Çevre Kalitesi Açısından Yakınsama Hipotezine Yeni Bir Bakış: Ekolojik Ayak İzi ve Kulüp Yakınsamaya Dayalı Ampirik Bir Analiz

Recep Ulucak

doi:10.18037/ausbd.552674

Çevre Kalitesi Açısından Yakınsama Hipotezine Yeni Bir Bakış: Ekolojik Ayak İzi ve Kulüp Yakınsamaya Dayalı Ampirik Bir Analiz

Öz

Çevre kalitesinin giderek bozulmasıyla birlikte iktisatta çevreci bir dönüşüm süreci başlamış, çevre ekonomisi, doğal kaynaklar ekonomisi ve ekolojik iktisat gibi alanlar ilgi çekmeye başlamıştır. Bu çerçevede çevresel unsurları temsil eden değişkenler kullanılarak ekonometrik analizler yoluyla politika önerileri oluşturulmaya çalışılmaktadır. Ancak literatürde bu alanla ilgili önemli kısıtlardan bir tanesi de çevreyi temsil edecek kapsamlı bir değişkene ihtiyaç duyulmasıdır. Bu ihtiyaca yönelik olarak ekolojik ayak izi’nin son yıllarda çevreyi kapsamlı bir şekilde temsil eden bir gösterge haline geldiği iddia edilmektedir. Dolayısıyla bu çalışma 1961-2009 dönemi için ekolojik ayak izi üzerinden çevresel yakınsama hipotezi’ni test etmektedir. Bunun için Phillips ve Sul (2007) tarafından özellikle panel gruplar için yakınsama hipotezini test etmek amacıyla geliştirilmiş olan ve ülkelerden kaynaklı heterojenliği dikkate alarak ortak özellikler taşıyan grupları kümeleyen kulüp yakınsama testi kullanılmaktadır. Elde edilen sonuçlar bir bütün olarak çevresel yakınsama hipotezinin geçerli olmadığını ancak yakınsayan kulüplerin olduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çevre Ekonomisi,Çevresel Yakınsama

Kaynakça

Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L., & Hemous, D. (2012). The Environment and Directed Technical Change. The American Economic Review, 102(1), 131–166. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.1.131
Acemoglu, D., Akcigit, U., Hanley, D., & Kerr, W. (2014). Transition to Clean Technology. Cambridge, MA. https://doi.org/10.3386/w20743
Ahmed, M., Khan, A. M., Bibi, S., & Zakaria, M. (2016). Convergence of per capita CO2 emissions across the globe: Insights via wavelet analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.053
Al-Mulali, U., Weng-Wai, C., Sheau-Ting, L., & Mohammed, A. H. (2015). Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecological Indicators, 48, 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.029
Aldy, J. E. (2006). Per Capita Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Convergence or Divergence? Environmental & Resource Economics, 33, 533–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-6160-x
Aldy, J. E. (2007). Divergence in state-level per capita carbon dioxide emissions. Land Economics, 83(3), 353–369. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27647777
Aldy, J. E. (2007). Divergence in State-Level Per Capita Carbon Dioxide Emissions. Land Economics, 83(3), 353–369. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27647777
Apergis, N. (2015). Convergence in Public Expenditure Across a Sample of Emerging Countries: Evidence from Club Convergence. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 51(3), 448–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2015.1025670

