Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

The Dynamics of the Construction Sector: An Input-Output Analysis of Turkey for the 2000-2014 Period

Year 2017, , 130 - 155, 20.11.2017
https://doi.org/10.25294/auiibfd.357622

Abstract

The construction sector in Turkey has been a prominent
sector recently with respect to the infrastructure investments and housing
constructions. It is widely accepted that the construction industry is
considered to be one of the main drivers of the overall economy due to its
strong inter-industrial linkages. The growth rate of construction sector in
Turkey has shown a trend above the average GDP growth rate almost in each
period after the 2000 era. In this study, the updated input-output tables
constructed by the World Input-Output Database (WIOD) project from 2000-2014
are employed and backward-forward linkages and several multipliers are also
calculated by using these input-output tables. In this study, it is aimed to
discuss whether the construction industry can be considered as the driver of
the economy.

References

  • Balaban, O. (2011) İnşaat Sektörü Neyin Lokomotifi?, Birikim, 270: 19-26.
  • Bielsa, J. ve Duarte, R. (2011) Size and Linkages of the Spanish Construction Industry: Key Sector or Deformation of the Economy, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35, 317-334.
  • Bon, R. (1992) The Future of International Construction: Secular Patterns of Growth and Decline, Habitat International, 16(3), 119-128.
  • Bon, R. ve Pietroforte, R. (1990) Historical Comparison of Construction Sector in the US, Japan, Italy and Finland Using Input-Output Tables, Construction Management and Economics, 8(3), 233-247.
  • Bon, R.; Birgönül, T. ve Özdoğan, İ. (1999) An Input-Output Analysis of the Turkish Construction Sector, 1973-1990: A Note, Construction Management and Economics, 17(5), 543-551.
  • Chenery, H. B. ve Watanabe, T. (1958) International Comparisons of the Structure of Production, Econometrica, 26(4), 487-521.
  • Dietzenbacher, E. ve Lahr, M. L. (2001) Introduction, M. L. Lahr ve E. Dietzenbacher (der.), Input-Output Analysis: Frontiers and Extensions, New York: Palgrave.
  • Drejer, I. (2002) Input-Output Based Measures of Interindustry Linkages Revisited-A Survey and Discussion, IIOA 14th International Conference on Input-Output Techniques, Canada.
  • Giang, D. T. H. ve Pheng, L. S. (2011) Role of Construction in Economic Development: Review of Key Concepts in the Past 40 Years, Habitat International, 35, 118-125.
  • Gül, Z. B. (2017) Construction Industry in Turkey: An Input-Output Analysis Using the World Input-Output Database (WIOD) for the 2002-2011 Periods, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(1), 157-174.
  • Gündeş, S. (2011) Exploring the Dynamics of the Turkish Construction Industry Using Input-Output Analysis, Construction Management and Economics, 29(1), 59-68.
  • Hirschman, A. O. (1958) The Strategy of Economic Development, New Haven, Yale University Press.
  • İlhan, B. ve Yaman, H. (2010) A Comparative Input-Output Analysis of the Construction Sector in Turkey and EU Countries, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 18(3), 248-265.
  • Kofoworola, O. F. ve Gheewala, S. (2008) An Input-Output Analysis of Thailand’s Construction Sector, Construction Management and Economics, 26(11), 1227-1240.
  • Lewis, T. M. (2009) Quantifying the GDP-Construction Relationship, L. Ruddock (der.), Economics for the Modern Built Environment, New York: Taylor and Francis. 34-59.
  • Lopes, J. (2009) Investment in Construction and Economic Growth: A Long Term Perspective, L. Ruddock (der.), Economics for the Modern Built Environment, New York: Taylor and Francis. 94-112
  • Miller, R. E. ve Blair, D. P. (2009) Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions, Second Edition, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Miller, R. E. ve Lahr, M. L. (2001) A Taxonomy of Extractions, R. E. Miller ve M. L. Lahr (der.), Regional Science Perspectives in Economic Analysis, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. 407-441.
  • Osei, V. (2013) The Construction Industry and Its Linkages to the Ghanaian Economy-Policies to Improve the Sector’s Performance, International Journal of Development and Economic Sustainability, 1(1), 56-72.
  • Özkan, F., Özkan, Ö. ve Gündüz, M. (2012) Causal Relationship between Construction Investment Policy and Economic Growth in Turkey, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 79, 362-370.
  • Pietroforte, R. ve Gregori, T. (2003) An Input-Output Analysis of the Construction Sector in Highly Developed Economies, Construction Management and Economics, 21(3), 319-327.
  • Ramachandra, T.; Rotimi, J. O. B. ve Rameezdeen, R. (2013) Direction of the Causal Relationship between Construction and the National Economy of Sri Lanka, Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 18(2), 49-63.
  • Rasmussen, P. N. (1957) Studies in Inter-Sectoral Relations, North-Holland: Amsterdam.
  • Ruddock, L. ve Lopes, J. (2006) The Construction Sector and Economic Development: the ‘Bon Curve’, Construction Management and Economics, 24(7), 717-723.
  • Strassmann, P. (1970) The Construction Sector in Economic Development, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 17(3), 391-409.
  • Şenesen, G. G.; Kaya, T. ve Şenesen, Ü. (2013) İnşaat Kesimi İstihdam mı Yaratıyor, Dışalımı mı Uyarıyor?, Ekonomi-tek, 2(3), 23-46.
  • Tan, W. (2002) Construction and Economic Development in Selected LDCs: Past, Present and Future, Construction Management and Economics, 20(7), 593-599.
  • Timmer, M. P. (2012) The World Input-Output Database (WIOD): Contents, Sources and Methods, WIOD Working Paper, 10, 1-73.
  • Turin, D. A. (1969) Industrialization of Developing Countries: Problems and Prospects-Construction Industry, UNIDO monograph No.2: New York.
  • Wu, X. and Zhang, Z. (2005) Input-Output Analysis of the Chinese Construction Sector, Construction Management and Economics, 23(9), 905-912.
  • www.tuik.gov.tr
  • www.wiod.org
  • www.stats.oecd.org

