Aşkın Gerçeklikler: İlahi Birlik Arayışında Mokşa ve Fenāʾ Üzerine Bir İnceleme Öz

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Şankaraçarya’nın yorumladığı Advaita Vedānta öğretisindeki mokşa (Kurtuluş) ile Mevlānā Celāleddīn-i Rūmī’nin açıkladığı sufi geleneğindeki fenāʾ (Benliğin Yok Oluşu) kavramlarını karşılaştırmalı olarak inceler. Araştırma, mokşa’yı, bireyin cehâletten (avidyā) kurtularak gerçek benliğin (ātman) evrensel mutlak gerçeklik Brahman ile özdeşliğinin nihai idrakine ulaşması olarak ele alır. Bu, bir tür aydınlanma ve bilgeliğe dayalı bir süreçtir. Fenāʾ ise, bireysel benliğin (ego) ilahi varlık karşısında tamamen silinmesi, adeta “yok olma” hâlidir. Bu durumda kişi ilahi özle birleşse de, Tanrı’nın özü (zât) ayrı kalır; esas olan benliğin fenāʾsıdır. Her iki kavram da bireysel kimliğin aşılmasını ve ilahi olanla derin bir bağ kurulmasını hedefler. Ancak bunu farklı yollarla tanımlar: Mokşa daha çok metafizik bir hakikatin bilgisi ve idraki üzerinden, fenāʾ ise yoğun aşk ve mistik tecrübe yoluyla ilerler. Çalışma, bu iki farklı dini geleneğin - Vedānta ve Sufizm - ilahi bağlantı arayışındaki paralel ve kesişen yollarını vurgulayarak, her ikisinin de bireysel benliğin ötesine geçerek yüce bir manevi farkındalığa ulaşma ortak amacını ortaya koyar. Felsefi tartışmalar, kutsal metin yorumları ve Rūmī gibi mutasavvıfların şiirlerinden yararlanılarak hazırlanan bu inceleme, derin manevi yolculuklara dair kapsamlı bir anlayış sunarak din çalışmaları ve karşılaştırmalı mistisizm alanlarına önemli katkılar sağlamaktadır.

Keywords

• Vedānta Mistisizmi
• Sufizm
• Mokşa
• Fenāʾ
• Şankaraçarya
• Mevlānā Celāleddīn-i Rūmī.

Transcendental Realities: A Study of Mokṣa and Fanāʾ in the Search for Divine Unity

Abstract

This study presents a comparative investigation of the notions of mokṣa (Liberation) in Advaita Vedānta, as interpreted by Śaṅkarācārya, and fanāʾ (Annihilation of the Self) in Sufism, as explained by Mawlānā Jalāl al-Dīn Rūmī. The research portrays mokṣa as the ultimate realization of the individual self’s (ātman) identity with the universal absolute reality, Brahman. This state is achieved through enlightenment and the dispelling of ignorance (avidyā), representing a profound awakening to metaphysical truth. In contrast, fanāʾ is depicted as the complete dissolution of the individual ego (nafs) in the presence of the Divine. It signifies a state of “non-existence” or annihilation, attained via intense love and mystical experience, where the seeker is effaced while the Divine Essence (Dhāt) remains distinct. Both concepts aim for transcending the individual self and establishing a profound connection with the Divine. However, they define this goal differently: Mokṣa emphasizes knowledge and realization of an underlying metaphysical unity, whereas Fanāʾ stresses the experiential path of love and surrender. The study highlights the distinct yet intersecting trajectories of these two traditions – Vedānta and Sufism – in their quest for divine union. It underscores their shared objective of moving beyond the limited individual self to attain a higher spiritual consciousness. Drawing on philosophical discourse, scriptural interpretations, and the mystical poetry of figures like Rūmī, this analysis offers a comprehensive understanding of profound spiritual journeys. It thereby contributes vital insights to the fields of religious studies and comparative mysticism.

Keywords

• Mysticism Vedānta
• Sufism
• Mokṣa
• Fanāʾ
• Śaṅkarācārya
• Mawlānā Jalāl al-Dīn Rūmī.

