Araştırma Makalesi

A Comparison of the Perfectionism and Social Desirability Levels in the Context of the Azerbaijani and Turkish Youth

Cilt: 11 Sayı: 4 22 Eylül 2024
PDF İndir
EN TR

A Comparison of the Perfectionism and Social Desirability Levels in the Context of the Azerbaijani and Turkish Youth

Öz

As social beings, humans seek approval and recognition from society. In this context, the study aims to examine the relationship between the social desirability and perfectionism levels, referred to "the need to behave in a culturally approved way,” by comparing them from a cultural perspective. A total of 214 participants, including 105 Azerbaijanis and 109 Turks aged 18-30, were reached. “Socio-Demographic Information Form”, "Marlow-Crowne Social Desirability Scale Short Form C (SD SF-C)," and "Big Three Perfectionism Scale-Short Form (BTPS-SF)" were implemented. The results indicated that the Azerbaijani and Turkish youth exhibit moderate levels of perfectionism, with self-critical perfectionism being dominant in both of the samples. There was no significant difference between the perfectionism and social desirability levels of these two groups, but the Azerbaijani youth scored higher in the social-behavioral sub-dimension of SD SF-C. In terms of sex, the males in Azerbaijan showed higher narcissistic perfectionism while the females in Türkiye showed higher self-critical perfectionism. A significant and weakly negative linear correlational relationship was found between these two variables. These findings reveal that the youth of Türkiye and Azerbaijan share similar characteristics, as reflected in the motto “one nation, two states”.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Abdurahmanlı, E. (2024, January 2). Azerbaycan Türklerinin Türk dünyası eğitimine entegrasyonu Bildiri: Dr Elvin Abdurahmanlı [Video]. Retrieved from YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4Jsqc4GTF0
  2. Akın-Arıkan, Ç., Baştemur, Ş., & Demirtaş-Zorbaz, S. (2021). Marlowe-Crowne Sosyal Beğenirlik Ölçeği Kısa Formu C’nin Türk Kültürüne Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. HAYEF: Journal of Education, 18(2), 278-94.
  3. Akşit, A. (2020). Ottoman legacy and contemporary Turkish culture. Journal of Turkish Studies, 15(2), 123-136.
  4. Akyazı, K. G. (2023). Ergenler İçin İnternette Yabancılarla Etkileşim Ölçeği Geliştirme Çalışması [Yüksek lisans tezi, Ordu Üniversitesi]. Yök Tez.
  5. Anthony, M. M., & Swinson, R. P. (2009). When perfect isn't enough: strategies for coping with perfectionism. New Harbinger Publications.
  6. Büyükbayraktar, Ç. (2011). Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Mükemmeliyetçilik ve Öfke İlişkisi [Yüksek lisans tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi]. Yök Tez.
  7. Casale, S., Fioravanti, G., Rugai, L., Flett, G. L., & Hewitt, P. L. (2019). What lies beyond the superordinate trait perfectionism factors? The perfectionistic self-presentation and perfectionism cognitions inventory versus the big three perfectionism scale in predicting depression and social anxiety. Journal of Personality Assesment, 102 (3), 370-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2019.1573429
  8. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047358

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Gelişim Psikolojisi (Diğer)

