Examination of the ethical positions of philosophy group teachers and their perception of metaphors related to the concept of ethics

Abstract

The Ethical Concept has been a topic that has not lost its relevance throughout history. That is why it is an indispensable subject of research. The teachers of the philosophy group have a conceptual substructure regarding the concept of ethics. This substructure forms the ideology and perceptions of the philosophical group of teachers regarding the concept of ethics. Many studies have been conducted on ethics, including those of teachers, directors, and students. In literature, however, there is no study of a philosophical group to ensure that the concept of ethics is the subject of teaching. Based on the reasons stated, this study aims to examine the metaphorical perceptions of ethical status levels and the concept of ethics by the teachers of the philosophy group. The study was carried out using the parallel method of synchronization, with 107 philosophical group teachers working in the central districts of Adana, Çukurova, Sarıçam, Seyhan and Yüreğir in the educational year 2020-2021. Sample selection based on maximum diversity was made to determine participants. The study used the personal information form as a tool for data collection, the Ethics Position Questionnaire developed by Forsyth (1980), and the metaphor for the ethical concept developed by researchers. Quantitative data were analyzed using the SPSS 22 program. Qualitative data is dealt with together with metaphors and reasoning by means of content analysis. In the subsequent process, the qualitative and quantitative data sources were analyzed first separately and then jointly, and the analysis found that the demographic structure had no impact on ethical position levels, and that the sub-dimension of idealism was high on the ethical state levels of the participants compared to the relativistic sub-dimension. Participants produced a total of 68 different metaphors. The most widely used metaphor by the teachers of the philosophy group has been identified as the concept of "human". In addition, they consider the concept of ethics to be the most guiding and vital element.

Keywords

• Ethics
• Metaphor perception
• Personal ethics ideologies
• Professional ethics
• Philosophy group teachers.

References

1. Ağyar, E., Angay Kutluk, F., & Cengiz, E. (2012). Meslek yüksekokulları muhasebe bölümü öğrencilerinin sosyo-ekonomik değişkenler ışığında mesleki etiğe bakış açılarının incelenmesi [The investigation of the attitudes of vocational school students studying in accounting department towards professional ethics (Akdeniz University case)]. Journal of Yasar University, 7(25). https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jyasar/issue/19137/203079
2. Akdemir, B. (2016). Zihinsel yetersizliği olan bireylerle çalışan öğretmenlerin cinsel eğitme yönelik tutumları ve etik durumlarının karşılattırılması [Meeting the attitudes and ethical standards of teachers working with persons with mental disabilities in relation to sexual education]. (Publication No. 445635). [Master's thesis, Marmara University]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Center.
3. Aktaş, K. (2014). Etik-ahlâk ilişkisi ve etiğin gelişim süreci [Ethic-moral relationship and ethic’s development process]. Journal of International Management and Social Research, 1(2), 22-32. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/uysad/issue/37702/164187
4. Aladağ, S. & Kuzgun, M. (2015). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının “değer” kavramına ilişkin metaforik algıları [The thoughts and metaphoric perceptions of primary school teacher candidates about value concept]. Journal of the Faculty of Education of Sakarya University, (29), 163-193. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sakaefd/issue/11234/134227
5. Altınkurt, Y. & Yılmaz, K. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının öğretmenlerin mesleki etik dışı davranışlar ile ilgili görüşleri [Prospective teachers’ views about teachers’ occupational unethical behaviours]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 1(22), 113-128. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/maeuefd/issue/19395/205998
6. Arslan, M. M. & Bayrakçı, M. (2006). Metaforik düşünme ve öğrenme yaklaşımının eğitim-öğretim açısından incelenmesi [Study of the metaphorical thinking and learning approach from the educational-teaching perspective]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 35(171), 100-108. https://dhgm.meb.gov.tr/yayimlar/dergiler/milli_egitim_dergisi/171/171/8.pdf
7. Aybek, B. & Karataş, T. (2015). Türkiye’de kadın eğitimi ve istihdamı [Women’s education and employment in Turkey]. In G. Ağrıdağ (Ed.), Research on woman in turkey and the world (pp. 69-75). Çukurova University Publishing.
8. Aydın, E. & Sulak, S. (2015). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının “değer” kavramına yönelik metafor algıları [Metaphor perception of prospective primary school teachers for “value” concept]. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 4(2), 482-500. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/buefad/issue/3818/51365