References

1. Alladi Mahadeva Sastry, trans. The Bhagavad Gītā with the Commentary of Śaṅkarācārya. Madras: Samata Books, 1977.
2. Anderson, Joshua. “An Investigation of Mokṣa in the Advaita Vedānta of Śaṅkara and Gauḍapāda.” Asian Philosophy 22:3 (2012): 275–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2012.709722.
3. al-Aswad, al-Sayyid. “The Invisible Other: Rituals and Egyptian Perception of the Unknowable.” Anthropology of Consciousness 34:2 (2023): 434–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/anoc.12196.
4. Cooms, Samantha, and Vicki Saunders. “Poetic Inquiry: A Tool for Decolonising Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Research Journal 24:1 (2023): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-05-2023-0071.
5. Corry, Dagmar Anna S., Anne P. Tracey, and Christopher Alan Lewis. “Spirituality and Creativity in Coping, Their Association and Transformative Effect: A Qualitative Enquiry.” Religions 6:2 (2015): 499–526. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel6020499.
6. D’Aquili, Eugene G., and Charles D. Laughlin. “The Biopsychological Determinants of Religious Ritual Behavior.” Zygon 10:1 (1975): 32–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1975.tb00534.x.
7. Deussen, Paul. The System of the Vedānta. Translated by Charles Johnston. Chicago: The Open Court Publishing Co., 1912.
8. Ewing, P. Katherine. “A Majzub and His Mother: The Place of Sainthood in a Family Emotional Memory.”

