Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Bölgesel Kalkınmada Yatırım ve Verimlilik: TRA1 Bölgesi İçin Hesaplanabilir Genel Denge Modeli Analizi

Year 2019, Volume: 19 Issue: 1, 54 - 105, 01.05.2019
https://doi.org/10.25294/auiibfd.559377

Abstract

Bölgesel kalkınmada yatırım ve verimlilik artışlarının
etkisini araştıran bu çalışmada, hesaplanabilir genel denge modeli kullanılarak
iki farklı senaryo test edilmiştir. Senaryolar TRA1 Düzey 2 Bölgesi
(Erzurum-Erzincan-Bayburt) için uygulanmıştır ve çalışmanın veri altyapısını 2016
yılı güncel sosyal hesaplar matrisi oluşturmaktadır. Birinci senaryoda kamu ve
özel kesim yatırımlarındaki artışın, ikinci senaryoda ise yatırım artışlarının verimlilik
artışı ile desteklenmesinin bölgenin istihdam, katma değer, ortalama ücret ve
bölge içi tüketim değerleri üzerine olan etkisi araştırılmıştır. Senaryo 1
sonucuna göre, yatırım artışı, tarımsal istihdamı daha fazla artıracak, katma
değer artışı daha az olacak, TRA1 bölgesi ile diğer bölgeler arasındaki
ortalama ücret farkı giderek artacak ve bölgeiçi tüketim tarımsal ürünlere
kayacaktır. Senaryo 2 sonucuna göre, yatırım artışının verimlilik artışı ile
desteklenmesi, tarımdışı istihdamı daha fazla artıracak, katma değer artışı
daha fazla olacak, TRA1 bölgesi ile diğer bölgeler arasındaki ortalama ücret
farkı giderek azalacak ve bölgeiçi tüketim tarımdışı ürünlere kayacaktır. Kurgulanan
modelin çözümü ile yatırımların verimlilik artışı ile desteklenmesinin bölge
ekonomisi için sadece yatırım artışından daha etkili olduğu ve yatırımların
artırılmasının yanısıra verimliliği artırıcı politikalara ağırlık verilmesi
gerektiği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

