Improving the Efficiency of Executive Power Bodies in the Republic of Azerbaijan

Öz

This study analyzes the efficient organization of the activities of executive power bodies within the modern public administration system in the context of large scale administrative reforms implemented in the Republic of Azerbaijan. It follows a qualitative, descriptive analytical design based on a review of the theoretical literature on public administration efficiency, an examination of relevant normative legal acts and official documents, and a conceptual comparison of administrative models with Azerbaijani practice. The article investigates the transition from the traditional hierarchical bureaucratic model to “New Public Management” (NPM) and “Good Governance” principles and the impact of this transformation on the flexibility and results orientation of the state apparatus. At the center of the research are Azerbaijan’s management innovations: the “ASAN service” model, digital government solutions, and the institution of the Special Representations of the President in the liberated territories. The article discusses the role of functional review in eliminating overlapping jurisdictions, the formation of human resource potential based on meritocracy, and the prospects for optimizing center local relations. Finally, directions are proposed for the evolution of Azerbaijan’s management model toward a more compact, transparent, and citizen oriented structure in line with the national development strategy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Executive Power
• Efficiency
• Digitalization
• ASAN Service
• Special Representation
• Administrative Reforms

Azerbaycan Cumhuriyeti’nde Yürütme Organlarının Etkinliğinin Artırılması

Öz

Bu çalışma, Azerbaycan Cumhuriyeti’nde uygulanan kapsamlı idari reformlar bağlamında, modern kamu yönetimi sistemi içinde yürütme organlarının faaliyetlerinin etkin biçimde örgütlenmesini incelemektedir. Araştırma nitel, betimleyici analitik bir desene dayanmakta; kamu yönetiminde etkinliğe ilişkin kuramsal literatürün taranmasını, Azerbaycan’a ait ilgili normatif hukuki düzenlemelerin ve resmî belgelerin incelenmesini ve yönetim modellerinin Azerbaycan uygulamasıyla kavramsal olarak karşılaştırılmasını kapsamaktadır. Makalede geleneksel hiyerarşik bürokratik modelden “Yeni Kamu İşletmeciliği” ve “İyi Yönetişim” ilkelerine geçiş süreci ile bu dönüşümün devlet aygıtının esnekliği ve sonuç odaklılığı üzerindeki etkisi ele alınmaktadır. Araştırmanın merkezinde Azerbaycan’ın yönetim alanındaki yenilikleri, yani “ASAN Hizmet” modeli, dijital devlet çözümleri ve işgalden kurtarılan topraklarda uygulanan Cumhurbaşkanı Özel Temsilcilikleri kurumu yer almaktadır. Çalışmada yürütme organlarının faaliyetlerindeki yetki çakışmalarının giderilmesinde işlevsel analizin rolü, liyakat ilkesine dayalı insan kaynağı kapasitesinin oluşturulması ve bölgesel yönetimde merkez yerel ilişkilerinin iyileştirilmesine yönelik olanaklar tartışılmaktadır. Son olarak, Azerbaycan’ın yönetim modelinin ulusal kalkınma stratejisi doğrultusunda daha sade, şeffaf ve vatandaş odaklı bir yapıya doğru evrilmesine yönelik öneriler sunulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yürütme Organları
• Etkinlik
• Dijitalleşme
• ASAN Hizmet
• Özel Temsilcilik
• İdari Reformlar