9. Embodying Charisma: Modernity, Locality and the Performance of Emotion in Sufi Cults, ed. Helene Basu and Pnina Werbner, in 160–183. London: Routledge, 1998. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203025208.
10. Fort, Andrew O. Jīvanmukti in Transformation. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1998.
11. Fuller, Robert C. “Spirituality in the Flesh: The Role of Discrete Emotions in Religious Life.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 75:1 (2007): 25–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfl064.
12. Grant, Sara. Śaṅkarācārya’s Concept of Relation. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishing House, 1999.
13. Hartnack, Justus. “The Metaphysics of the ‘I.’” The Philosophical Quarterly 22:88 (1972): 248–254.
14. Howes, L. M., A. R. Casey, M. Asplund, et al. “Extremely Metal-Poor Stars from the Cosmic Dawn in the Bulge of the Milky Way.” Nature 527:7579 (2015): 484–87. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15747.
15. Hume, Robert Ernest. The Thirteen Principal Upaniṣads. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1921.
16. Ignatius, Gnanapragasam. “Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan and Jñāna.” The Modern Schoolman 36:1 (1958): 41–56. https://doi.org/10.5840/schoolman19583613.
17. Jagadananda, Swami, Upadeśasāhasrī of Śrī Śaṅkarācārya. Madras: Sri Ramakrishna Math, 1949.
18. Jha, Ganganātha. The Chāndogya Upaniṣad with the Commentary of Śaṅkara. Poona: Oriental Book Agency, 1942.
19. Kirkpatrick, Lee A. “An Attachment-Theory Approach to the Psychology of Religion.” The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 2:1 (1992): 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr0201_2.
20. Loy, David. “Enlightenment in Buddhism and Advaita Vedānta.” International Philosophical Quarterly 22:1 (1982): 65–74. https://doi.org/10.5840/ipq19822217.
21. Mellema, Garrelt, Léon V. E. Koopmans, et al. “Reionization and the Cosmic Dawn with the Square Kilometre Array.” Experimental Astronomy 36:1 (2013): 235–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-013-9334-5.
22. Mildaeni, Itsna Nurrahma, and Eko Muharudin. “The Importance of Attachment to God in Improving Positive Mental Health in the Elderly.” Social Values & Society 4:2 (2022): 20–24. https://doi.org/10.26480/svs.02.2022.20.24.
23. Nikfarid, Lida, Maryam Rassouli, Leili Borimnejad, and Hamid Alavimajd. “Religious Coping in Iranian Mothers of Children with Cancer: A Qualitative Content Analysis.” Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing 35:3 (2018): 188–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043454217748597.
24. Nikhilananda, Swami. The Māṇḍūkyopaniṣad with Gauḍapāda’s Kārikā and Śaṅkara’s Commentary. Mysore: Sri Ramakrishna Ashrama, 1949.
25. Parrinder, Geoffrey. Mysticism in the World’s Religions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.
26. Radhakrishnan, Sarvepalli. Indian Philosophy. Vol. 1. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1948.
27. Radhakrishnan, Sarvepalli. The Philosophy of the Upaniṣads. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1924.
28. Rūmī, Jalāl al-Dīn. The Masnavi. Book One. Translated by Jawid Mojaddedi. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
29. Rūmī, Jalāl al-Dīn. The Masnavi. Book Four. Translated by Jawid Mojaddedi. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
30. Rūmī, Jalāl al-Dīn. The Mathnawī of Jalāl al-Dīn Rūmī. Translated by Reynold Nicholson. 8 vol. London: Cambridge University Press, 1925-1940.
31. Sastri, A. Mahadeva, The Taittirīya Upaniṣad with the Commentaries of Śaṅkarācārya, Sureśvarācārya, and Sāyaṇa. Mysore: G.T.A. Printing Works, 1903.
32. Schieman, Scott, Alex Bierman, et al.. “Love Thy Self? How Belief in a Supportive God Shapes Self-Esteem.” Review of Religious Research 59:3 (2017): 293–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-017-0292-7.
33. Schimmel, Annemarie. Mystical Dimensions of Islam. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1975.
34. Schimmel, Annemarie. “Yūsuf in Mawlānā Rūmī’s Poetry.” In The Legacy of Medieval Persian Sufism, ed. Leonard Lewisohn, 45–60. London: Khaniqahi Nimatullahi Publications, 1992.
35. Sparham, Davoud, Mousa Rahimi, and Mehmet Şahin. “Mevlânâ’nın Şiirlerinde Revâkıyye Düşüncesinin Yansımaları.” Türk Kültürü ve Hacı Bektaş Veli Araştırma Dergisi 105 (2023): 129–149.
36. Sureśvarācārya. The Naiṣkarmya-Siddhi of Sureśvarācārya. 4th ed. Bombay Sanskrit and Prakrit Series, no. 38. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 1980. https://catalog.lib.uchicago.edu/vufind/Record/1023169.
37. Suwar, Arizul, and Tb Endayani. “The Relevance of Jalāl al-Dīn Rūmī’s Ṣūfīsm Education Concept to Character Education in the Digital Era.” Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli 4:1 (2021): 66–76. https://doi.org/10.47647/jsh.v4i1.447.
38. Tisdell, Elizabeth J. “The Braid of Transformative Learning, Spirituality, and Creativity: The Impetus to Create as Well as Critique.” New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 177 (2023): 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.20477.
39. Wilcox, Andrew. “The Dual Mystical Concepts of Fanāʾ and Baqāʾ in Early Ṣūfism.” British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 38:1 (2011): 95–118.
40. Woodhouse, B. Neil. “‘You Are Jesus, and I Am Your Bird’: Christ, Persian Poetry, and Theological Imagination in the Iranian Diaspora.” Missiology 44:4 (2016): 416–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091829616658497.
41. Xu, Jianbin. “Pargament’s Theory of Religious Coping: Implications for Spiritually Sensitive Social Work Practice.” The British Journal of Social Work 46:5 (2016): 1394–1410. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcv080.
42. Yılmaz, Ozan Can. “Immaculate Conception of Gender: The Marian Phenomenon among Catholic Women Pilgrims.” Feminist Theology 32:2 (2024): 206–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/09667350231208141.
43. Yitik, Ali İhsan. Hint Kökenli Dinlerde Karma İnancının Tenasüh İnancıyla İlişkisi. İstanbul: Ruh ve Madde Yayınları, 1996.
44. Yitik, Ali İhsan. “Şankara'nın Mistizmi.” In Büyük Mistikler ve Mistisizm Kuramcıları, vol. 1, ed. Fatma Yüce, 121–42. Ankara: Elis Yayınları, 2024.
45. Zaehner, R. C. Hindu and Muslim Mysticism. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2016.