Changing strategy and foreign policy of the United States regarding Afghanistan and the new interim government of the Taliban

Öz

The history of Afghanistan has always been accompanied by insecurity, military occupation, intra-sectarian and religious differences, foreign interventions and poverty of the society, which did not turn this country into a field to protect the interests of foreign powers. The relationship between Afghanistan and other countries such as Russia, China and Iran has always been considered in the foreign policy equations of the American governments. Occurrences subsequent to the incidents of September 11 and the military occupation of Afghanistan in 2001 removed the Taliban from power until 2021, simultaneously as the withdrawal of American troops and the fall of Afghan cities. The Taliban put the power at their disposal after two decades. The main question is how can the US foreign policy approach be explained prior to the establishment of the Taliban group? The current research, with the explanatory method according to the theory of realism, seeks to test this hypothesis that the domination of the Taliban at the top of Afghanistan's power did not mean the complete withdrawal of America from that country, but rather for various reasons such as concern about the growing power of China, heavy military expenditures, the presence of regional powers. Like Russia, China, and Iran, the failure to destroy terrorism, disagreement with the Afghan government and agreement with the Taliban can be explained.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Taliban
• Afghanistan
• America
• foreign policy

Kaynakça

1. Acharya, A., Buhari, SAAS ve Sulaiman, S. (2009). Kargaşadan para kazanmak: Pakistan'ın Kabile Bölgelerindeki Taliban ayaklanmasını finanse etmek. Çatışma ve Terörizm Çalışmaları, 32 (2), 95-108.
2. Ajili, H. and Rezaei, N. (2018) Defensive and Offensive Realism (Theoretical Framework for Analyzing Events and Events in the Persian Gulf Region), National Security Journal, 8th year, 12 pp. 198-165. https://tinyurl.com/ycxp7m9f (Persian).
3. Belasco, A. (2011). Cost of Iraq, Afghanistan, and other global war on terror operations since 9/11. DIANE Publishing.
4. Baybordi, I., Khabeiri, K., Shahrezaei, M. (2015) Review of America's foreign policy in the fight against terrorism: the goals and consequences of the Washington Security Treaty, International Relations Research, 8th year, 30, 105-146 http://tinyurl.com/2w3pw6ap (Persian).
5. Perić, I. (2022). Anthony H. Cordesman: Learning the Right Lessons from the Afghan War. Washington, DC: CSIS, September 2021.
6. Dehshiar, H. (2008). America and the ethnic supremacy in Afghanistan. Political-Economic Information Magazine, 258. Page - from 4 to 15 http://tinyurl.com/25c65ade (Persian).
7. Dehshiar, H. (2007) Theoretical Frameworks of America's Response to the Rise of China. Regional Studies Quarterly: Israel Studies-American Studies, 9th year, 1, 56-37 http://tinyurl.com/5aucr72c (Persian).
8. Dehshiar, H. (2008) Congress and the nature of American foreign policy. Regional studies journal:Israel studies-American studies, fifth year, 3. 7-21.

9. Dehshiar, H. (2009) America's Failures in Afghanistan. Political and Economic Information Magazine, 270, 97-107. https://tinyurl.com/2s3bmrxx (Persian).
10. Dehshiar, H. (2009). Barack Obama and the Maximum War in Afghanistan. Journal of Political and Economic Information, 24 (1), 265-266. http://tinyurl.com/yd65vcfn (Persian).
11. Dehshiar, H. (2010). Barack Obama's Counterinsurgency Strategy in Afghanistan. Political and International Approaches, 21, 9 to 32.http://tinyurl.com/7vpaaf34 (Persian).