Review
BibTex RIS Cite

PERİNATOLOJİDE SAĞLIK EĞİTİMİ: GELİŞEN VE DEĞİŞEN DİNAMİKLER

Year 2022, Volume: 1 Issue: 3 - February 2022, 6 - 18, 18.04.2022
https://doi.org/10.54270/atljm.2022.12

Abstract

Sağlık eğitimi geniş anlamıyla bireylerde sağlıklı yaşam biçimi davranışları oluşturmak için verilen ve amaca yönelik öğrenme eğitimlerini kapsayan bir süreçtir. Sağlık eğitiminin iyi bir şekilde yürütülebilmesi için
planlama, uygulama ve değerlendirme basamaklarına hâkim olmak gerekmektedir. Sağlık eğitiminde engellerin bilinmesi, önümüze çıkabilecek engellere karşı hazırlıklı olmak ve süreci yönetme konusunda
yardımcı olmaktadır. Günümüzde artan teknoloji kullanımı ve özellikle yapay zekâ alanındaki çalışmalar sağlık eğitiminde de yerini almaya başlamıştır. Perinatolojide sağlık eğitimi kapsamında, simulasyon uygulamaları ve sanal gerçeklik, yapay zekâ yardımıyla üstün bir öğrenme ortamı geliştirmektedir. Aynı zamanda, hasta eğitim programları da artık bu teknolojiler üzerinden yürütülmektedir. Ülkemizde, klasik
öğrenme modelleri yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Gebe eğitimleri ve değerlendirilmesiyle ilgili çalışmalar ülkemizde sınırlıdır. Türkiye’de riskli gebelik eğitimi ile ilgili literatürde bir araştırmaya veya derlemeye rastlanmamıştır. Bu derlemenin amacı sağlık eğitiminin temelleri doğrultusunda hem öğrenci eğitimini hem de hasta eğitimini perinatoloji çerçevesinde açıklamaktır.

