Sosyal Bilgiler Dersi Bilim ve Teknolojide Temel Yetkinlik Üzerine Bir Eylem Araştırması

Öz

Sosyal Bilgiler dersi, öğrencileri sosyal hayata hazırlayan temel derslerden biridir. Günümüzde bilim ve teknolojideki değişim ve gelişmeler önemli hale gelmiştir. Sosyal Bilgiler dersi, bilim ve teknolojideki gelişmeleri temel yetkinlikler göz önünde bulundurularak ele alır. Bu araştırmanın amacı, bilim ve teknolojiyle ilgili temel yeterlik alanına ilişkin sosyal bilgiler dersi sürecini ortaya çıkarmak ve bu süreçle ilgili öğrenci ve öğretmen görüşlerini belirlemektir. Araştırma, nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden biri olan eylem araştırması modeline göre tasarlanmıştır. Araştırma, 2022-2023 akademik yılının birinci ve ikinci dönemlerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın katılımcıları, 6. sınıf öğrencileri ve onların sosyal bilgiler öğretmenidir. Araştırmanın verileri, gözlem formu, öğretmen ve öğrenci günlükleri, öğrenci ürünleri, yarı yapılandırılmış mülakat formları gibi süreçte araştırmacı tarafından yapılan video kayıtları aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Araştırmanın veri analizi, betimsel analiz yöntemi kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmada, sosyal bilgiler dersinde bilim ve teknolojiye ilişkin temel yeterliklerle ilgili yapılan etkinliklerin öğrencileri ders boyunca eğlendirdiği, dersin daha iyi anlaşıldığı ve konuların kolayca öğrenildiği sonucuna varılmıştır. Ayrıca, sosyal bilgiler dersinde bilim ve teknolojiyle ilgili temel yeterliklere yönelik etkinliklerin, öğrencilerin bilimsel araştırma sürecini kullanma yeteneklerini geliştirdiği, bilimsel etik kavramının, emeğe saygı ve referansları alıntılama gibi konuların önemini fark ettirdiği sonucuna varılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonuçları göz önüne alındığında, uygulayıcılar ve araştırmacılar için önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sosyal bilgiler eğitimi
• bilim
• teknoloji
• temel yeterlik
• eylem araştırması

An Action Research on Basic Competence in Science and Technology in Social Studies Course

Abstract

Social Studies course is one of the basic courses that prepare students for social life. Change and development have become important in science and technology in the present time. Social Studies course has found its place in the development and change in science and technology. Developments in science and technology are given in Social Studies course, considering the basic competences in science and technology. The aim of this research is to reveal the process of activities related to the basic competence area of social studies course regarding science and technology and to determine the views of students and teachers regarding this process. The research was designed in action research pattern which is one of the qualitative research methods. The research was conducted in the first and second semesters of 2022-2023 academic year. The participants of the research are 6th grade students and their social studies teacher. The data of the research, observation form, teacher and student diaries, student products, semi-structured interview forms were gathered via video recordings of the researcher in the process. Data analysis of the research was conducted using descriptive analysis method. In the research it was concluded that the activities conducted regarding basic competence in science and technology in social studies course entertained the students during the course, the course was better comprehended and the subjects were learned easily. In addition, it was concluded that the activities related to the basic competence in science and technology in Social Studies course improved students' ability to conduct research using scientific research process, and realized the importance of the scientific ethics concept, respect for labor and citing references. Considering the results of the research, recommendations for practitioners and researchers were made.