Apergis, N., Christou, C., & Hassapis, C. (2013). Convergence in public expenditures across EU countries: evidence from club convergence. Economics & Finance Research, 1(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/21649480.2013.862735
Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2017). Per capita carbon dioxide emissions across U.S. states by sector and fossil fuel source: Evidence from club convergence tests. Energy Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.11.027
Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R., Dasgupta, P., Folke, C., Holling, C. S., … Pimentel, D. (1995). Economic Growth, Carrying Capacity, and the Environment. Science, 268(5210).
Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2), 223–251. https://doi.org/10.1086/261816
Bartelmus, P. (2008). Quantitative eco-nomics: How sustainable are our economies? Quantitative Economics: How sustainable are our economies? Springer Netherlands.
Bastianoni, S., Niccolucci, V., Pulselli, R. M., & Marchettini, N. (2012). Indicator and indicandum: “Sustainable way” vs “prevailing conditions” in the Ecological Footprint. Ecological Indicators, 16, 47–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.10.001
Borucke, M., Moore, D., Cranston, G., Gracey, K., Iha, K., Larson, J., … Galli, A. (2013). Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere’s regenerative capacity: The National Footprint Accounts’ underlying methodology and framework. Ecological Indicators, 24, 518–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolind.2012.08.005
Brock, W. A., & Taylor, M. S. (2003). The Kindergarten Rule of Sustainable Growth (NBER No. Working Paper 9597). Massachusetts.
Brock, W. A., & Taylor, M. S. (2010). The Green Solow model. Journal of Economic Growth, 15(2), 127–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-010-9051-0
Burnett, J. W. (2016). Club convergence and clustering of U.S. energy-related CO2 emissions. Resource and Energy Economics, 46, 62–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2016.09.001
Camarero, M., Picazo-Tadeo, A. J., & Tamarit, C. (2008). Is the environmental performance of industrialized countries converging? A “SURE” approach to testing for convergence. Ecological Economics, 66(4), 653–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.024
Caviglia-Harris, J. L., Chambers, D., & Kahn, J. R. (2009). Taking the “U” out of Kuznets. A comprehensive analysis of the EKC and environmental degradation. Ecological Economics, 68(4), 1149–1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.08.006
Chen, Y., Cuestas, J. C., & Regis, P. J. (2016). Convergence in Corporate Statutory Tax Rates in the Asian and Pacific Economies. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 21(3), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1546
Claustre Bajona, , & Kehoe, T. J. (2010). Trade, growth, and convergence in a dynamic Heckscher–Ohlin model. Review of Economic Dynamics, 13, 487–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2010.05.002
Cordero, E. C., Marie Todd, A., Abellera, D., Cordero, E. C., Todd, A. M., & Abellera, D. (2008). Climate Change Education and the Ecological Footprint. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 89(6), 865–872. https://doi.org/10.1175/2007BAMS2432.1
Costanza, R. (2000). The dynamics of the ecological footprint concept. Ecological Economics, 32, 341–345. Retrieved from www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 3914(3914), 1–57. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic Growth and the Environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443
Haberl, H., Erb, K.-H., & Krausmann, F. (2001). How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time: the case of Austria 1926–1995. Ecological Economics, 38(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00152-5
Hao, Y., Wang, S., & Zhang, Z.-Y. (2015). Examine the Convergence in Per Capita Energy Consumption in China with Breakpoints. Energy Procedia, 75, 2617–2625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.341
Herrerias, M. J. (2013). The environmental convergence hypothesis: Carbon dioxide emissions according to the source of energy. Energy Policy, 61, 1140–1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.120
Hervieux, M. S., & Darné, O. (2015). Environmental Kuznets Curve and ecological footprint: A time series analysis. Economics Bulletin, 35(1), 814–826. http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2015/Volume35/EB-15-V35-I1-P84.pdf
Howarth, R. B. (1998). An Overlapping Generations Model of Climate-Economy Interactions. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 100(3), 575–591. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9442.00123
Ioana-Laura, Ţ. (2015). Is there Evidence of Tax Convergence in the European Union? Procedia Economics and Finance, 32, 194–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01382-9
Islam, N. (2003). What have We Learnt from the Convergence Debate? Journal of Economic Surveys, 17(3), 309–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00197
Kitzes, J., & Wackernagel, M. (2009). Answers to common questions in Ecological Footprint accounting. Ecological Indicators, 9(4), 812–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.09.014
Kurozumi, E., Yamazaki, D., & Hadri, K. (2013). COVARIATE UNIT ROOT TEST FOR CROSS-SECTIONALLY DEPENDENT PANEL DATA (QUEEN’S MANAGEMENT SCHOOL ECONOMICS WORKING PAPER SERIES No. 2013–1). Retrieved from ftp://ftp.qub.ac.uk/pub/users/repec/qub/wpaper/MS_WPS_ECO_13_01.pdf
LaFree, G. (2005). Evidence For Elite Convergence in Cross-National Homicide Victimization Trends, 1956 to 2000. Sociological Quarterly, 46(1), 191–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2005.00009.x
