Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Tıp Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Anatomi Dersi,Anatomi Dersinin İşleyişi ve Materyalleri ile ilgili Görüşleri

Year 2023, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 61 - 79, 09.06.2023

Abstract

ÖZET
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı Van YYÜ Tıp Fakültesi bünyesinde; Anatomi dersinin işleyişi ve tıp fakültesi dönem 1-6 öğrencileriyle özellikle son 2 yılda geçirilen pandemi süreci de düşünülerek Anatomi eğitim süreci ve yeterliliğinin ölçme-değerlendirmesidir.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmanın amacına uygun olarak 24 soru içeren Anatomi Dersine İlişkin Tutum Ölçeği, 351 öğrenciye çevrimiçi (online) olarak uygulanmıştır. Ölçekte; ‘Hiçbir Zaman’, ‘Nadiren’, ‘Bazen’, ‘Sık sık’ ve ‘Her zaman’ seçeneklerini içeren 5’li likert tipinde 24 soru bulunmaktadır. Her zaman: 1’, ‘Sık sık: 2’, ‘Bazen: 3’, ‘Nadiren: 4’, ‘Hiçbir zaman: 5’ olarak derecelendirilmiştir.
Bulgular: Öğrencilerin sorulara toplamda verdikleri cevaplar baz alınarak Anatomi dersine ilgilerinin ve Anatomi eğitimine karşı tutumlarının;%1,4’ünün düşük düzeyde %38,2’sinin orta düzeyde ve %60.4’ünün ise yüksek düzeyde olduğu görülür. Anatomi Tutum Ölçeği” puan ortalaması ise 92,07±14,43 olarak bulunmuştur.
Sonuç: Anatomi eğitiminde geleneksel yani maket,kadavra,kemik gibi materyallerle yüzyüze eğitimin daha etkili ve daha kalıcı olacağı ama yeni teknolojik eğitim şekillerinin de öğrenciler için yararlı ve cazip olabileceği saptanan çalışmanın sonucunda Anatomi eğitiminin; hekimlik mesleği ve özellikle ileride seçilebilecek cerrahi branşlar açısından birebir uygulamalı şekliyle daha efektif ve kalıcı olacağı düşünülmüştür..
Anahtar Kelimeler: Anatomi,tıp eğitimi,kadavra,tutum ölçeği

SUMMARY
Aim: The aim of this study is within Van YYU Faculty of Medicine; it is the measurement-evaluation of the Anatomy education process and proficiency, considering the functioning of the anatomy course and the pandemic process, especially in the last 2 years, with medical faculty students in terms 1-6.
Materials and Methods: In accordance with the purpose of the study, the Attitude Scale towards the Anatomy Lesson, which includes 24 questions, was administered to 351 students online. In scale; There are 24 questions in 5-point likert type, including 'Never', 'Rarely', 'Sometimes', 'Often' and 'Always'. It is rated always: 1', 'Frequently: 2', 'Sometimes: 3', 'Rarely: 4', 'Never: 5'.
Results: Based on the answers given by the students to the questions in total, it is seen that their interest in Anatomy lesson and their attitudes towards Anatomy education; 1.4% are at low level, 38.2% at medium level and 60.4% at high level. The mean score of "Anatomy Attitude Scale" was found to be 92.07±14.43.
Conclusion: As a result of the study, it was determined that face-to-face education with traditional materials such as models, cadavers, bones in anatomy education would be more effective and more permanent, but that new technological education forms could be beneficial and attractive for students; It is thought that it will be more effective and permanent in terms of the medical profession and especially the surgical branches that may be selected in the future.

Keywords: Anatomy, medical education, cadaver, attitude scale

Thanks

Kıymetli hocam,tevazü gösterip makale kabulunde bulunduğunuz için çok teşekkür ederiz. Bu bilimsel aktivitede sizin bünyenizde bulunmak bizim için bir onurdur. Saygılarımla.