9. Balcı, A. (2003). Eğitim örgütlerine yeni bakış açıları: kuram-araştırma ilişkisi II [New perspectives on educational organizations: Relationship between theory-research II]. Educational Administration in Theory and Practice, 33(33), 26-61. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kuey/issue/10364/126865
10. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2013). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Data analysis manual for social sciences]. Pegem Akademi Publishing. https://doi.org/10.14527/9789756802748
11. Cerit, Y. (2008). Öğretmen kavramı ile ilgili metaforlara ilişkin öğrenci, öğretmen ve yöneticilerin görüşleri [Opinions of students, teachers and managers on metaphors relating to the concept of teacher]. Turkish Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(4), 693-712. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tebd/issue/26110/275093
12. Creswell, J.W. (2021). Araştırma deseni nitel, nicel ve karma yöntem yaklaşımları [Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches] (S.B. Demir, Ed. & Trans.). Eğiten Kitap Publishing. (Original work published 2014)
13. Çelikkaya, T. & Seyhan, O. (2017). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmenlerinin ve öğretmen adaylarının evrensel değerlere ilişkin metafor algıları [Metaphorical perceptions of universal values by social information teachers and candidates]. E-International Education Research Journal, 8(3), 65-87. https://doi.org/10.19160/ijer.342330
14. Çeliksoy, R. B. (2019). Öğretmen adaylarının “değerler” ve “değerler eğitimi” algılarının metafor yoluyla analizi [Metaphorical analysis of candidate teachers’ perceptions of “values” and “value education”]. (Publication No. 589458). [Master’s thesis, Atatürk University]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Center.
15. Çevikbaş, R. (2006). Yönetimde etik ve yozlaşma [Ethics and corruption in management)]. Atatürk University Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 20(1), 265-289. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/atauniiibd/issue/2689/35359
16. Çinkılıç, A. M. (2018). X ve Y Kuşağı mensubu öğretmenlerin mesleki etik algılarının karşılaştırılmasına ilişkin bir alan araştırması [A field study on the comparison of professional ethics perceptions of teachers from the X and Y generations]. (Publication No. 491291). [Master’s thesis, Hitit University]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Center.
17. Çokan, S. E. (2006). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin öğretim etiğine yönelik algılarının sınıf içerisinde karşılaştıkları sorunlu davranışları gidermeye yönelik kullandıkları stratejilere yansıması (Balıkesir il örneği) [The perception of teaching ethics by class teachers reflects the strategies they use to address problematic behaviour in the classroom (Balıkesir province example)]. (Publication No. 206625). [Master’s thesis, Balıkesir University]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Center.
18. Demir, E., & Köse, M. (2016). Öğretmenlerin rol modelliğine ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri [Teachers' views on role modeling of teachers]. Akademik Bakış Dergisi, (53), 38-57. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/383164
19. Demirkaya, H. & Çal, Ü. T. (2018). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının dürüstlük değerine ilişkin metaforik algıları [Metaphorical perceptions of candidates for social information teachers about the value of honesty]. Ahi Evran University Kirşehir Faculty of Education Journal, 19(3), 1964-1980. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/kefad/issue/59259/851332
20. Forsyth, D. R. (1980). A taxanomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39 (1), 175-185. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.1.175
21. Forsyth, D. R. (1992). Judging the morality of business practices: The influence of personal moral philosophies. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(5), 461-470. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00870557
22. Forsyth, D. R. (1981). Moral judgment: The influence of ethical ideology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7(2), 218-223. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616728172006
23. Forsyth, D. R, & Berger, R. E. (1982). The effects of ethical ideology on moral behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 117(1), 53-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1982.9713406
24. Forsyth, D. R., O’Boyle, E. H. & McDaniel Michael, A. (2008). East meets west: A meta-analytic investigations in idealism and relativism. Journal of Business Ethics, 83 (4), 813-833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9667-6
25. Gardelli, Alerby, & Persson (2014). Why philosophical ethics in school: Implications for education in technology and in general, Ethics and Education, 9 (1), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2014.890277
26. Gutmann, A. (1993). Democracy & democratic education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 12, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01235468
27. Gül, H. & Gökçe, H. (2008). Örgütsel etik ve bileşenleri [Organizational ethic and its components]. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 13(1), 377-389. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sduiibfd/issue/20834/223228
28. Gülcan, N. Y. (2015). Discussing the importance of teaching ethics in education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2622-2625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.942
29. Güler, A. (2017). The relationship between personal ethical ideology and perception of corporate social responsibility: An application in Turkey (Publication No. 492891). [Master’s thesis, Marmara University]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Center.