Lanne, M., & Liski, M. (2004). Trends and Breaks in Per-Capita Carbon Dioxide Emissions, 1870-2028. The Energy Journal, 25(4). https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol25-No4-3
Lau, C. K. M., Demir, E., & Bilgin, M. H. (2016). A Nonlinear Model of Military Expenditure Convergence: Evidence From Estar Nonlinear Unit Root Test. Defence and Peace Economics, 27(3), 392–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2015.1016296
Li, X., & Lin, B. (2013). Global convergence in per capita CO2 emissions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24, 357–363. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.048
Mishra, V., & Smyth, R. (2014). Convergence in energy consumption per capita among ASEAN countries. Energy Policy (Vol. 73). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.06.006
Narayan, P. K., & Narayan, S. (2010). Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: Panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy (Vol.38). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.005
Neumayer, E. (2004). Indicators of Sustainability. In Thomas H. Tietenberg & H. Folmer (Eds.), The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 2004/2005 (pp. 139–189). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Nguyen Van, P. (2005). Distribution Dynamics of CO2 Emissions. Environmental & Resource Economics, 32(4), 495–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-7687-6
Nordhaus, W. D. (1992). Lethal Model 2: The Limits to Growth Revisited. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 23(2), 1–60. https://www.brookings.edu/wpcontent/uploads/1992/06/1992b_bpea_nordhaus_stavins_weitzman.pdf
Ozturk, I., Al-Mulali, U., & Saboori, B. (2016). Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of tourism and ecological footprint. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(2), 1916–1928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5447-x
Panopoulou, E., & Pantelidis, T. (2009). Club Convergence in Carbon Dioxide Emissions. Environmental and Resource Economics, 44(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9260-6
Phillips, P. C. B., & Sul, D. (2007a). Transition Modeling and Econometric Convergence Tests. Econometrica, 75(6), 1771–1855. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00811.x
Phillips, P. C. B., & Sul, D. (2007b). Transition Modeling and Econometric Convergence Tests. Econometrica, 75(6), 1771–1855. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00811.x
Pjesky, R. J. (2013). Convergence In State And Local Spending On Education: Are Lotteries Ear Marked For Education The Key? Journal of Business & Economics Research, 11(3), 137–146. https://cluteinstitute.com/ojs/index.php/JBER/article/download/7665/7730/
Presno, M. J., Landajo, M., & Fernández González, P. (2015). Stochastic convergence in per capita CO2 emissions. An approach from nonlinear stationarity analysis. Energy Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.10.001
Reyes, R. C. (2011). The Green Solow model with natural resources constraint: A theoretical note. DLSU Business and Economics Review, 21(1), 111–116. http://www.dlsu.edu.ph/offices/publishing-house/journals/ber/ber-publication.asp
Solarin, S. A., & Lean, H. H. (2014). Nonlinearity convergence of tourism markets in Seychelles. Current Issues in Tourism, 17(6), 475–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2013.810612
Solow, R. M. (1956). A CONTRIBUTION TO THE THEORY OF ECONOMIC GROWTH. Source: The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1884513
Strazicich, M. C., & List, J. A. (2003). Are CO2 Emission Levels Converging Among Industrial Countries? Environmental and Resource Economics, 24(3), 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022910701857
Su, C.-W., Chang, H.-L., Chang, T., & Yin, K. (2014). Monetary convergence in East Asian countries relative to China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 33, 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2014.05.008
Tiwari, A. K., Kyophilavong, P., & Albulescu, C. T. (2016). Testing the stationarity of CO2 emissions series in Sub-Saharan African countries by incorporating nonlinearity and smooth breaks. Research in International Business and Finance, 37, 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.01.005
Ulucak, R., & Lin, D. (2017). Persistence of policy shocks to Ecological Footprint of the USA. Ecological Indicators, 80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.020
Van Vuuren, D. P., & Smeets, E. M. W. (2000). Ecological footprints of Benin, Bhutan, Costa Rica and the Netherlands. Ecological Economics, 34(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00155-5
Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. The New Catalyst Bioregional Series. New Society Publishers.
Wang, Y., Han, R., & Kubota, J. (2016). Is there an Environmental Kuznets Curve for SO2 emissions? A semi-parametric panel data analysis for China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 1182–1188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.143
Wang, Y., Kang, L., Wu, X., & Xiao, Y. (2013). Estimating the environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint at the global level: A spatial econometric approach. Ecological Indicators, 34, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.021
Wang, Y., Zhang, P., Huang, D., & Cai, C. (2014). Convergence behavior of carbon dioxide emissions in China. Economic Modelling, 43, 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.07.040
Westerlund, J., & Basher, S. A. (2008). Testing for Convergence in Carbon Dioxide Emissions Using a Century of Panel Data. Environmental and Resource Economics, 40(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9143-2
Wiedmann, T., & Barrett, J. (2010). A Review of the Ecological Footprint Indicator—Perceptions and Methods. Sustainability, 2(6), 1645–1693. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2061645