References

  • World Health Organization. Health Education: Theoretical Concepts, Effective Strategies and Core Competencies. [Internet]. Health promotion practice. 2014. 1–82 p. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/119953
  • Christiana Nkanunye C, Obiechina GO. Health communication strategies as gateway to effective health promotion and well-being. J Med Res Heal Educ. 2017;1(3):13.
  • WHO. Health Promotion Glossary [Internet]. 1998 [cited 2019 Feb 26]. Available from: https://www.who.int/healthpromotion/about/HPR Glossary 1998.pdf
  • Mcleroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An Ecological Perspective on Health Promotion Programs. Heal Educ Behav. 1988;15(4):351–77.
  • Pancer SM, Nelson G. Community-Based Approaches to Health Promotion: Guidelines for Community Mobilization. Int Q Community Health Educ. 2005;10(2):91–111.
  • Nancy Sharby. Planning, Implementing and Evaluating Health Promotion Programs: A Primer. J Phys Ther Educ. 2005;19(2):72.
  • Rimer BKB, Glanz K, Rimer BKB. Theory at a Glance: A Guide for Health Promotion Practice. Heal (San Fr [Internet]. 2005;52. Available from: http://www.popline.org/node/276257
  • McGinnis JM. Does proof matter? Why strong evidence sometimes yields weak action. Am J Heal Promot. 2001;15(5):391–6.
  • Gavin NR, Satin AJ. Simulation Training in Obstetrics. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;60(4):802–10.
  • Smith ML, Foley MR. Transforming clinical education in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(4):763–7.
  • Emergencies in Clinical Obstetrics (ECO) Course [Internet]. [cited 2019 May 24]. Available from: https://www.acog.org/Education-and-Events/ECO-Course
  • ACOG Emergencies in Clinical Obstetrics (ECO) Course [Internet]. [cited 2019 May 24]. Available from: https://medicine.umich.edu/dept/obgyn/education/center-education/clinical-simulation/acog-emergenciesclinical-obstetrics-eco-course
  • Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Sentinel Event Alert, Issue 30: Preventing infant death and injury during delivery | Joint Commission. 2004; Available from: http://www.jointcommission.org/sentinel_event_alert_issue_30_preventing_infant_death_and_injury_during_delivery/
  • Taylor Alderman J. Using Simulation to Teach Nursing Students and Licensed Clinicians Obstetric Emergencies. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs [Internet]. 2012;37(6):394–400. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=jlh&AN=108108120&site=ehost-live
  • Unsal Atan S, Gulec Satir D, Ozturk R, Kavlak O, Saruhan A, Guneri SE, et al. The Effect of Using High Fidelity Birthing Simulator on Satisfaction and Performance of Nursing Students in Developing Obstetric. Florence Nightingale Hemşirelik Derg. 2019;27(1):1–16.
  • McLelland G, Perera C, Morphet J, McKenna L, Hall H, Williams B, et al. Interprofessional simulation of birth in a non-maternity setting for pre-professional students. Nurse Educ Today [Internet]. 2017 Nov;58:25–31. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0260691717301788
  • Lee WS, Kim M. Effects and Adequacy of High-Fidelity Simulation-Based Training for Obstetrical Nursing. J Korean Acad Nurs [Internet]. 2011;41(4):433. Available from: http://synapse.koreamed.org/DOIx.php?id=10.4040/jkan.2011.41.4.433
  • Taekman JM, Shelley K. Virtual Environments in Healthcare: Immersion, Disruption, and Flow. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2010;48(3):101–21.
  • Sideris M, Drosos C, Lales G, Papagiouvanni I, Paparoidamis G, Panagiotakopoulos T, et al. Virtual and Augmented Reality in Medical Education. Med Surg Educ - Past, Present Futur. 2018;
  • Cass S, Choi C. Google Glass, HoloLens, and the real future of augmented reality. IEEE Spectr. 2015;
  • Savran MM, Sørensen SMD, Konge L, Tolsgaard MG, Bjerrum F. Training and Assessment of Hysteroscopic Skills: A Systematic Review. J Surg Educ [Internet]. 2016 Sep;73(5):906–18. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1931720416300198
  • CAE Lucina Augmented Reality Bundle [Internet]. [cited 2019 May 24]. Available from: https://caehealthcare.com/offers/caelucina-augmented-reality-bundle/
  • Desai GS. Artificial Intelligence: The Future of Obstetrics and Gynecology. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2018;68(4):326–7.
  • Svensson J, Barclay L, Cooke M. Randomisedcontrolled trial of two antenatal education programmes. Midwifery [Internet]. 2009 Apr;25(2):114–25. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S0266613807000289
  • Soriano-Vidal FJ, Vila-Candel R, SorianoMartín PJ, Tejedor-Tornero A, Castro-Sánchez E. The effect of prenatal education classes on the birth expectations of Spanish women. Midwifery [Internet]. 2018 May;60:41–7. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0266613817302516
  • Carolan-Olah M, Sayakhot P. A randomized controlled trial of a web-based education intervention for women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Midwifery. 2019;68:39–47.
  • Abuidhail J, Mrayyan L, Jaradat D. Evaluating effects of prenatal web-based breastfeeding education for pregnant mothers in their third trimester of pregnancy: Prospective randomized control trial. Midwifery. 2019;69:143–9.
  • Chikalipo MC, Chirwa EM, Muula AS. Exploring antenatal education content for couples in Blantyre, Malawi. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1).
  • (CNPP) UC for NP and P. Choose MyPlate [Internet]. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). [cited 2019 May 30]. Available from: www.choosemyplate.gov
  • USDA Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion (CNPP). Get your MyPlate Plan [Internet]. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). [cited 2019 May 30]. Available from: https://www.choosemyplate.gov/MyPlatePlan
  • Sayakhot P, Carolan-Olah M. Internet use by pregnant women seeking pregnancyrelated information: A systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1).
  • Artieta-Pinedo I, Paz-Pascual C, Grandes G, Espinosa M. Framework for the establishment of a feasible, tailored and effective perinatal education programme. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2017 Dec 8;17(1):58. Available from: http://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-017-1234-7
  • Buultjens M, Murphy G, Robinson P, Milgrom J, Monfries M. Women’s experiences of, and attitudes to, maternity education across the perinatal period in Victoria, Australia: A mixed-methods approach. Women and Birth [Internet]. 2017 Oct;30(5):406–14. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1871519217301075
  • Turgut N, Güldür A, Çakmakçı H, Şerbetçi G, Yıldırım F, Ender Yumru A, et al. Gebe Okulunda Eğitim Alan Gebelerin Bilgi Füzeyleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. J Acad Res Nurs [Internet]. 2017;3(1):1–8. Available from: http://www.jarengteah.org/jvi.aspx?pdir=jaren&plng=tur&un=JAREN-43531&look4=
  • Yılmaz Esencan T, Karabulut Ö, Yıldırım AD, Abbasoğlu DE, Külek H, Şimşek Ç, et al. Doğuma Hazırlık Eğitimi Alan Gebelerin Doğum Şekli, İlk Emzirme Zamanı ve Ten Tene Temas Tercihleri. Nightingale J Nurs FNJN Florence Nightingale Hemşirelik Derg [Internet]. 2018;26(1):31–43. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/FNJN.387192
  • Gebe Okulu, Gebe Bilgilendirme Sınıfı, Doğuma Hazırlık ve Danışmanlık Merkezleri Hakkında Genelge. 2018.
Year 2022, Volume: 1 Issue: 3 - February 2022, 6 - 18, 18.04.2022
https://doi.org/10.54270/atljm.2022.12

