1 variety can be the first choice for the production for fresh consumption in the Erzurum region. 

Keywords

Sweet corn, Variety, Quality, Protein, Soluble solid

Project Number

FYL-2018-6631

References

• Alan, O., Kinaci, G., Kinaci, E., Basciftci, Z.B., Sonmez, K., Evrenosoglu, Y., Kutlu, I., 2014. Kernel quality of some sweet corn varieties in relation to processing. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 42 (2): 414-419.
• Azanza, F., Bar-Zur, A., Juvik, J.A., 1996. Variation in sweet corn kernel characteristics associated with stand establishment and eating quality. Euphytica, 87 (1): 7-18.
• Baratova, S., Slosar, M., Andrejiova, A., 2016. Examination of basic variety characteristics of sweet corn in conditions of the Southern Slovakia. Acta Horticulturae Regiotecturae, 19 (1): 4-7.
• Basciftci, Z.B., Alan, Ö., Kinaci, E., Kinaci, G., Kutlu, İ., Sonmez, K., Evrenosoglu, Y., 2012. Technological and quality characteristics of some sweet corn (Zea mays saccharata Sturt) varieties. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 26 (4): 11-18. (in Turkish with abstract in English).
• Bhargava, S.C., 1983. Effect of altitude on maize protein in equatorial environment. Indian journal of plant physiology, 26 (3): 250-257.
• Bhatt, P.S., 2012. Response of sweet corn hybrid to varying plant densities and nitrogen levels. African Journal of Agricultural Research 7 (46): 6158-6166.
• Burcu, Y., Akgun, İ., 2018. Effects of plant density and different sowing dates on fresh ear yield and quality characters of sweet corn (Zea mays saccharata sturt.) grown under Isparta conditions. Süleyman Demirel University, Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences, 22 (2): 679-684. (in Turkish with abstract in English).
• Dragana, L., Darinka, B., Berenji, J., Marinkovic, B., Crnobarac, J., Jacimovic, G., Nikolic, L., 2013. The yield and sugar content of sweet corn cultivated in organic production system. Research Journal of Agricultural Science, 45 (3): 117-122.
• Ertek, A., Kara, B., 2013. Yield and quality of sweet corn under deficit irrigation. Agricultural water management, 129: 138-144.
• Esiyok, D., Bozokalfa, M.K., Ugur, A., 2004. Determination of yield quality and some plant characteristic of some sweet corn (Zea mays L. var. saccharata) varieties in different locations. Ege University, Journal of Agriculture Faculty, 41 (1): 1-9. (in Turkish with abstract in English).
• Esiyok, D., Bozokalfa, M.K., 2005. The effects of sowing and planting dates on yield and some agronomic properties of sweet corn (Zea mays L. var. saccharata). Ege University, Journal of Agriculture Faculty, 42 (1): 35-46. (in Turkish with abstract in English).
• Farsiani, A., Ghobadi, M.E., Jalali-Honarm, S., 2011. The effect of water deficit and sowing date on yield components and seed sugar contents of sweet corn (Zea mays L.). African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6 (26): 5769-5774.
• Goldman, I.L., Tracy, W.F., 1994. Kernel protein concentration in sugary-1 and shrunken-2 sweet corn. HortScience, 29 (3): 209-210.
• Hale, T.A., Hassell, R.L., Phillips, T., 2005. Refractometer measurements of soluble solid concentration do not reliably predict sugar content in sweet corn. HortTechnology, 15 (3): 668-672.
• Kantarci, D., Pazir, F., İştipliler, D., Tosun, M., Tonk, F.A., 2016. Optimization of harvesting time by quality criteria of sweet corn. Journal of Central Research Institute for Field Crops, 25 (1): 70-73.
• Kashiani, P., Saleh, G., Osman, M., Habibi, D., 2011. Sweet corn yield response to alternate furrow irrigation methods under different planting densities in a semi-arid climatic condition. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6 (4): 1032-1040.
• Khanduri, A., Hossain, F., Lakhera, P. C., Prasanna, B.M., 2011. Effect of harvest time on kernel sugar concentration in sweet corn. Indian J. Genet., 71 (3): 1-4.
• Khazaei, F., Alikhani, M.A., Yari, L., Khandan, A., 2010. Study the correlation, regression and path coefficient analysis in sweet corn (Zea mays var. saccharata) under different levels of plant density and nitrogen rate. Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 5 (6): 14-19.
• Liu, S.Y., Dong, S.T., Hu, C.H., 2005. The study of latitude and altitude affecting to maize quality. J. Maize Sci. 13 (2): 68–71.
• Maynard, E.T., Bluhm, E.A., 2017. Sugar-enhanced and synergistic sweet corn cultivar evaluation for Northern Indiana. Midwest Vegetable Trial Report for 2017, 1-7.