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Recep Ulucak

Yayımlanma Tarihi

20 Aralık 2018

Gönderilme Tarihi

26 Temmuz 2017

Kabul Tarihi

19 Mart 2018

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2018 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 4

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.552674

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA89HK28TY

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Ulucak, R. (2018). Çevre Kalitesi Açısından Yakınsama Hipotezine Yeni Bir Bakış: Ekolojik Ayak İzi ve Kulüp Yakınsamaya Dayalı Ampirik Bir Analiz. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18(4), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.552674

AMA

1.Ulucak R. Çevre Kalitesi Açısından Yakınsama Hipotezine Yeni Bir Bakış: Ekolojik Ayak İzi ve Kulüp Yakınsamaya Dayalı Ampirik Bir Analiz. AÜSBD. 2018;18(4):29-38. doi:10.18037/ausbd.552674

Chicago

Ulucak, Recep. 2018. “Çevre Kalitesi Açısından Yakınsama Hipotezine Yeni Bir Bakış: Ekolojik Ayak İzi ve Kulüp Yakınsamaya Dayalı Ampirik Bir Analiz”. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 18 (4): 29-38. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.552674.

EndNote

Ulucak R (01 Aralık 2018) Çevre Kalitesi Açısından Yakınsama Hipotezine Yeni Bir Bakış: Ekolojik Ayak İzi ve Kulüp Yakınsamaya Dayalı Ampirik Bir Analiz. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 18 4 29–38.

IEEE

[1]R. Ulucak, “Çevre Kalitesi Açısından Yakınsama Hipotezine Yeni Bir Bakış: Ekolojik Ayak İzi ve Kulüp Yakınsamaya Dayalı Ampirik Bir Analiz”, AÜSBD, c. 18, sy 4, ss. 29–38, Ara. 2018, doi: 10.18037/ausbd.552674.

ISNAD

Ulucak, Recep. “Çevre Kalitesi Açısından Yakınsama Hipotezine Yeni Bir Bakış: Ekolojik Ayak İzi ve Kulüp Yakınsamaya Dayalı Ampirik Bir Analiz”. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 18/4 (01 Aralık 2018): 29-38. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.552674.

JAMA

1.Ulucak R. Çevre Kalitesi Açısından Yakınsama Hipotezine Yeni Bir Bakış: Ekolojik Ayak İzi ve Kulüp Yakınsamaya Dayalı Ampirik Bir Analiz. AÜSBD. 2018;18:29–38.

