Evaluation of Mathematical Modeling Activities of 4th-Grade Students: The Case of Experiential Learning Theory

Abstract

The aim of the study is to evaluate the mathematical modeling activities of 4th-grade students within the framework of the experiential learning theory. One of the reasons for considering modeling and experiential learning together is that mathematical modeling activities consist of real life problems and allow students to learn experientially. The research conducted as a qualitative case study and whole process fulfilled online. 13 fourth grade students determined with the appropriate sampling method. Modeling activity story, modeling evaluation rubric, observation form and semi-structured interview forms were used as data collection tools. During the implementation process, the students were shown a digital story created by the researchers and the problem situation was embedded in the story. The story about a virus facing humanity asked to the students to find a solution of the problem. In the context of this story, the students carried out a mathematical modeling activities about perimeter and area. At the end of the implementation process, a semi-structured interview form was used to get students' opinions about the activity. As a result, students have achieved on mathematical and mental modeling while they made low score on mathematical results which subject area.

Keywords

• Experiential learning
• mathematical modeling
• primary school mathematics
• perimeter and area

References

1. Akgün, L., Çiltaş, A., Deniz, D., Çiftçi Z. & Işık, A. (2013). İlköğretim matematik öğretmenlerinin matematiksel modelleme ile ilgili farkındalıkları. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(12), 1-33.
2. Altunışık, R., Çoşkun, R., Yıldırım, E. & Bayraktaroğlu, S. (2010). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri (6th Edition). Sakarya: Sakarya Kitabevi.
3. Baturo, A., & Nason, R. (1996). Student teachers’ subject matter knowledge within the domain of area measurement. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31, 235–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376322
4. Bilen, N. & Çiltaş, A. (2015). Evaluation of mathematical models and modeling in the fifth-grade mathematics curriculum based on teachers’ views. E-Kafkas Journal of Educatianal Research, 2(2). 40-54.
5. Blum, W. & Borromeo-Ferri, R. (2009). Mathematical modelling: Can it be taught and learnt? Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application 1(1), 45-58.
6. Blum, W., Galbraith, P. L., Henn, H., & Niss, M. (2007). Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI Study. New York: Sprenger.
7. Blum, W., & Leiß, D. (2007). Investigating quality mathematics teaching–the DISUM Project. Developing and researching quality in mathematics teaching and learning, proceedings of MADIF, 5, 3-16.
8. Boz, N. (2008). Why is mathematics difficult? Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education (EFMED), 2(2), 52-65.

9. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (18. bs.). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
10. Chappell, M. F. & Thompson, D. R. (1999). Perimeter or area?: Which measure is it? Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 5(1), 20-23. Chesimet, M.C., Githua,B.N. & Ng’eno, J.K. (2016). Effects of experiential learning approach on students’ mathematical creativity among secondary school students of Kericho East Sub-County, Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 7 (23), 51-57.
11. Çavuş Erdem, Z.,Doğan, M.,Gürbüz, R. & Şahin, S. (2017). The reflections of mathematical modeling in teaching tools: Textbook analysis. Adıyaman University Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(1), 61-86.
12. Çetinkaya, B., Kertil, M., Erbas, A. K., Korkmaz, H., Alacaci, C., & Cakiroglu, E. (2016). Pre-service teachers’ developing conceptions about the nature and pedagogy of mathematical modeling in the context of a mathematical modeling course. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 18(4), 287-314.
13. Çiltaş, A. & Işık, A. (2012). The effect of mathematical modeling method on academic achievement. Journal of Contemporary Education Academic, 2, 57-67.