• Oktem, A., Oktem, A.G., Coskun, Y., 2004. Determination of sowing sates of sweet corn (Zea mays L. saccharata Sturt.) under Şanlıurfa conditions. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 28 (2): 83-91.
• Oktem, A., Oktem, A.G., 2006. Determination of yield characteristics of some sweet corn (Zea mays saccharata Sturt) genotypes under Harran Plain conditions. Uludağ University, Journal of Agriculture Faculty, 20 (1): 33-46. (in Turkish with abstract in English).
• Oktem, A., 2008. Effect of water shortage on yield, and protein and mineral compositions of drip-irrigated sweet corn in sustainable agricultural systems. Agricultural Water Management, 95 (9): 1003-1010.
• Oktem, A., Oktem, A.G., Emeklier, H.Y., 2010. Effect of nitrogen on yield and some quality parameters of sweet corn. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 41 (7): 832–847.
• Okumura, R.S., de Cinque Mariano, D., Nogueira Franco, A.A., Contador Zaccheo, P.V., Ometto Zorzenoni, T., 2013. Sweet corn: Genetic aspects, agronomic and nutritional traits. Brazilian Journal of Applied Technology for Agricultural Science, 6 (1): 105-114.
• Okumura, R.S., Vidigal Filho, P.S., Scapim, C.A., Marques, O.J., Franco, A.A.N., Souza, R.S., Reche, D.L., 2014. Effects of nitrogen rates and timing of nitrogen topdressing applications on the nutritional and agronomic traits of sweet corn. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 12 (2): 391-398.
• Oladeji, A.E., Olorunfemi, O., Bussie, M.D., Abebe, M., 2014. Varietal and harvesting time effects on physical characteristics and sensory attributes of boiled fresh yellow maize hybrids. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 82: 7347-7358.
• Ordas, B., Revilla, P., Ordas, A., Malvar, R.A., 2008. Hybrids sugary× sugary enhancer of sweet corn: A valuable option for cool environments. Scientia Horticulturae, 118 (2): 111-114.
• Sakin, M. A., Azapoglu, Ö., (2017). Effects of nitrogen and phosphorous on fresh ear and grain yield with some yield and quality components of sweet corn (Zea mays saccharata sturt.) in Tokat-Kazova conditions. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa University, 34 (3): 46-55. (in Turkish with abstract in English).
• Sonmez, K., Alan, O., Kinaci, E., Kinaci, G., Kutlu, İ., Basciftci, Z.B., Evrenosoglu, Y., 2013. Plant, ear and yield characteristics of some sweet corn (Zea mays saccharata Sturt) varieties. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of SDU, 8 (1): 28-40. (in Turkish with abstract in English).
• Stansluos, A.A.L., Ozturk, A., Kodaz, S., 2020. Agronomic performance of different sweet corn varieties in the highest plain of Turkey: Plant growth and yields. International Organization Science Research (in press).
• Szymanek, M., Dobrzański, B., Niedziółka, I., Rybczyński, R., 2006. Sweet corn: harvest and technology physical properties and quality. B. Dobrzański Institute of Agrophysics Polish Academy of Sciences. Lublin.
• Szymanek, M., 2009. Influence of sweet corn harvest date on kernels quality. Res Agr Eng, 55 (1): 10-17.
• Szymanek, M., Tanas, W., Kassar, F.H., 2015. Kernel carbohydrates concentration in sugary-1, sugary enhanced and shrunken sweet corn kernels. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 7: 260-264.
• Thakur, A.K., Thakur, D.S., Patel, R.K., Pradhan, A., Kumar, P., 2015. Effect of different plant geometry and nitrogen levels, in relation to growth characters, yield and economics on sweet corn (Zea mays sachharata L.) at Bastar Plateau Zone. The Bioscan, 10 (3): 1223-1226.
• Turgut, I., 2000. Effects of plant populations and nitrogen doses on fresh ear yield and yield components of sweet corn (Zea mays saccharata Sturt.) grown under Bursa conditions. Turk. J. Agric. For, 24: 341-347. (in Turkish with abstract in English).
• Turgut, I., Balci, A., 2002. Effect of different sowing dates on fresh ear yield and yield components of sweet corn (Zea mays saccharata Sturt.) cultivars under Bursa conditions. Uludağ University, Journal of Agriculture Faculty, 16 (2): 79-91. (in Turkish with abstract in English).
• Zhu, S., Mount, J.R., Collins, J.L., 1992. Sugar and soluble solids changes in refrigerated sweet corn (Zea mays L). Journal of Food Science, 57 (2): 454-457.
• Znidarcic, D., Ban, D., Ilak Persuric, S.A., Bızjak Koncar, A., 2008. Yield and quality of sweet corn (Zea mays L. var. saccharata) cultivars grown on different soil types. Cereal Research Communications, 36: 147-150.