Abstract

References

  • World Health Organization. Health Education: Theoretical Concepts, Effective Strategies and Core Competencies. [Internet]. Health promotion practice. 2014. 1–82 p. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/119953
  • Christiana Nkanunye C, Obiechina GO. Health communication strategies as gateway to effective health promotion and well-being. J Med Res Heal Educ. 2017;1(3):13.
  • WHO. Health Promotion Glossary [Internet]. 1998 [cited 2019 Feb 26]. Available from: https://www.who.int/healthpromotion/about/HPR Glossary 1998.pdf
  • Mcleroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An Ecological Perspective on Health Promotion Programs. Heal Educ Behav. 1988;15(4):351–77.
  • Pancer SM, Nelson G. Community-Based Approaches to Health Promotion: Guidelines for Community Mobilization. Int Q Community Health Educ. 2005;10(2):91–111.
  • Nancy Sharby. Planning, Implementing and Evaluating Health Promotion Programs: A Primer. J Phys Ther Educ. 2005;19(2):72.
  • Rimer BKB, Glanz K, Rimer BKB. Theory at a Glance: A Guide for Health Promotion Practice. Heal (San Fr [Internet]. 2005;52. Available from: http://www.popline.org/node/276257
  • McGinnis JM. Does proof matter? Why strong evidence sometimes yields weak action. Am J Heal Promot. 2001;15(5):391–6.
  • Gavin NR, Satin AJ. Simulation Training in Obstetrics. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;60(4):802–10.
  • Smith ML, Foley MR. Transforming clinical education in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(4):763–7.
  • Emergencies in Clinical Obstetrics (ECO) Course [Internet]. [cited 2019 May 24]. Available from: https://www.acog.org/Education-and-Events/ECO-Course
  • ACOG Emergencies in Clinical Obstetrics (ECO) Course [Internet]. [cited 2019 May 24]. Available from: https://medicine.umich.edu/dept/obgyn/education/center-education/clinical-simulation/acog-emergenciesclinical-obstetrics-eco-course
  • Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Sentinel Event Alert, Issue 30: Preventing infant death and injury during delivery | Joint Commission. 2004; Available from: http://www.jointcommission.org/sentinel_event_alert_issue_30_preventing_infant_death_and_injury_during_delivery/
  • Taylor Alderman J. Using Simulation to Teach Nursing Students and Licensed Clinicians Obstetric Emergencies. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs [Internet]. 2012;37(6):394–400. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=jlh&AN=108108120&site=ehost-live
  • Unsal Atan S, Gulec Satir D, Ozturk R, Kavlak O, Saruhan A, Guneri SE, et al. The Effect of Using High Fidelity Birthing Simulator on Satisfaction and Performance of Nursing Students in Developing Obstetric. Florence Nightingale Hemşirelik Derg. 2019;27(1):1–16.
  • McLelland G, Perera C, Morphet J, McKenna L, Hall H, Williams B, et al. Interprofessional simulation of birth in a non-maternity setting for pre-professional students. Nurse Educ Today [Internet]. 2017 Nov;58:25–31. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0260691717301788
  • Lee WS, Kim M. Effects and Adequacy of High-Fidelity Simulation-Based Training for Obstetrical Nursing. J Korean Acad Nurs [Internet]. 2011;41(4):433. Available from: http://synapse.koreamed.org/DOIx.php?id=10.4040/jkan.2011.41.4.433
  • Taekman JM, Shelley K. Virtual Environments in Healthcare: Immersion, Disruption, and Flow. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2010;48(3):101–21.
  • Sideris M, Drosos C, Lales G, Papagiouvanni I, Paparoidamis G, Panagiotakopoulos T, et al. Virtual and Augmented Reality in Medical Education. Med Surg Educ - Past, Present Futur. 2018;
  • Cass S, Choi C. Google Glass, HoloLens, and the real future of augmented reality. IEEE Spectr. 2015;
  • Savran MM, Sørensen SMD, Konge L, Tolsgaard MG, Bjerrum F. Training and Assessment of Hysteroscopic Skills: A Systematic Review. J Surg Educ [Internet]. 2016 Sep;73(5):906–18. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1931720416300198
