Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2020, , 134 - 152, 31.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.33769/aupse.690478

Abstract

Supporting Institution

Çankaya Üniversitesi

References

  • Pace, P.E., Detecting and Classifying Low Probability of Intercept Radar. 2nd Ed., Artech House, Norwood, MA, USA, 2009.
  • Tao, R., Li, B., Sun, H., Research Progress of the Algebraic and Geometric Signal Processing, Defence Technology, 9(1) (2013), 40-47.
  • Kong, S.H., Kim, M., Hoang, L.M., Kim, E., Automatic LPI Radar Waveform Recognition Using CNN, IEEE Access, 6 (2018), 4207-4219.
  • Hoang, L.M., Kim, M., Kong, S.H., Automatic Recognition of General LPI Radar Waveform Using SSD and Supplementary Classifier, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 67(13) 2019, 3516-3530.
  • Gao, L., Zhang, X., Gao, J., You, S., Fusion Image Based Radar Signal Feature Extraction and Modulation Recognition, Access IEEE, 7 (2019), 13135-13148.
  • Huang, Z., Ma, Z., Huang, G., Radar Waveform Recognition Based on Multiple Autocorrelation Images, Access IEEE, 7 (2019), 98653-98668.
  • Gulum, T., Autonomous Non-Linear Classification of LPI Radar Signal Modulations, https://calhoun.nps.edu/handle/10945/3302; 2007 [accessed 24 September 2019].
  • Kishore, T.R., Rao, K.D., Automatic intrapulse modulation classification of advanced LPI radar waveforms, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 53(2) (2017), 901-914.
  • Tong, X., Modelling and realization of real time electronic countermeasure simulation system based on SystemVue, Defence Technology, 2019.
  • Deng, B., Luan, J., Cui, S., Analysis of parameter estimation using the sampling-type algorithm of discrete fractional Fourier transform, Defence Technology, 10(4) (2014), 321-327.
  • Liu, M., Liao, G., Yang, Z., Song, H., Gong, F., Electromagnetic Signal Classification Based on Deep Sparse Capsule Networks, Access IEEE, 7 (2019), 83974-83983.
  • Zeng, X., Wang, S., Bark-wavelet Analysis and Hilbert–Huang Transform for Underwater Target Recognition, Defence Technology, 9(2) (2013), 115-120.
  • Choi, H.I., Williams, W.J., Improved time-frequency representation of multicomponent signals using exponential kernels, IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process., 37(6) (1989), 862-871.
  • Hollinger, K.B., Code optimization for the Choi-Williams distribution for ELINT applications, https://calhoun.nps.edu/handle/10945/4422; 2009 [accessed 24 September 2019].
  • Liu, Y., Xiao, P., Wu, H., Xiao, W., LPI radar signal detection based on radial integration of Choi-Williams time-frequency image, Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, (2015), 973-981.
  • Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J., The Elements of Statistical Learning, 2nd Ed., Springer New York Inc, New York, NY, USA, 2001.
  • Theodoridis, S., Koutroumbas, K., Pattern Recognition, 4th Ed., Academic Press. Inc., Orlando, FL, USA, 2009.
  • Snoek, J., Larochelle, H., Adams, R.P., Practical Bayesian optimization of machine learning algorithms, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 25 (2012), 2960-2968.
  • Feurer, M., Hutter, F., Hyperparameter Optimization. In: Hutter F, Kotthoff L, Vanschoren, J., editors, Automated Machine Learning, Cham: Springer International Publishing, (2019), 3-33.
  • Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., Stork, D.G., Pattern Classification, 2nd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, 2001.
  • Powers, D.M.W., Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to Roc, Informedness, Markedness & Correlation, Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1) (2011), 37-63.
  • Lima, A.F., Analysis of low probability of intercept (LPI) radar signals using cyclostationary processing, https://calhoun.nps.edu/handle/10945/4944, 2002 [accessed 24 December 2019].
  • Platt, J. C., Cristianini, N., Shawe-Taylor, J., Large margin DAGs for multiclass classification, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, MIT Press,12 (2000), 547–553.

