TOPLULUK/BİRLİK İLE ÜYE DEVLETLER ARASINDA YETKİ PAYLAŞIMI: AVRUPA BİRLEŞİK DEVLETLERİ Mİ? BİRLEŞİK DEVLETLERİN AVRUPASI MI

Year 2005, Volume: 54 Issue: 2, 219 - 247, 01.03.2005

Arif Köktaş

https://doi.org/10.1501/Hukfak_0000000410

Keywords

-

The Division Of Powers Between The Community/Union And The Member States: United States Of Europe? Or Europe Of United States?

Keywords

-

References

• Arsava, A. Füsun, (2000), Amsterdam Antlaşmasının Avrupa Birliği Hukukuna Katkıları (Makaleler Derlemesi), A.Ü. SBF Yayınları, No: 589, Ankara.
• Arsava, A. Füsun, (2003), Nice Antlaşması Sonrası Avrupa Birliği’nin Geleceği, Ankara Üniversitesi Avrupa Toplulukları Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi Araştırma Dizisi No: 18, Ankara.
• Basedow, Jürgen, (2003), “Avrupa Özel Hukukunun Doğuşu” (Çev. Ayşe Oğuz), Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 52, Sayı 3, ss. 1-18.
• Bernard, Nicolas, (1996), “The Future of Economic Law in the Light of the Principle of Subsidiarity,” 33 Common Market Law Review 633.
• Bozkurt, Enver, Mehmet Özcan, Arif Köktaş, (2004), Avrupa Birliği Hukuku, Asil Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara.
• Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament of October 27, 1992 on the principle of subsidiarity, Bull EC 10, p. 2.2.1, 121.
• Craig, Paul and Grainne de Burca, (2003), EU Law: Text, Cases and Materials, 3th ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Craig, Paul, (2001), “Constitutions, Constitutionalism and the European Union” 7 European Law Review 125-150.
• Dashwood, Alan, (1996), “The Limits of European Community Powers”, 21 European Law Review 113.
• Dashwood, Alan, (2004), “The Relationship Between the Member States and the European Union/European Community”, 41 Common Market Law Review 355-381.
• De Burca, Grainne, (1998), “The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Court of Justice as an Institutional Actor”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 36, No 2, Jun, pp. 217-236.
• Di Fabio, Udo, (2002), “Some Remarks on the Allocation of Competences Between the European Union and its Member States”, 39 Common Market Law Review 1289-1301.
• Douglas-Scott, Sionaidh, (2002), Constitutional Law of the European Union, Pearson/Longman, Essex.
• Ehlermann, Claus Dieter, (1998), “Differentiation, Flexibility, Closer Co- operation: The New Provisions of the Amsterdam Treaty”, European Law Journal, Vol. 4, No. 3, Sept., pp. 246-270.
• Emiliou, Nicholas, (1992), “Subsidiarity: an Effective Barrier Against the Enterprises of Ambition,” 17 European Law Review 383.
• Foster, Nigel, (2004), EC Legislation 2003-2004, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Gaja, Giorgio, (1998), “How Flexible is Flexibility under the Amsterdam Treaty?”, 35 Common Market Law Review 855.
• Gonzales, José Palacio, (1995), “The Principle of Subsidiarity: A Guide For Lawyers with a Particular Community Orientation”, 20 European Law Review 357.
• Hartley, T.C., (1998), The Foundations of European Community Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• http://europa.eu.int/comm/economy_finance/euro/our_currency_en.htm (erişim tarihi: 05.01.2005)
• http://europa.eu.int/comm/justice_home/news/information_dossiers/laec ken_council/en/index.htm (erişim tarihi: 10.01.2005)
• http://www.constitution.org/constit_.htm (erişim tarihi: 05.01.2005)
• Kortenberg, Helmut, (1998), “Closer Cooperation in the Treaty of Amsterdam”, 35 Common Market Law Review 833.
• Lenaerts, Koen and Marlies Desomer, (2002), “Bricks for a Constitutional Treaty of the European Union: Values, Objectives and Means” 27 European Law Review 377-407.
• Oder, Bertil Emrah, (2004), Avrupa Birliği’nde Anayasa ve Anayasacılık, Anahtar Kitaplar Yayınevi, İstanbul.
• Okutan, Gül, (2000), Topluluğun ve Üye Ülkelerin Yetki Alanlarının Belirlenmesi, (Tekinalp/Tekinalp), Avrupa Birliği Hukuku, Beta, İstanbul.
• Shaw, Jo, (1998), “The Treaty of Amsterdam: Challenges of Flexibility and Legitimacy”, European Law Journal Vol. 4, No 1, March, pp. 63-86.
• Stubb, A.C. G. (1996), “A Categorisation of Differentiated Integration”, 2 Journal of European Public Policy, pp. 283-295.
• Stubb, A.C. G. (1997), “The 1996 Intergovernmental Conference and the Management of Flexible Integration”, 4 Journal of European Public Policy, pp. 37–55.
• Tekinalp, Gülören, (2000), AB’nin Geleceğine İlişkin Beklentiler, (Tekinalp/Tekinalp), Avrupa Birliği Hukuku, Beta, İstanbul.
• Van Kersbergen, Kees and Bertjan Verbeek, (1994), “The Politics of Subsidiarity in the European Union”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 32, No 2, June, pp. 215-236.
• Weiler, Joseph H.H., (2002), “A Constitution for Europe? Some Hard Choices”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 563-580.
• Yatanagas, Xenophon A., (2001), “The Treaty of Nice: The Sharing of Power and the Institutional Balance in the European Union- A Continental Perspective” European Law Journal, Vol. 7, No, 3, pp. 242-291.