Keywords

• Social studies education
• science
• technology
• basic competence
• action research

References

1. Acar, Ç. (2015). Parents' views on the digital literacy of their primary, secondary and high school children and themselves. (Unpublished master's thesis), Ankara University, Ankara.
2. Almeida, F. & Simoes, J. (2019). The role of serious games, gamification and industry 4.0 tools in the education 4.0 paradigm. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(2), 120–136. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.554469
3. Asempapa, R. S. & Love, T. S. (2021). Teaching math modeling through 3D-printing: Examining the influence of an integrative professional development. School Science and Mathematics, 121(2), 85–95. https://doi.org/ 10. 1111/ ssm. 12448
4. Blikstad-Balas, M. (2015). Digital literacy in upper secondary school–what do students use their laptops for during teacher ınstruction?, Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10, 122-137.
5. Bongomin, O., Gilibrays O., G., Oyondi N., E., Musinguzi, A. & Omara, T. (2020). Exponential disruptive technologies and the required skills of industry 4.0. Journal of Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4280156
6. Buckley, J., Piacentini, M. & Von Davier, A. (2021). Towards a new generation of assessment. presentation at digital education for a strong recovery: A way forward. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
7. Burak, D. (2023). The effect of technology-supported teaching in social studies course on students' academic achievement: meta-analysis study. International Journal of Turkish Literature Culture Education, 12(1), 414-426.
8. Ciolacu, M., Svasta, P.M., Berg, W. & Popp, H. (2017). Education 4.0 for tall thin engineer in a data driven society. In: 2017 IEEE 23rd International Symposium for Design and Technology in Electronic Packaging, Constanta, Romania.