LPI RADAR WAVEFORM CLASSIFICATION USING BINARY SVM AND MULTI-CLASS SVM BASED ON PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS OF TFI

Year 2020, , 134 - 152, 31.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.33769/aupse.690478

Abstract

Since cognition has become an important topic in Electronic Warfare (EW) systems, Electronic Support Measures (ESM) are used to monitor, intercept and analyse radar signals. Low Probability of Intercept (LPI) radars is preferred to be able to detect targets without being detected by ES systems. Because of their properties as low power, variable frequency, wide bandwidth, LPI Radar waveforms are difficult to intercept with ESM systems. In addition to intercepting, the determination of the waveform types used by the LPI Radars is also very important for applying counter-measures against these radars. In this study, a solution for the LPI Radar waveform recognition is proposed. The solution is based on the training of Support Vector Machine (SVM) after applying Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to the data obtained by Time-Frequency Images (TFI). TFIs are generated using Choi-Williams Distribution. High energy regions on these images are cropped automatically and then resized to obtain uniform data set. To obtain the best result in SVM, the SVM Hyper-Parameters are also optimized. Results are obtained by using one-against-all and one-against-one methods. Better classification performance than those given in the literature have been obtained especially for lower Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) values. The cross-validated results obtained are compared with the best results in the literature.

References

  • Pace, P.E., Detecting and Classifying Low Probability of Intercept Radar. 2nd Ed., Artech House, Norwood, MA, USA, 2009.
  • Tao, R., Li, B., Sun, H., Research Progress of the Algebraic and Geometric Signal Processing, Defence Technology, 9(1) (2013), 40-47.
  • Kong, S.H., Kim, M., Hoang, L.M., Kim, E., Automatic LPI Radar Waveform Recognition Using CNN, IEEE Access, 6 (2018), 4207-4219.
  • Hoang, L.M., Kim, M., Kong, S.H., Automatic Recognition of General LPI Radar Waveform Using SSD and Supplementary Classifier, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 67(13) 2019, 3516-3530.
  • Gao, L., Zhang, X., Gao, J., You, S., Fusion Image Based Radar Signal Feature Extraction and Modulation Recognition, Access IEEE, 7 (2019), 13135-13148.
  • Huang, Z., Ma, Z., Huang, G., Radar Waveform Recognition Based on Multiple Autocorrelation Images, Access IEEE, 7 (2019), 98653-98668.
  • Gulum, T., Autonomous Non-Linear Classification of LPI Radar Signal Modulations, https://calhoun.nps.edu/handle/10945/3302; 2007 [accessed 24 September 2019].
  • Kishore, T.R., Rao, K.D., Automatic intrapulse modulation classification of advanced LPI radar waveforms, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 53(2) (2017), 901-914.
  • Tong, X., Modelling and realization of real time electronic countermeasure simulation system based on SystemVue, Defence Technology, 2019.
  • Deng, B., Luan, J., Cui, S., Analysis of parameter estimation using the sampling-type algorithm of discrete fractional Fourier transform, Defence Technology, 10(4) (2014), 321-327.
  • Liu, M., Liao, G., Yang, Z., Song, H., Gong, F., Electromagnetic Signal Classification Based on Deep Sparse Capsule Networks, Access IEEE, 7 (2019), 83974-83983.
  • Zeng, X., Wang, S., Bark-wavelet Analysis and Hilbert–Huang Transform for Underwater Target Recognition, Defence Technology, 9(2) (2013), 115-120.
  • Choi, H.I., Williams, W.J., Improved time-frequency representation of multicomponent signals using exponential kernels, IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process., 37(6) (1989), 862-871.
  • Hollinger, K.B., Code optimization for the Choi-Williams distribution for ELINT applications, https://calhoun.nps.edu/handle/10945/4422; 2009 [accessed 24 September 2019].
  • Liu, Y., Xiao, P., Wu, H., Xiao, W., LPI radar signal detection based on radial integration of Choi-Williams time-frequency image, Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, (2015), 973-981.
  • Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J., The Elements of Statistical Learning, 2nd Ed., Springer New York Inc, New York, NY, USA, 2001.
  • Theodoridis, S., Koutroumbas, K., Pattern Recognition, 4th Ed., Academic Press. Inc., Orlando, FL, USA, 2009.
  • Snoek, J., Larochelle, H., Adams, R.P., Practical Bayesian optimization of machine learning algorithms, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 25 (2012), 2960-2968.
  • Feurer, M., Hutter, F., Hyperparameter Optimization. In: Hutter F, Kotthoff L, Vanschoren, J., editors, Automated Machine Learning, Cham: Springer International Publishing, (2019), 3-33.
  • Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., Stork, D.G., Pattern Classification, 2nd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, 2001.
  • Powers, D.M.W., Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to Roc, Informedness, Markedness & Correlation, Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1) (2011), 37-63.
  • Lima, A.F., Analysis of low probability of intercept (LPI) radar signals using cyclostationary processing, https://calhoun.nps.edu/handle/10945/4944, 2002 [accessed 24 December 2019].
  • Platt, J. C., Cristianini, N., Shawe-Taylor, J., Large margin DAGs for multiclass classification, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, MIT Press,12 (2000), 547–553.
There are 23 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Almıla Bektaş 0000-0002-5253-7825