References

  • Aghian, P. ve Howitt, P. (2009). Economics of Growth, MIT Press, Cambridge.
  • Aschauer, D. A. (1989). “Is Public Expenditure Productive?”. Journal of Monetary Economics, 23: 177-200.
  • Bautista, R. M. (1988). “General Equilibrium Effects of Increasing Productivity in Philippine Manufacturing, With Special Reference to Food Processing”. Journal of Philippine Development, Number Twenty Seven, XV(2): 223-243.
  • Calderón, C. ve Servén, L. (2004). The Effects of Infrastructure Development on Growth and Income Ditribution, WPS3400.
  • Costa, J. S., Ellson, R. W. ve Martin, R. C. (1987). “Public Capital, Regional Output, And Development: Some Empirical Evidence”. Journal of Regional Science, 27(3): 419-437.
  • Coutinho, R. M. ve Gallo, G. M. (1996). Do Public and Private Investment Stand in Each Other’s Way. (unpublished paper), Washington, DC.
  • Çavdaroğlu, H. S. (2007). Türk Ekonomisinde Sektörler Arası Mali Fon Akımları. Planlama Uzmanlığı Tezi, Kalkınma Bakanlığı, Ankara.
  • Duffy-Deno, K. T. ve Eberts, R. W. (1991). “Public Infrastructure and Regional Economic Development: A Simulations Equations Approach”. Journal Of Urban Economics, 30: 329-343.
  • Erten, H. (2009). Türkiye İçin Sektörel Sosyal Hesaplar Matrisi Üretme Yöntemi ve İstihdam Üzerine Bir Hesaplanabilir Genel Denge Modeli Uygulaması. Dpt Uzmanlık Tezi, Ankara.
  • Fougere, M., Merette, M., Harvey, S., Poitras, F. (2004). “Ageing Population and Immigration in Canada: An Analysis with a Regional CGE Overlapping Generations Model”. Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 27: 209-236.
  • Gallagher, M. (1991). Rent-Seeking and Economic Growth in Africa. Westview Press Inc.
  • Garcia-Milà, T. (1992). “The Contribution of Publicly Provided Inputs to States’ Economies”. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 22(2): 229-241.
  • Ghazanchyan, M., Stotsky, J. (2013). “Drivers of Growth: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa”. IMF Working Paper, WP/13/236, International Monetary Fund, Washington.
  • Gupta, S., Kangur, A., Papageorgiou, C. ve Wane, A. (2014). “Efficiency-Adjusted Public Capital and Growth”. World Economic Development, 57: 164–78.
  • Hansen, N. (1965). “Unbalanced Growth And Regional Development”. Western Economic Journal, 4: 3-14.
  • Hulten, C. R. ve Schwab, R. M. (1984). "Regional Productivity Growth in U.S. Manufacturing: 1951-78". The American Economic Review, 74(1): 152-162.
  • Johansen, L. (1960). A Multi-Sectoral Study Of Economic Growth. Amsterdam, North-Holland.
  • Khan, M. S. ve Reinhart, C. M. (1990). "Private Investment and Economic Growth in Developing Countries". World Development, 18(1): 19-27.
  • Khan, M. S., Kumar, M. S. (1993). Public and Private Investment and the Convergence of Per Capita Incomes in Developing Countries. IMF Working Paper, No. 93/51, International Monetary Fund, Washington DC.
  • Khan, M. S. ve Kumar, M. S. (1997). “Public Investment, Productivity, And Economic Growth İn Developng Countries”. Journel of Public Budgeting, Accounting&Financial Management, 9(3): 440-466.
  • Kim, E. ve Kim, K. (2002). “Impacts of Regional Development Strategies on Growth And Equity of Korea: A Multiregional CGE Model”. The Annals of Regional Science, 36: 165-180.
  • Kim, E. ve Kim, K. (2003). “Impacts of the Development of Large Cities on Economic Growth And Income Distribution in Korea: A Multiregional CGE Model”, Papers in Regional Science, 82: 101-122.
  • King, R. G. ve Levine, R. (1992). Financial Indicators and Growth in a Cross-Section of Countries. The World Bank Working Paper Series (WPS 819), Washington.
  • Li, W., Li, X., Wang, W. ve Guangbao, Z. (2010). Fiscal Policy, Regional Disparity And Poverty in Chine: A General Equilibrium Approcah, MPIA Working Paper.
  • Liu, C. C. (2006). “Evaluating The Impacts of Tainan Science-Based Industrial Park on the Southern Region in Taiwan”. The Empirical Economics Letters, 5(1): 55-66.
  • Lofgren, H., Harris, R. L., Robinson, S., Thomas, M. ve El-Said, M. (2002). A Standard Computable General Equilibrium (Cge) Model in GAMS, Microcomputers İn Policy Research 5, International Food Research Instıtute.
  • Lu, W. (1996). “Public Infrastructure And Regional Economic Development: Evidence From China”, Pacific Economic Papers, No. 258.
  • Lynde, C. ve Richmond, J. (1993). “Public Capital And Total Factor Productivity”, International Economic Review, 34(2): 401-414.
  • Márquez, M. A., Ramajo, J. ve Hewings, G. J. D. (2011). “Public Capital And Regional Economic Growth: A SVAR Approach fort he Spanish Regions”, Investigaciones Regionales, 21: 199-223.
  • Mostert, J. W. M. ve Heerden, J. H. (2015). “A Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Analysis of the Expenditure on Infrastructure in the Limpopo Economy in South Africa”, Int Adv Res, 21: 227-236.
  • Munnell, A. H. (1990). “Why Has Productivity Growth Declined? Productivity and Public Investment”, New England Economic Review, 3(22).
  • Munnell, A. H. (1992). “Policy Watch Infrastructure Investment And Econımic Growth”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6(4): 189-198.
  • Odedokun, M. O. (1992). Multi-country Evidence on the Effects of Macroeconomic, Financial and Trade Policies on Efficiency of Resource Utilization in Developing Countries. IMF Working Paper, Paper No 92/53, Washington.
  • Rosik, P. (2006). “Public Capital And Regional Economic Growth”, Poznań University of Economics Review, 6(1): 69-93.
  • Sakamoto, H. (2012). “CGE Analysis of Transportation Cost And Regional Economy: East Asia And Northern Kyushu”, Regional Science Inquiry Journal, IV(1): 121-140.
  • Serven, L., Solimano, A. (1990). Private Investment and Macroeconomic Adjustment: Theory, Country Experience, and Policy Implications. Policiy, Research And External Affairs Workinp Paper, Washington DC.
  • Telli, Ç. (2004). Sosyal Hesaplar Matrisi Üretme Yöntemi ve Türkiye Uygulaması, Uzmanlık Tezi, Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı Yıllık Programlar ve Konjonktür Değerlendirme Genel Müdürlüğü Planlama, Ankara.
  • Thaipraset, N., Faulk, D., Hicks, M. J. (2013). “A Regional Computable General Equilibrium Analysis of Property Tax Rate Caps and A Sales Tax Rate Increase in Indiana”. Public Finance Review, 41(4): 446-472.
  • Upadhyaya, M. P. (1995). A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis of Alternative Tax Policies in the State of Washington. UMI Company, UMI Microform 9632274, USA.
  • Yamano, N. ve Ohkawara, T. (2000). “The Regional Allocation of Public Investment: Efficiency or Equity?”, Journal of Regional Science, 40(2): 205-229.
  • Yeldan, E., Taşcı, K., Voyvoda, E. ve Özsan, M. E. (2012). Orta Gelir Tuzağı’ndan Çıkış: Hangi Türkiye? Cilt 1: Makro/ Sektörel/ Bölgesel Analiz. Türkonfed, İstanbul.
  • Yeldan, E., Taşcı, K., Voyvoda, E. ve Özsan, M. E. (2013). Orta Gelir Tuzağı’ndan Çıkış: Hangi Türkiye? Cilt 2: Bölgesel Kalkınma ve İkili Tuzaktan Çıkış Stratejileri. Türkonfed, İstanbul.
  • DAP Bölge Kalkınma İdaresi Başkanlığı, www.dap.gov.tr, (erişim tarihi: 01.01. 2017).
  • Dünya Bankası, www.worldbank.org., (erişim tarihi: 01.01. 2017).
  • Gelir İdaresi Başkanlığı, www.gib.gov.tr., (erişim tarihi: 01.01. 2017).
  • Hazine Müsteşarlığı, www.hazine.gov.tr., (erişim tarihi: 01.01. 2017).
  • International Monetary Fund, www.imf.org., (erişim tarihi: 01.01. 2017).
  • Kalkınma Bakanlığı, www.kalkinma.gov.tr., (erişim tarihi: 01.01. 2017).
  • Kuzeydoğu Anadolu Kalkınma Ajansı (KUDAKA), www.kudaka.org.tr., (erişim tarihi: 01.01. 2017).
  • Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, www.tuik.gov.tr., (erişim tarihi: 01.01. 2017).
  • Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası, www.tcmb.gov.tr., (erişim tarihi: 01.01. 2017).
  • Türkiye İhracatçılar Meclisi (TİM), www.tim.org.tr., (erişim tarihi: 01.01. 2017).