9. Çelikcan, Ş. (2010). The effect of teaching the science, technology and society learning area of social studies course with active learning methods on the academic success of the student. (Unpublished doctoral thesis), Gazi University, Ankara.
10. Çetin, O., Çalışkan, E. & Menzi, N. (2012). The relationship between teacher candidates' technology competencies and their attitudes towards technology. Primary Education Online, 11(2), 273-291.
11. Daşdemir, İ. (2019). Examining the effect of virtual tour applications in social studies teaching. (Unpublished doctoral thesis), Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyon.
12. Davies, R., S. (2011). Understanding Technology Literacy: A Framework for Evaluating Educational Technology Integration, TechTrends, 55(5), 45-52.
13. Dematrini, C. & Benussi, L. (2017). Do Web 4.0 and Industry 4.0 imply Education 4.0. IEEE Comput. Soc, 19(3), 4-7.
14. Demirezen, S. & Turan, R. (2016). The effect of concept analysis method on student success and attitude in learning concepts in the field of global connections learning. International Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 6, 1-18.
15. Dikmen, M. & Bahadır, F. (2021). University students' views on the effectiveness of learning through homework. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 13(3).
16. Dikmen, M. & Tuncer, M. (2018). A meta-analysis of effects of computer assisted education on students’ academic achievement: a-10-year review of achievement effect. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 9(1), 97-121.
17. Dilci, T. (2009). Evaluation of postgraduate education in the field of educational sciences based on the opinions of students and faculty members. (Unpublished doctoral thesis), Fırat University, Elazığ.
18. Ecevit, M. C. (2006). Several social aspects of ethical problems in scientific practice. Periodical Publishing in Social Sciences, Ankara.
19. Goldfarb, T. D. ve Pritchard M. S. (2000). Ethics in the science classroom. An Instructional Guide for Secondary School Science Teachers with Model Lessons for Classroom Use. National Science Foundation (NSF)-funded program. web site: https://onlineethics.org/sites/onlineethics/files/2021-04/Ethics%20 in%20the%20Science%20Classroom_0.pdf
20. González-Peña, O. I., Morán-Soto, G., Rodríguez-Masegosa, R. & Rodríguez-Lara, B. M. (2021). Effects of a thermal inversion experiment on STEM students learning and application of damped harmonic motion. Sustainability, 13(2), 919.
21. Göksu, İ. & Bolat, Y. İ. (2020). Does the use of technology affect the academic success of students in Turkey? A meta-analysis study. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 10(1), 138-176. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.614505
22. Gür, D. & Bulut-Özek, M. (2021). The effect of mobile learning on students' academic achievement, motivation and attitudes: A meta-analysis study. Journal of Trakya Faculty of Education, 11(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.581539
23. Heafner, T. (2004). Using technology to motivate students to learn social studies, Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 4(1), 42-53.
24. Hicks, D., Lee, J. K., Berson, M., Bolick, C. & Diem, R. (2014). Guidelines for using technology to prepare social studies teachers. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 14(4), 433-450.
25. Higde, E. (2022). An interdisciplinary renewable energy education: Investigating the influence of STEM activities on perception, attitude, and behavior. Journal of Science Learning, 5(2), 373-385.
26. Hussin, A.A. (2018). Education 4.0 made simple: Ideas for teaching. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(3), 92–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.92
27. Ilomäki, L., Paavola, S., Kantosalo, A. & Lakkala, M. (2016). Digital Competence-an emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research. Educ. Inf. Technol, (21), 655-679. web sitesi: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-014-9346-4
28. Jobirovich, Y. M. (2022). Tools of using digital technologies in primary educational courses. European Journal Of Modern Medicine And Practice, 2(4), 119-123.
29. Kablan, Z., Topan, B. & Erkan, B. (2013). The effectiveness level of material use in classroom teaching: A meta-analysis study. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 13(3), 1629-1644. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2013.3.1692
30. Keser, H. & Semerci, A. (2019). Technology trends, education 4.0 and beyond. Contemporary Educational Researches Journal, 9(3), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.18844/cerj.v9i3.4269
31. Knobel, Michele & Lankshear, C. (2006). Digital Literacy and digital literacies: Policy, pedagogy and research considerations for education, Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 1(1), 12-24.
32. Kurtoğlu, S. & Baydere, F. K. (2021). Opinions of science teacher candidates about the STEM activity called "preventing tooth decay. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 10(2), 481-509.
33. León, J., Núñez, J. L. & Liew, J. (2015). Self-determination and STEM education: Effects of autonomy, motivation, and self-regulated learning on high school math achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 156-163.
34. Liesatyadharma, S., Fernandez, S. E., Jeffina, M. & Udjaja, Y. (2023). Holoreact: chemistry experiment game with hologram based to enhance learning on senior high school level. Procedia Computer Science, 216, 453-461.
35. Love, T. S., Cysyk, J. P., Attaluri, A., Tunks, R. D., Harter, K. & Sipos, R. (2023). Examining science and technology/engineering educators’ views of teaching biomedical concepts through physical computing. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(1), 96-110.