  • CAE Lucina Augmented Reality Bundle [Internet]. [cited 2019 May 24]. Available from: https://caehealthcare.com/offers/caelucina-augmented-reality-bundle/
  • Desai GS. Artificial Intelligence: The Future of Obstetrics and Gynecology. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2018;68(4):326–7.
  • Svensson J, Barclay L, Cooke M. Randomisedcontrolled trial of two antenatal education programmes. Midwifery [Internet]. 2009 Apr;25(2):114–25. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S0266613807000289
  • Soriano-Vidal FJ, Vila-Candel R, SorianoMartín PJ, Tejedor-Tornero A, Castro-Sánchez E. The effect of prenatal education classes on the birth expectations of Spanish women. Midwifery [Internet]. 2018 May;60:41–7. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0266613817302516
  • Carolan-Olah M, Sayakhot P. A randomized controlled trial of a web-based education intervention for women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Midwifery. 2019;68:39–47.
  • Abuidhail J, Mrayyan L, Jaradat D. Evaluating effects of prenatal web-based breastfeeding education for pregnant mothers in their third trimester of pregnancy: Prospective randomized control trial. Midwifery. 2019;69:143–9.
  • Chikalipo MC, Chirwa EM, Muula AS. Exploring antenatal education content for couples in Blantyre, Malawi. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1).
  • (CNPP) UC for NP and P. Choose MyPlate [Internet]. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). [cited 2019 May 30]. Available from: www.choosemyplate.gov
  • USDA Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion (CNPP). Get your MyPlate Plan [Internet]. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). [cited 2019 May 30]. Available from: https://www.choosemyplate.gov/MyPlatePlan
  • Sayakhot P, Carolan-Olah M. Internet use by pregnant women seeking pregnancyrelated information: A systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1).
  • Artieta-Pinedo I, Paz-Pascual C, Grandes G, Espinosa M. Framework for the establishment of a feasible, tailored and effective perinatal education programme. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2017 Dec 8;17(1):58. Available from: http://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-017-1234-7
  • Buultjens M, Murphy G, Robinson P, Milgrom J, Monfries M. Women’s experiences of, and attitudes to, maternity education across the perinatal period in Victoria, Australia: A mixed-methods approach. Women and Birth [Internet]. 2017 Oct;30(5):406–14. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1871519217301075
  • Turgut N, Güldür A, Çakmakçı H, Şerbetçi G, Yıldırım F, Ender Yumru A, et al. Gebe Okulunda Eğitim Alan Gebelerin Bilgi Füzeyleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. J Acad Res Nurs [Internet]. 2017;3(1):1–8. Available from: http://www.jarengteah.org/jvi.aspx?pdir=jaren&plng=tur&un=JAREN-43531&look4=
  • Yılmaz Esencan T, Karabulut Ö, Yıldırım AD, Abbasoğlu DE, Külek H, Şimşek Ç, et al. Doğuma Hazırlık Eğitimi Alan Gebelerin Doğum Şekli, İlk Emzirme Zamanı ve Ten Tene Temas Tercihleri. Nightingale J Nurs FNJN Florence Nightingale Hemşirelik Derg [Internet]. 2018;26(1):31–43. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/FNJN.387192
  • Gebe Okulu, Gebe Bilgilendirme Sınıfı, Doğuma Hazırlık ve Danışmanlık Merkezleri Hakkında Genelge. 2018.
There are 36 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Health Services and Systems (Other)
Journal Section Reviews
Authors

Ömercan Aksoy This is me 0000-0003-4344-8190

Feride Yiğit This is me 0000-0001-8152-0400

Esra Yurtsev This is me 0000-0001-6347-2521

Publication Date April 18, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 1 Issue: 3 - February 2022

Cite

Vancouver Aksoy Ö, Yiğit F, Yurtsev E. PERİNATOLOJİDE SAĞLIK EĞİTİMİ: GELİŞEN VE DEĞİŞEN DİNAMİKLER. ATLJM. 2022;1(3):6-18.