30. Gündüz, M., Saygılı, G. & Sulak, S. E. (2014). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin üçüncü sınıf öğrencilerine değerler eğitimiyle kazandırılmak istenen davranışlara yönelik metaforik algıları [Classroom Teachers’ Metaphoric Perception on Behaviors which are Taught 3rd Class Students by Value Education]. Journal of Education and Humanities: Theory and Practice, 5(10), 73-94. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/eibd/issue/22665/242053
31. Haynes, F. (2002). Eğitimde etik [Ethics in education]. (S. Kunt-Akbaş, Trans.). Ayrıntı Publications. (Original work published 1998)
32. Karaboğa, M. T. (2019). Lise öğrencilerinin rol model tercihleri üzerine bir araştırma [A study on the role model preferences of high school students]. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 15(2), 363-391. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.537859
33. Karataş, S., Caner, M., Kahyaoğlu, R. B. & Kahya, S. (2019). Öğretmen adaylarının gözünden etik öğretmen ve öğretmenlik meslek etiği dersi [Perceptions of Pre-Service Teachers on Ethical Teacher and Professional Ethics Course]. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 7(1), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.7c1s.2m
34. Keskin, M. O., Aksakal, E. & Yücetürk, C. (2020). Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin etik kavramına ilişkin metaforik algıları [The metaphoric perceptions of education faculty students towards “ethics” concept]. Al Farabi International Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 49-61. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/farabi/issue/58908/834734
35. Keskin, M. O., Yıldız, Ö. Ö. & Aksakal, E. (2019). Tıp fakültesi öğrencilerinin etik kavramına ilişkin metaforik algıları [Metaphoric perceptions of medical school students about ethical concept]. Ihlara Journal of Educational Research, 4(2), 300-313. http://ihead.aksaray.edu.tr/tr/pub/issue/46867/645332
36. Kılcan, B. (2017). Metafor ve eğitimde metaforik çalışmalar için bir uygulama rehberi [A practical guide to metaphorical studies in education]. Pegem Akademi Publishing.
37. Kline, R. B. (2011). Convergence of structural equation modeling and multilevel modeling. In W. P. Vogt & M. Williams (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of innovation in social research methods (pp. 562-589). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268261.n31
38. Kuçuradi, İ. (2020). Ahlak, etik ve etikler [Morality, Ethics, and Codes of Ethics]. Turkish Institute of Philosophy.
39. Kuçuradi, İ. (2018). Etik [Ethics]. Turkish Institute of Philosophy.
40. Küken, G. (2003). Orta çağda eğitim felsefesi [Philosophy of education in primeval times]. İstanbul: Alfa Publications.
41. Küken, G. (2001). İlkçağda eğitim felsefesi [Philosophy of education in the Middle Ages]. İstanbul: Alfa Publications.
42. Mahmutoğlu, A. (2009). Etik ve ahlâk; benzerlikler, farklılıklar ve ilişkiler [Ethic and Moral; Similarities, Differences and Connections]. Türk İdare Dergisi, 81 (463-464), 225-249. http://www.tid.gov.tr/kurumlar/tid.gov.tr/tum-sayilar(2)/2001-2025/2009/Haziran-Eylul/Yil81_463_464_2009_.pdf
43. Narvaez, D. (2006). Integrative ethical education. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development. Psychology Press (pp. 721-750). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410615336
44. Öztürk, Ş. (2015). Sosyal medyada etik sorunlar [Ethical issues in the social media]. Selçuk İletişim, 9(1), 287-311. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/josc/issue/19031/201143
45. Pieper, A. (2012). Etiğe giriş [Introduction to Ethics] (V. Atayman & G. Sezer, Trans.). Ayrıntı Publishing. (Original work published 1994)
46. Russell, B. (2017). Etik, toplum, siyaset [Ethics, society, politics]. (F. Sezer, Trans.). Say Publishing. (Original work published 1992)
47. Saban, A. (2008). Okula ilişkin metaforlar [Metaphors about school]. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 55(55), 459-496. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kuey/issue/10342/126702
48. The Ministry of Industry and Technology of the Republic of Türkiye (2022). İlçelerin sosyo- ekonomik gelişmişlik sıralaması araştırması: SEGE-2022 [Socio-economic development index of districts: District SEDI-2022]. https://www.sanayi.gov.tr/assets/pdf/birimler/2022-ilce-sege.pdf
49. Şakar, M. C. (2010). İlköğretim sınıf öğretmenlerinin etik görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of the ethical views of primary school class teachers] (Publication No. 257402). [Master’s thesis, Yüzüncü Yıl University]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Center.
50. Timuçin, A. (2014a). Düşünce tarihi 1 [History of thought 1]. Bulut Publications.
51. Timuçin, A. (2014b). Düşünce tarihi 3 [History of Thought 3]. Bulut Publications.
52. Toprakcı, E., Bozpolat, E., & Buldur, S. (2010). Öğretmen davranışlarının kamu meslek etiği ilkelerine uygunluğu [The behaviour of teacher the compliance level to the principles of the public professional ethics] E-International Journal of Educational Research, 1(2), 35-50. https://www.e-ijer.com/tr/pub/issue/8012/105221
53. Türkeri, M. (2019). Etik kuramları [Ethical theories]. Lotus Publishing.
54. Uluç, M. A. (2015). Sosyoloji ve felsefe sarkacında etik [Ethics in the pendulum of sociology and philosophy]. (Publication No. 396083). [Master’s thesis, Artuklu University]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Center.
55. Yazıcı, A. & Yazıcı, S. (2010). Etik Durum Ölçeğinin geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Validity and reliability study of the Ethics Scale]. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 8(4), 1001-1017. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tebd/issue/26102/275022
56. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek H. (1999). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences]. Seçkin Publishing.