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

13 Ağustos 2024

Yayımlanma Tarihi

22 Eylül 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

20 Mayıs 2024

Kabul Tarihi

13 Ağustos 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA
Duman, N., Mustafayeva, S., Yıldız, E., & Eldemir, E. Ş. (2024). A Comparison of the Perfectionism and Social Desirability Levels in the Context of the Azerbaijani and Turkish Youth. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi, 11(4), 2131-2149. https://doi.org/10.46868/atdd.2024.696
AMA
1.Duman N, Mustafayeva S, Yıldız E, Eldemir EŞ. A Comparison of the Perfectionism and Social Desirability Levels in the Context of the Azerbaijani and Turkish Youth. ATDD. 2024;11(4):2131-2149. doi:10.46868/atdd.2024.696
Chicago
Duman, Nesrin, Shams Mustafayeva, Elif Yıldız, ve Emine Şeyda Eldemir. 2024. “A Comparison of the Perfectionism and Social Desirability Levels in the Context of the Azerbaijani and Turkish Youth”. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi 11 (4): 2131-49. https://doi.org/10.46868/atdd.2024.696.
EndNote
Duman N, Mustafayeva S, Yıldız E, Eldemir EŞ (01 Eylül 2024) A Comparison of the Perfectionism and Social Desirability Levels in the Context of the Azerbaijani and Turkish Youth. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi 11 4 2131–2149.
IEEE
[1]N. Duman, S. Mustafayeva, E. Yıldız, ve E. Ş. Eldemir, “A Comparison of the Perfectionism and Social Desirability Levels in the Context of the Azerbaijani and Turkish Youth”, ATDD, c. 11, sy 4, ss. 2131–2149, Eyl. 2024, doi: 10.46868/atdd.2024.696.
ISNAD
Duman, Nesrin - Mustafayeva, Shams - Yıldız, Elif - Eldemir, Emine Şeyda. “A Comparison of the Perfectionism and Social Desirability Levels in the Context of the Azerbaijani and Turkish Youth”. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi 11/4 (01 Eylül 2024): 2131-2149. https://doi.org/10.46868/atdd.2024.696.
JAMA
1.Duman N, Mustafayeva S, Yıldız E, Eldemir EŞ. A Comparison of the Perfectionism and Social Desirability Levels in the Context of the Azerbaijani and Turkish Youth. ATDD. 2024;11:2131–2149.
MLA
Duman, Nesrin, vd. “A Comparison of the Perfectionism and Social Desirability Levels in the Context of the Azerbaijani and Turkish Youth”. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi, c. 11, sy 4, Eylül 2024, ss. 2131-49, doi:10.46868/atdd.2024.696.
Vancouver
1.Nesrin Duman, Shams Mustafayeva, Elif Yıldız, Emine Şeyda Eldemir. A Comparison of the Perfectionism and Social Desirability Levels in the Context of the Azerbaijani and Turkish Youth. ATDD. 01 Eylül 2024;11(4):2131-49. doi:10.46868/atdd.2024.696

 

Copyright and Licensing Policy

Academic Journal of History and Idea / Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi adopts an open access publishing policy in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI).

Copyright in published articles remains with the author(s). By submitting a manuscript, authors retain the copyright to their work and grant the journal the right of first publication. Authors do not transfer ownership of copyright to the journal.

The journal provides immediate and free open access to all published content under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0):
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, users may read, download, copy, distribute, share, reproduce, adapt, translate, and otherwise reuse the published material in any medium or format for non-commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes are indicated where applicable.

Any use of the published material for commercial purposes is not permitted under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.

The authors bear full scientific, ethical, and legal responsibility for the content of their manuscripts. Opinions, interpretations, and claims expressed in published articles are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editors or the Editorial Board.

The journal does not claim ownership of the copyright in published articles.

© Academic Journal of History and Idea / Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi (ATDD). Individual articles are licensed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.

 

download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiYnkucG5nIiwicGF0aCI6IjkwMWYvMjY0NS82ZDAyLzZhNzNiZGFhMDQ1YjU3LjY0NjA0OTIwLnBuZyIsImV4cCI6MTc4NTk3MzY5MCwibm9uY2UiOiI2MmM2ODQzMmQxZDY5NzY2ZmI5ZTkxOGQ4MmY4MzdmOSJ9.y4SC5MPockrmqFSBIeba9s6E_Jf6fjC9K-Fn6WAkhGM

         download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiaW1hZ2UucG5nIiwicGF0aCI6ImM1NTQvZmM4OS8yMmIxLzZhNzNiZTM1OGFmMDk5LjE5Mzg2NTI0LnBuZyIsImV4cCI6MTc4NTk3MzgyOSwibm9uY2UiOiJjMTYzMzJlZDA1NzkzOTUyOWE5YWEwMzM0YzNkOWJhOSJ9._tQb_6jWIXbyfAStrBGmJMpaWAJV86U8BAHyYGxkyUU   

Journal Performance & Bibliometric Indicators (2025)

2025 SOBİAD Journal Metrics
Citation Count: 90 • Impact Value: 0.205 • Quartile: Q2

https://atif.sobiad.com/ 

download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiUTIucG5nIiwicGF0aCI6IjU4MDMvM2Y2My8wMzJmLzZhNzNjOGRlNTUxMmM4LjMxOTI1MzY0LnBuZyIsImV4cCI6MTc4NTk3NjU1OCwibm9uY2UiOiI5NzA2NTcwYjJjZGVhZmM4ODU2NDljNWJkZjNhNjQ3ZSJ9.S8EaUu-fmZna_dXRXNuK26x6n-V5w3fzzPHpnIYT6-o