MLA

Ulucak, Recep. “Çevre Kalitesi Açısından Yakınsama Hipotezine Yeni Bir Bakış: Ekolojik Ayak İzi ve Kulüp Yakınsamaya Dayalı Ampirik Bir Analiz”. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 18, sy 4, Aralık 2018, ss. 29-38, doi:10.18037/ausbd.552674.

Vancouver

1.Recep Ulucak. Çevre Kalitesi Açısından Yakınsama Hipotezine Yeni Bir Bakış: Ekolojik Ayak İzi ve Kulüp Yakınsamaya Dayalı Ampirik Bir Analiz. AÜSBD. 01 Aralık 2018;18(4):29-38. doi:10.18037/ausbd.552674

Does ecological footprint in ECCAS and ECOWAS converge? Empirical evidence from a panel unit root test with sharp and smooth breaks

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23178-3

TÜRKİYE’DE BÖLGESEL GELİR EŞİTSİZLİĞİ: DÜZEY-2 BÖLGELERİ BAZINDA YAKINSAMA ANALİZİ

Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute

https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1275122

Kulüp Yakınsama Analizi Temelinde OECD Ülkelerinin Vergi Gayreti Performansı

Sosyoekonomi

https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2024.01.20

Impact of tourism, globalization, and technological patents on ecological footprint in ASEAN countries: static and dynamic panel regression approaches

Discover Sustainability

https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00708-2

G7 ve BRICS-T Ülkelerinde Stokastik Çevresel Yakınsamasının Geçerliliği: Panel KPSS ile Keskin ve Yumuşak Kırılmalar

Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1561715

BİYOLOJİK KAPASİTEDE YAKINSAMA VAR MI? OECD ÜLKELERİ İÇİN KULÜP DİNAMİKLERİNİN ANALİZİ

Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.36543/kauiibfd.2025.033

Environmental Sustainability in Southeast Asia: Evidence from Linear and Nonlinear Unit Root Tests and Policy Implications

Politická ekonomie

https://doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.1510

Çevre Kalitesi Açısından Yakınsama Hipotezine Yeni Bir Bakış: Ekolojik Ayak İzi ve Kulüp Yakınsamaya Dayalı Ampirik Bir Analiz

Çevre Kalitesi Açısından Yakınsama Hipotezine Yeni Bir Bakış: Ekolojik Ayak İzi ve Kulüp Yakınsamaya Dayalı Ampirik Bir Analiz

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster

Cited By

Doğrusal Olmayan Panel Birim Kök Testi İle Turizm Gelirleri İçin Yakınsama Analizi

Club Convergence: Do public investments play a role in regional income per capita convergence in Turkey?

An Empirical Study Regarding Effects on Ecological Footprint of Environmental Technology Patents and Renewable Energy

Does ecological footprint in ECCAS and ECOWAS converge? Empirical evidence from a panel unit root test with sharp and smooth breaks

TÜRKİYE’DE BÖLGESEL GELİR EŞİTSİZLİĞİ: DÜZEY-2 BÖLGELERİ BAZINDA YAKINSAMA ANALİZİ

Kulüp Yakınsama Analizi Temelinde OECD Ülkelerinin Vergi Gayreti Performansı

Impact of tourism, globalization, and technological patents on ecological footprint in ASEAN countries: static and dynamic panel regression approaches

G7 ve BRICS-T Ülkelerinde Stokastik Çevresel Yakınsamasının Geçerliliği: Panel KPSS ile Keskin ve Yumuşak Kırılmalar

BİYOLOJİK KAPASİTEDE YAKINSAMA VAR MI? OECD ÜLKELERİ İÇİN KULÜP DİNAMİKLERİNİN ANALİZİ

Environmental Sustainability in Southeast Asia: Evidence from Linear and Nonlinear Unit Root Tests and Policy Implications