Investment and Productivity in Regional Development: Analysis of Computable General Equilibrium Model For TRA1 Region

Year 2019, Volume: 19 Issue: 1, 54 - 105, 01.05.2019
https://doi.org/10.25294/auiibfd.559377

Abstract

In this study, to investigate the effect of investment and
productivity increases on regional development two different policy scenarios
were applied by using a computable general equilibrium model . The scenarios
have been implemented for TRA1 Level 2 Region (Erzurum-Erzincan-Bayburt) and
the data utilized in the study was composed of the actual social accounting
matrix for 2016. In the first scenario, the effect of the increase in public
and private sector investments and in the second scenario, the effect of the
investment increases sourced by the productivity increase has been investigated
on the region's employment, added value, average wage and intra-regional
consumption values. According to the result of scenario 1, increases in
investment would enhance agricultural employment even more, the increase in
added value would be less, average wage differential between TRA1 region and
other regions would gradually increase and the intra-regional consumption would
shift to agricultural products. According to the result of scenario 2,
supporting investment increase sourced by increased productivity would enhance
non-farm employment even more, the increase in added value would be more,
average wage differential between TRA1 region and other regions would gradually
decrease and the intra-regional consumption would shift to non-agricultural
products. It has been concluded that supporting the investments with increased
productivity would be more effective than only investment increases for the
region's economy and that the policies increasing productivity should be
targeted besides investment increase.