İnşaat Sektörünün Dinamikleri: Türkiye için 2000-2014 Girdi-Çıktı Analizi

Year 2017, , 130 - 155, 20.11.2017
https://doi.org/10.25294/auiibfd.357622

Abstract

Türkiye’de inşaat sektörü, gerek altyapı yatırımları,
gerekse konut inşaatları çerçevesinden bakıldığında, son yıllarda öne çıkan
sektörler arasında yer almaktadır. Genel olarak inşaat sektörü, güçlü sektörel
bağlantıları nedeniyle ekonominin sürükleyici sektörlerinden biri olarak kabul
edilmektedir. Ülkemizde 2000 sonrası dönem ele alındığında, sektörün büyüme
hızı hemen her dönemde GSYİH büyüme hızının üzerinde bir seyir izlemiştir. Bu
çalışmada,
World Input-Output Database (WIOD) projesinden alınan
güncellenmiş 2000-2014 yılları arası girdi-çıktı tabloları kullanılmıştır. Bu
girdi-çıktı tablolarından ileri ve geri bağlantılar ile çıktı, gelir, istihdam
gibi çeşitli çarpanlar hesaplanmıştır. Çalışmada girdi-çıktı analizi sonucu
hesaplanan yapısal parametreler ışığında, inşaat sektörünün ekonominin
lokomotif sektörü olarak görülebilme ihtimalini tartışmak amaçlanmaktadır.

References

  • Balaban, O. (2011) İnşaat Sektörü Neyin Lokomotifi?, Birikim, 270: 19-26.
  • Bielsa, J. ve Duarte, R. (2011) Size and Linkages of the Spanish Construction Industry: Key Sector or Deformation of the Economy, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35, 317-334.
  • Bon, R. (1992) The Future of International Construction: Secular Patterns of Growth and Decline, Habitat International, 16(3), 119-128.
  • Bon, R. ve Pietroforte, R. (1990) Historical Comparison of Construction Sector in the US, Japan, Italy and Finland Using Input-Output Tables, Construction Management and Economics, 8(3), 233-247.
  • Bon, R.; Birgönül, T. ve Özdoğan, İ. (1999) An Input-Output Analysis of the Turkish Construction Sector, 1973-1990: A Note, Construction Management and Economics, 17(5), 543-551.
  • Chenery, H. B. ve Watanabe, T. (1958) International Comparisons of the Structure of Production, Econometrica, 26(4), 487-521.
  • Dietzenbacher, E. ve Lahr, M. L. (2001) Introduction, M. L. Lahr ve E. Dietzenbacher (der.), Input-Output Analysis: Frontiers and Extensions, New York: Palgrave.
  • Drejer, I. (2002) Input-Output Based Measures of Interindustry Linkages Revisited-A Survey and Discussion, IIOA 14th International Conference on Input-Output Techniques, Canada.
  • Giang, D. T. H. ve Pheng, L. S. (2011) Role of Construction in Economic Development: Review of Key Concepts in the Past 40 Years, Habitat International, 35, 118-125.
  • Gül, Z. B. (2017) Construction Industry in Turkey: An Input-Output Analysis Using the World Input-Output Database (WIOD) for the 2002-2011 Periods, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(1), 157-174.
  • Gündeş, S. (2011) Exploring the Dynamics of the Turkish Construction Industry Using Input-Output Analysis, Construction Management and Economics, 29(1), 59-68.
  • Hirschman, A. O. (1958) The Strategy of Economic Development, New Haven, Yale University Press.
  • İlhan, B. ve Yaman, H. (2010) A Comparative Input-Output Analysis of the Construction Sector in Turkey and EU Countries, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 18(3), 248-265.
  • Kofoworola, O. F. ve Gheewala, S. (2008) An Input-Output Analysis of Thailand’s Construction Sector, Construction Management and Economics, 26(11), 1227-1240.
  • Lewis, T. M. (2009) Quantifying the GDP-Construction Relationship, L. Ruddock (der.), Economics for the Modern Built Environment, New York: Taylor and Francis. 34-59.
  • Lopes, J. (2009) Investment in Construction and Economic Growth: A Long Term Perspective, L. Ruddock (der.), Economics for the Modern Built Environment, New York: Taylor and Francis. 94-112
  • Miller, R. E. ve Blair, D. P. (2009) Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions, Second Edition, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Miller, R. E. ve Lahr, M. L. (2001) A Taxonomy of Extractions, R. E. Miller ve M. L. Lahr (der.), Regional Science Perspectives in Economic Analysis, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. 407-441.
  • Osei, V. (2013) The Construction Industry and Its Linkages to the Ghanaian Economy-Policies to Improve the Sector’s Performance, International Journal of Development and Economic Sustainability, 1(1), 56-72.
  • Özkan, F., Özkan, Ö. ve Gündüz, M. (2012) Causal Relationship between Construction Investment Policy and Economic Growth in Turkey, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 79, 362-370.
  • Pietroforte, R. ve Gregori, T. (2003) An Input-Output Analysis of the Construction Sector in Highly Developed Economies, Construction Management and Economics, 21(3), 319-327.
  • Ramachandra, T.; Rotimi, J. O. B. ve Rameezdeen, R. (2013) Direction of the Causal Relationship between Construction and the National Economy of Sri Lanka, Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 18(2), 49-63.
  • Rasmussen, P. N. (1957) Studies in Inter-Sectoral Relations, North-Holland: Amsterdam.
  • Ruddock, L. ve Lopes, J. (2006) The Construction Sector and Economic Development: the ‘Bon Curve’, Construction Management and Economics, 24(7), 717-723.
  • Strassmann, P. (1970) The Construction Sector in Economic Development, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 17(3), 391-409.
  • Şenesen, G. G.; Kaya, T. ve Şenesen, Ü. (2013) İnşaat Kesimi İstihdam mı Yaratıyor, Dışalımı mı Uyarıyor?, Ekonomi-tek, 2(3), 23-46.
  • Tan, W. (2002) Construction and Economic Development in Selected LDCs: Past, Present and Future, Construction Management and Economics, 20(7), 593-599.
  • Timmer, M. P. (2012) The World Input-Output Database (WIOD): Contents, Sources and Methods, WIOD Working Paper, 10, 1-73.
  • Turin, D. A. (1969) Industrialization of Developing Countries: Problems and Prospects-Construction Industry, UNIDO monograph No.2: New York.
  • Wu, X. and Zhang, Z. (2005) Input-Output Analysis of the Chinese Construction Sector, Construction Management and Economics, 23(9), 905-912.
  • www.tuik.gov.tr
  • www.wiod.org
  • www.stats.oecd.org
There are 33 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Zafer Barış Gül