References

  • 1. Abdullah Ortadeveci,• Merve Nur Ermez,• Semih Oz,• Hilmi Ozden; A survey study on distance anatomy education: challenges unique to anatomy; Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-021-02772
  • 2. Alsaida, , M. Bertrand; Students’ memorization of anatomy, influence of drawing; Morphologie,Volume 100;Issue 3,28,March 2016;pages 2-6
  • 3. Anja Boeckers et al;How can we deal with mental distressin the dissection room?-An evaluation of the need for pyschological support,August 2010
  • 4. Bahçeci,D (2006). Anatomi dersinde portfolyo kullanmanın öğrencilerin bilişsel ve duyuşsal özellikleri üzerine etkisi (Yayınlanmış doktora tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi,Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü,Ankara
  • 5. B. H. Verhoeven, G. M. Verwijnen, A. J. J. A. Scherpbier et al., “An analysis of progress test results of PBL and non-PBL students,” Medical Teacher, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 310–316, 1998
  • 6. BW Turney;Anatomy in a modern curriculum;Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2007;89:104-107
  • 7. İlhan Bahşi, Zehra Topal,Murat Çetkin,Mustafa Orhan, Piraye Kervancıoğlu,Mehmet Ercan Odabaşıoğlu, Ömer Faruk Cihan; Evaluation of attitudes and opinions of medical faculty students against the use of cadaver in anatomy education and investigation of the factors afecting their emotional responses related thereto; Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy (2021) 43:481–487)
  • 8. Kaissar Yammine; The Current Status of Anatomy Knowledge: Where Are We Now? Where Do We Need to Go and How Do We Get There?; Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 26(2), 184–188
  • 9.Keerti Singh et al;Teaching Anatomy using an active and engaging learning strategy;19:149,2019
  • 10.. Louise Ainscough, Richard Leung, and X Kay Colthorpe; Learning how to learn: can embedded discussion boards help first-year students discover new learning strategies?,October 2019
  • 11. Mohamed Estai, Stuart Bunt; Best teaching practices in Anatomy education:A critical review,February 2016
  • 12. Sevda KÜÇÜK, Samet KAPAKİN, Yüksel GÖKTAŞ; Tıp Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Mobil Artırılmış Gerçeklikle Anatomi Öğrenimine Yönelik Görüşleri; Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, Cilt 5, Sayı 3, Aralık 2015; Sayfa 316-323)
  • 13. Triepels, C. P. R., Koppes, D. M., Van Kuijk, S. M. J., Popeijus, H. E., Lamers, W. H., Van Gorp, T., ... & Notten, K. J. B. (2018). Medical students’ perspective on training in anatomy. Annals of Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeiger, 217, 60-65.
  • 14. Veronica Papa ,Mauro Vaccarezza; Teaching Anatomy in the XXI Century: New Aspects and Pitfalls; Hindawi Publishing Corporation The Scientific World Journal Volume 2013, Article ID 310348, 5 pages
Year 2023, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 61 - 79, 09.06.2023

Abstract

References

  • 1. Abdullah Ortadeveci,• Merve Nur Ermez,• Semih Oz,• Hilmi Ozden; A survey study on distance anatomy education: challenges unique to anatomy; Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-021-02772
  • 2. Alsaida, , M. Bertrand; Students’ memorization of anatomy, influence of drawing; Morphologie,Volume 100;Issue 3,28,March 2016;pages 2-6
  • 3. Anja Boeckers et al;How can we deal with mental distressin the dissection room?-An evaluation of the need for pyschological support,August 2010
  • 4. Bahçeci,D (2006). Anatomi dersinde portfolyo kullanmanın öğrencilerin bilişsel ve duyuşsal özellikleri üzerine etkisi (Yayınlanmış doktora tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi,Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü,Ankara
  • 5. B. H. Verhoeven, G. M. Verwijnen, A. J. J. A. Scherpbier et al., “An analysis of progress test results of PBL and non-PBL students,” Medical Teacher, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 310–316, 1998
  • 6. BW Turney;Anatomy in a modern curriculum;Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2007;89:104-107
  • 7. İlhan Bahşi, Zehra Topal,Murat Çetkin,Mustafa Orhan, Piraye Kervancıoğlu,Mehmet Ercan Odabaşıoğlu, Ömer Faruk Cihan; Evaluation of attitudes and opinions of medical faculty students against the use of cadaver in anatomy education and investigation of the factors afecting their emotional responses related thereto; Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy (2021) 43:481–487)
  • 8. Kaissar Yammine; The Current Status of Anatomy Knowledge: Where Are We Now? Where Do We Need to Go and How Do We Get There?; Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 26(2), 184–188
  • 9.Keerti Singh et al;Teaching Anatomy using an active and engaging learning strategy;19:149,2019
  • 10.. Louise Ainscough, Richard Leung, and X Kay Colthorpe; Learning how to learn: can embedded discussion boards help first-year students discover new learning strategies?,October 2019
  • 11. Mohamed Estai, Stuart Bunt; Best teaching practices in Anatomy education:A critical review,February 2016
  • 12. Sevda KÜÇÜK, Samet KAPAKİN, Yüksel GÖKTAŞ; Tıp Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Mobil Artırılmış Gerçeklikle Anatomi Öğrenimine Yönelik Görüşleri; Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, Cilt 5, Sayı 3, Aralık 2015; Sayfa 316-323)
  • 13. Triepels, C. P. R., Koppes, D. M., Van Kuijk, S. M. J., Popeijus, H. E., Lamers, W. H., Van Gorp, T., ... & Notten, K. J. B. (2018). Medical students’ perspective on training in anatomy. Annals of Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeiger, 217, 60-65.
  • 14. Veronica Papa ,Mauro Vaccarezza; Teaching Anatomy in the XXI Century: New Aspects and Pitfalls; Hindawi Publishing Corporation The Scientific World Journal Volume 2013, Article ID 310348, 5 pages
There are 14 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Clinical Sciences
Journal Section Original Research
Authors

Ece Buru 0000-0002-2984-6582

Publication Date June 9, 2023
Acceptance Date March 1, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 6 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Buru, E. (2023). Tıp Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Anatomi Dersi,Anatomi Dersinin İşleyişi ve Materyalleri ile ilgili Görüşleri. Tıp Fakültesi Klinikleri Dergisi, 6(1), 61-79.


All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Common Attribution Licence. (CC-BY-NC 4.0)

by-nc.png