References

  • Aghian, P. ve Howitt, P. (2009). Economics of Growth, MIT Press, Cambridge.
  • Aschauer, D. A. (1989). “Is Public Expenditure Productive?”. Journal of Monetary Economics, 23: 177-200.
  • Bautista, R. M. (1988). “General Equilibrium Effects of Increasing Productivity in Philippine Manufacturing, With Special Reference to Food Processing”. Journal of Philippine Development, Number Twenty Seven, XV(2): 223-243.
  • Calderón, C. ve Servén, L. (2004). The Effects of Infrastructure Development on Growth and Income Ditribution, WPS3400.
  • Costa, J. S., Ellson, R. W. ve Martin, R. C. (1987). “Public Capital, Regional Output, And Development: Some Empirical Evidence”. Journal of Regional Science, 27(3): 419-437.
  • Coutinho, R. M. ve Gallo, G. M. (1996). Do Public and Private Investment Stand in Each Other’s Way. (unpublished paper), Washington, DC.
  • Çavdaroğlu, H. S. (2007). Türk Ekonomisinde Sektörler Arası Mali Fon Akımları. Planlama Uzmanlığı Tezi, Kalkınma Bakanlığı, Ankara.
  • Duffy-Deno, K. T. ve Eberts, R. W. (1991). “Public Infrastructure and Regional Economic Development: A Simulations Equations Approach”. Journal Of Urban Economics, 30: 329-343.
  • Erten, H. (2009). Türkiye İçin Sektörel Sosyal Hesaplar Matrisi Üretme Yöntemi ve İstihdam Üzerine Bir Hesaplanabilir Genel Denge Modeli Uygulaması. Dpt Uzmanlık Tezi, Ankara.
  • Fougere, M., Merette, M., Harvey, S., Poitras, F. (2004). “Ageing Population and Immigration in Canada: An Analysis with a Regional CGE Overlapping Generations Model”. Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 27: 209-236.
  • Gallagher, M. (1991). Rent-Seeking and Economic Growth in Africa. Westview Press Inc.
  • Garcia-Milà, T. (1992). “The Contribution of Publicly Provided Inputs to States’ Economies”. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 22(2): 229-241.
  • Ghazanchyan, M., Stotsky, J. (2013). “Drivers of Growth: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa”. IMF Working Paper, WP/13/236, International Monetary Fund, Washington.
  • Gupta, S., Kangur, A., Papageorgiou, C. ve Wane, A. (2014). “Efficiency-Adjusted Public Capital and Growth”. World Economic Development, 57: 164–78.
  • Hansen, N. (1965). “Unbalanced Growth And Regional Development”. Western Economic Journal, 4: 3-14.
  • Hulten, C. R. ve Schwab, R. M. (1984). "Regional Productivity Growth in U.S. Manufacturing: 1951-78". The American Economic Review, 74(1): 152-162.
  • Johansen, L. (1960). A Multi-Sectoral Study Of Economic Growth. Amsterdam, North-Holland.
  • Khan, M. S. ve Reinhart, C. M. (1990). "Private Investment and Economic Growth in Developing Countries". World Development, 18(1): 19-27.
  • Khan, M. S., Kumar, M. S. (1993). Public and Private Investment and the Convergence of Per Capita Incomes in Developing Countries. IMF Working Paper, No. 93/51, International Monetary Fund, Washington DC.
  • Khan, M. S. ve Kumar, M. S. (1997). “Public Investment, Productivity, And Economic Growth İn Developng Countries”. Journel of Public Budgeting, Accounting&Financial Management, 9(3): 440-466.
  • Kim, E. ve Kim, K. (2002). “Impacts of Regional Development Strategies on Growth And Equity of Korea: A Multiregional CGE Model”. The Annals of Regional Science, 36: 165-180.
  • Kim, E. ve Kim, K. (2003). “Impacts of the Development of Large Cities on Economic Growth And Income Distribution in Korea: A Multiregional CGE Model”, Papers in Regional Science, 82: 101-122.
  • King, R. G. ve Levine, R. (1992). Financial Indicators and Growth in a Cross-Section of Countries. The World Bank Working Paper Series (WPS 819), Washington.
  • Li, W., Li, X., Wang, W. ve Guangbao, Z. (2010). Fiscal Policy, Regional Disparity And Poverty in Chine: A General Equilibrium Approcah, MPIA Working Paper.
  • Liu, C. C. (2006). “Evaluating The Impacts of Tainan Science-Based Industrial Park on the Southern Region in Taiwan”. The Empirical Economics Letters, 5(1): 55-66.