Halit Ergezer 0000-0002-7280-0416

Publication Date December 31, 2020
Submission Date February 17, 2020
Acceptance Date July 1, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020

Cite

APA Bektaş, A., & Ergezer, H. (2020). LPI RADAR WAVEFORM CLASSIFICATION USING BINARY SVM AND MULTI-CLASS SVM BASED ON PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS OF TFI. Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series A2-A3 Physical Sciences and Engineering, 62(2), 134-152. https://doi.org/10.33769/aupse.690478
AMA Bektaş A, Ergezer H. LPI RADAR WAVEFORM CLASSIFICATION USING BINARY SVM AND MULTI-CLASS SVM BASED ON PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS OF TFI. Commun.Fac.Sci.Univ.Ank.Series A2-A3: Phys.Sci. and Eng. December 2020;62(2):134-152. doi:10.33769/aupse.690478
Chicago Bektaş, Almıla, and Halit Ergezer. “LPI RADAR WAVEFORM CLASSIFICATION USING BINARY SVM AND MULTI-CLASS SVM BASED ON PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS OF TFI”. Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series A2-A3 Physical Sciences and Engineering 62, no. 2 (December 2020): 134-52. https://doi.org/10.33769/aupse.690478.
EndNote Bektaş A, Ergezer H (December 1, 2020) LPI RADAR WAVEFORM CLASSIFICATION USING BINARY SVM AND MULTI-CLASS SVM BASED ON PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS OF TFI. Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series A2-A3 Physical Sciences and Engineering 62 2 134–152.
IEEE A. Bektaş and H. Ergezer, “LPI RADAR WAVEFORM CLASSIFICATION USING BINARY SVM AND MULTI-CLASS SVM BASED ON PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS OF TFI”, Commun.Fac.Sci.Univ.Ank.Series A2-A3: Phys.Sci. and Eng., vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 134–152, 2020, doi: 10.33769/aupse.690478.
ISNAD Bektaş, Almıla - Ergezer, Halit. “LPI RADAR WAVEFORM CLASSIFICATION USING BINARY SVM AND MULTI-CLASS SVM BASED ON PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS OF TFI”. Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series A2-A3 Physical Sciences and Engineering 62/2 (December 2020), 134-152. https://doi.org/10.33769/aupse.690478.
JAMA Bektaş A, Ergezer H. LPI RADAR WAVEFORM CLASSIFICATION USING BINARY SVM AND MULTI-CLASS SVM BASED ON PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS OF TFI. Commun.Fac.Sci.Univ.Ank.Series A2-A3: Phys.Sci. and Eng. 2020;62:134–152.
MLA Bektaş, Almıla and Halit Ergezer. “LPI RADAR WAVEFORM CLASSIFICATION USING BINARY SVM AND MULTI-CLASS SVM BASED ON PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS OF TFI”. Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series A2-A3 Physical Sciences and Engineering, vol. 62, no. 2, 2020, pp. 134-52, doi:10.33769/aupse.690478.
Vancouver Bektaş A, Ergezer H. LPI RADAR WAVEFORM CLASSIFICATION USING BINARY SVM AND MULTI-CLASS SVM BASED ON PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS OF TFI. Commun.Fac.Sci.Univ.Ank.Series A2-A3: Phys.Sci. and Eng. 2020;62(2):134-52.

Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series A2-A3 Physical Sciences and Engineering

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.