Kaynakça

1. Abbasova Agamamed, S., Asgarova Alinazim, F., Aliyeva Shaban, M., Hamidova Adil, L., Qushkhani Nasir, R., & Rzayeva Yusif, L. (2023). Problems and prospects in developing the auditing system in Azerbaijan. Revista Universidad y Sociedad, 15(2), 550⁠–⁠561.
2. Adilov, N. A. O. (2017). Azərbaycan Respublikasında “ASAN xidmət”in fəaliyyətinin inkişaf meylləri və qlobal miqyasda öncül təcrübənin öyrənilməsi. Qanun Jurnalı, 3, 87⁠–⁠98.
3. Bagirzade, M. (2023). Etymology and semantic basis of the termination of the expression (governance). Terminology Issues, (1), 97⁠–⁠100. https://doi.org/10.59849/2663 8967.2023.1.97
4. Dekier, Ł. (2012). The origins and evolution of Lean Management system. Journal of International Studies, 5(1), 46⁠–⁠51. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071 8330.2012/5 1/6
5. Drucker, P. F. (1954). The practice of management. Harper & Brothers.
6. Hasanoğlu, M. (2008). Azerbaycan Cumhuriyeti’nde devletin yeniden yapılandırılması ve yerel yönetimlerin güçlendirilmesi çabaları. Sayıştay Dergisi, (69), 73⁠–⁠90.
7. Hill, C. J. (2018). Public management and program effectiveness in US public administration. In E. C. Stazyk & H. G. Frederickson (Eds.), Handbook of American public administration. Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786432070.00037
8. Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3⁠–⁠19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467 9299.1991.tb00779.x

9. Ibrahimzade, E. (2026). The flexible decision making capacity of the presidential institution in the context of contemporary threats: Advantages and limitations. Metafizika, 9(2), 239⁠–⁠263. https://doi.org/10.33864/2617 751X.2026.v9.i2.239 263
10. Jafarli, I. (2021). Effective public service delivery: The case of Azerbaijan. International Journal of Civil Service Reform and Practice, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.56289/ijcsrp.153
11. Lægreid, P. (2015). Christopher Hood, “A public management for all seasons?” In S. J. Balla, M. Lodge, & E. C. Page (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of classics in public policy and administration (pp. 541⁠–⁠558). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199646135.013.25
12. Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of “muddling through.” Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79⁠–⁠88. https://doi.org/10.2307/973677
13. Meier, K. J. (2010). Governance, structure, and democracy: Luther Gulick and the future of public administration. Public Administration Review, 70(s1), s284⁠–⁠s291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540 6210.2010.02288.x
14. Muradov, M., Safaraliyeva, R., Agayev, Y., & Gurbatov, N. (2014). Report on monitoring and evaluation of electronic services in Azerbaijan. Transparency Azerbaijan Anti corruption Public Union.
15. President of the Republic of Azerbaijan. (2021). Regulation on the Special Representations of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan (approved by Presidential Decree No. 1280 of 4 February 2021). https://president.az/az/articles/view/50530
16. Republic of Azerbaijan. (2001). Constitutional Law of the Republic of Azerbaijan “On the Commissioner for Human Rights (Ombudsman) of the Republic of Azerbaijan” (adopted 28 December 2001).
17. Republic of Azerbaijan. (2013). Law of the Republic of Azerbaijan “On Public Participation” (signed 22 November 2013).
18. Sadigov, S. M., Murshudli, F. A., & Baghirzade, M. M. (2025). Azerbaijan’s experience in commercialisation of digital public services: The ASAN service model. Public Administration Issues, (2), 30⁠–⁠66. https://doi.org/10.17323/1999 5431 2025 0 2 30 66
19. Simon, H. A. (1946). The proverbs of administration. Public Administration Review, 6(1), 53⁠–⁠67. https://doi.org/10.2307/973030
20. Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative behavior: A study of decision making processes in administrative organization. Macmillan.
21. Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99⁠–⁠118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852
22. United Nations. (2015). ASAN Service (Azerbaijan Service and Assessment Network): 2015 United Nations Public Service Award winner, category “Improving the Delivery of Public Services.” United Nations Public Service Awards. https://publicadministration.un.org/unpsa/database/ Winners/2015 Winners/ASAN Service
23. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. (2009). What is good governance? https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12870/3794
24. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). University of California Press. (Original work published 1922)
25. Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2), 197⁠–⁠222. https://doi.org/10.2307/2139277
26. Yang, R., & Azadov, E. (2005). Public administration reforms: Achievements, problems, prospects (A. Nuriyev, Ed.). CBS Polygraphic Production.
27. Zia, Y. A., & Khan, M. Z. (2014). A comparative review of traditional and new public administration and critique of new public management. The Dialogue, 9(4), 429⁠–⁠442.