  • Lofgren, H., Harris, R. L., Robinson, S., Thomas, M. ve El-Said, M. (2002). A Standard Computable General Equilibrium (Cge) Model in GAMS, Microcomputers İn Policy Research 5, International Food Research Instıtute.
  • Lu, W. (1996). “Public Infrastructure And Regional Economic Development: Evidence From China”, Pacific Economic Papers, No. 258.
  • Lynde, C. ve Richmond, J. (1993). “Public Capital And Total Factor Productivity”, International Economic Review, 34(2): 401-414.
  • Márquez, M. A., Ramajo, J. ve Hewings, G. J. D. (2011). “Public Capital And Regional Economic Growth: A SVAR Approach fort he Spanish Regions”, Investigaciones Regionales, 21: 199-223.
  • Mostert, J. W. M. ve Heerden, J. H. (2015). “A Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Analysis of the Expenditure on Infrastructure in the Limpopo Economy in South Africa”, Int Adv Res, 21: 227-236.
  • Munnell, A. H. (1990). “Why Has Productivity Growth Declined? Productivity and Public Investment”, New England Economic Review, 3(22).
  • Munnell, A. H. (1992). “Policy Watch Infrastructure Investment And Econımic Growth”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6(4): 189-198.
  • Odedokun, M. O. (1992). Multi-country Evidence on the Effects of Macroeconomic, Financial and Trade Policies on Efficiency of Resource Utilization in Developing Countries. IMF Working Paper, Paper No 92/53, Washington.
  • Rosik, P. (2006). “Public Capital And Regional Economic Growth”, Poznań University of Economics Review, 6(1): 69-93.
  • Sakamoto, H. (2012). “CGE Analysis of Transportation Cost And Regional Economy: East Asia And Northern Kyushu”, Regional Science Inquiry Journal, IV(1): 121-140.
  • Serven, L., Solimano, A. (1990). Private Investment and Macroeconomic Adjustment: Theory, Country Experience, and Policy Implications. Policiy, Research And External Affairs Workinp Paper, Washington DC.
  • Telli, Ç. (2004). Sosyal Hesaplar Matrisi Üretme Yöntemi ve Türkiye Uygulaması, Uzmanlık Tezi, Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı Yıllık Programlar ve Konjonktür Değerlendirme Genel Müdürlüğü Planlama, Ankara.
  • Thaipraset, N., Faulk, D., Hicks, M. J. (2013). “A Regional Computable General Equilibrium Analysis of Property Tax Rate Caps and A Sales Tax Rate Increase in Indiana”. Public Finance Review, 41(4): 446-472.
  • Upadhyaya, M. P. (1995). A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis of Alternative Tax Policies in the State of Washington. UMI Company, UMI Microform 9632274, USA.
  • Yamano, N. ve Ohkawara, T. (2000). “The Regional Allocation of Public Investment: Efficiency or Equity?”, Journal of Regional Science, 40(2): 205-229.
  • Yeldan, E., Taşcı, K., Voyvoda, E. ve Özsan, M. E. (2012). Orta Gelir Tuzağı’ndan Çıkış: Hangi Türkiye? Cilt 1: Makro/ Sektörel/ Bölgesel Analiz. Türkonfed, İstanbul.
  • Yeldan, E., Taşcı, K., Voyvoda, E. ve Özsan, M. E. (2013). Orta Gelir Tuzağı’ndan Çıkış: Hangi Türkiye? Cilt 2: Bölgesel Kalkınma ve İkili Tuzaktan Çıkış Stratejileri. Türkonfed, İstanbul.
  • DAP Bölge Kalkınma İdaresi Başkanlığı, www.dap.gov.tr, (erişim tarihi: 01.01. 2017).
  • Dünya Bankası, www.worldbank.org., (erişim tarihi: 01.01. 2017).
  • Gelir İdaresi Başkanlığı, www.gib.gov.tr., (erişim tarihi: 01.01. 2017).
  • Hazine Müsteşarlığı, www.hazine.gov.tr., (erişim tarihi: 01.01. 2017).
  • International Monetary Fund, www.imf.org., (erişim tarihi: 01.01. 2017).
  • Kalkınma Bakanlığı, www.kalkinma.gov.tr., (erişim tarihi: 01.01. 2017).
  • Kuzeydoğu Anadolu Kalkınma Ajansı (KUDAKA), www.kudaka.org.tr., (erişim tarihi: 01.01. 2017).
  • Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, www.tuik.gov.tr., (erişim tarihi: 01.01. 2017).
  • Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası, www.tcmb.gov.tr., (erişim tarihi: 01.01. 2017).
  • Türkiye İhracatçılar Meclisi (TİM), www.tim.org.tr., (erişim tarihi: 01.01. 2017).
There are 52 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Economics
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Muammer Yaylalı This is me 0000-0001-6240-026X