Mısra Çakaloğlu

Publication Date November 20, 2017
Submission Date April 4, 2017
Acceptance Date July 25, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017

Cite

APA Gül, Z. B., & Çakaloğlu, M. (2017). İnşaat Sektörünün Dinamikleri: Türkiye için 2000-2014 Girdi-Çıktı Analizi. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, 17(36), 130-155. https://doi.org/10.25294/auiibfd.357622
AMA Gül ZB, Çakaloğlu M. İnşaat Sektörünün Dinamikleri: Türkiye için 2000-2014 Girdi-Çıktı Analizi. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi. November 2017;17(36):130-155. doi:10.25294/auiibfd.357622
Chicago Gül, Zafer Barış, and Mısra Çakaloğlu. “İnşaat Sektörünün Dinamikleri: Türkiye için 2000-2014 Girdi-Çıktı Analizi”. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi 17, no. 36 (November 2017): 130-55. https://doi.org/10.25294/auiibfd.357622.
EndNote Gül ZB, Çakaloğlu M (November 1, 2017) İnşaat Sektörünün Dinamikleri: Türkiye için 2000-2014 Girdi-Çıktı Analizi. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi 17 36 130–155.
IEEE Z. B. Gül and M. Çakaloğlu, “İnşaat Sektörünün Dinamikleri: Türkiye için 2000-2014 Girdi-Çıktı Analizi”, Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, vol. 17, no. 36, pp. 130–155, 2017, doi: 10.25294/auiibfd.357622.
ISNAD Gül, Zafer Barış - Çakaloğlu, Mısra. “İnşaat Sektörünün Dinamikleri: Türkiye için 2000-2014 Girdi-Çıktı Analizi”. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi 17/36 (November 2017), 130-155. https://doi.org/10.25294/auiibfd.357622.
JAMA Gül ZB, Çakaloğlu M. İnşaat Sektörünün Dinamikleri: Türkiye için 2000-2014 Girdi-Çıktı Analizi. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi. 2017;17:130–155.
MLA Gül, Zafer Barış and Mısra Çakaloğlu. “İnşaat Sektörünün Dinamikleri: Türkiye için 2000-2014 Girdi-Çıktı Analizi”. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, vol. 17, no. 36, 2017, pp. 130-55, doi:10.25294/auiibfd.357622.
Vancouver Gül ZB, Çakaloğlu M. İnşaat Sektörünün Dinamikleri: Türkiye için 2000-2014 Girdi-Çıktı Analizi. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi. 2017;17(36):130-55.
Dizinler

143751437114372      14373