36. Love, T. S. & Hughes, A. J. (2022). Engineering pedagogical content knowledge: Examining correlations with formal and informal preparation experiences. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(29), 1–20. https://doi.org/ 10. 1186/ s40594- 022- 00345-z
37. Lynch, P., Singal, N. & Francis, G. 2021. EdTech for learners with disabilities in primary school settings in LMICs: a systematic literature review. web sitesi: https://docs.edtechhub.org/lib/XJ42VUQG
38. Lutf, A., Aftinia, F. & Permani, B. E. (2023). Gamification: Game as a medium for learning chemistry to motivate and increase retention of student learning outcomes. JOTSE, 13(1), 193-207.
39. Malkoç, E. (2018). The effect of computer and internet use on success and retention in teaching social studies. (Unpublished master's thesis). Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir.
40. Martin, A. & Grudzieci, J. (2006). DigEuLit: Concepts and Tools for Digital Literacy Development, Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(4), 249-267.
41. McGillivray, D., McPherson, G., Jones, J. & McCandlish, A. (2016). Young people, digital media making and critical digital citizenship. Leisure Studies, 35(6), 724-738.
42. McLaughlin, A. (1970). Science, reason and value. Theory and Decision, 1, 121–137.
43. Ministry of National Education (MoNE). (2019). PISA Türkiye resmî web sitesi: http://pisa.meb.gov.tr/?page
44. Ministry of National Education (MoNE). (2024). Sosyal bilgiler dersi öğretim programı. (İlkokul ve ortaokul 4, 5, 6, 7. Sınıflar). Türkiye Yüzyılı Maarif Modeli. https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/
45. Mertler, C. A. (2017). Action research: Improving schools and empowering educators (5. bs.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Meyers, E., M., Erickson, I. & Small, R., V. (2013). Digital literacy and informal learning environments: an introduction, Learning, Media and Technology, 38(4), 355-367.
47. Morrison, A. (2006). A contextualisation of entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 12(4), 192-209.
48. Naumoska, A., Dimeski, H. & Stojanovska, M. (2023). Using the Escape Room game-based approach in chemistry teaching. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society, 88 (0) 1–13.
49. Özerbaş, M. A. & Kuralbаyeva, A. (2018). The examination of the digital literacy levels of prospective teachers in Turkey and Kazakhstan. MSKU Faculty of Education Journal, 5(1), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.21666/muefd.314761
50. Öztürk, M. (2015). Middle school students' levels of digital citizenship. (Unpublished master's thesis). Kastamonu University, Kastamonu.
51. Pala, Ş. M. (2020). Alignment of 5th Grade Social Studies Curriculum Learning Outcomes with Key Competencies. Gümüşhane University Journal of Social Sciences, 11, 298-308.
52. Ribble, M. (2011). Digital citizenship in schools, the international society for technology in education (ISTE), Washington.
53. Sanjeev, R., & Natrajan, N. S. (2021). A systematic review on education 4.0 using social media platform. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 12(7), 1901–1918.
54. Scipanov, L. V., & Nistor, F. (2020). Implications of ethics in the academic scientific research. eLearning & Software for Education, 1.
55. Silva, D.E., Lopes, T., Sobrinho, M.C. & Valentim, N.M.C. (2021). Investigating initiatives to promote the advancement of education 4.0: A systematic mapping study. In: Csedu, 1, 458–466. https//doi.org/10.5220/0010439704580466
56. Sisco, H., T. (2008). A correlation of technology ımplementation and middle school academic achievement in tennessee's middle schools (Unpublished doctoral thesis). East Tennessee State University, ABD.
57. Sulaeman, N. F., Putra, P. D. A., Mineta, I., Hakamada, H., Takahashi, M., Ide, Y. & Kumano, Y. (2021). Exploring student engagement in STEM education through the engineering design process. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 7(1), 1-16.
58. Sönmez, N. (2019). The impact of mobile learning on academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. (Unpublished master's thesis). Adıyaman University, Adıyaman.
59. Stern, E. (1997). The evaluation of the Teaching and learning technology programme of the UK higher education funding council. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, (2).
60. Sulaeman, N. F., Putra, P. D. A., Mineta, I., Hakamada, H., Takahashi, M., Ide, Y. & Kumano, Y. (2021). Exploring student engagement in STEM education through the engineering design process. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 7(1), 1-16.
61. Taş, H. & Kıroğlu, K. (2018). 2017 Evaluation of the primary school social studies curriculum based on teacher perspectives, Elementary Education Online, 17(2), 697-716.
62. Toraman, Ç., Çelik, Ö. C. & Çakmak, M. (2018). The impact of game-based learning environments on academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. Journal of Kastamonu Education, 26(6), 1803-1811. https//doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2074
63. Tunkham, P., Donpudsa, S. & Dornbundit, P. (2016). Development of STEM activities in chemistry on “protein” to enhance 21 st century learning skills for senior high school students. Silpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, 16(3), 217-234.
64. Uğurlu, N. & Sert. H. (2020). Determination of the attitudes of postgraduate students toward academic ethical values. ournal of Educational Theory and Practice Research, 6(3), 322-336.
65. Uzuner, Y. (2005). Action research with examples from special education. Journal of Special Education of Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences, 6(2), 1-12.
66. Yeşiltaş, E. & Kaymakçı, S. (2014). The Technological dimension of the social studies curriculum, Journal of Social Sciences, 5(16), 314-340.