Zeynep Karaca 0000-0001-8046-7222

Publication Date May 1, 2019
Submission Date December 1, 2018
Acceptance Date January 20, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 19 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Yaylalı, M., & Karaca, Z. (2019). Bölgesel Kalkınmada Yatırım ve Verimlilik: TRA1 Bölgesi İçin Hesaplanabilir Genel Denge Modeli Analizi. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, 19(1), 54-105. https://doi.org/10.25294/auiibfd.559377
AMA Yaylalı M, Karaca Z. Bölgesel Kalkınmada Yatırım ve Verimlilik: TRA1 Bölgesi İçin Hesaplanabilir Genel Denge Modeli Analizi. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi. May 2019;19(1):54-105. doi:10.25294/auiibfd.559377
Chicago Yaylalı, Muammer, and Zeynep Karaca. “Bölgesel Kalkınmada Yatırım Ve Verimlilik: TRA1 Bölgesi İçin Hesaplanabilir Genel Denge Modeli Analizi”. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi 19, no. 1 (May 2019): 54-105. https://doi.org/10.25294/auiibfd.559377.
EndNote Yaylalı M, Karaca Z (May 1, 2019) Bölgesel Kalkınmada Yatırım ve Verimlilik: TRA1 Bölgesi İçin Hesaplanabilir Genel Denge Modeli Analizi. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi 19 1 54–105.
IEEE M. Yaylalı and Z. Karaca, “Bölgesel Kalkınmada Yatırım ve Verimlilik: TRA1 Bölgesi İçin Hesaplanabilir Genel Denge Modeli Analizi”, Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 54–105, 2019, doi: 10.25294/auiibfd.559377.
ISNAD Yaylalı, Muammer - Karaca, Zeynep. “Bölgesel Kalkınmada Yatırım Ve Verimlilik: TRA1 Bölgesi İçin Hesaplanabilir Genel Denge Modeli Analizi”. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi 19/1 (May 2019), 54-105. https://doi.org/10.25294/auiibfd.559377.
JAMA Yaylalı M, Karaca Z. Bölgesel Kalkınmada Yatırım ve Verimlilik: TRA1 Bölgesi İçin Hesaplanabilir Genel Denge Modeli Analizi. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi. 2019;19:54–105.
MLA Yaylalı, Muammer and Zeynep Karaca. “Bölgesel Kalkınmada Yatırım Ve Verimlilik: TRA1 Bölgesi İçin Hesaplanabilir Genel Denge Modeli Analizi”. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, vol. 19, no. 1, 2019, pp. 54-105, doi:10.25294/auiibfd.559377.
Vancouver Yaylalı M, Karaca Z. Bölgesel Kalkınmada Yatırım ve Verimlilik: TRA1 Bölgesi İçin Hesaplanabilir Genel Denge Modeli Analizi. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi. 2019;19(1):54-105.
Dizinler

143751437114372      14373